|
New Comment Rating: -1 Similar topics: 1.Cum isn't stored in the balls!!! 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III 5.Is this about you 🤷♂️, those that live in glass houses should not throw stones. Comments: |
Try to tell people it's not good for you,and they still want it, oh well, maybe they see each other stroke out they will slow down using
All clear results of behavior. It's human nature to risk health for other benefits.
Meanwhile, cannabis/marijuana edibles in responsible use carry a fraction of the systemic health risks that everyday sugar, tobacco, or alcohol consumption do. Unlike those substances, cannabis is widely used for genuine therapeutic benefits, offering vital relief from chronic pain, anxiety, and sleep disorders, without causing any lung damage.
No substance is completely risk-free, but isolating one risk, while ignoring the massive toll of other use/consumption/behavior is a logical fallacy.
Millions of people die every year from cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases, directly driven by tobacco, alcohol, and poor diet; preventable deaths that shape our entire healthcare crisis. In stark contrast, fatal overdoses from cannabis alone are practically non-existent, and its statistical contribution to mortality pales into absolute insignificance, compared to the slow-killing 'vices' that your culture tolerates.
My country has had a liberal approach to cannabis for ever.
And 25,2% of adults report that they have ever used cannabis.
The US has always been more restricting and is still in many states.
51% of American adults report that they have ever used cannabis.
The US also has the worst drugs problem in the Western world.
What data do you need to convince you that your ideas are not working?
That's because banning things that people want doesn't work.
Making it illegal makes them turn to criminals, who also sell hard drugs.
In The Netherlands people just go to the coffee-shop where they can only
get products that are legal to sell and use. (legal, taxed and regulated)
No one is asking them if they want to try 'something stronger'.
If political and social discussions annoy you, perhaps the problem isn't the forum but your expectations. Not every conversation has to revolve around entertainment and mindless scrolling. Some people actually enjoy exchanging opinions, discussing real-world issues, and exercising their brains. And if that makes the forum seem geriatric, perhaps maturity is being mistaken for old age.
“ Some people actually enjoy exchanging opinions, discussing real-world issues, and exercising their brains.”
Do you ever rip on other countries or do you prefer to tear down the United States? You exchange a good deal of opinions with Ananas2xLekker and i don’t recall hearing him rip on the Netherlands. I compare the U.S.A. to family. Am I always happy with my family? No and I don’t and will not allow or tolerate others to tear them (family) down or insult them because they are my family. I am a moderator on the Nextdoor platform for “my neighborhood” and someone posted the following;
“Happy BLUE WAVE WEEK TO EVERYONE!”
And one lady posted;
“Proud to be an American”
And I responded;
“I am, too, 24/7/365! I WILL ALWAYS BE PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN EVEN WHEN MY POLITICAL AFFILIATION ISNT HOLDING AN OFFICE! “
Are you a proud American? I suspect you are, why not act like it?
Most of the time, though, I’m not well versed enough to have opinions about other countries’s politics. Yes, I know of some of the policies of other countries but I believe that we have enough to fix in this country without borrowing problems.
You say you are not always happy with your family. When you are not, do you sit back or try to fix the reason for the unhappiness?
I have never insulted my country nor have I tried to bring it down. Many people mistake dislike for the current government as being anti American.
If you’ve noticed my exchanges between Ananas and me, then you should have seen that I seldom comment on the dialogue between him and Phart. I do comment when Ananas states a truth about the USA.
And Ananas is right. The average American is under-educated. Most of us have no idea what happens in the rest of the world or in this country, for that matter and how our country is partly responsible for what is happening in their world.
Ananas has the right to his views on America. We are a HUGE influence on what happens in his country and the rest of the world.
I’m glad you are a proud American. I am too, but I am more than just proud. I want to see it be better. Many of the exchanges between Ananas and Phart, Dgraff, and others, occur on your threads, yet, you seldom get involved.
I want socialized medicine. I want better treatment for the unfortunates that are homeless, illegal, or under incarceration. I believe in helping people to have an easier time getting to vote in public elections. I want fair minimum wages. I don’t want for my president to obscenely profit for being the president. I don’t want my country to invade or go to war with other sovereign nations without my Congress saying it’s okay. There’s many more things that I would like to change. Seeing a mother go hungry so she can feed her baby in one of the richest nation in the world is a crime.
But, yeah, I guess I don’t act like I’m a good American.
I have to point out, though. This last election showed that people are tired of what the current administration is doing with their country. And, they too put down what is happening here.
So, if you won’t tolerate others to tear down your “family”, then you’re putting down a HUGE AMOUNT of your family.
And yes, it does feel to be a “personal attack” towards me.
I believe it’s because I posted a response to AngelOfDeath‘s post. Your friend.
It’s okay. Most of my controversial comments occur in my thread. And it’s where Ananas, Phart, and others like to do their POLITICAL commentaries. The same on Tecsan‘s political thread.
Same with Iran and a nuke, we know they are wanting a nuke,we know other enemys are probably selling them materials, why not take premptive action to prevent them from having a nuke? Instead of "oh, no threat right now,they don't have 1 yet" and then wait until they are waving it in our faces to finally then say,"oh we have a problem".
As far as political discussions, there is a little rolly knob on my computer mouse that allows me to scroll past what I don't like or don't want to respond to, I think there are some down right,straight up IDIOTS on this forum,but hey, live and let live. Some like Ananas will at least try to explain their mindset, others like leo,just call people names and jurk off in their coffee.
As far as skipping a chat, I agree. If you don’t like it then pass on it.
"Crossplay games be like"
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Um
only registered users can see external links
I wouldn't call her unrecognizable, but let me quote her:
"If I look older than when you saw me last, it's because I'm older
than when you saw me last."
Perhaps she's simply allowing herself to look like a 68-year-old woman.
Do you have a problem with that?
She is a lesbian who doesn't dress and wear her hair like a woman.
They call themselves "butch", but it's also called "masculine-presenting".
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
PoloFields added a comment on your abuse report: Agreed, we do need an AI policy here, either from admin or the panel to hash one out. It may have to be the latter since I don't know if admin is acting on it. This seems to be a pretty blatant ad for an AI site and seems inappropriate here.
steve3095 added a comment on your abuse report: AI pics and numerous different women in the pics. Appears to be internet pics.
badboy666 added a comment on your abuse report: its about time we learnt to keep it real, AI should not be here
Juchuh02 added a comment on your abuse report: It should be a real site and no KI
DeepThroatThis added a comment on your abuse report: Enough
Again, so odd that 3 of the 5 voters are in agreement to delete an AI profile yet are supporters/friends of the biggest site offender, the creator of the Sophie profile.
--------------------------------------- added after 15 hours
The 3 of you members who support this farce, @Sophie_+_Friends_Only_Universe need to visit my page ro see what a happens when “you” piss off a drunken psychopath! Oooooo, he’s scary!
You are, without question, one of the biggest trolls here, bella!. Small wonder, then, that so many on this site see fit to hunt and ridicule you.
And let it be noted: I have stayed out of your business, while you have done nothing but constantly poke your nose into mine. Granted, previously we were at each other — but since sending my profile underground, I have resisted your consistent taunting within your forum threads, and I have bitten my tongue.
This platform hosts a great many AI profiles, with new ones emerging constantly. Several weeks ago, I made the decision to send my own profile underground. All of my content is now invisible to everyone except those on my friends list. I have ceased public blogging entirely, choosing instead to share thoughts and stories privately — exclusively with those willing to listen, inside a private, locked group.
I made this decision for several reasons, chief among them, though not limited to, the following: admin, whom I affectionately call Boss, admitted to me via private message that my profile had become a profane pain in his ass, with numerous reports landing on his desk daily. Trolls began attacking friends of the profile, and some who might otherwise have engaged with it held back, deterred by all the 💩 surrounding it — and others. Those, however, were the primary ones.
My profile once dominated this site: the main wall, the comments, and countless other corners of it.
These days, apart from a handful of images posted publicly each week — visible for less than 24 hours before vanishing to friends-only — the occasional wall advert every couple of days, and little else, the profile is all but invisible.
Yet here you are, with your 💩, once again.
admin, I would respectfully request your assistance regarding the persistent harassment from member bella!. Would you kindly initiate an administrative blacklisting between member bella! and myself, exactly as you did previously between PITBULL and tecsan? I thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter.
Administrator:
Sophie_+_Friends_Only_Universe
Feel free to razzle and dazzle anyone and everyone who joins you in your world of fantasy. What concerns me is the mindset and the ability of the voting members to be unbiased. Again, they are voting to boot AI profiles while supporting the biggest offender here, YOU!
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
She's talking about jobs at DoorDash and McDonald's, the absolute bottom.
Besides, Yea, I don't want to do business with people with blue hair.
Even if they do EVERYTHING right, the prices of homes are rising faster
than they can ever grow their income. In your youth, everyone could become
a homeowner, now it is only for kids with rich parents, or the few very lucky ones.
The company I work for doesn't look at that. There are some limits; you're not allowed to walk around in your underwear or show Nazi tattoos, but outside of that they only look at your potential. We do business with people who don't mind doing business with people of various stripes. If other companies don't share our values, then we do not care to do business with them.
But they tried. Here in the US and other places, you can produce WAY more kids than you can feed because the idea is let their rich Uncle Sam feed them. that is the root problem. to many people.
"People want high wages, it requires high prices."
WRONG; it requires that more money goes to the people who do the actual work
and less money goes to the people who don't add any value.
Let's find an example where the service of the worker are the direct product,
so you see the best link between price and wages; a basic men's haircut.
(We are talking about workers who work for a boss, not self-employed people)
Average Consumer Price (of a basic men's haircut):
US: $30 to $45 (Plus expected tips 15% to 20% -> total: $36–$54).
NL: €15 to €25 (Roughly $16.50 to $27.50). Tipping is rare and/or only a small token.
Worker Base Wage Floor (of a hairdresser):
US: Often tied to the federal floor $7.25/hr or state floor (e.g., $10–$15/hr).
NL: $16,52 (€14.71) /hr absolute minimum, but legally scaled up based on experience (via the Kappers-CAO (Hairdressers Agreement))
Mandatory Protections (for hairdressers):
US: Zero federal paid sick leave, zero paid vacation, and employer healthcare
is rarely provided.
NL: 8% holiday allowance, 25 days paid vacation, fully paid sick leave,
and mandatory employer pension contributions.
So the price in my country is about HALF, while our wages are up to DOUBLE.
And they have lots of benefits that American hairdressers don't have.
ANOTHER EXAMPLE THEN:
Just a while back we talked about the wages of McDonald's workers.
They make considerably more in the Netherlands, than in the US.
Hourly Wage (Adult 21+):
US: $11.00 to $14.00 / hr (Stuck at $7.25 in states using the federal floor).
NL: $17.10 (€15.22) / hr absolute base (Set by the mandatory Horeca CAO).
Mandatory Benefits & Rights
US: NONE!
NL: 8% holiday allowance bringing it to $18,47 (€16.44) / hr,
25 days paid vacation, fully paid sick leave, built-in pension accumulation,
and strict overtime premiums.
So, that should result in McDonald's being astronomically more expensive
in the Netherlands, RIGHT?
Price of a Big Mac Meal:
US: $9.50 to $12.00 (Varies wildly by state and franchise location).
NL: €9.50 to €11.00 (Roughly $10.40 to $12.00).
(there are no cheap locations in my country, because we are densely populated)
If it is just price vs wages, explain this.
Who covers the cost of all that vacation leave and such? what is the tax rate on those wages?
We have a self-employed hairdresser who comes to us.
She doesn't have a boss skimming her and she doesn't need a salon.
For her, every cent that she adds to the price results in a higher income.
We were talking about employees of a company, that's different.
You are starting another argument; the taxes don't change the costs
for the business.
Your argument was that higher wager MUST result in higher prices.
I just showed you that this is NOT correct.
If the company does a hair cut for 28 bucks in your country,which is less than ours, but yet they get paid for not being at work, that money is coming from somewhere?? WHERE!?????
McDonald's STILL makes profit in my country, and not a little bit either.
So do hair salons, food delivery services, supermarkets, drugstores, internet providers, insurance companies, movie theaters, gym chains, the train, airlines, private educational courses, etc. They all exist in my country, pay better wages, offer better services, and are either more affordable or have similar prices.
We just don't transfer as much money from the average citizen to the wealthy
like you do in the US.
You are assuming corporations use "cost-plus" pricing (blindly adding a fixed profit markup on top of their expenses). They don't. They use value-based pricing, centered entirely on finding the price optimum.
• The Price Optimum Formula: A corporation continuously tests the market to find the exact intersection where Price × Sales Volume yields the absolute maximum total profit. They always charge the maximum price the local market can tolerate before demand collapses.
• The Demand Ceiling Capping Prices: If a company raises prices beyond this optimum just because their internal costs (like wages or rent) went up, they ruin their own demand. A higher price that causes a massive drop in customers results in lower total revenue. Therefore, prices are structurally capped by consumer purchasing power and local competition, not driven upward by a company's internal bills.
• Costs Impact Profit, Not Price: Internal expenses, whether they are wages, taxes, or real estate, dictate the profit margin, not the price tag. When operational costs rise, a company has a choice: accept a slightly lower profit margin to maintain their sales volume, or raise prices and risk destroying demand.
I would not call this 'basic economics', but it all aligns perfectly with standard neoclassical microeconomic theory. It is fully backed by academic economics because it directly operationalizes the foundational principle that firms are profit maximizers operating under demand constraints.
The Ultimate Proof (Recent US Price Cuts): Look at McDonald's recent behavior in the US. After aggressively raising prices for years, they were forced to introduce value menus and slash prices. They didn't do this out of goodwill, and they certainly didn't do it because their labor or supply costs suddenly dropped. They did it because consumers, strained by economic uncertainty, stopped buying. Demand collapsed, forcing McDonald's to lower their prices back down to find the new market optimum.
Public narrative heavily distorts economics into a moral tale of companies just covering their bills. In reality, economic theory demonstrates that corporations are just cold, optimization algorithms. They charge the absolute maximum the market will bear. They will ONLY lower prices if they can make more profit from it, by increasing demand.
so a whopping 5 bucks total. You are telling me there is enough profit for them to pay all those employees for 20+ days off, 18 dollars a hour and all that?
Please show me the math, I would appreciate it.
only registered users can see external links
Those breakfasts cost almost nothing to make. There is like a 75% markup on that. The labor on it is also almost nothing. The secret behind the profit from low-priced meal deals lies in the drinks. Coffee and soft drinks have the highest profit margins in the entire hospitality industry. Coffee has a profit margin that can reach as high as 2,900%.
Companies often uses a cheap breakfast item at an extremely low price as a loss leader. Even if they make barely any profit on that specific article, it is profitable because customers rarely order just that one item; they almost always add a drink, a hash brown, or an extra snack.
It was my girlfriend's birthday, and she received a code from the garden center to pick up a free plant. It’s a lure, really, because once you’re there, you end up having a bite to eat in their restaurant (for $25), buying a few plant pots, some potting soil, some Christmas items, a couple of bags of chips, and so on, and suddenly you’ve spent $150. That’s how they make a profit off a free plant.
All Dutch supermarkets sell bananas at a loss, because they are a traffic-builder:
- Bananas are a price-sensitive product. Customers know roughly what they should cost, so a low banana price makes a supermarket seem cheap.
- They attract customers. Once people come in for cheap bananas, they often buy other products with higher profit margins.
- Bananas are used for price competition. Supermarkets may deliberately accept a small loss to compete with rivals and strengthen their overall price image.
- The loss is compensated elsewhere. The supermarket makes money on products with much higher margins, so losing a few cents per kilo on bananas can be worthwhile.
In short: the supermarket isn't trying to make money on every banana;
it's using cheap bananas to make money on the customer's entire shopping basket.
Don't you know these things? In my country, we have several consumer affairs programmes, who investigate things like this and advice the customer. I watch all of those, and that's how I know how all these commerce tricks.
is a better option than either or all three other options?
The entire goal of working is to be able to afford to live. Right?
When I secured my job at BCBSM I could have been assigned to the mailroom but I wasn’t. I dated a fellow employee who was a garage attendant. At the time he applied for a job at BCBSM, they didn’t have anything open within his field and rather than cutting him loose, they gave him a temporary job in the garage. My guess is that the remuneration was that of an entry engineer, because he stayed in the garage for slightly more than one year before he got THE job he earned his degree in.
There are too many of those 'entry-level jobs' in your country to fill them with just high school kids.
That means that there will be by design many people stuck in jobs that do NOT pay a living wage. Then you have a choice of supporting them with food-aid programs, which means that you are supporting the profits of all those fast food companies with tax-payer dollars, OR you have a huge chuck of your community grow old without any progress in life. They will live in slums, eat garbage, never have kids or have kids grow up on the streets becoming addicts and gangsters, and then die young from poverty related illnesses. Is that Making America Great Again?
If the American people do indeed pull themselves up by their bootstraps, and make it to managers, engineers, accountants, lawyers, dentists, economists, architects, etc, by working 100 hrs/week in their fast-food jobs, to pay for their education, then who will do those jobs that pay shit wages? That will make the owners of McDonald's very sad and they will pay your politicians to open the borders and let in lots of 'dirty' immigrants to do their shit jobs.
only registered users can see external links
When the robots replace all the workers, it just means that ONLY
the wealthy owners make money from giving people obesity,
diabetes and heart disease.
Well, maybe some programmers and maintenance people will have a job.
Those are better jobs, so that's an improvement, but where will all the numbties find a job?
Look around and see how dumb the average person is, then realize
that 50% of them is dumber than that. How are they going to learn
to program AI and maintain robots (if they don't maintain themselves)?
Will the people who cannot manage in the robot economy be the pets
of Elon Musk, or put to work in government funded sheltered workshops,
do they get Universal Basic Income (UBI), or will they just starve?
Oh, well I forgot,people are to LAZY to get educated ,although 1 thru 12 is FREE to all
New Comment Go to top