Recent Posts of member Ananas2xLekker

Topics:

Let's help Elon make twitter great 02,Nov,22 05:44

Posts:

By Ananas2xLekker 30,Jan,23 11:50
A police system needs to have checks and balances, so bad cops like that get flushed out. And it's not needed in just the police system, but in all government organizations. The same people who argue that an employee should be able to get fired over whatever the employer gives as a reason, argue that government officials, like cops, are allowed to do literally every crime against the people, that they want. And then, when the government turns out to be a shit-show, they say they want 'small government', because 'the government sucks'. It does, because they made it suck.



By Ananas2xLekker 30,Jan,23 11:29
No, you don't want the truth, you want to rewrite history.
Like your bullshit that the conservatives wrote the constitution.
Or that the conservatives fought against slavery, instead of the liberals.
That's bullshit propaganda from people who shit on the constitution daily
and would love to reinstate slavery tomorrow; conservatives.

And you want to erase history where America looks bad.
Similar like if Germany banned all books about WWII.
And then no one will ever learn from previous mistakes.

What are they saying that is not the truth then?

And you don't want to take the government the hell out of it,
you want the government to censor speech that you don't like
and then replace it with your lies, to indoctrinate children,
which is already happening in lots of states, where they teach creation
as an alternative 'theory' to evolution.

You just want teachers to teach bullshit and create even more dumb people.
Because somehow that might Make America Great Again.
But your ideology will just Make America Hate Again.



By Ananas2xLekker 30,Jan,23 11:20
There is a whole range between just saying 'yes sir' and 'no sir' and being an asshole. I also just cooperate with the police if they want something from me, but there is no reason for the police to force people into compliant little cucks, by punishment of death. Police officers have the same responsibility to accept that some people are assholes as everyone else. They shouldn't have special privileges to kill assholes.



By Ananas2xLekker 30,Jan,23 07:07
And you think banning books isn't manipulating more young people into your fold?
Everything you are told those teachers are doing is propaganda.
It exactly is just tolerance that the teachers are teaching.

But you have become intolerant of tolerance. You don't want to just leave people alone, you want to invade into their life and forbid them to be who they want to be. It's not affecting your life, but you are affecting their life.

You want teachers to teach hate and bigotry, and you want BIG GOVERNMENT
to step in and censor people and control people's bodily autonomy.
That's your ideology and it's at war with tolerance, respect and freedom.



By Ananas2xLekker 30,Jan,23 06:25
"Well if the book is banned,I would think there is a law that backs that ban up correct?"
If a state makes laws that are unconstitutional, any book can be banned.
If you allow that, all speech can be banned. How would you like it, if gender affirming pronouns would be banned, by a new law in California? Say 'he' or 'she' and go to jail?

There are rules that limit free speech. You should know what those are by now.
When people break those limits of free speech, that can be a crime.
If a book contains speech that breaks those limits, than the author is liable.
That is the limit of the government's power on the subject of free speech.

The First Amendment is specifically written to protect your speech from GOVERNMENT crackdown. You are crying about free speech when a private media company bans someone for breaking the limits of free speech, which IS THE LAW AND IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT, but now you don't care when THE GOVERNMENT is cracking down on speech THAT IS WITHIN THE LIMITS. Why? Because you don't like THAT speech.

Jailing librarians and teachers for allowing books to be in libraries, that's where the government's power stops. And if you understood free speech, you would agree.

Find me any precedent for a government jailing librarians and teachers over books. What countries would be associated with that? Nazi Germany? Iran? Russia?
China under Mao Zedong? That's because what Ron DeSantis is doing, is FASCISM!



By Ananas2xLekker 30,Jan,23 06:14
You forget one reason for the protests; the government not doing anything to fix the problem of police violence. If people demand changes and the government does nothing, the people are right to keep protesting, until the government does enough to alleviate the problem.



By Ananas2xLekker 29,Jan,23 12:18
Parents react to empty classrooms and library shelves as DCPS continues book reviews
only registered users can see external links

Parents react to empty classroom, library shelves as DCPS continues book review
only registered users can see external links

That's what happens if you threaten teachers with prison, for books that are not sanctioned by the state. The rules on what is or is not 'woke' are vague, so they don't take any chances and remove every single book, until all of them are reviewed by the Florida states 'censoring commission'.



By Ananas2xLekker 27,Jan,23 12:57
It's strange that this dickpic site has turned into a political discussion forum for such a big part, but it's pretty rare. It's not easy finding sites who offer the same. Besides this site, I only discuss politics on YouTube, but those are just comments on the particular video and those discussions die, when the video popularity declines.
I know sites like Reddit, Quora, Discourse and many others exist, but I haven't found any as accessible as this dickpic site yet. It's strength is simplicity.



By Ananas2xLekker 27,Jan,23 07:09
If you don't care for this debate, no one forces you to take part in it.

It's about the wealthiest person in the world, buying one of the biggest social media companies in the world, and about free speech rights itself. There are major political view differences associated with that. If that is a topic not worthy of discussion, than what is?
If this political topic shouldn't be allowed on this site, because this is a site for dickpics, than all political topics should be deleted.
However, there is no TOS limiting political topics on this site.

But I agree; Elon is shit, even without believing he shot JFK, 8 years before his birth.



By Ananas2xLekker 27,Jan,23 07:04
Which part exactly? The part that protects democracy and everyone's freedoms,
independent of their political opinions?

But of course YOU think it abides by your Constitution,
because you don't understand the least thing about it.



By Ananas2xLekker 27,Jan,23 05:48
You say "In answer to your question" and then answer nothing.

"if you are a socialist right now in the US, then you have it made for a few more years" Because now the corporate neo-liberals protect the status quo for a while, instead of the fascists turning the US even further in a theocratic oligarchy, leftists have reached all their goals?

As long as I live in a capitalist system, I obey its rules.
If I protest the exploitative nature of it, I do it by the rules democracy has provided.

'bitching if you do not get your way' is exactly what Elon Musk is doing.
He is the wealthiest capitalist in the world and he is not playing by the rules of either capitalism or democracy, by refusing to pay his rent. He is just breaking the law.
You normally pretend to hate everyone who breaks the law, but that is only for people that you don't like. You just like when Elon Musk breaks the law, because you see him as god-emperor now, since you think he will allow the N-word and your fascist leader on Twitter, even when you are not on Twitter yourself. Did you like Elon and rush to protect Elon, when he was just selling electric cars?

[It's not free speech to break the first amendment, with racism, by threatening people, inciting violence, defaming your opponents, asking for campaign donations and using it fraudulently to enrich yourself, be obscene just by being yourself and use fighting words and threats daily. Except for child porn, Trump has violated every TOS that social media are required by law to have.]
only registered users can see external links
Racism is not in there? Correct, it has it's own laws overruling free speech laws.
only registered users can see external links

Elon Musk doesn't give a damn about free speech. He just want to decide what IS 'free speech' on his platform. And make that speech not FREE anymore, but have
his users PAY for it. The users must pay, for dumb Elon paying twice the value.
Meanwhile the value is dropping, because Elon is firing all the human resources that the company had developed. People are a company's greatest asset.
only registered users can see external links
The idiot even fired the people who sell the ads to advertisers. That's 89% of Twitter's revenue, you could say; the whole business model.
Besides that, a bird logo and the value of legitimacy, that once Twitter had, the value of the company is nothing. And they are even selling that bird logo: only registered users can see external links



By Ananas2xLekker 27,Jan,23 05:25
Can normal people renegotiate the contract, by not paying their bills?

"May be looking for cheaper space and thought the landlord would offer a lower rate if they stayed?" Exactly, that's how you do it in capitalism. And then you leave and pay your bills, up to the last day of use. Or you start a lawsuit if you have good arguments about being coerced.

I have no love for the royal family, but why do you care? All people who own and rent out massive property are wealthy. And now that one capitalist is doesn't hold up to a contract with another capitalist, it matters that one is royalty?
IS ELON MUSK NOT WEALTHY ENOUGH TO PAY HIS RENT?

If Trump was not paid the rent that someone owes him and there was no lawful reason for that, I would stand for the law.

"there is probably more to the story than we are being told" If arguments are presented in Twitter's/Elon Musks favor, than I might agree. I do not assume there is 'more to the story' until it's presented, just because I like one of the sides. That's what right-wingers do; taking the side they like most, no matter the evidence or lack of evidence.



By Ananas2xLekker 26,Jan,23 07:38
The problem here is, I think, that this particular Term of Use is hard to police.
Unless the site decides to ban anonymous users, there is no way for moderators
to ascertain if one account is created by the same person as another account.

I understand that the site doesn't want to become a troll-farm, or help some asshole create multiple accounts with the same pictures of his ex to do revenge-porn, or just spam the site with pictures ripped from the internet, changing this community into just another porn-site.

But maybe their are ways to achieve the goal, but with an alternative/extra Term of Use policy, that is easier to supervise. Maybe demand an actual dick-pick with the user name in the picture, within a certain time-frame. That would maintain anonymity for people who value that (like me), but give some incentive to be an active member, makes creating multiple accounts harder and maybe makes it easier to recognize multiple accounts (same dick, several times). By the way, I'm not suggesting making this a dick-only site, other recognizable body-parts should be allowed as 'evidence', for people without dicks.
I know the site is called ShowYourDick, but that's only fun if there are people who WatchYourDick.



By Ananas2xLekker 26,Jan,23 07:01
The Jehovah's Witnesses are no longer a "religious community" in Norway
only registered users can see external links



By Ananas2xLekker 26,Jan,23 06:45
Republicans Want to Jail Teachers and Librarians Who Don't Comply with Book Bans.
only registered users can see external links

That's fascism!

You only believe in free speech, if you protect the speech you don't agree with.



By Ananas2xLekker 26,Jan,23 05:00
Twitter is not paying their rent.
Why? Don't they want to, or are they not able to?
Can normal people not pay their rent and get away with it?
Your a capitalist; do contracts not matter anymore?
Are no 'points' appearing in your brain, if you hear that news?



By Ananas2xLekker 26,Jan,23 04:54
Ghislaine Maxwell Says Epstein Didn't K*ll Himself | The Kyle Kulinski Show
only registered users can see external links

Summary: "Really? You don't say..."



By Ananas2xLekker 25,Jan,23 11:34
There are more contraceptives than just rubbers.
But like I said before, Republicans want to ban contraceptives too.



By Ananas2xLekker 25,Jan,23 10:50
"So their parents knew the score and shoulda kept their pants up and not brought kids into that world."

Their life already sucks and then you deny them sex too.

Why do you think I am pro-choice? Because sometimes contraceptives fail and then I don't want people, who are in no shape to raise children, being forced to bring kids into a horrible world.
You understand the last part, but fail to understand that people should have a choice, better than the one you're offering.



By Ananas2xLekker 25,Jan,23 10:43
"The people who do the exploiting exist in every country. Even yours, Ananas."
That's true. That is the problem I'm addressing all the time.

If by your reference to a 'Datcha', you imply that Russia is, or ever was the most socialistic country; it isn't and it never was. It was at most communist; an authoritarian government controlling everything. Socialism means full democratic control of the PEOPLE. Russia never had that, it was always controlled by the wealthy elite and it still is now. The people never had any power and even now Putin does some sham elections, they still have no power. The most 'socialistic' countries are the Scandinavian countries. And there are the least starving and homeless people in the world there. When people refer to Venezuela, they know nothing. That's a corrupt state run by oil barons, an oligarchy is not socialism.
The people have no power at all.

A free market is part of capitalism. It doesn't mean that everything is owned and controlled by corporations. But who is owner of the farm, or the mortgage of the farm or who owns that mom and pop shop, who collects their rent, who controls the money you pay with or the method you pay by. Where did the farm buy their seeds, or the manure. Who competes with that farm and mom and pop shop, determining the price you are willing to pay, where does your money come from?
When there is an economic crisis, who gets bailed out with your tax-dollars,
that self-pick farm, the mom and pop shop, or big banks and corporations?
In all those steps, corporations have lots of influence over what you think is an uncontrolled free market.

In the past, everyone was exploited. We come from a time of lords and serfs.
It's true that people are more free to be happy now, but don't be complacent, because your freedom is fragile and the time of lords and serfs is closer than you think. For many uneducated working people, it's already a reality that is almost inescapable. They are living in their car, on the parking lot of the factory, because they don't have money for a house and they work too many hours to travel home anyway. That bar of exploitation is moving up, to more people we used to call the 'middle class'. How many jobs do you know, that used to pay enough to house and feed a whole family and now doesn't pay enough for one person? Are there less people doing those jobs now? Or are there now just more people with jobs that don't pay enough to house and feed them?



By Ananas2xLekker 25,Jan,23 10:05
Musk sued over unpaid rent by King Charles III's Crown Estate
only registered users can see external links



By Ananas2xLekker 25,Jan,23 08:41
Wow, I agree with Candace Owens on something. Never thought I see the day.
This right-wing grifter feud is funny.
only registered users can see external links



By Ananas2xLekker 25,Jan,23 06:47
Lying is a sign of weakness!

"Lying is for the weak-minded. If you can't think of a truthful way to solve your problems, you're not thinking hard enough.” — Robin Brande



By Ananas2xLekker 25,Jan,23 06:08
Did I ever say it was easy?
I understand every single challenge associated with it.
But that's what got humanity to this point; overcoming challenges.

Humanity is declining in progress, because of complacency.
It's not the laziness you think, people are working their asses off.
It's laziness of thinking, people are averse to it.
Not only do people not want to think, they distrust others who do.
That results in everyone working hard, on our own destruction.



By Ananas2xLekker 25,Jan,23 05:48
I can't find any Dutch news reporting on it. Apparently, if it's less than 10 people
and not children, Dutch news considers it; just another day in America.



By Ananas2xLekker 25,Jan,23 05:37
Exactly! It's definitely a skill, to be that good at lying.
I even enjoy seeing him use it so brilliantly. He's really a master at it.
It's just horrible that it's acceptable for a representative of the people.



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jan,23 13:39
No, he's so much fun! He really cannot help himself and just keeps lying.
He's like Trump, but for him, getting caught somehow does matter.
At least, now that it's getting this bad, over such pathetic subjects.
When he was lying like a standard Republican, no one cared yet.
He's doing nice damage to the Republican party, so I hope they cannot boot him.



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jan,23 13:30
Yes, 'in or near Delft'. I know it well.
Mostly from my studies, which took me the better part of 10 years.
And from getting hopelessly lost, on my moped, every time I tried to find anything
in Delft. That was before the age of navigation. I'm so thankful for that invention.

There's many cities like Delft in The Netherlands. Lots of our cities are hundreds or over a thousand years old and they built to last. Where ever it wasn't bombed to smithereens in WWII, most of it is still there and protected well.

I don't like Delft pottery either. We only have one Delft blue tile, standing on a shelf,
from visiting the Delft pottery factory once. It's mostly for tourists. Shame we couldn't part you of some money for it.



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jan,23 12:56
No one is 100% honest.
But, I've seen politicians up close, that came very close.
They don't answer a question, with something the asker wants to hear,
they answer clearly and directly, according to their principles.
And when they ever make a mistake, they admit that fully and openly,
telling you where they made the mistake, why they made that mistake
and how they are going to fix it.
That's when you know they are working for you and not for themselves.

In The Netherlands, I only see that in the Socialist Party. Every other party,
to the right of them, is obfuscating, twisting, embellishing and concealing.

Meanwhile our right-wing prime minister is a very smooth liar.
He has even introduced new terminology with his lying. He often says:
"I have no active memory of that.", so you can't get him, if it turns out he knew.
Other politicians started to use that too. And people like managers of companies in trouble, getting caught for sketchy shit and getting interrogated by journalists.

And he has an old Nokia phone, with a tiny memory, so he can delete every message that he doesn't want the public to know about, while he has the obligation to share or record everything. 'Plausible deniability', 100%.



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jan,23 12:46
"I say pick the more honest" I fully agree!
Unfortunately you have a poor judge of character, if you think that's Trump.
He has been a lying, stealing, cheating, conning, scumbag, all his life.
How could you believe he would have been different as president?

Trump is just so experienced in lying, that it sounds like the truth,
especially if you like those lies and you have no skeptical reasoning skills.



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jan,23 12:37
Voting for the most honest, might get you... honest politicians?
A shock, I understand, what would that look like?
Maybe it would give you politicians who actually represent the people?



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jan,23 12:10
"...rural departments will not be able to respond due to small budgets and truck to old." Then they need to increase the budget, don't they. No one said saving humanity and nature would be cheap. But, it's cheaper than doing nothing, before the end.
After the end, no one cares about money anymore.
Still, lawmakers are always stupid, even if the mean well. Off course you only do away with the old firetrucks, AFTER replacing them. Start complaining when they don't do that, not when right-wing media is fearmongering that they won't.
Right-wing media always fails every single prediction. They get everything wrong,
all the time, but still you keep listening.

And they never offer any solutions. That would give you hope and calm your anger.
They want you angry and scared, so you will vote for a 'strong leader', telling you everything will be OK, if you vote for him. Then he will throw out everyone who is causing the 'problems'. Off course the problems will not go away, because denying the real problems will just make them worse. But maybe you will not be so afraid anymore, knowing 'big daddy' is there for you.

As a socialist, I understand that problems will only be solved, when people come together and demand change from their incompetent leaders, or we just throw them out and just solve the problems ourselves. Those 'strong leaders' never deliver any solutions.



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jan,23 11:34
Paint me a picture, describing the problem in basic economics then.
Every time economics has any involvement in your arguments, you show
no grasp of it in the slightest.

When resources are scarce, the price goes up. That happens with energy now.
That's why we need alternatives.

And preferably not alternatives that will kill everyone.



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jan,23 11:29
Your energy requires raw materials now too. It's called oil and natural gas.
Maybe you didn't notice, but there is a global shortage of both, because a certain
Mr. Putin. That's why the whole world is accelerating the transformation to renewables.
If they started that years/decades ago, we wouldn't be in this kind of a hurry now.
Now it's creating shortages of raw materials, high prices and a labor shortage.

That's what happens, if shortsighted people run the world.
You only present problems, but you have no solutions, besides this one:



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jan,23 10:48
Drainage and huge pumps. Not just for the rain, but for the ground water.
If those pumps stop running, it will become a nice canal, very quickly.



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jan,23 17:41
That would be a fun day in court to be in the audience.



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jan,23 17:38
Yes, I noticed. He has good eyes.



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jan,23 15:45
"Check out this crazy awesome Dutch road infrastructure"
only registered users can see external links

It's a road about 0.75 miles from my house. I use it almost every time I go anywhere.
There are several of those in The Netherlands, but this piece turned out to be the most expensive road per mile. That 7 kilometer (4.35 miles) long strip of road costed € 900 million ($ 977,336,100). It was the solution to connect two major highways, directly through a city, which they battled over for more than 30 years. For all that time, the A4 ended into a piece of grass, in walking distance of the A20 that it was supposed to connect with.
In 2015 it was finally finished. Through the city of Schiedam, there's a tunnel of 1.2 miles long, with a park and several soccer fields on top.
51°56'33.4"N 4°21'32.1"E



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jan,23 14:08
Maybe you have an other idea about the meaning of 'deserving'.
Might there be some negative connotation attached to it in the US?

To me 'deserving' means exactly the same as 'having the right to'.
You have the right to live. Just because you are a person and explicitly by law.
Your laws might differ with mine, on the right to end your life, but in my opinion, you don't HAVE TO live. Your life is yours and yours alone. You have a right to it and you should have the right to end it.

I also consider human rights 'absolute' (for as far as rights or morality can be absolute). Even if the laws of the land do not define those rights, I still think you have, or should have, them. They are more than words on paper, they are what you 'deserve'.



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jan,23 13:55
It was a disappointment at first, but then I appreciated it.



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jan,23 13:52
Most of the time, the religious views determine the law of the land.
I'm pleased that, in this case, most countries choose rationality over religious views.



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jan,23 13:27
Polygamy is the practice of marrying multiple spouses.
It's actually illegal in most countries. With the exception of the Solomon Islands, polygamous marriages are not recognized in Europe and Oceania. In India, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Singapore, the governments recognize polygamous marriages, but only for Muslims. In those countries, it's only the men who are allowed to have multiple spouses. Polyandry is a form of polygamy in which a woman takes two or more husbands at the same time. For example, fraternal polyandry is practiced among Tibetans in Nepal, parts of China and part of northern India, in which two or more brothers are married to the same wife, with the wife having equal “sexual access” to them.

Personally, I don't give a shit about the institution of marriage. I would give everyone the freedom to marry anyone, in any number, if those people were all able to freely make that choice. However, because we live in a world where people do not always have the freedom of choice, especially women, it's better to limit marriage to two people.
Marriage is not necessary for commitment or to prevent spreading diseases, (I guess you refer to unwanted) pregnancies or breaking hearts and move right along as if nothing is going on. Maybe marriage forces some people to stay together, but that is no guarantee for happiness. And seeing as divorces are plenty, it doesn't promote any commitment either.

There are lots of reasons to consider the world a mess, but in my opinion the freedom to have sex with any other consenting adult and freely start and end relationships, only made the world a better place. A freedom is only a problem, when it negatively affects other people's freedoms. These particular freedoms only do that, when people are not ready for that freedom. Then the people are the problem, not the freedom. Love is not a weapon. If people use it as such, than they are wrong, not love itself.



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jan,23 12:10
"No one deserves anything."
I disagree; just by being a person, you deserve to live
and if life is unbearable, without remedy, you deserve the right to end it.

Why even have 'human rights' or the 'bill of rights'
if 'no one deserves anything'?

only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jan,23 11:59
They call the teaching the history of slavery and oppression of black people;
'unsolicited theories that may lead to student indoctrination'.
But, off course they love to say they are protecting 'freedom of speech'.

New Training Tells Florida School Librarians Which Books Are Off-Limits:
only registered users can see external links

"School librarians in Florida will have to undergo training on choosing, removing, and curating books for school and classroom libraries to comply with a state law passed last year.
They are prohibited from using any instructional materials that include critical race theory, culturally responsive teaching, social-emotional learning, social justice, “and any other unsolicited theories that may lead to student indoctrination are prohibited,” according to the training."



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jan,23 10:28
Money only supports your life, it's not the goal of life.
If you make money your main goal in life, you stop living.
My 'socialist' goal is to make money less important to support all our lives,
so we can actually really LIVE.

It shouldn't take this much of an effort to support our lives.
Lots of people are working harder to support their lives, than cavemen ever did.
Humanity has progressed too much, for surviving to cost this much effort.
It would already be progress, if you ever understood that.



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jan,23 10:06
The credibility of your political system was destroyed, when Republicans introduced laws that claim money = speech and corporations are people. It's the party that you vote for that legalized corruption. That's were your democracy started dying.



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jan,23 10:03
The 'liberal' media is indeed also responsible for the US turning into a kleptocracy. They are only allowed to pay lip-service to people asking for personal freedoms, because those personal freedoms don't cost any money for the wealthy owners and advertisers of the 'liberal' media. They also bear responsibility for keeping silent about the kleptocracy. Fully lying, what the right-wing media does, is still less honest than keeping silent about the truth.

Newsmax completely makes up 'facts' and puts a complete spin on everything else. They lie about 80% of the time. The 'liberal' media is at least presenting real facts, 80% of the time. They put some spin on it, to appease their owners and advertisers, but it's not as dishonest as the right-wing media. You just think right-wing media is more honest, because they tell you the same propaganda, you have been indoctrinated with your whole life. Familiar lies sound more honest.

It's you, who thinks commercial media is preferable over publicly owned media.
They are ALL lying to you or not telling the truth. You acknowledge that yourself.
Are you ready to change your opinion on commercial media already?



By Ananas2xLekker 20,Jan,23 18:52
Always blaming the people with the absolute least, instead of the people with money and power. You have a very strange view about responsibility.

I imagined that you wouldn't get the 'better yourself' point.
I'm not talking about your possessions, I'm talking about your character, skills, knowledge and inner peace.



By Ananas2xLekker 20,Jan,23 03:49
You SAY "Citizens first, America FIRST", but you DO Elon Musk first, Jeff Bezos first.

Isn't 200 billion enough for them to start thinking about 'the citizens'?
It's your idea of capitalism, that the wealthy run the country, right?
So, how much more do they need to have, before you give them some responsibility?
A trillion? Ten trillion? 99% of all the money? 100%? WHEN????

If the wealthy don't have that responsibility, than who?
You want to give them all the power, but no responsibility?
Do you see the recipe for disaster now?



By Ananas2xLekker 20,Jan,23 03:46
Your legal citizens are starving and homeless, because they are exploited by the same people that illegals are. It's not the lack of resources you should worry about, because there is an abundance of it, it's who controls those resources, why you have citizens who are starving and homeless.