Yes she did, but, at the time, he was still truthful and impressive. Now, Oprah refuses to endorse him on his run for Congress. I voted for Carter. I still believe he is a great, caring man, yet, I would not vote for him again.
You learn from your mistakes. That's something you righ wing Trump supporters haven't learned yet.

If Oprah ever gave Dr. Oz a platform to scam people, than she was probably scammed just as much as the viewers, because she doesn't do much research
or thinking about 'stuff'. She's intelligent, but pretty ignorant.

Oprah Winfrey has long insisted that she is apolitical.
She has endorsed Barack Obama, but off course, that was expected of her.
Her political views on 'The View' are a mixed bag. Some of her views were praised by conservatives. Most of the time that I saw her speak on the view, I just found her very ill-informed. But, she did surprise me with some liberal ideas once or twice, so sure, you can call her a liberal Democrat, but she is surely not a progressive. And I found they idea that she would run for president ludicrous, because she would have no idea how to run the country. I bet her campaign would just be completely devoid of ideas and just focus on; 'I'm Oprah, you like me, don't you? So, vote for me!'.
So, you can trust her to be nice, but no one should trust her political instincts.

I don’t know what part of Pennsylvania you’re looking at but I don’t see any poor people in the country oh you must be looking at Philadelphia a city that should be burned down along with the rats 🐀 in it have you actually ever been to Pennsylvania I don’t think you have or you wouldn’t have come off with a dumb ass remark like that

Every Republican candidate is posing with or shooting guns in their adds.
So who is seeking approval from punks with uzi's under their sweaters?
Oh, I see,... it's the sweaters you are worried about.
People should wear their uzi's under their three piece suits.

You're just showing that you are shallow and don't care about values.
Dr. Oz was on Oprah and wears suits, John Fetterman has tattoos, so.....

I support Peter Kwint, because of his ideas and values. He's a real socialist.
He was reprimanded for wearing an open t-shirt, showing his tattoos.
'Mister Kwint, where is your jacket?'
only registered users can see external links

I also support Lilian Marijnissen and Renske Leijten, because of their ideas and values, not for being good looking ladies who always dress impeccably.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links

I don't support a slick looking grifter like Thierry Baudet (who is lying about his support of Putin, for money), because of his ideas and values.
only registered users can see external links
Maybe you see a guy in a nice suit. I see he's lying, just by his body language.
(He is arguing that Russia is no threat to us, while calling people naive).
only registered users can see external links

"looks like a tattoed up freak show to me"
On his left arm he wears a tattoo of the zip code of Braddock.
On his right arm he wears tattoos of the people who got killed by gun violence,
while he was mayor of Braddock. He wanted to remember those victims,
so they would act as a constant reminder to improve safety in his community.
only registered users can see external links

Know any Republicans who care that much?

That's because you are brainwashed by capitalist propaganda.
Building the 'socialist dream' requires diligently working for people.
Building the 'capitalist dream' requires sitting back and letting the wealthy and corporations take control, destroy the unions even further and destroy democracy.

Or do you think deregulation and cutting taxes requires any effort?
It's not even necessary, just sit back while corporations violate pollution and
job safety regulations. Just sit back while corporations and the wealthy cheat
on taxes. Just cut the EPA and IRS and the 'capitalist dream' is that much closer.

Ananas, you know that socialist breed chaos then what arises next 'necessity'. You know it as well as many here. Hell, you have stated that to me many times, just not with those words.

So you want to preemptively ban smokers, just for the chance they would take breaks? Just have agreements about breaks. It's not so difficult. We have.

Smokers already pay for their own costs. They pay lots of taxes and die younger, which saves a lot on social security. The government loves smokers.

I agree that second hand smoke should be minimized. That's why I'm glad smoking is banned in public places and in work places. I don't think you can ban people smoking at home and poisoning their children. We can only ask smoking parents to not be idiots. There is a level of child abuse society allows, like teaching your children religion or right-wing conservatism. Unfortunately it's just up to the children to eventually recover from those forms of child abuse. We can only do our best
to have education provide an antivenom. Sadly, you support the venom.

We will see in 2 months.

"That is how the justice system works."
Oh really? Wow, I didn't know that.
And off course it never makes mistakes then.

Just before he died, the victim said that someone else did that to him.
That statement is known in the law as a “dying declaration.” It is typically given significant evidentiary weight, as it is presumed that a person on his deathbed will tell the truth. Nonetheless, the jury believed the defense of the person accused by the victim, over the defense of Charles Goldblum and he was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder, plus 15 to 30 years on other charges.

If you think this is a clear-cut case, you are just biassed.
And even if he was guilty, after 45 years in prison, he had served his debt to society and they concluded that he was no threat to anyone.

I would have also agreed if Trump had signed his pardon.
However Trump still kept calling for the executions of the Central Park 5,
when they were exonerated by DNA evidence.

For me to answer that question, I would have to look into the case.
And I'm not interested in doing that. That was Fetterman's job however.
It's just 100% predictable that Republicans would try to use that against him.

Gov. Wolf commuted Charles Goldblum’s life sentence after almost 45 years in prison. Goldblum is 71 and has health issues. Lt. Gov. John Fetterman, former mayor of Braddock, chairs the state’s Board of Pardons. Fetterman said that it served no purpose for Goldblum to remain behind bars.
“I think it’s important that mercy must be a partner to justice,”

only registered users can see external links

That's what the pardon system was intended for, not for having a president preemptively pardoning his partners in crime.