Stay Hard as Steel!!!

Tired of ads
on this site?

Find local men
to exchange blowjobs

Become an expert in
pussy licking!
She'll Beg You For More!


Discussion Forum on Show It Off

Page #1

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#166

Started by CAT [Ignore] 14,May,20 02:51  other posts

New Comment       Rating: 2  

By CAT [Ignore] 09,Dec,23 13:46 other posts 
Florida bill targeting drivers who cruise in the left lane moves through House

A few years ago we had a Republican governor that made it ok for drivers to stay in whatever lane they wanted to drive at any speed they wanted to drive. There Republicans don't know shit.
By phart [Ignore] 09,Dec,23 14:44 other posts 
I don't know what the fucking deal is with using the left lane. What good is it if everyone is bunched up in the right lane all slamming on brakes for people to merge and etc.
IF the speed limit is 65, and the person in the left lane is doing 65 or 68, then what is the problem? Any faster than the speed limit is breaking the law regardless of what lane you are in.
By CAT [Ignore] 09,Dec,23 17:23 other posts 
That isn't the problem. The problem is with drivers doing 45 on the left lane on a superhighway whose speed limit is 65 or 70 and blocking faster traffic.
By phart [Ignore] 09,Dec,23 18:00 other posts 
Well that is a problem in all the lanes ,people driving well under the speed limit.
if you are doing 69 in a 65 ,no reason you shouldn't be able to set the cruise control in the left lane and ride. but it seems people that want to drive 82 think that you are in their way and they have "RIGHTS". and it is causing road rage when THEY pass on the right or whatever to get around someone.
If you ask me, they are the problem,

By CAT [Ignore] 06,Dec,23 21:19 other posts 
Bridget Ziegler—the Moms for Liberty co-founder who finds herself in the middle of a ménage ŕ trois sex scandal alongside her husband, Christian Ziegler, who is now the subject of a criminal probe—is such a coward that she dared not show her face, even on Zoom.

No shame.
By Gntlmn [Ignore] 06,Dec,23 22:20 other posts 
Yet another maga moron morass
By CAT [Ignore] 07,Dec,23 09:27 other posts 
So true
By leopoldij [Ignore] 07,Dec,23 00:36 other posts 
Hypocrites. What do you expect? They hide behind Christian values in order to do things they advocate against.
By CAT [Ignore] 07,Dec,23 09:27 other posts 
I agree
By kebmo [Ignore] 08,Dec,23 16:57 other posts 
His wife was also somehow involved in the “Don’t Say Gay”
bill! Now that’s hypocrisy at its finest because she was
involved in a consensual threesome with her husband and
this woman who charged him with sexually assaulting
her on a different occasion a year later.

only registered users can see external links
By CAT [Ignore] 09,Dec,23 10:40 other posts 
Time after time, all these sanctimonious RIGHT wing superstars have “feet of clay”

By CAT [Ignore] 04,Dec,23 09:49 other posts 
LIZ CHENEY on why she believes Trump's reelection would mean the end of our republic

only registered users can see external links
By leopoldij [Ignore] 07,Dec,23 00:37 other posts 
According to phart, Liz Cheney is a traitor.
By CAT [Ignore] 07,Dec,23 09:28 other posts 
“According to Phart“. That’s laughable .
By leopoldij [Ignore] 07,Dec,23 11:56 other posts 
Rudimentary decency is deemed laughable by repukers. That's how indecent they are.
By phart [Ignore] 07,Dec,23 13:06 other posts 
According to leo, all beings in the universe are dumb.since we will never travel into space and etc So, that would include him

By phart [Ignore] 04,Dec,23 18:58 other posts 
only registered users can see external links
By CAT [Ignore] 05,Dec,23 07:42 other posts 
We are a very minute part of the Universe. But that is about size. Until we discover a more superior species, we are on top. And, I, for one, consider myself one of the"good" ones.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 05,Dec,23 21:11 other posts 
There's no chance that we'll ever discover anything else out there that resembles life. Maybe it exists. But we'll NEVER encounter it.
By phart [Ignore] 05,Dec,23 21:25 other posts 
May I ask why you are so certain?
I am sure at some point a intellectual said "man will never fly with the birds" or Man will never see what is beyond that hill".
By leopoldij [Ignore] 05,Dec,23 22:23 other posts 
Because of relativity and because we need at least 10 thousand years, at speed comparable to that of light, to go to some stars that may have planets sustaining life. At that speed we travel to the future, and certainly exceed the life of civilization or reach the end of human span. There are some absolutely fundamental limits in the universe that have nothing to do with technology. Besides, the mass increases by a factor of (1-(v/c)^2)^(-1/2) at speed v, which means that close to the speed of light mass becomes infinitely large. There's no energy that can boost such a mass, unless, say, we can harvest the energy of an entire star or black hole.

And then there's the fact that time gets fucked up at such speeds....

Forget it. There's no chance. Unless we manage to exist for another few billion years. Impossible. No species has lasted that long.
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes

Don't forget that we're still primitive. Mammals have existed for only 70 million years. That's nothing.
By CAT [Ignore] 06,Dec,23 12:02 other posts 
Leo, we may never (probably won’t) be able to travel to another star system, but, evidence of our presence may be found by some other civilization that cracked the code for interstellar travel in their present time. That would be the “superior species”.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 06,Dec,23 14:22 other posts 
There's no code. So long as physics and chemistry, exactly as we have figured out so far, is the same in all parts of the Universe, we'll never find anything and we'll never be found.

Mind you, I don't object to the existence of biology elsewhere, I'm just saying that we'll never know.

There's a chance like 0.0000000000000000001% that I'm wrong, but I consider this number practically zero.
By phart [Ignore] 06,Dec,23 13:02 other posts 
Leo,what you are saying is that another species from another world far far away, is to dumb to meet the criteria before us?
I will admit, we are not in a position as a human race at this time to travel much past the moon, but there are other planets out there, and to me, there is a possibility that they will find US first. I laugh when I see this
only registered users can see external links
By leopoldij [Ignore] 06,Dec,23 14:19 other posts 
What I'm saying is that the concept of time even changes at high speeds in ways one can't comprehend with intuition. For example, there are many futures and many pasts and present moments that aren't comparable to one another. When we say "in the future" we have to take into account that the meaning of this changes with speed. This makes it even less probable to ever know that another civilization exists.

Some questions are meaningless. For example, if our universe isn't the only one. That we'll never know.

We can keep dreaming, of course, and laughing with little red men from outer space, but that's not a proof. There'll never be a proof.

By CAT [Ignore] 04,Dec,23 16:34 other posts 
This is a chat with Bella!:

Read those words and rationale, calling someone a "MOTHER FUCKING HOMO" and another a "DIRTY FILTHY JEW" fit the occasion and apparently justified.
So you really believe that calling someone a "MOTHER FUCKING HOMO" OR "DIRTY FILTHY JEW" was warranted and "fit the occasion"? Shame on you that you are not able to keep your emotions under control and lack the ability to filter your words.

Yes, I do feel it was warranted and fit the occasion. Why should I feel shame for stating a truth/s? You can filter your words till the cows come home. That’s your thing, I guess. Me? No way, Jose.

Didn't you have an issue about one month ago when your name was mentioned for "worst member" poll? There were jabs made at you and how did you resolve that? Yeah, you ended up blacklisting me as well as another member just because.....

Yeah, that was dumb and I regretted it almost immediately. That’s why I un-blocked you and Dgraff. You took your sweet time to un-block me.

I was under the impression that you wanted to concentrate on what initially drew you to this website, being an "incurable exhibitionist" as well as the thrill of knowing men were excited by your pictures and sexy chats. Did the well run dry? Perhaps there weren't as many "lollipops" interested in your stimulating conversations because you're back in the Forum going at warp speed.

No, the well is still full and sweet. Not that’s any of your business, but, my porn life here is going at full speed. In fact, I don’t have enough time to juggle all the daily “sexy chats”.

By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 04,Dec,23 08:38 other posts 
Transparent Aluminum - Star Trek Technology is now Real
only registered users can see external links

The link is broken. Just search YouTube for 'Wonder World Transparent Aluminum'.
By CAT [Ignore] 04,Dec,23 09:27 other posts 

By CAT [Ignore] 03,Dec,23 21:15 other posts 
Bella! posted:

“Why do some members feel the need to tag aka mention other members every ding dang time the burp bullshit?”

I would think that, you, Bella!, would know the answer to that. That’s what you do all the time.

--------------------------------------- added after 54 minutes
"Hey, dgraff, this is merely informational, the reason I requested that admin allow the "owner" of a forum thread OR blog to delete comments is because there are some members that aren't able to be respectful and/or act civilized. Yes, as an "owner" of a thread, I may make the choice to delete posts for the following reasons;

● when members make defamatory remarks toward others, ie calling someone a "MOTHER FUCKING HOMO", "DIRTY FILTHY JEW", etc.

● when it is apparent that a member has copied and pasted the same "bla bla blah" in multiple threads. I mean what's the purpose?

I'm really okay with 99% of the posters and their posts however there are some members that just don't know when enough is enough and/or when to stop and it's for that reason their posts may be deleted."

--------------------------------------- added after 12 hours

Dgraff you posted a response to Bella! in response to the above:

“I understand that perfectly”

This is my response:
“That’s something, I guess. There’s hope you will understand more important things in life.
Tell your friend that, sometimes, calling someone a MOTHER FUCKING HOMO or a DIRTY FILTHY JEW fits the occasion. The truth is not always pretty, but, it’s the truth. Political correctness goes out the window when the only reasonable response is the above.
And that’s why, posting in my thread is essential to show my views without fearing those views will be deleted.”

By CAT [Ignore] 03,Dec,23 11:34 other posts 
Dgraff, you posted in Bella!‘s thread:

“ Let some liberal fuck help them their the ones that have people hurting”

I assume you meant helping people in need. It’s just like you and other conservative FUCKS not to care, no matter why they are in that situation.
Another thing, liberals are not the only ones responsible for the suffering of a large part of the population. The Repuckers have fought tooth and nails to keep minimum wage down in the poverty level. The Clown exacerbated the situation by going on an economic war with China. And, if that wasn’t enough, his handling of the Covid pandemic set this country so far behind economically, it will take a whole generation for us to recover. It won’t make much of a difference who’s in charge, just not Trump or DeSantis.
In other words, Dgraff, you are full of 💩💩💩 and your pall, Bella!, is right there with you. 👿
--------------------------------------- added after 5 hours

Dgraff, I did not attempt to move this topic to my thread. I DID MOVE IT TO MY THREAD. I’ve said it before. I like my thread, BECAUSE IT’S MY THREAD. You are not required to answer anything there. Neither is Phart nor @Balla!@. And, regardless of what Bella! said, I don’t need you.
I don’t move all posts to my thread. I’ve got lots to say and several members that do contribute to my thread. I move the ones that make me see red. The 💩💩💩 that you and your friends post sometimes needs for someone to refute. In Bella!‘s thread I run the risk she might delete it.
In the name of transparency, the reason I highlighted your nics and used the third person, is because I’m posting this here, too.
By dgraff [Ignore] 03,Dec,23 12:01 other posts 
What can I say we see with our eyes not a computer
By CAT [Ignore] 03,Dec,23 16:48 other posts 
Dgraff, the problem, as I see it, is that your eyes have a limited range. A computer is just a tool, just like a socket wrench or a screwdriver. It’s use is as accurate as the user’s comprehension. You use a computer, either a desk/pad or a smart phone to participate here. Do you make fun of how you use it? I think not. I say you are shortsighted.
By phart [Ignore] 03,Dec,23 15:13 other posts 
sheesh, in a nut shell, dgraff is saying that the liberals need to put their money and physical effort into helping the "poor" it is all to easy for the liberals to say "tax the rich" and claim to use the money to "help" the poor when in reality, they know 90 % of it is wasted. some of their ideas to help the poor are to make safe places to do drugs. duh,why not heal the sick?
By CAT [Ignore] 03,Dec,23 16:44 other posts 
Phart, don’t take my word for it, think about it.

Who’s responsible for these great social programs? Social Security (Democrats), minimum wage (Democrats), food stamps (Democrats), welfare, public hospitals, unemployment insurance, Affordable Care, WIC? All Democrats.
Democratic platforms seek to promote social programs, labor unions, consumer protection, workplace safety regulation, equal opportunity, disability rights, racial equity, regulations against environmental pollution, and criminal justice reform.

Tell me, what are the Repuckers able to claim as their own? Wasn’t the Clown who gave all those tax cuts to the rich?

By CAT [Ignore] 01,Dec,23 11:14 other posts 
The House has voted to expel Republican Rep. George Santos on Friday, a historic move that hasn’t happened in more than 20 years.

only registered users can see external links

It was time. 👍😈
By phart [Ignore] 01,Dec,23 22:48 other posts 
way past time.
By CAT [Ignore] 03,Dec,23 10:50 other posts 

By leopoldij [Ignore] 01,Dec,23 10:35 other posts 
The worst ever American criminal finally died.
He served no time in prison for killingg 3 million people.
(In comparison: Hitler killed 2.7 million Jews.)
And he was even givem the (discredited) nobel peace prize.

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes

Measuring purely by confirmed kills, the worst mass murderer ever executed by the United States was the white-supremacist terrorist Timothy McVeigh. On April 19, 1995, McVeigh detonated a massive bomb at the Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City, killing 168 people, including 19 children.



What's worse?
By CAT [Ignore] 01,Dec,23 11:48 other posts 
He and Nixon have a lot to answer for. I know this will sound callous, but, my thoughts are for all those brave American kids from my generation who ended up as cannon fodder for nothing.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 01,Dec,23 14:10 other posts 
And the millions of Laos people who were killed for nothing. They were humans too.
And how about those people in countries where he installed dictatorships? Argentina, Greece, and others. So many tortured and killed, including children.
--------------------------------------- added after 35 hours

Correction: I was referring to Cambodia. Laos was also bombed. But Cambodia received more bombs than the allies used in the whole of WWII, including Hiroshima and Nagaski. Kissinger is responsible for that. Cambodia remains the most bombed country in history.
only registered users can see external links

By CAT [Ignore] 29,Nov,23 12:46 other posts 
I posted on Bella!‘s thread on 11/28 this:

I'm sorry. I don't follow what you are trying to say.

And I still didn’t get an answer. Why?
By leopoldij [Ignore] 01,Dec,23 10:32 other posts 
Because she doesn't follow what she says either.
She's just a religious, sex-hating, self-righteous, ultra-conservative person. No loss if you don't get a reply from her.
By CAT [Ignore] 01,Dec,23 11:46 other posts 
No comment. Bella! is the way she is and she has a right to be as she likes. I don’t expect anything from anyone.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 01,Dec,23 14:08 other posts 
No. Don't expect. I'm just starting some facts.
--------------------------------------- added after 5 hours


By CAT [Ignore] 29,Nov,23 15:58 other posts 
only registered users can see external links

On the move. Brrrrrr!

By CAT [Ignore] 29,Nov,23 12:43 other posts 
only registered users can see external links

By CAT [Ignore] 27,Nov,23 16:43 other posts 
Hey, Sir-Skittles you are talking 💩💩💩again. Regarding your post on Bella!‘s thread, here’s the truth:

only registered users can see external links

No Change in George Floyd’s Cause of Death, Despite Viral False Claims
By Saranac Hale Spencer

Posted on November 6, 2023 on FACT-CHECK

The police officer who kept his knee on George Floyd’s neck for about nine minutes in 2020 was convicted
of murder, and the medical examiner determined that police efforts to subdue Floyd caused his death. Nothing
about the autopsy’s findings have changed, but social media posts falsely claim new documents show Floyd
died of a drug overdose or natural causes.

Full Story
George Floyd, a Black man, was killed on May 25, 2020, after a white police officer,
Derek Chauvin, kneeled on Floyd’s neck during an arrest in Minneapolis for about nine
minutes while Floyd said repeatedly that he couldn’t breathe. The incident sparked protests
and riots across the country. Chauvin was subsequently convicted of murdering Floyd.

The county medical examiner who conducted the autopsy listed Floyd’s death as a homicide
and determined that the cause was “cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement
subdual, restraint, and neck compression.”
This finding was highlighted in the first set of charges leveled against Chauvin in May 2020
and was explained in detail by the medical examiner, Dr. Andrew Baker, during Chauvin’s trial.

“The top line of the cause of death is really what you think is the most important thing that precipitated
the death. Other things that you think played a role in the death but were not direct causes get relegated
to what’s known as the ‘other significant conditions’ part of the death certificate,” Baker said at the trial,
explaining why Floyd’s other health conditions weren’t included in his cause of death.

“So, the other significant conditions are things that played a role in the death, but didn’t directly cause
the death,” Baker said. “So, for example, Mr. Floyd’s use of fentanyl did not cause the subdual or neck
restraint; his heart disease did not cause the subdual or the neck restraint.” Nothing new has emerged
in the medical examiner’s findings. But recently posts have been circulating on social media falsely
claiming that new court documents show Floyd was not murdered and, instead, died of a drug overdose.
Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson also posted a video to his X account on Oct. 20 in which he says,
“George Floyd, according to the official autopsy, was not murdered. He died instead of what we used to
call natural causes, which in his case would include decades of drug use, as well as the fatal concentration
of fentanyl that was in his system on his final day.”

That’s not true. Floyd’s autopsy report hasn’t changed. It shows Floyd had fentanyl in his system when he
died, but determined his death was caused by action taken by police that resulted in cardiac arrest.
The Hennepin County Medical Examiner’s office confirmed to us in a phone interview on Nov. 3 that no
changes have been made. Experts at Chauvin’s trial also said the evidence doesn’t support the idea that
he had died of an overdose, as USA Today reported.
By dgraff [Ignore] 27,Nov,23 19:22 other posts 
They should have took the hand cuffs off of him threw a pistol to him and as soon as he pointed it at the officer they should have gunned him down
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 28,Nov,23 03:55 other posts 
Why, what did he do that deserves the death penalty?
By dgraff [Ignore] 28,Nov,23 05:37 other posts 
What didn’t he do he was a career thug never made an honest dollar in his life
Car jacking
Purse snatching
Assault and Battery
Stealing trick or treat candy from children
Tax evasion
I could go on and on
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 28,Nov,23 06:15 other posts 
This is what I found about his record:
"Between 1997 and 2005, Floyd served eight jail terms on various charges, including drug possession, theft, and trespass. In one of these cases, Floyd was convicted of possessing half a gram of crack cocaine in 2004 based on the sole testimony of police officer Gerald Goines."
"He served four years in prison after accepting a plea bargain for a 2007 aggravated robbery in a home invasion.[5] After he was paroled in 2013, he served as a mentor in his religious community and posted anti-violence videos to social media.[6][7][8][9] In 2014, he moved to the Minneapolis area, residing in the nearby suburb of St. Louis Park, and worked as a truck driver and bouncer. In 2020, he lost his job as a truck driver, and then his security job during the COVID-19 pandemic."

It looks like that his crime was all in the past and he served his time.
He did make an honest dollar in his life. You are making shit up.
By dgraff [Ignore] 28,Nov,23 06:28 other posts 
Still he’s nothing more than street trash when will you liberals learn that a tiger 🐅 can’t loose his stripes
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 28,Nov,23 07:19 other posts 
It looks like he WAS, but that he cleaned up at least partially.
Is that enough to deserve the death penalty, by your account?
There are many millions of people like him in your country.
It will make law and order nice and clear; death for every crime.

You could saved a lot of money on Trump's lawsuits; just execute him.
R@pe, espionage, fraud and treason are a lot worse than Floyd’s petty crimes.
By dgraff [Ignore] 28,Nov,23 08:26 other posts 
Hey if you can make it stick go for it makes no difference to me
By CAT [Ignore] 28,Nov,23 09:03 other posts 
Ananas, I consider my country to be the greatest of them all, but, it’s all material greatness. As long as we have people like Dgraff, and we have huge numbers like him, we are a very poor nation.
I don’t understand it. We could reach the sky. Instead we play in the excrements of society. There must be a name for that.
By Gntlmn [Ignore] 28,Nov,23 10:40 other posts 
There is. MAGA
By CAT [Ignore] 28,Nov,23 11:11 other posts 
By phart [Ignore] 28,Nov,23 09:10 other posts 
he is 1 of so many classic cases of so called recovery.
When he died he was full of dope. When he died he was being accused of using fake money.
Someone gave him a security job, he lost it, someone let him drive a truck,he lost it, I wonder if a failed drug test was the reason for loosing the truck driving job? we will never know because the media would cover that up.
Very important to be sober while driving a truck of any size with a load on it.
Your research turned up info that was probably homogenized by AI,that is why it sounds so "ok".
By CAT [Ignore] 28,Nov,23 09:22 other posts 
Phart “ because the media would cover that up. ”
Why? What is the gain for the media to do that? The media is a BUSINESS and they want to sell the news. That’s why birdcage bottom covers like Fox and other 💩💩💩 news outlets, look for controversial news.
You have been brainwashed, haven’t you?
By phart [Ignore] 28,Nov,23 10:32 other posts 
If you can put newspapers in your bird cage, you sure don't have a Parrot. Must be a parakeet.

Letting it out how he lost his truck driving job might would support people like me's ideas of floyd being a looser still to the minute he died.
TO many tears have been shed over that mongrel.Yes,the knee was not needed, just leave him in the car with the doors open and let him stroke out on his own would have been more fitting.
By CAT [Ignore] 28,Nov,23 11:10 other posts 
The point is not what he was but that he got murdered. I get that you couldn’t care less that he died. I doubt anyone really would have cared if one more loser had passed away, but, until his last dying breath, he had the right to do so on his own. He did not deserve to be murdered.
Whatever he was should not deviate your thinking that the perpetrator of this crime had it right. That’s it. Murder is the ultimate crime.
By phart [Ignore] 28,Nov,23 10:35 other posts 
UH, is it petty to hold a loaded gun to a pregnant womans stomach while your buddies ransack her home?
That to me is bumping Hamas quality terror.
only registered users can see external links

Alot of good reading here on the zero floyd
Evidence found in Floyd's car shows that he was using Suboxone, a prescription medication used for adults with an opioid addiction. It blocks the effects of fentanyl.

New Comment   Go to top

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#166

Show It Off