Tired of ads
on this site?

Become an expert in
pussy licking!
She'll Beg You For More!

Stay Hard as Steel!!!

Get Paid For
Using Social Sites!

QUESTIONABLE STUFF 😵‍💫

Discussion Forum on Show It Off

Page #1

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#110

Started by bella! [Ignore] 13,Aug,23 07:15  other posts
This thread is for questionable content. WHY? Just because! I am someone who enjoys the Hodge Twins. YEP, the Hodge Twins. They probably make the hairs on the back of a WOKE person stand straight up! Anyway.....

New Comment       Rating: -1  


Comments:
By phart [Ignore] 07,Nov,26 16:42 other posts 
only registered users can see external links

Try to tell people it's not good for you,and they still want it, oh well, maybe they see each other stroke out they will slow down using
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 09,Nov,26 04:43 other posts 
People smoke and give themselves cancer, consume (too much) alcohol and destroy their liver, eat way too much saturated fats and clog up their arteries, eat way to much fat and sugar and give themselves diabetes, and eat nowhere near enough plant-based food and starve their bodies of nutrients.
All clear results of behavior. It's human nature to risk health for other benefits.

Meanwhile, cannabis/marijuana edibles in responsible use carry a fraction of the systemic health risks that everyday sugar, tobacco, or alcohol consumption do. Unlike those substances, cannabis is widely used for genuine therapeutic benefits, offering vital relief from chronic pain, anxiety, and sleep disorders, without causing any lung damage.
No substance is completely risk-free, but isolating one risk, while ignoring the massive toll of other use/consumption/behavior is a logical fallacy.

Millions of people die every year from cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases, directly driven by tobacco, alcohol, and poor diet; preventable deaths that shape our entire healthcare crisis. In stark contrast, fatal overdoses from cannabis alone are practically non-existent, and its statistical contribution to mortality pales into absolute insignificance, compared to the slow-killing 'vices' that your culture tolerates.
By quint [Ignore] 09,Nov,26 07:44 other posts  ⤴
Phart.. the fun cop!
By phart [Ignore] 09,Nov,26 10:47 other posts 
Oh,geez, i am sorry you folks have never watched some good people start out with this innocent tobacco alternative and progress to the point of death from stronger stuff. to stop the drug problem, need to start at the root,pot. IF and I do mean a BIG IF, people would stop at 1 or 2 joints,1 or 2 beers, or a couple glasses of wine, it wouldn't hurt much at all of society. But these things are addictive, that is when it starts doing harm.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 09,Nov,26 11:26 other posts 
Even if that were true, banning it is still counterproductive.
My country has had a liberal approach to cannabis for ever.
And 25,2% of adults report that they have ever used cannabis.
The US has always been more restricting and is still in many states.
51% of American adults report that they have ever used cannabis.

The US also has the worst drugs problem in the Western world.
What data do you need to convince you that your ideas are not working?

That's because banning things that people want doesn't work.
Making it illegal makes them turn to criminals, who also sell hard drugs.
In The Netherlands people just go to the coffee-shop where they can only
get products that are legal to sell and use. (legal, taxed and regulated)
No one is asking them if they want to try 'something stronger'.


By Jamie [Ignore] 28,Oct,26 20:03 other posts 
I was on TikTok and all I see Trump. Has anyone seen him..
By AngelofDeath [Ignore] 28,Oct,26 20:57 other posts 
No offense but TikTok is retarded. Most social media is and this site well the forum anyway is kind of turning into the geriatric version of TikTok with all the political and social economic crap some like to constantly discuss. I get it, but it’s annoying.
By bella! [Ignore] 29,Oct,26 00:23 other posts 
I complimented a young lady on her really cute sneakers and she mentioned that she bought them on the TikTok Shop.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 08,Nov,26 14:42 other posts  ⤴
AngelOfDeath
If political and social discussions annoy you, perhaps the problem isn't the forum but your expectations. Not every conversation has to revolve around entertainment and mindless scrolling. Some people actually enjoy exchanging opinions, discussing real-world issues, and exercising their brains. And if that makes the forum seem geriatric, perhaps maturity is being mistaken for old age.
By bella! [Ignore] 09,Nov,26 00:28 other posts 
This is not intended to be a “personal attack” toward you but I do have an analogy and a question for you. The assertion that you made;

“ Some people actually enjoy exchanging opinions, discussing real-world issues, and exercising their brains.”

Do you ever rip on other countries or do you prefer to tear down the United States? You exchange a good deal of opinions with Ananas2xLekker and i don’t recall hearing him rip on the Netherlands. I compare the U.S.A. to family. Am I always happy with my family? No and I don’t and will not allow or tolerate others to tear them (family) down or insult them because they are my family. I am a moderator on the Nextdoor platform for “my neighborhood” and someone posted the following;

“Happy BLUE WAVE WEEK TO EVERYONE!”

And one lady posted;

“Proud to be an American”

And I responded;

“I am, too, 24/7/365! I WILL ALWAYS BE PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN EVEN WHEN MY POLITICAL AFFILIATION ISNT HOLDING AN OFFICE! “

Are you a proud American? I suspect you are, why not act like it?
By CAT52! [Ignore] 09,Nov,26 08:35 other posts 
I try not to rip on other countries unless they do something that affects my country. For instance, I’ve been a supporter and defender of Israel all my life, but right now, I don’t like how Netanyahu has influenced my President to attack another sovereign nation without provocation.
Most of the time, though, I’m not well versed enough to have opinions about other countries’s politics. Yes, I know of some of the policies of other countries but I believe that we have enough to fix in this country without borrowing problems.
You say you are not always happy with your family. When you are not, do you sit back or try to fix the reason for the unhappiness?
I have never insulted my country nor have I tried to bring it down. Many people mistake dislike for the current government as being anti American.
If you’ve noticed my exchanges between Ananas and me, then you should have seen that I seldom comment on the dialogue between him and Phart. I do comment when Ananas states a truth about the USA.
And Ananas is right. The average American is under-educated. Most of us have no idea what happens in the rest of the world or in this country, for that matter and how our country is partly responsible for what is happening in their world.
Ananas has the right to his views on America. We are a HUGE influence on what happens in his country and the rest of the world.
I’m glad you are a proud American. I am too, but I am more than just proud. I want to see it be better. Many of the exchanges between Ananas and Phart, Dgraff, and others, occur on your threads, yet, you seldom get involved.
I want socialized medicine. I want better treatment for the unfortunates that are homeless, illegal, or under incarceration. I believe in helping people to have an easier time getting to vote in public elections. I want fair minimum wages. I don’t want for my president to obscenely profit for being the president. I don’t want my country to invade or go to war with other sovereign nations without my Congress saying it’s okay. There’s many more things that I would like to change. Seeing a mother go hungry so she can feed her baby in one of the richest nation in the world is a crime.
But, yeah, I guess I don’t act like I’m a good American.
I have to point out, though. This last election showed that people are tired of what the current administration is doing with their country. And, they too put down what is happening here.
So, if you won’t tolerate others to tear down your “family”, then you’re putting down a HUGE AMOUNT of your family.
And yes, it does feel to be a “personal attack” towards me.
I believe it’s because I posted a response to AngelOfDeath‘s post. Your friend.
It’s okay. Most of my controversial comments occur in my thread. And it’s where Ananas, Phart, and others like to do their POLITICAL commentaries. The same on Tecsan‘s political thread.
By phart [Ignore] 09,Nov,26 10:52 other posts 
cat, if you went to the dr, and the dr. noticed a lump in your right breast and he mentioned, "we need to get this checked for cancer". Would you do it or say, "oh, it's not bothering me yet,so it's not a threat"?

Same with Iran and a nuke, we know they are wanting a nuke,we know other enemys are probably selling them materials, why not take premptive action to prevent them from having a nuke? Instead of "oh, no threat right now,they don't have 1 yet" and then wait until they are waving it in our faces to finally then say,"oh we have a problem".
As far as political discussions, there is a little rolly knob on my computer mouse that allows me to scroll past what I don't like or don't want to respond to, I think there are some down right,straight up IDIOTS on this forum,but hey, live and let live. Some like Ananas will at least try to explain their mindset, others like leo,just call people names and jurk off in their coffee.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 09,Nov,26 11:17 other posts 
I understand your argument but does that mean one of our declared enemies should build a dirty bomb and detonated it in downtown big city (pick one)? Pre-entive.
As far as skipping a chat, I agree. If you don’t like it then pass on it.


By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 09,Nov,26 04:13 other posts 
Something for the gamers:

"Crossplay games be like"
only registered users can see external links


By phart [Ignore] 08,Nov,26 15:18 other posts 
Well now we know why hitler was so mad at the world, his balls didn't drop!
only registered users can see external links


By phart [Ignore] 04,Nov,26 15:55 other posts 
Why did ellen leave the US?
Um

only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 07,Nov,26 04:53 other posts 
Maybe she fled the rise of fascism, because she is a lesbian.

I wouldn't call her unrecognizable, but let me quote her:
"If I look older than when you saw me last, it's because I'm older
than when you saw me last."

Perhaps she's simply allowing herself to look like a 68-year-old woman.
Do you have a problem with that?
By phart [Ignore] 07,Nov,26 09:18 other posts 
Uh,no, she looks more like a 75 year old MAN.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 08,Nov,26 13:04 other posts 
Not like most 75 year old AMERICAN men.

She is a lesbian who doesn't dress and wear her hair like a woman.
They call themselves "butch", but it's also called "masculine-presenting".


By phart [Ignore] 25,Oct,26 10:18 other posts 
There are some people here that this would fit them good!
only registered users can see external links

By t-rex [Ignore] 25,Oct,26 11:09 other posts 
By whatsupcocks [Ignore] 31,Oct,26 00:34 other posts 


By bella! [Ignore] 29,Oct,26 08:09 other posts 
SEATTLE!? “When you let Democrats run the show…..”

only registered users can see external links
By whatsupcocks [Ignore] 31,Oct,26 00:29 other posts 
100% true.


By bella! [Ignore] 30,Oct,26 07:16 other posts 
This video begins by the content provider saying; “Can you guess which American city he’s describing in this video?”. The content provider doesn’t provide the answer however I read some of the 500 plus comments left. The general consensus believe that the city is Chicago. Is Chicago really this messed up?

only registered users can see external links


By bella! [Ignore] 24,Oct,26 17:10 other posts 
Yesterday I reported a new profile to the Evaluation Panel for review and possible deletion. My report included that the profile was created by a “male” who had posted 60 plus pictures of AI generated CRAP, all women. The report was resolved relatively quickly however I was quite surprised that of the 5 voting members, 3 of them apparently support and are friends of the biggest AI offender of the site, Sophie_+_Friends_Only_Universe. The following verified members voted;

PoloFields added a comment on your abuse report: Agreed, we do need an AI policy here, either from admin or the panel to hash one out. It may have to be the latter since I don't know if admin is acting on it. This seems to be a pretty blatant ad for an AI site and seems inappropriate here.
steve3095 added a comment on your abuse report: AI pics and numerous different women in the pics. Appears to be internet pics.
badboy666 added a comment on your abuse report: its about time we learnt to keep it real, AI should not be here
Juchuh02 added a comment on your abuse report: It should be a real site and no KI
DeepThroatThis added a comment on your abuse report: Enough

Again, so odd that 3 of the 5 voters are in agreement to delete an AI profile yet are supporters/friends of the biggest site offender, the creator of the Sophie profile.
--------------------------------------- added after 15 hours

The 3 of you members who support this farce, @Sophie_+_Friends_Only_Universe need to visit my page ro see what a happens when “you” piss off a drunken psychopath! Oooooo, he’s scary!
Enough Is Enough

You are, without question, one of the biggest trolls here, bella!. Small wonder, then, that so many on this site see fit to hunt and ridicule you.

And let it be noted: I have stayed out of your business, while you have done nothing but constantly poke your nose into mine. Granted, previously we were at each other — but since sending my profile underground, I have resisted your consistent taunting within your forum threads, and I have bitten my tongue.

This platform hosts a great many AI profiles, with new ones emerging constantly. Several weeks ago, I made the decision to send my own profile underground. All of my content is now invisible to everyone except those on my friends list. I have ceased public blogging entirely, choosing instead to share thoughts and stories privately — exclusively with those willing to listen, inside a private, locked group.

I made this decision for several reasons, chief among them, though not limited to, the following: admin, whom I affectionately call Boss, admitted to me via private message that my profile had become a profane pain in his ass, with numerous reports landing on his desk daily. Trolls began attacking friends of the profile, and some who might otherwise have engaged with it held back, deterred by all the 💩 surrounding it — and others. Those, however, were the primary ones.

My profile once dominated this site: the main wall, the comments, and countless other corners of it.

These days, apart from a handful of images posted publicly each week — visible for less than 24 hours before vanishing to friends-only — the occasional wall advert every couple of days, and little else, the profile is all but invisible.

Yet here you are, with your 💩, once again.

admin, I would respectfully request your assistance regarding the persistent harassment from member bella!. Would you kindly initiate an administrative blacklisting between member bella! and myself, exactly as you did previously between PITBULL and tecsan? I thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter.

Administrator:
Sophie_+_Friends_Only_Universe
By bella! [Ignore] 24,Oct,26 19:48 other posts 
You must have relied on AI to compile your assertions, which by the way, are totally untrue (aka total fabrication also known as lies). You and your bull crap are not anything that I allow to enter my mind. I do not, have not, poked anything of mine into any of your “business” UNLESS you are talking about a picture that I made the mistake of sharing and that member modified it to use on their profile. Yep, I demanded that they remove it and when it didn’t happen, I had to reach out to admin for his assistance.

Feel free to razzle and dazzle anyone and everyone who joins you in your world of fantasy. What concerns me is the mindset and the ability of the voting members to be unbiased. Again, they are voting to boot AI profiles while supporting the biggest offender here, YOU!
By bella! [Ignore] 25,Oct,26 08:58 other posts  ⤴
Such a window licker!
By phart [Ignore] 25,Oct,26 09:25 other posts 
Well,to me there should be other websites for the artwork. that way it is welcome there and no static from anyone.


By bella! [Ignore] 24,Oct,26 12:25 other posts 
This guy PROVES that his school board is nothing but a group of hypocrites!

only registered users can see external links


By bella! [Ignore] 30,Sep,26 11:27 other posts 
Unfortunately, this young lady is representative of the way many young people look and think, this the way our world is headed. The content provider says a mouthful.

only registered users can see external links
By phart [Ignore] 30,Sep,26 11:36 other posts 
Yep,he's right, people think they can get a job working to serve the public looking like a circus side show actor. Nope,you need to look and dress professionally if you want a job. Look like freak on your time off, NOT while you are trying to get a job or working a job.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 30,Sep,26 11:47 other posts 
Because she has blue hair? OMG man, we are living in 2026.

She's talking about jobs at DoorDash and McDonald's, the absolute bottom.
By phart [Ignore] 30,Sep,26 15:29 other posts 
You can't see how she acts? acts like she is 5 years old. If you went to her and you ask her to repeat the total price of the food because you couldn't hear her mumble it, she is apt to throw a hissy fit and cry you a river right there at the cash register.
Besides, Yea, I don't want to do business with people with blue hair.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 01,Oct,26 13:00 other posts 
You could have some more empathy towards young people these days.
Even if they do EVERYTHING right, the prices of homes are rising faster
than they can ever grow their income. In your youth, everyone could become
a homeowner, now it is only for kids with rich parents, or the few very lucky ones.

The company I work for doesn't look at that. There are some limits; you're not allowed to walk around in your underwear or show Nazi tattoos, but outside of that they only look at your potential. We do business with people who don't mind doing business with people of various stripes. If other companies don't share our values, then we do not care to do business with them.
By phart [Ignore] 02,Oct,26 00:16 other posts 
I can't help the cost of living. People want high wages, it requires high prices. Demand is way higher than it used to be as well. At least 1 good thing about china, they controlled population growth to prevent overloading their entire "eco" system so to speak. Was it the best idea? Nope.
But they tried. Here in the US and other places, you can produce WAY more kids than you can feed because the idea is let their rich Uncle Sam feed them. that is the root problem. to many people.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 02,Oct,26 04:17 other posts 
"I can't help the cost of living" Yes you can, it's the result of your politics.

"People want high wages, it requires high prices."
WRONG; it requires that more money goes to the people who do the actual work
and less money goes to the people who don't add any value.

Let's find an example where the service of the worker are the direct product,
so you see the best link between price and wages; a basic men's haircut.
(We are talking about workers who work for a boss, not self-employed people)

Average Consumer Price (of a basic men's haircut):
US: $30 to $45 (Plus expected tips 15% to 20% -> total: $36–$54).
NL: €15 to €25 (Roughly $16.50 to $27.50). Tipping is rare and/or only a small token.

Worker Base Wage Floor (of a hairdresser):
US: Often tied to the federal floor $7.25/hr or state floor (e.g., $10–$15/hr).
NL: $16,52 (€14.71) /hr absolute minimum, but legally scaled up based on experience (via the Kappers-CAO (Hairdressers Agreement))

Mandatory Protections (for hairdressers):
US: Zero federal paid sick leave, zero paid vacation, and employer healthcare
is rarely provided.
NL: 8% holiday allowance, 25 days paid vacation, fully paid sick leave,
and mandatory employer pension contributions.

So the price in my country is about HALF, while our wages are up to DOUBLE.
And they have lots of benefits that American hairdressers don't have.

ANOTHER EXAMPLE THEN:

Just a while back we talked about the wages of McDonald's workers.
They make considerably more in the Netherlands, than in the US.

Hourly Wage (Adult 21+):
US: $11.00 to $14.00 / hr (Stuck at $7.25 in states using the federal floor).
NL: $17.10 (€15.22) / hr absolute base (Set by the mandatory Horeca CAO).

Mandatory Benefits & Rights
US: NONE!
NL: 8% holiday allowance bringing it to $18,47 (€16.44) / hr,
25 days paid vacation, fully paid sick leave, built-in pension accumulation,
and strict overtime premiums.

So, that should result in McDonald's being astronomically more expensive
in the Netherlands, RIGHT?

Price of a Big Mac Meal:
US: $9.50 to $12.00 (Varies wildly by state and franchise location).
NL: €9.50 to €11.00 (Roughly $10.40 to $12.00).
(there are no cheap locations in my country, because we are densely populated)

If it is just price vs wages, explain this.
By phart [Ignore] 02,Oct,26 09:55 other posts 
My God,you pay that much for a hair cut? my hair cuts are 12 bucks a pop and I get 2 a year. not trying to impress anyone,not dating,no reason to keep it perfect. I can't imagine paying that much for a hair cut.Wow.
Who covers the cost of all that vacation leave and such? what is the tax rate on those wages?
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 02,Oct,26 10:04 other posts 
It's an AVERAGE. This is what people pay at a hair salon.

We have a self-employed hairdresser who comes to us.
She doesn't have a boss skimming her and she doesn't need a salon.
For her, every cent that she adds to the price results in a higher income.
We were talking about employees of a company, that's different.

You are starting another argument; the taxes don't change the costs
for the business.

Your argument was that higher wager MUST result in higher prices.
I just showed you that this is NOT correct.
By phart [Ignore] 02,Oct,26 14:30 other posts 
I am trying to get you to explain where the money comes from to pay those high wages if the higher wages don't increase operating cost for the company? the money does not drop out of the air,it comes from somewhere.
If the company does a hair cut for 28 bucks in your country,which is less than ours, but yet they get paid for not being at work, that money is coming from somewhere?? WHERE!?????
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 02,Oct,26 19:10 other posts 
OUT OF THEIR PROFITS!!! Isn't that clear?
McDonald's STILL makes profit in my country, and not a little bit either.
So do hair salons, food delivery services, supermarkets, drugstores, internet providers, insurance companies, movie theaters, gym chains, the train, airlines, private educational courses, etc. They all exist in my country, pay better wages, offer better services, and are either more affordable or have similar prices.

We just don't transfer as much money from the average citizen to the wealthy
like you do in the US.

You are assuming corporations use "cost-plus" pricing (blindly adding a fixed profit markup on top of their expenses). They don't. They use value-based pricing, centered entirely on finding the price optimum.

• The Price Optimum Formula: A corporation continuously tests the market to find the exact intersection where Price × Sales Volume yields the absolute maximum total profit. They always charge the maximum price the local market can tolerate before demand collapses.

• The Demand Ceiling Capping Prices: If a company raises prices beyond this optimum just because their internal costs (like wages or rent) went up, they ruin their own demand. A higher price that causes a massive drop in customers results in lower total revenue. Therefore, prices are structurally capped by consumer purchasing power and local competition, not driven upward by a company's internal bills.

• Costs Impact Profit, Not Price: Internal expenses, whether they are wages, taxes, or real estate, dictate the profit margin, not the price tag. When operational costs rise, a company has a choice: accept a slightly lower profit margin to maintain their sales volume, or raise prices and risk destroying demand.

I would not call this 'basic economics', but it all aligns perfectly with standard neoclassical microeconomic theory. It is fully backed by academic economics because it directly operationalizes the foundational principle that firms are profit maximizers operating under demand constraints.

The Ultimate Proof (Recent US Price Cuts): Look at McDonald's recent behavior in the US. After aggressively raising prices for years, they were forced to introduce value menus and slash prices. They didn't do this out of goodwill, and they certainly didn't do it because their labor or supply costs suddenly dropped. They did it because consumers, strained by economic uncertainty, stopped buying. Demand collapsed, forcing McDonald's to lower their prices back down to find the new market optimum.

Public narrative heavily distorts economics into a moral tale of companies just covering their bills. In reality, economic theory demonstrates that corporations are just cold, optimization algorithms. They charge the absolute maximum the market will bear. They will ONLY lower prices if they can make more profit from it, by increasing demand.
By phart [Ignore] 03,Oct,26 00:58 other posts 
Ok, so thursday morning I went to mcdonalds, I bought the 4 dollar breakfast mcmuffin meal. had to pay extra for sweet tea,
so a whopping 5 bucks total. You are telling me there is enough profit for them to pay all those employees for 20+ days off, 18 dollars a hour and all that?
Please show me the math, I would appreciate it.
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 03,Oct,26 17:30 other posts 
Yes, I'm telling you that they still make lots of profit in my country.
Those breakfasts cost almost nothing to make. There is like a 75% markup on that. The labor on it is also almost nothing. The secret behind the profit from low-priced meal deals lies in the drinks. Coffee and soft drinks have the highest profit margins in the entire hospitality industry. Coffee has a profit margin that can reach as high as 2,900%.

Companies often uses a cheap breakfast item at an extremely low price as a loss leader. Even if they make barely any profit on that specific article, it is profitable because customers rarely order just that one item; they almost always add a drink, a hash brown, or an extra snack.

It was my girlfriend's birthday, and she received a code from the garden center to pick up a free plant. It’s a lure, really, because once you’re there, you end up having a bite to eat in their restaurant (for $25), buying a few plant pots, some potting soil, some Christmas items, a couple of bags of chips, and so on, and suddenly you’ve spent $150. That’s how they make a profit off a free plant.

All Dutch supermarkets sell bananas at a loss, because they are a traffic-builder:
- Bananas are a price-sensitive product. Customers know roughly what they should cost, so a low banana price makes a supermarket seem cheap.
- They attract customers. Once people come in for cheap bananas, they often buy other products with higher profit margins.
- Bananas are used for price competition. Supermarkets may deliberately accept a small loss to compete with rivals and strengthen their overall price image.
- The loss is compensated elsewhere. The supermarket makes money on products with much higher margins, so losing a few cents per kilo on bananas can be worthwhile.
In short: the supermarket isn't trying to make money on every banana;
it's using cheap bananas to make money on the customer's entire shopping basket.

Don't you know these things? In my country, we have several consumer affairs programmes, who investigate things like this and advice the customer. I watch all of those, and that's how I know how all these commerce tricks.
By phart [Ignore] 05,Oct,26 17:00 other posts 
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 06,Oct,26 03:41 other posts 
Why do you think that paying all those people NOT a living wage,
is a better option than either or all three other options?
The entire goal of working is to be able to afford to live. Right?
By phart [Ignore] 06,Oct,26 11:58 other posts 
-Fast food jobs are first jobs for high school kids trying to buy their first car or something, they are not meant to be Careers!
By bella! [Ignore] 06,Oct,26 12:22 other posts 
Yes, traditionally jobs at fast food restaurants are something easily obtained by high school KIDS aged 15, 16 and 17 but why do you feel that they are not meant to be careers? One can’t those young kids work their way up that corporate ladder and possibly by a district manager over bunch of restaurants and/or become a franchise owner themselves?

When I secured my job at BCBSM I could have been assigned to the mailroom but I wasn’t. I dated a fellow employee who was a garage attendant. At the time he applied for a job at BCBSM, they didn’t have anything open within his field and rather than cutting him loose, they gave him a temporary job in the garage. My guess is that the remuneration was that of an entry engineer, because he stayed in the garage for slightly more than one year before he got THE job he earned his degree in.
Most poorly educated lower working class people don't make careers.
There are too many of those 'entry-level jobs' in your country to fill them with just high school kids.
That means that there will be by design many people stuck in jobs that do NOT pay a living wage. Then you have a choice of supporting them with food-aid programs, which means that you are supporting the profits of all those fast food companies with tax-payer dollars, OR you have a huge chuck of your community grow old without any progress in life. They will live in slums, eat garbage, never have kids or have kids grow up on the streets becoming addicts and gangsters, and then die young from poverty related illnesses. Is that Making America Great Again?

If the American people do indeed pull themselves up by their bootstraps, and make it to managers, engineers, accountants, lawyers, dentists, economists, architects, etc, by working 100 hrs/week in their fast-food jobs, to pay for their education, then who will do those jobs that pay shit wages? That will make the owners of McDonald's very sad and they will pay your politicians to open the borders and let in lots of 'dirty' immigrants to do their shit jobs.
By bella! [Ignore] 07,Oct,26 22:58 other posts  ⤴
Hey, phart, this is the future of fast food……ROBOTS

only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 08,Oct,26 03:41 other posts 
Is it a good alternative for workers making a living wage from it?
When the robots replace all the workers, it just means that ONLY
the wealthy owners make money from giving people obesity,
diabetes and heart disease.

Well, maybe some programmers and maintenance people will have a job.
Those are better jobs, so that's an improvement, but where will all the numbties find a job?
Look around and see how dumb the average person is, then realize
that 50% of them is dumber than that. How are they going to learn
to program AI and maintain robots (if they don't maintain themselves)?

Will the people who cannot manage in the robot economy be the pets
of Elon Musk, or put to work in government funded sheltered workshops,
do they get Universal Basic Income (UBI), or will they just starve?
By phart [Ignore] 10,Oct,26 12:48 other posts 
Well, maybe being hungry and unemployed will motivate them to get educated.
Oh, well I forgot,people are to LAZY to get educated ,although 1 thru 12 is FREE to all
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 15,Oct,26 11:40 other posts 
And then what? How many educated people will they still need?
By Pawpaw [Ignore] 11,Oct,26 00:16 other posts  ⤴
Who the heck are the Hodge Twins? Seriously! I've never heard of them!
By bella! [Ignore] 24,Oct,26 12:14 other posts 
Hmmmmm……curious that you sent time to rate this thread a (-1) when you should have used those few seconds to Google the Hodge Twins instead. My guess is they probably wonder who the heck you are, too!


New Comment   Go to top

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#110



Show It Off