Male Multiple Orgasm
Discover your full Abilities!

Get Paid For
Using Social Sites!

Tired of ads
on this site?

Laughably Small Penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!

NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III

Discussion Forum on Show It Off

Page #1

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#228

Started by CAT52! [Ignore] 14,May,20 02:51  other posts
NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF. POST WHAT YOU LIKE, ASK WHAT YOU LIKE, LEAVE MSGS HERE. PLEASE BE CIVIL. IF YOU ARE GOING TO BITCH, DO IT WITH SOME CLASS. IF YOU LIKE WHAT'S WRITTEN,COMMENT. IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT YOU SEE, COMMENT. ALL I ASK IS PROOF.

New Comment       Rating: 2  


Comments:
By leopoldij [Ignore] 06,Feb,26 08:08 other posts 
Latest fixations and blackmailings
of the donald.

He wants the Washington’s Dulles International Airport and New York’s Penn Station to be named after him.

If it doesn't happen then he won't release the federal funds required to build a long-delayed tunnel between New York and New Jersey.

only registered users can see external links

He openly says "i have a big ego".

only registered users can see external links

I mean it's so fucked up.
There's never been such a cry baby
megalomaniac thing before.
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes

I HAVE A SUGGESTION.
EVERY TIME YOU ADD A LINK
MAKE SURE TO HAVE VERY
SHORT ROWS IN YOUR TEXT.
HIT RETURN FREQUENTLY.

BECAUSE THE TEXT IS OFTEN
PARTIALLY HIDDEN WHEN LINKS
ARE PRESENT.

PLEASE FOLLOW THIS PRACTICE.

only registered users can see external links
By phart [Ignore] 06,Feb,26 20:54 other posts 
so you have been running into that problem as well? Um,
I don't care what they name after him. It is just a name.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 06,Feb,26 20:59 other posts 
Regarding the line wrapping,
yes.

Regarding your Führer, he's
uniquely megalomaniacal,
even more so than Hitler
or Stalin or Putin
or Lukashenko.
By phart [Ignore] 06,Feb,26 21:18 other posts 
And joe biden was our savior I suppose? Or kamala coulda done better? I shiver at what kind of shape the US would be in right now had she got in. she would have been soro's second puppet in command after obama.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 07,Feb,26 09:49 other posts 
You have dictatorship now.
The whole world sees it and
the US has alienated even its
closest allies. You're currently
under a Hitlerian regime.
I know you love it, and that's
why i call you a fascist.
By phart [Ignore] 07,Feb,26 11:35 other posts 
I don't love it, there are still alot of faults with the way this country is run. but at least someone stepped up to the plate and TRIED to turn the tables before they were shoved off a cliff by democrats.
As far as alienating people. Were they really allies or just rainy day buddys? think about it before you answer
By CAT52! [Ignore] 07,Feb,26 13:47 other posts 
And you truly believe we are better off than a year ago?
By phart [Ignore] 07,Feb,26 14:36 other posts 
I am, aren't you? I don't know anyone right now personally that is having a hard time. Several folks I know got better jobs . 1 of my friends that couldn't rub 2 pennys together 2 years ago, thanks to the better economy is making over 30 a hour with some over time because of the large buildings like amazon warehouses going up, he digs footings and works with concrete, has health insurance and is investing now.

Now tell me just what is so wrong for you, other than family health issues and such not affected or caused by the economy, you are retired, should have investments sending you dividends and interest ,a social security check and retirement check. What is possibly so bad about your economy?
By leopoldij [Ignore] 07,Feb,26 15:04 other posts 
You're deluded.
Even conservative news media,
like CNN, are fed up with the
dictatorship that your dear leader
is building up.
By phart [Ignore] 07,Feb,26 15:26 other posts 
Just being real, and telling what I am experiencing and witnessing. If all you ever do is watch the boob tube the news you will get is what THEY as in liberal owned media wants you to hear and believe.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 07,Feb,26 19:14 other posts 
Listen. There's no way that you
can be convinced about anything.
So I'm not going to engage in
discussion with you because it's
pointless. As pointless as it is
to convince a die hard religionist
about how fake his gods are.
Bye
By phart [Ignore] 07,Feb,26 21:49 other posts 
are you looking into a mirror? Sounds like it.

There is a episode of Star Trek the original you might need to watch sometime on the net.
only registered users can see external links

kinda makes you think for a minute,
Were the folks recorded in history and folk lore as Greek Gods , actually from another place and just so different we accepted them as being superior?
By CAT52! [Ignore] 08,Feb,26 09:49 other posts 
Really? Because my grocery budget doubled in the last year. My meds cost more. My health insurance went up. Unemployment is going up. Inflation is going up. I know of innocent people getting murdered by ICE. And I know of American citizens getting arrested simply for driving down a road.
How would you describe this?
By phart [Ignore] 08,Feb,26 13:19 other posts 
I haven't noticed any of that. My insurance is employer provided so, i didn't notice a increase. my meds are paid for by that insurance, again, didn't see that, only folks interfering and obstructing ICE are getting the lead. so I didn't notice any innocent people being killed. My grocery's, chicken is the only thing I notice has gone up and stayed up, everything else seems to have rollback over the price tag.

Maybe you notice these things because of lifestyle choices, like who you worked for and how long, where you live and etc.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 08,Feb,26 13:42 other posts 
My insurance pays for my meds but t not all. I need to take hormones because I don’t have any women’s plumbing due to a hysterectomy. No insurance covers it. It costs me $525 every 4 months. In 2025 it was $375. It just went up in November. Do you think you can pass this cost through your insurance? And WOODY has to take Oxempic. His co-payment is $998/3months. It went up $228 from last September.
These are not lifetime choices. I like my steaks but now I can’t buy them all the time. You refuse to see that 65% of the people are hurting but, of course, YOUR lifestyle choices, are the way to go.
Most people live like me. In a city
By phart [Ignore] 08,Feb,26 17:12 other posts 
there's half your problem. Supply and demand is different in a city.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 08,Feb,26 17:28 other posts 
That’s BS Phart
By phart [Ignore] 08,Feb,26 19:14 other posts 
no its not. You know we had a snow storm here about a week ago. You know who cleaned off our shelves at the local walmart? People from the large city 25 miles down the road. the citys stores were out of shit and they came out to the country and bought up the shit meant for us. assholes.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 08,Feb,26 19:17 other posts 
If it was the other way around, wouldn’t you have done the same?
By phart [Ignore] 09,Feb,26 08:39 other posts 
Probably wouldn't need to. The only reason I know is because I had to take a neighbor that was just out of the hospital to the store so he could stock up. I watched the weather and had my supplys gathered a week prior. Along my chainsaws fueled and ready and other heavy equipment ready for tree removal or whatever. It is called preparation. Something city slickers don't seem to understand. they depend on the city services and uber and door dash.and when that shit don't work, they go nuts.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 09,Feb,26 12:42 other posts 
You seem to think “city slickers” don’t know how to prepare for a natural disaster. Next time there’s a hurricane heading towards South Florida, come on down and see how Home Depot, Lowe’s and other businesses get depleted and same for grocery stores. All the homes and businesses get borded up and everyone starts to collect sand bags. Gas stations run out of gas and ATMs run out of cash. You don’t have a monopoly on preparedness. And if you don’t believe me than ask people like Cody
By phart [Ignore] 09,Feb,26 14:21 other posts 
Strange how every storm you folks buy new plywood to cover your windows and doors,pack new sand bags. What do you do with your sandbags when the storm pass's? Why not simply stack that plywood in the garage for the next storm? Why deplete resources, the same resources,time and time again? you know there will be another storm.
And haven't folks lost enough cars already to figure out they need to move them to high ground BEFORE the storm?
No one seems to learn anything from past experience. If you sit thru a storm without power for week, you should know when the sun comes back out to go buy a generator and have it ready for the next storm and etc.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 09,Feb,26 15:26 other posts 
Some of us that have the room do store it, but, after being soaked for several days and stored for many years, the go bad. They warp and they desintergrate. Same with sand bags. The plastic bags become brittle and break. Better to use them around the garden.
By phart [Ignore] 09,Feb,26 17:29 other posts 
well, at least you try. it just looks like from what we see up this way that folks have never owned a piece of plywood before the storm and literally storm the stores.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 09,Feb,26 19:42 other posts 
Many of us have metal shutters and/or awnings.
By phart [Ignore] 09,Feb,26 21:11 other posts 
I don't care. I think it will just ANGER a lot of people.
Let him do it. It will make people even more sick of him.

Let him desecrate the White House, Mount Rushmore, the Statue of Liberty,
The Capitol Building, The Supreme Court Building, The Liberty Bell, Independence Hall and the FUCKING AMERICAN FLAG. I want you to be humiliated for voting for that FUCKING DISGRACE OF A MAN, for perpetuity.


By LoboLover93 [Ignore] 09,Feb,26 02:30 other posts 

--------------------------------------- added after 40 seconds


--------------------------------------- added after 77 seconds


--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes




The newest releases
By CAT52! [Ignore] 09,Feb,26 05:07 other posts 
Hot stuff Babe


By CAT52! [Ignore] 08,Feb,26 18:06 other posts 
Well, I found another a..hole. His name is Limpy. I was having a conversation in Tecsan‘s thread where I asked this botched abortion to explain a post and this is what he posted back:

“Since you can't fucking read and since your a fucking Nazi in hiding I suggest you get past the 5th fucking grade.. THe answer is here so stop being a fucking lazy ass'd fucking bitch that you are.. Learn about GDP. GNP, Tarrifs, NATO... And finished the 5th fucking history GED. GOt it? You're lucky you're not here I'd slap all the white off ya ass.
You will stay the fuck away from me. You got that too asshole?”

Well people, do you think he passed a cognitive test? 🤣🤣
--------------------------------------- added after 59 seconds

Haha. By system 08,Feb,26 18:01
You were blacklisted by Limpy
Send Private Reply (start chat if the member is on-line)
--------------------------------------- added after 8 minutes

Here’s more:
I fucking told you to stay the fuck aways from me you nasty ass'd diseased cunt.. This is my last fucking warning /// Shut your fucking hitler supporting jew hating murding
cunt..
You stay your dog shitten rotten brain and attitude and stay the fuck away from me..

If you want to take this personal I'll meet you any fucking time or place.. you got it
By phart [Ignore] 08,Feb,26 19:16 other posts 
The world is full of people we will not be able to get along with.the world will continue to turn.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 08,Feb,26 19:18 other posts 
So true


By Sir-Skittles [Ignore] 07,Feb,26 22:35 other posts 
By CAT52! [Ignore] 08,Feb,26 10:07 other posts 
You lose, dummy.

A person on the sex offender registry but not under active supervision generally has no legal restriction against viewing legal, adult, non-child-exploitation pornography, as restrictions are typically tied to probation/parole conditions. However, federal law prohibits possession of materials depicting unlawful sexual conduct

WOODY NEVER LOST HIS CIVIL RIGHTS. He completed his probation in 2001 which included five years of phycological treatment and evaluation. He has no individual restrictions. His only restriction is location of his domicile and reporting of same.


By leopoldij [Ignore] 01,Feb,26 18:35 other posts 
MELANIA
The Movie
Directed by Brett Ratner
a thug like his supporters.


Melania director Brett Ratner pictured cuddling woman in Epstein files

only registered users can see external links

But we knew that.
9 years ago, six women accused filmmaker Brett Ratner of sexual harassment or misconduct

only registered users can see external links
By phart [Ignore] 01,Feb,26 22:40 other posts 
So why wasn't he convicted 9 years ago?
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 02,Feb,26 10:38 other posts 
For the same reason all those powerful and rich people who were part of that ped0phile sex ring were protected; there is a two-tiered justice system, in which rich and powerful people can get away with almost anything.

Poor person gets caught stealing a wallet -> Could get 1 year in jail.
CEO gets caught stealing a many millions from people's pensions -> The company pays a fine, maybe CEO gets fired, gets to keep his bonus and possibly exits with a golden parachute.
By phart [Ignore] 02,Feb,26 19:23 other posts 
I guess you would like this movie better?
only registered users can see external links

the thought of a first lady that could out shoot me on the target range is kinda cool
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 03,Feb,26 05:03 other posts 
It's funny, good music, and looks hot, but you are fooling yourself that Trump and Melania are 'country folk'. Trump is a white collar criminal from New York, who imported his wife from a Eastern European country, through his best friend, the main villain in the global cabal that abuses children. Epstein was everything that right-wing conspiracy theorists shouted about from the rooftops. Since they never provided any evidence and all their claims turned out to be nonsense, I didn't believe it. But, damn, it turned out to be true, and actually covered-up for a long time by the powerful elites: governments, media, law enforcement, and corporations all turned out to be complicit or actively hiding the truth. And your president was heavily involved in all of it. It wasn't just Epstein, it was also Jean-Luc Brunel, who operated in Trump Tower. He collaborated with or intersected with Trump Model Management in the late 1990s–early 2000s (shared spaces, scouting pipelines, industry overlap). Multiple women accused Brunel of sexual assault and trafficking. He was formally charged in France in 2021 for r@ping of minors and trafficking. Brunel died in 2022 while in pretrial detention (ruled a suicide). Another global ped0phile cabal villain tied to Trump, and another suicide!
Since most of Trump's (former) best friends are implicated, QAnon is now 'vewy qwiet'.

Trump is the quintessential “carpetbagger”, a wealthy, opportunistic Northerner,
who exploits the Southerners. I cannot feel sorry for you, if you are this stupid.
By phart [Ignore] 03,Feb,26 10:01 other posts 
the video was a joke to laugh at,nothing to take serious.
And why during TRumps first term did things improve for the southern people? At least all the communities around here improved. Second term, he is trying to fix the root problems of America,and getting alot of static because he fighting fire with fire.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 03,Feb,26 11:05 other posts 
What did Trump specifically do, first or second term, to improve things for the southern people?

The root problem in America today is the incredible wealth inequality, and he has exacerbated that. He could have fixed some trade problems with targeted tariffs,
I am not against them in general, but the way he used them is so incredibly dumb.
That's the problem with voting for a president who doesn't understand anything.
If he at least would have brought in some experts, it could have turned out OK,
but he brought in inept loyalists, who just do all the stupid shit he tells them to do.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 03,Feb,26 13:30 other posts 
He's trying to fix jack shit.
He's trying not to go to prison.

But let's get back to my posting.
Did I mention the you have the
strategy of diverting as much as
possible, just like your heil Hitler?


MELANIA
SHITY MOVIE
BY A SHITTY DIRECTOR
ABOUT A MAIL BRIDE,
AND ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT

“MELANIA” IS AS VACUOUS AS ITS SUBJECT

only registered users can see external links

😆
By phart [Ignore] 03,Feb,26 15:14 other posts 
Name another man she coulda married that would have gotten her into the White house while still in her prime?
All I am hearing is crickets.
IF Trump curled up and died in the morning, Melania would have a good chance at a place in government simply because of her presence in the White house as first lady.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 05,Feb,26 04:06 other posts 
Why the fuck does she need to be in the White House?
She doesn't even like living there, and almost never is.
Do you ever see her look happy?

With your dumb-ass regime, I give it a good chance that she would get a position
in the government, for that dumb reason alone. Does she have even 1 real skill,
that you can point to, that would actually qualify her for that?

'DEI' for former Eastern European model trophy wives?
By phart [Ignore] 05,Feb,26 08:01 other posts 
What rock are you living under? What woman in her right mind wouldn't want to be the first lady in the white house? the highest position for a wife in the country?
it's a ego thing.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 05,Feb,26 08:18 other posts 
An 'ego thing' to get value passed down from your husband's 'achievement'?
Damn, you're living in the middle ages.

Do you understand the humiliation she suffers from being required to support
her husband, while he has been shown to have payed off a model and a porn-star to hide his sexual indiscretions, while she was pregnant, have to call his perversions "locker room talk", know that his name is the Epstein files many thousands of times, with lots of clear claims that he was cheating on her,
with under@ge girls?

Do you think she needs evidence? She knows who she married, by now.

What rock are you living under, thinking that her 'ego' was boosted in any way?

If you cannot see the question "When will you finally die?" in her eyes,
every time she looks at her husband, you are blind as a bat.

Damn, I would almost go see her movie, if wasn't such a witch herself.
By phart [Ignore] 05,Feb,26 14:02 other posts 
what rock are YOU living under?I tell you what, ask the women you know how many would marry a fellow from overseas for a shot at the white house.

Besides if she hated him as much as you make out like she does, why hasn't she got a divorce yet? that would bring him down to his knees.

I hear crickets.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 05,Feb,26 15:01 other posts 
Women today might want to be in the White House as PRESIDENT.
The type of Melania just wants a wealthy man, who gives her a luxurious life. Some might want to be a first lady like Jackie Kennedy, who was respected by her husband, and got to be First Lady as a position with at least some substance, in a modern way.

Melania is just dragged along as a prop. And from day one, she got disrespected by her husband directly and humiliated by his actions indirectly. Not even the gold-digger tradwife that you make her out to be, has the lack
of agency, to accept this level of humiliation.

Why hasn't she got a divorce yet? Prenups? Fear? Have you seen what happens to people who are disloyal to Trump?

Trump should have kicked the bucket by now, the way his health has been deteriorating. Some doctors only give him a few months. No way that he still has many years. Melania thinks she can wait it out. That time is not worth the risk.
By t-rex [Ignore] 03,Feb,26 14:38 other posts 
I love it 😃
By phart [Ignore] 03,Feb,26 15:21 other posts 
I haven't went to watch it and don't plan to. It doesn't seem to be a movie of any intrest to me.
I can't remember which order they came in,I could research it I guess but I think "Day after Tomorrow" or "The Village" was the last 2 movies I saw in a theater. cost to much and "The Village" took what coulda been a good story and made a mess of it. todays movies are boring,all fake and to much dei and such for my interest. Now if they made movies like "Bullit" or "True Grit" nowadays, I might be interested.
By t-rex [Ignore] 03,Feb,26 15:35 other posts 
I just meant I loved the song and video, but t I get what you are saying
By CAT52! [Ignore] 02,Feb,26 13:12 other posts 
Because The Clown was President then
By leopoldij [Ignore] 03,Feb,26 13:27 other posts 
Exactly.


By #623135 22,Jun,21 10:16
Phart posted
So they are already having issues with charging electric cars?
Sheesh,what about in 5 years? The power company are not permited to build new power plants.Solar and wind are going to be important to keep the grid up. But that didn't work in Texas did it?
They make a lot of energy in Texas,but how many folks died over the winter this past 1?

Angel1227!
So a private, for profit, company did not plan on a hard winter so their production of electricity was not sufficient? And this utility, regulated by the states, failed to meet the demands? This state (Texas) governed by Repukers was not regulated correctly so this company spent less on production and got richer because of it? This sounds very much like a Repuker business idea.
By phart [Ignore] 22,Jun,21 22:13 other posts 
Regulation? Hahaha,look at californicated, that is what happens when you over regulate. No one can trim trees off the lines, the power company has to cut power off in high winds,that is the result of Liberal-democrat regulation. Hug the trees,to hell with the humans.
I fault the power companys in texas to a point but I also fault the citizens for lack of preparedness.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 23,Jun,21 08:10 other posts 
The power companies in Texas are now have trouble providing enough power for air-conditioning. The problem in the winter were not a fluke. It happens again only months later. Prices for power skyrocketed again. Many people again received electric bills for thousands of dollars. Texas' power market is not a good example of 'good' deregulation.

Face it, sometimes you need regulation, especially for basic facilities like power.
By #623135 23,Jun,21 12:19
Did I mention California? Was this the subject of the conversation? This is about Texas and it’s power company. Phart reply to this or open another thread.
By phart [Ignore] 23,Jun,21 12:27 other posts 
I posted a link to a news report about california having issues with electric car charging,
And I then mentioned the issues in texas with electricity.
What everyone is missing here is the fact there is NOT enough electricity being produced to meet CURRENT demand.As Ananas has indicated.So imagine if you will,5-10 years from now,when there is GREATER demand? What a mess we are in for.
Regulation is not the solution. that is how you GOT TO THIS POINT. To many regulations preventing new power plants being built and trying to snuff out coal,a effective energy source.
By #623135 23,Jun,21 16:34
Phart do you think power companies sat down in the 1920’s and said, “We are building for the future so, in 1945, we stop because there’ll be too many regulations to conduct business”?
You think that if they are running short they won’t try to catch up? The regulations you protest are there to protect the people and the environment. But, knowing how you think, fuck that. Let coal continue to pollute. We’ll be dead by the time our grandkids die of poisoned air.
By phart [Ignore] 23,Jun,21 19:40 other posts 
newest nuclear power plant started in 2016.
only registered users can see external links
Only 2 under construction according to this chart.
only registered users can see external links

The US shut down how many? lets see
only registered users can see external links

Now, we shut down 39 and we are building 2. Does that sound like regulations are helping any? 2, there are 50 states. So state regulation is not changing anything where it may be either.
If you want coal gone,you need to have a replacement handy before hand.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 24,Jun,21 02:17 other posts 
Maybe those old reactors have become very dangerous over time and/or they are not as efficient as the new ones.
Nuclear power is not the solution. There are 80 sites in the United States where nuclear waste is stored. Some of it is stored temporary in a location that is not safe long term. The best uranium sites are already running out and it's getting ever more expensive to mine the stuff.

That waste has to be looked after for the next 20,000 to 1M years, before it's safe. Humanity probably kills itself before that or there might be a few survivors that don't know how to keep the waste safe and radiation will finish them off. But who cares, right?

only registered users can see external links

Like nuclear is the only alternative to coal.
By phart [Ignore] 24,Jun,21 09:18 other posts 
Well Ananas, at least we have some common ground, I h@te nuclear and wish people would have enough sense to study other ideas.
I just used nuclear here because MOST tree huggers-liberals,think nuclear is the answer.And it has Ooodles of issues that take Many years to deal with.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 24,Jun,21 12:27 other posts 
Glad we agree

Actually, I even prefer fossil fuels over nuclear, even though I'm a tree hugger-liberal. Nuclear might be a bit better on carbon emissions when the reactor is built, but building new ones creates so much emissions, it takes 20 years to recover.
Another problem is that nuclear reactors take ages to start up and stop again, which is not practical as backup for solar and wind. Fossil fuels are at least needed until we have enough geothermal, hydro (incl. wave), biofuel, biogas, hydrogen, chemical storage (formic acid), thermal energy storage, battery storage and whatever I forgot or they think up next.

Then there is off-course the waste and the risk.
By #623135 24,Jun,21 09:43
Phart,,, only registered users can see external links
By phart [Ignore] 24,Jun,21 11:47 other posts 
qoute "Reducing the overall demand for electricity makes it easier for renewables like solar and wind to fill the gap, and targeted projects can reduce demand on the grid at peak times."

Eh so more electric cars will reduce demand?
I know you are not a engineer,but even you should be able to figure out that can't work.
By #623135 24,Jun,21 12:29
I don't pretend to be an engineer, but, I do know electric vehicles will not burn fossil fuels and pollute. If (and it looks like they are) the local electric companies can't handle the load they will have to upgrade. Eventually they will reach parity. Again, I say to you, if a problem exists, there will have to be an adjustment. Electric companies are allowed by government to be monopolies, but, they can loose it all if they can't provide proper service.
Coal is pretty much done as an industry. Not just because of regulations, but because investors and insurers are now backing away. If we all switch to electric cars soon, there's definitely a challenge to provide that electricity, but the overall power consumption will go down. Electric cars are more efficient. Now, I'm not talking about Tesla's that do 0 to 60 in 2 s and are comparable to a Porsche, but sensible electric cars that are appearing now.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 24,Jun,21 10:57 other posts 
It's nice to see that the world is moving towards new energy solutions, such as electric cars. We can't afford burning fossil fuels any longer. I'm glad to see that everyone agrees on that. Perhaps Saudi Arabia will be unhappy, but that country is a militant dictatorship with
groas violations of human rights, so the US or Europe don't need them as an ally.
By phart [Ignore] 24,Jun,21 11:50 other posts 
Um, who do you think backed the loans for the solar farms around here? Saudi Arabia.
If they can't sell us oil ,they will make their money on interest from loans.
We could afford to use fossil fuels if we could finish our pipelines and drill in otherwise useless lands like up north in alaska where there is nothing but woods.
The alaskan pipeline built long ago,was supposed to be such a wildlife disaster,ha,the animals love it,it is warm near the pipeline.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 24,Jun,21 12:00 other posts 
Glad you agree.
By #623135 24,Jun,21 12:30
Fossil fuels promote pollution. Doesn't that get through your head?
By phart [Ignore] 24,Jun,21 16:47 other posts 
Eh yea,some,but nuclear wipes out MILES of earth for 100's of years. Check out Chernobyl sometime.

California has MILES of coast line,Why are they not looking into this tech?
only registered users can see external links
Instead of wasting all that coast line for half naked people to lay around and spread covid,there could be power plants there!
NO pollution! No noise that is not already there,and erosion control! WOW,
Kansas,could be using wind and solar to help of course.
Another non polluting power source,
only registered users can see external links
By #623135 24,Jun,21 21:05
Every time I think I’ve heard all your dippy theories, you come up with a new one.
By phart [Ignore] 24,Jun,21 22:05 other posts 
Same here! No theorys posted, those are technology's already being tested and shown to work,perhaps just not as efficient as others.
I actually use some old equipment that is electric that was made way back before it was "cool" So I research alternative energy sources and what not for that reason. If I lived near a active stream,you better believe there would be a water wheel turning a old Gm alternator to charge back up batterys.
When I build a green house,yep,I will use geothermal to help with temp control.
By #610414 25,Jun,21 07:37
If I lived next to a moving stream, I, too, would use it for power, however, you would need several deep discharged batteries and a back up energy system in case you deplete your batteries too fast. I would also go upstream a few hundred yards and divert some of the water through pipes to have energy free house water.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 25,Jun,21 12:15 other posts 
Just some old car batteries are better than nothing. It's free energy.
Every bit you can use of it is better than none at all.
That sound very cool. I would love to do some tinkering like that.

Here are some fun do-it-yourself builds on YouTube.
I had seen them before and it made me regret living next to a stationary ditch.
Maybe there are some ideas you can use:
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
By phart [Ignore] 25,Jun,21 13:32 other posts 
the third link i watched the whole thing, very interesting,will get the other 2 tonight.
I DO NOT quite understand the amount of AMPS he is getting from that washing machine motor.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 26,Jun,21 05:46 other posts 
Here they say 600W should be possible. A washing machine motor will use 400 to 1300 watts. They might not be as efficient to generate the same amount, but can still do the job pretty well, as it seams and should be very easy to obtain.

only registered users can see external links
By #623135 28,Jun,21 17:51
Phart
How many Chernobyl’s do you know? One in the states, one in Japan, and one in Russia. Here, in Miami-Dade county, FP&L has been operating the local one over 50 yrs. Same in other cities around the state. And no pollution
By phart [Ignore] 28,Jun,21 18:03 other posts 
3 mile island here in the US. Prompted a nation wide process of adding new cooling systems.1 of my neighbors worked on the crew that went around building it. Made a fortune doing it.

You don't hear about the Mcquire plant here in NC getting to hot but it did a few years ago. The tree huggers were angry because a type of fish was dieing from getting caught in the cooling system water.So they put a screen over the intake. Worked fine for a while. Until the screen clogged up with little fishes.A employee told me about it.

Here is a long list of potential accidents and how to deal with them
only registered users can see external links

Yea,I know,I got dizzy after 10 minutes of readin!

I can't see a coal plant being any where near as dangerous to operate
By #623135 29,Jun,21 08:16
Sometimes it’s not what you can see but what you can’t
So what's your point? Just let any company kill whatever part of nature is in their way, because US companies are completely inadequate in solving any problem ever?
They can't even take in water, without sucking up all the fishes
By #623135 29,Jun,21 09:23
Ananas2xlekker my point is that all companies have a responsibility to protect the environment. People are part of the environment. In this case, the “sucking up of all the fishes” is not because the plant is nuclear. Yes, the reactors do need cooling. Cooling canals and reservoirs are needed. In this case, some knucklehead got the idea to put a screen on the pickup line. Duh, a cheap fuckup because of a cheap fix. Seems to me that an industry that can build nuclear reactors to make electricity should be able to prevent “little fishies” from clogging the intake of cooling water. Spent nuclear fuel rods are a problem. Finding a location to store them safely is still a problem and hopefully it better be resolved soon.

According to the Rainforest Action Network. For decades, climate change has been a global crisis that will impact every single person and living being on this planet. Now, according to the latest UN climate report, we have less than 10 years to cut global emissions in half.

Burning fossil fuels isn’t just bad for the climate, these industries also violate countless fundamental human rights. From frontline communities facing a fossil fuel pipeline on their land to Indigenous people facing fires in the Amazon to worker rights violations on palm oil plantations, the industries fueling climate change are also fueling injustice.

Coal, tar sands, and fracked gas show everything that’s wrong within the fossil fuel industry. These extraction practices are harming people and planet every day, and big banks are fueling this destruction of the planet and negligence of life.

So what’s so bad about coal, tar sands, and fracked gas? Basically everything, from start to the finish these fossil fuels are disastrous. For decades, climate change has been a global crisis that will impact every single person and living being on this planet. Now, according to the latest UN climate report, we have less than 10 years to cut global emissions in half.

Burning fossil fuels isn’t just bad for the climate, these industries also violate countless fundamental human rights. From frontline communities facing a fossil fuel pipeline on their land to Indigenous people facing fires in the Amazon to worker rights violations on palm oil plantations, the industries fueling climate change are also fueling injustice.

Coal, tar sands, and fracked gas show everything that’s wrong within the fossil fuel industry. These extraction practices are harming people and planet every day, and big banks are fueling this destruction of the planet and negligence of life.

So what’s so bad about coal, tar sands, and fracked gas? Basically everything, from start to the finish these fossil fuels are disastrous.

Like I said, “What you don’t see can be more dangerous.”
By phart [Ignore] 29,Jun,21 10:33 other posts 
only registered users can see external links

only registered users can see external links

chernobyl didn just happen and stop.It is still happening today.

Smog will go away at some point.
coal smoke can be filtered.Try filtering radiaton.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 29,Jun,21 13:39 other posts 
Managing the Chernobyl disaster has probably already cost more energy than several nuclear reactors will produce in their lifetime. The exclusion zone of Chernobyl; 2600 km², if filled with solar panels, would produce 234 TWh/year. That's about twice the whole electricity consumption of The Netherlands.

So we only would need half that exclusion zone filled with solar panels
and that would cost about 78 Billion Euro's. That would raise our national debt from 56.3% of GDP to 66.2% of GDP.
Jobs for all our unemployed people will pull that debt down soon enough.
By #623135 30,Jun,21 08:42
You forget that the disaster in Chernobyl happened to a nuclear electric plant that would never be built in the US. According to the Atomic Energy Commission, this type of reactor was ver vulnerable to the disaster. The USSR didn’t care. Like the Chinese, they wanted results.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 30,Jun,21 09:54 other posts 
How about Fukushima?
Accidents happen. Even if the chance is 1:1M (historically proven it's much higher), when you multiply that risk by the number of nuclear power plants required, something catastrophic will happen at some point. Such catastrophes could cost more than the complete energy transition.
That's not worth it, because nuclear power is only a temporary solution, because the uranium will run out at some point. It's already becoming more and more expensive to mine the stuff.

Even if all those problems didn't exist, it still takes 10 years before any nuclear power plant has compensates his own build. But it first takes 10 years to build any. Then after 20 years, they are just as CO2 effecient as wind and solar. That's too late. We need to lower CO2 emissions ASAP.

Anyone with some money to spare can invest in their own solar panels,
lower their costs and be less dependent on power companies.
It's nice to have air-conditioning in a heat wave, when the government
is telling you not to use power or you can't afford it when power companies are charging you 100x the normal rate.

only registered users can see external links
By #623135 30,Jun,21 10:08
Fukushima’s disaster included the meltdown but IT WAS THE SUNAMI THAT CAUSED IT AND MOST OF THE DEVASTATION of that city. Last I’ve checked there are no dinamices happening in Kansas. I will give you this one. In Californicate state they’ve built one on the fault line. Engineer had too much Blow.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 30,Jun,21 11:06 other posts 
Isn't Kansas part of Tornado Alley?
There are al sorts of natural disasters, but it can also be a terrorist attack or a hacker or just basic human error.
By #623135 30,Jun,21 11:21
Yes, it is but you can’t compare a wind storm, even a tornado, to a sunami. Our nuclear plant in Turkey Point went through several hurricanes . Hurricanes produce tornados inside the storm. Hurricane Andrews destroyed large swaths out of the county. Huge communities disappeared. The Turkey Point plan took it in stride.
BTW, instead of Kansas I could have picked West Virginia
--------------------------------------- added after 4 minutes

As far as anything else, we have to trust security will prevail. Every thing is a crapshoot. Hopefully we don’t roll snake eyes,
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 30,Jun,21 12:54 other posts 
Or just choose all the many alternatives and don't build any new nuclear power plants. Why are you such a proponent of nuclear energy? What do you consider the advantage over truly sustainable energy technologies?
By #623135 30,Jun,21 13:30
Except for solar energies nuclear is the most reliable. I guess I’m like a Trump supporter but with nuclear capability--------------------------------------- added after 11

only registered users can see external links
I was talking to phart.
I also don't like nuclear energy and my arguments are in line with the science on climate change. That uranium has to be mined, which also emits CO2.
A nuclear power plant takes a lot of energy to be built and maintained.
Then afterwards we have to keep the waste safe for the next 20,000 years.
On the short term nuclear is about as energy/CO2 efficient as wind power and even less than solar. In the long term nuclear has a horrible energy/CO2 efficiency, because keeping the waste safe also costs energy. Also, building nuclear power plants takes a long time and lots of materials. It takes about 10 years before a nuclear power plant compensates his own build. That's about 1-1.5 years for wind energy and 2 years for solar. However solar is cheaper
on maintenance.

Other than that, I agree with most of what you said.

All energy technology costs money, materials, energy and land to build and maintain. All energy technology has downsides like pollution, mineral shortages, exploitation of people and CO2 emissions. We just need to stop with the worst energy technologies first and expand on the best ones the most.

It doesn't require completely changing our life or have impact on the quality of our life. However climate change already impacts our life and it will only get worse. We can either choose to accept some changes now and prevent total catastrophe later or we can deny the truth until catastrophe proves us wrong.
By #623135 29,Jun,21 15:43
I wish we went back to the pre 1860’s. We really don’t need electricity. Natural gas was good enough to live and we don’t need TV or cars.


New Comment   Go to top

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#228



Show It Off