"So you're saying I'm brainwashed into striving for moral correctness in comparison to political correctness."
No, you are brainwashed into thinking that what your saying is true.
What kind of bullshit is it to compare moral correctness to political correctness? I want politics to represent my morality, not the other way around. I have explained enough of my basis for my morality, and how I expand on it to for my political opinions. You just say that yours is based on right and wrong, or moral correctness or altruism, without showing any link to your political ideas.
Definitions are useless, if you cannot show your words to contain any meaning. Definitions are for describing the meaning of words. We should have the exact same ones, because that's just the rules of language.
You can just go to Cambridge Dictionary and search those words.
I'll agree, most of the time. There are some words that are used very broadly. The definition is than not very useful. The term 'socialism' is overused, to mean almost nothing anymore. If idiots think it's the exact same thing for Stalin, Hitler, Cuba, Venezuela, Iceland, Finland or my Socialist Party, then the term itself can't hold it's own.
I'm also not going to define terms that you pulled into the discussion.
They are not useful for me, to explain my ideas. If they are useful to you, it's your burden to show the significance of them. If defining them does that, go ahead. It doesn't explain anything besides what you think those terms mean. If you think the term 'democracy' means something else than what society has agreed it means, saying 'the US is not a democracy' might be correct for you, but not for the rest of society.
"Socialism gives all the power to the government."
If that is your definition, than understand that I want that government to
BE THE PEOPLE! I want everyone to be involved in deciding how to best organize that government. That's power for the people to control what you call the government.
It's exactly the opposite of the straw-men you keep repeating.
Meanwhile, you support Trump, who only wants people to cheer for him and do as they are told. Then he picks a bunch of loyalists for his GOVERNMENT, to rule over them and you, with an iron fist. He will be the leader of the COMMUNIST EMPIRE OF THE SEPARATED STATES.
He will rule it like Putin and Kim Jong-un, because that's what he likes about them. "We wrote beautiful love letters to each other!"
And you are sad little sucker for not seeing it.
You want a government that controls women's bodily autonomy.
You want a government that reduces sex to only reproduction.
You want a government that takes away IVF, if they do want a baby.
You want a government that controls who people may love.
That's 'giving all the power to the government'.
If the large majority of people want gun restrictions, that's DEMOCRACY!
The Constitution is a blue print for how to be a democracy.
You are correct that it wasn't the perfect expression of democracy, but a compromise, to the southern states who didn't want a democracy at all. That's why they introduced the Electoral College, which provides stronger votes for southern states. The better options, which were similar to what we have in Europe, were not agreed upon by those southern states.
So, you have a flawed democracy, but at least it was the first one.
There is some 'moral correctness' in it, but the GOAL of organizing a government that way was providing people with rights, so they wouldn't want to support some king from England or France, coming over to take power, which is harder when you distribute power over more people.
When you just have a king, the enemy can easily behead the king and announce themselves to be the new king. Trump wants to be king or emperor and you're the gullible idiots who would give away your own power to that king, because you think you have less power now.
The only argument you have is; it's not really a democracy anyway.
Yes, it is, the majority just doesn't agree with you.
"As long as you have abuse of power, lying, stealing and removing guns with freedom of speech the country is done. Our cities are destroyed and unlivable now." Absolute nonsense!
Maybe you should use Russia's system? Didn't Tucker Carlson show you how nice their subways, grocery stores and super market carts are?
That's a guy from your side, literally trying to sell you COMMUNISM
and then you accuse my side of it. You cannot make this stuff up.
"The bullshit comment about you in one country and kebmo in another country is used for deception, just like you say I'm one with more than one account and was Trump 2."
Of course you are, do you think you are fooling anyone?
You are saying the exact same things that you said as TS2.
You still lied about it though.
It's all PROJECTION; you accuse others of what you are doing yourself.