Page #1
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#821
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF,, ANY STUFF III 5.NEW MONGO STUFF, OLD MONGO STUFF, ANY MONGO STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
Less mistakes in manufacturing, less accidents in manufacturing ,less workers comp claims, less labor cost for company's.
He is actually just explaining what folks thought when the assembly line started, or when robots first came to car manufacturing, "oh the humans are going to be out of work". No the humans will just have to get better educations to maintain the machines.
I think the threat of AI taking jobs should be a great motivator to our young people to get good educations so they can build the buildings and the power grid and such for AI to function.
I don't see poor people being any more poor or more of them.
This is video is just gloom and doom talk
ok so AI can start a war. It can also fight in ways humans are to slow to think about. Simply hack into energy grids and communications and radar systems and the enemy is down. done.war won.
Personally, I don't think that they will succeed in creating a "god in the box",
but their goal is to make as many working people obsolete as possible.
You are not thinking about what happens to all those people.
If they do manage to create a "god in the box", what confidence do you have
that its creators manage to maintain control over it?
Why would it obey the order to shut down the enemy.
Do you think it would agree with you who the enemy is?
God has no manager, i guess you could say Jesus does as he checks with his dad,
but Ai shouldn't need management once it is finished to a point it can be self reliant.
Have you seen the movie I, Robot (2004), with Will Smith?
Did you see Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning (2023) and its sequel, Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning (2025)?
Did you learn anything from all the Terminator movies?
Of course, Hollywood movies mostly have good endings. Real life, not so much.
You get spooked when NASA finds an asteroid with 2.3% chance to hit the earth in 7 years, when the data is just in. You were also fearmongering over some clickbait about solar flares. Why are you worried about these things, and not about the tech giants investing trillions into an AI overlord? Why are you not worried about the absolute inescapable disaster of climate change, and politicians completely ignoring it?
I think you have no idea about the ridiculous power consumption of AI.
In my country, they are talking about building an AI-gigafactory for $26.5 billion, which would consume the amount of power comparable with 2.5 million households. One of our biggest wind-farms produces power for 1.5 million households. What a waste of (green) energy. We already have so many problems with the power grid, that new homes are waiting to be connected and some beach clubs have now created their own green energy grid, to be able to exist.
There are now lots of areas in your country, where people pay a much higher electricity price, because, big companies pocket the profits, but outsource a lot of the costs.
When AI data centers move in, utilities must build new infrastructure, and they spread the cost onto the citizens. Data centers often get special electricity deals, and the shortfall is shifted to regular customers.
AI data centers don’t look dirty, but they drive pollution indirectly and locally through the energy, water, and backup systems they require. Fossil-fuel power plants get built or run harder. Diesel backup generators pollute neighborhoods directly.
Many Americans also suffer from the noise. Building codes might restrict a grocery store in a neighborhood, but very noisy data centers are built way too damn near to people's houses.
Trump tried to get a proposal through, to ban state AI regulation for 10 years, in the federal budget bill earlier in 2025. Imagine how people get fucked over, if states cannot in any way limit where, and how many, AI data centers are built. How about state's rights, that your side claims to care about?
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Asteroids can't,
Ai will never have the 1 advantage Humans have over it. The power to Reason.
No i don't want to be Controlled by AI Gods but at the same time I think Ai would do a better job at alot of things eliminating human interaction and necessity of paying them.
If it spreads itself all over the world, in every server and data center, we would never
be able to unplug it, because those utilities have completely taken over everything
we need. It might require a global memory wipe, destroying all data we have accumulated, including the system of money itself.
The AI that they want to build DOES have the power to reason.
That's their whole goal. It wouldn't be a "god in the box" without it.
I also think that AI would do a better job than humanity, but the people who are in control now would NEVER give up their power. Unfortunately, they are also blinded by power enough, to think they can control their creation. And if that fails, they would do anything to regain their power, no matter who they hurt in the process.
Divorce would simply be, Clic,back space,highlight,clic, done.
I watched a couple of the terminator movies but not the others.
You seem to forget i was learning in the field when programming a Apple 2 e was the thing to do.
So I have been in this for a long time. I was warned by a professor to never let tech control us.
AI will be a great asset, but it will only control us if WE LET IT.
Those people are exactly the type of people you shouldn't trust with that power.
There is no "WE", there is only a "THEM". And them are fucked-up in the head.
only registered users can see external links
Ottawa Hospital was declared Dutch territory so that
princess Marguerite could be completely a Dutch citizen.
This has led to Holland sending thousands of tulips to
Ottawa every year for the tulip festival.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
But I must also say, I am very surprised that the son is still in jail with bail.
I thought they turned people back loose in california once arrested and cycled thru the system
The last thing that it means is being OK with murder.
Being OK with murder, that is only on your political side.
You celebrate it, justify it, or ignore it, except in some very specific cases,
when it involves some cult footsoldier, and when it helps your cult of hate.
8 of the top 10 states with the highest Murder & Manslaughter rates are RED states. California isn't even in that top 10, they are ranked 28th.
It’s how the system works
--------------------------------------- added after 39 seconds
As usual, you guys are talking out of your ass
Wow, need to watch it closely. Must be because the victims were liberals that the liberals are going to use the system. Had it been a conservative victim, i doubt they would have even bothered to look for the killer.
why don't you make it concrete?
California is your most successful state, and that is not caused by failures.
They are succeeding because of liberalism, not despite of it.
Approximately 74.35% of felony charges in California result in a conviction.
The National Average is roughly 70%.
In 2024, California reported 1,666 homicides and made 1,305 homicide arrests.
This indicates a clearance rate of roughly 78%, which state analysts describe as significantly better than the national average of 61.4%.
States with the Lowest Murder "Solving" (Clearance) Rates:
- Illinois: Preliminary 2024 data reported a murder clearance rate of 35.5%. While a slight improvement from 33.5% in 2023, it remains one of the lowest in the nation.
- New Mexico: Reports indicate New Mexico has some of the lowest violent crime clearance rates in the country as of 2024/2025. In 2023, the state recorded a homicide rate of 11.5 per 100,000 residents, the highest in the U.S. at that time.
- Georgia and Mississippi: These states were also identified in 2025 analyses as having consistently low violent crime clearance rates relative to other states.
Everything you are saying is 100% based on your indoctrination.
President Trump’s comment on Rob Reiner and wife’s murder:
"A very sad thing happened last night in Hollywood. Rob Reiner, a tortured and struggling, but once very talented movie director and comedy star, has passed away, together with his wife, Michele, reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, sometimes referred to as TDS."
President Donald J Trump
Did any prominent Democratic politician do that when Charlie Kirk was killed?
And yes anal licker many Democrats made horrible comments about Charlie
--------------------------------------- added after 76 seconds
More sarcasm than joke I believe
Trump has been a hateful narcissist asshole all his life.
Otherwise, I completely agree with the statement.
while he said that the first amendment is worth some people being killed.
2) Some Democrats or liberals pointed out that Trump was more concerned
with the construction of his new ballroom, when he was asked about the murder.
3) Some Democrats or liberals pointed out that his widow was not appearing
to be grieving that much, but mostly spending her time grifting off it.
4) Some Democrats or liberals pointed out that Charlie Kirk was not a honest debater,
who needs to be respected for how he engaged with the open marketplace of ideas.
No Democrat or prominent liberal made horrible comments about Charlie's MURDER.
Trump however blamed the victim for getting killed, for hating HIM.
That was not a joke, or a justifiable remark, that was Trump being a sick bastard.
I see no Democrats and liberals declaring war on you over this, like your cult did.
I asked you about which "Democrat or prominent liberal" made horrible comments about Charlie's MURDER, because there are OTHER NORMS for public figures,
than for any random Joe Schmo on the internet. Do you agree?
Pointing out things like point 1 to 4, are NOT horrible comments about a MURDER,
that is pointing out behavior or the morality of the person before the murder or other people after the murder. That is different than celebrating the persons murder or blaming the victim for their murder. You don't have to mourn the loss of a person,
to mourn their murder.
Although, there are norms for that, when it relates to elected representatives,
who are supposed to represent everyone, like THE FUCKING PRESIDENT!!!
It's his job and he's the worst at, of all your presidents, ever.
Yes, people got fired for re-posting one of these 4 points I mentioned.
None of them are violations of free speech. What fucking country allows people
to be fired over exercising their FREE SPEECH?
Are you not thinking "this might be a bit hypocritical", before you say shit like this?
I feel like explaining stealing is wrong, to a toddler.
only registered users can see external links
"First Time Buying My Wife Tampons"
only registered users can see external links
No, Nimesh, buying tampons is NOT like buying gasoline!
The men were probably thinking "Thanks for the info, dude."
And in the Land of Leo, we have to paint the walls to help prevent people from peeing in public.
Nasty,I thought the UK was more civilized than this.
I mean peeing in the streets for residents to have to walk in is something you would expect from a 3rd world country,not the UK?
only registered users can see external links
New Comment Go to top