Page #5
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#220
New Comment Rating: 3 Similar topics: 1.STUFF, JUST STUFF 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.A Forum Topic 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF,, ANY STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
CAT52! You racist bitch, nasty old saggy granny. I know you are a coward and will never unbaned me.
only registered users can see external links
They have found clear evidence of election machine tampering, resulting in
a 7% favorability towards Trump versus hand counting.
Their statistical analysis shows that this is enough to flip the election to Trump.
They are moving forward with 2 litigation cases with evidence of vote manipulation
from actual on the ground investigation.
I think he's right.
I had to read about this from yet another link found with google as there is no reputable site talking about it and the link Ananas posted wanted to put a bunch of cookies on my computer
only registered users can see external links
Heres what I can say to it. i voted early, about a week and a half early. and i have pretty good eyesite, and the place was PACKED and I was able to see about 7 different peoples votes as they just held their cards in their drooped hands as I did. and all 7 were for Trump,because i could see the marks. and several of those 7 were women. I don't see any room for fraud because there was volunteers from both partys on hand to supervise the voting and watch as you put your vote in the machine and you yourself could see it clic 1 mor vote as the card was read.
Your side was believing Mike Lindell, who didn't show any evidence for weeks,
and when he finally did show something, it wasn't actually showing anything.
It was a complete "trust me bro", from start to finish.
Election Truth Alliance STARTS with the evidence.
If the fraud is built in to the voting computers, like your own side accused Dominion of doing, then you would not see any fraud. The only way to detect it, is seeing a difference between exit polls and vote counts or a difference between hand counts and electronic vote counts. You would also see a discrepancy between voter turnout and vote share. That's the exact claim they are making. Your side just investigated the wrong machines.
The machines are verified, but they can be programmed to understand the difference between verification actions and real voting actions, and only apply their meddling during the real use. Read about 'dieselgate' to understand how that works.
Trump got 60 court cases, to prove his claims about voter fraud. He didn't provide
any concrete evidence and lost. Let these guys show their evidence and we will see
if it sticks.
I'm not ready to get my hopes up. I'm even doubting if it would make any difference,
if they prove voter fraud in court, beyond a reasonable doubt. It would just go up to
the Supreme Court and they are by majority pawns of Trump.
of the Election Truth Alliance.
only registered users can see external links
Make up your own mind.
When 'the radical left' makes a claim, they are providing evidence, telling people
where to get the raw data, and how to do the statistical analysis yourself.
They even provided a course for the people who don't know anything about
how elections work. only registered users can see external links
Still, phart, in his lifelong endeavour to deify his Dear Leader, will doggedly deny, deny, deny.
the electoral collage, them doing more gerrymandering, purging voter rolls,
shutting down polling places and having Elon literally buy registrations and
give prizes to only MAGA voters. At what point are you still supporting the idea
that democracy is about the vote of the majority?
Can evidence make you believe otherwise?
where was all this anger in the 2020 election?
And I wouldn't piss on Pillow man if he was on fire. He kept hollaring he had evidence and never showed it. don't trust him.
Please read about Peter Thiel's vision for the future. It is fucking scary.
Some of these tech bros are completely mad. And this guy is co-founder
and owns a big chuck of Palantir, a very scary company. There is no more
a 'deep state' asshole, running a 'deep state' company, than this guy.
And you want his protegee to run your country?
He is everything you people have fear-mongered about FOR DECADES.
everyone involved should go to jail.
If you think that people will elect JD Vance then, you are crazy.
He SAID he had evidence, but he never showed it, because it was a LIE.
Trump's claims were based on that lie and you believe(d) that.
Some folks like Ananas want a 1 world government. and when the US doesn't vote like they want it to, it upsets their apple cart.
If europe was such a great place, why did the Pilgrams come here? Why did my german ancestors struggle to get over here in the late 1700's? There had to be some really serious issues over there or the US would still belong to the Natives and i wouldn't be born because my german ancestors would have never met my Cherakee ancestors .
I DON'T. Stop STRAW-MANNING me!
It is quite simple really.
If governments operated as you wish them to, all governments would be the same eventually and consolidation would be the next natural flow of things as people like yourself would look at how inefficient it is to have so many people doing the same job using the same laws and same operating procedures . putting resources towards 1 central government for a smaller more efficient machine, thus 1 government ruling the world. if you look at your theorys on how things should work, that would be the final stage. think .
Humanity needs it, or it destroys itself.
I don't like a "central government" at all.
Socialists want PEOPLE in power, not the government and definitely not
a CENTRAL government.
My Socialist Party is the most grass roots party IN THE WORLD.
The members have power from the bottom up. There are people in the top of the organization, but they all exist in their position at the behest of the members. There isn't someone like Chuck Schumer, who has a 17% approval rating,
in my party. He would have been voted out long ago.
That's a decentralized structure for just our party, but we support that structure for every organization outside our party too.
After we have discussed so much, just still don't understand even the smallest bit about my/our principles and goals. That's really sad.
This is our international page. Where do we say we want a centralized government?
only registered users can see external links
Yea, right, the place would sink like a rock.
And you would constantly fight greed, same as with capitalism or communism. there will always be those that are greedy.
It would never work well.
people usually are not jacks of all trades. work at walmart during the day, determine the proper route for a water system and acquire right of way by night. or work at mc donalds and then determine which tank and which airplane the country needs to buy for defense by night.
It is best for those people to be able to vote for representives to do their work for them.
People who are involved in the process, talk with each other about the problems they are facing, understand the causes, and think of solutions.
"the average Susy or Johny come lately that works at walmart"
Yes, them too. When they are involved, they can understand more than you think.
Are they not allowed to vote in your country?
You think they are too dumb to be involved in power, but you don't think
that they are too dumb to VOTE? How do those dumb people understand
who represents them then?
How are they not just voting for the most effective LIARS?
I want them to be INVOLVED, so they won't make the ignorant choices
that they are making now.
They are NOT voting for representatives who work for them.
They are voting for LIARS, who are screwing them.
Do you think that the Republicans and Democrats are actually representing
the "average Susy or Johnny come lately"? OMG!
Will you?
I will also protect that right for people I disagree with. Will you?
If you don't protect your democracy and you throw away your freedom,
it doesn't just affect me, or you, it might destroy the whole of humanity,
because the US is the most powerful country in the world.
That's MY business too, I'm part of that humanity.
Do you understand how much people sacrificed, to give you that vote?
Poor, exploited people, all over the world, suffered and died for that right.
Then they finally found some wise people, who put their right into law and created a system to protect their right; The Constitution, and a government that was designed in a way to to protect and defend it. You, as a voter, have the responsibility towards those people, to use your vote well, and to consider its effects, on ALL the people.
When you have a choice between Biden and Trump, you vote for the lesser EVIL.
You vote for the one who respects your vote, to vote again, for better options.
Biden was in no way a threat to democracy, Trump IS, and his supporters LIKE it.
Biden didn't do enough to save humanity, but Trump is speeding up the destruction.
Yes, it's your choice, but I'm angry that you don't understand that you have a RESPONSIBILITY to at least fucking INFORM YOURSELF.
My vote doesn't affect you. If my country goes NAZI, one big nuke cures that.
If your country goes NAZI, we are ALL FUCKED!!!
Hey, Cody8789, do you have an answer?
Do you think that it's OK to say what you said, and then just bugger off?
I have come to expect more from you. Was I wrong?
These are the people who always shouted about The Constitution the loudest.
Now they happily vote for people who tell them that their life is worth nothing.
Can you explain their thinking to me? You live among these numbskulls.
Trump is not only telling me that my life is worth alot and that my country is worth far more and is working to make America FIRST and is doing everything he can to protect AMERICA, if it makes others mad, fuck em,
this is the kind of shit that makes your side of things more dispicable.
only registered users can see external links
until someone brain washed people into thinking they had some".
You are calling your founding fathers "someone brain washed people".
You want to reject the one most important idea that makes us human,
the ability to make moral choices. The invention of human rights is one
of the most important moral choices that humanity ever made.
It's a moral choice that Christianity never accomplished.
Still, all religions propose an idea of "Universal Human Dignity".
It looks to me that you even reject that.
When did Trump say anything like that your life is worth a lot?
I'm not asking about your value to the economy or to him,
but just your value as a sentient being with hopes and dreams,
and him recognizing that every human being has that value.
I know he values your loyalty, but stand up to his demand for loyalty once
and you are worth less than a cockroach to him. Tell me I'm wrong.
no you got that wrong. there were no rights until someone brain washed people into thinking they had some. then wrote down their liberal wet dreams on paper.
of course they inserted some things in there good. but most of it,is entitlements, not RIGHTS , to me there is a difference.
That's what they hired the Cyber Ninjas for, and they said there was no evidence.
--------------------------------------- added after 450 hours
When you NEVER have a serious answer to ANYTHING,
why should anyone listen to you?
plaintiffs
v.
CAT52!,
defendant.
_____________________/
...................COMPLAINT............................
This Court declares all he statements in this document are true based on the evidence of the case.
COUNT I. DESTROYING CASE EVIDENCE
1. The defendant destroyed case evidence.
2. Defendant destroyed evidence on the case of LisaVegas, who was charged with Violation of the Clean Page Act.
3. The defendant, CAT52! deleted all negative gifts from LisaVega's page without any authorization from this Court.
COUNT II. LYING ABOUT HER AGE
1. The defendant claims she is 77 years old.
2. Several investigations have confirmed that the defendant is 80 years old and not 77 years old.
COUNT III. POSTING FAKE PICTURES
1. Defendant continues to post fake pictures on this site.
2. The evidence shows she posted a fake picture of her vagina on the front page of this site with the intent to attract more men to her page.
3. She posted a photoshopped picture to enhance a bigger vagina with fewer wrinkles and more pubic hair.
Judge RuFino; Ms. CAT52! I see you haven't learned anything from your impeachment. You are still violating rules, and your conduct here is outrageous. I suggest cleaning up your act to avoid more charges to your record. I found you guilty of the above charges. You will be on probation for 30 days.
10/17/25
—————————————————————-
This is by that Chihuahua, Pitbull posted in his trash SITO COURT thread. Except for the first part where he tells about my “destroying evidence”, everything else is false. Even his sidekick, Sir-Skittles, knows that.
🤣😈
Eat ass hairs Saggy!
only registered users can see external links
It did create all the problems that everyone predicted.
I agree, independence is a good thing, so is COOPERATION.
The UK had a big voice in the EU. Now they are getting screwed.
That has created economic problems, resulting in poverty and crime.
My Socialist Party is a not in favor of leaving the EU, they are often classified as
'Soft Eurosceptic' or critical rather than outright oppositionist. That is, they see the EU
as having positive potential, but believe that its structure, powers, budget, and priorities need significant reform to ensure it serves people rather than big business.
🤣🤣
I guess getting part of it cut off would cause mental issues
--------------------------------------- added after 50 seconds
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Ok, douchebag, you got your one punch, now go back to sucking your boyfriend’s cock and stay out of my way.
only registered users can see external links
She is very right. She justifies her sentences fully.
What is this about?
The quote “she has no memory that she was at the party, should we trust that she remembers the assault?”—was made by trump during a campaign rally in Southaven, Mississippi, on October 2, 2018. He was mocking Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who had testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee that she was sexually assaulted by then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh at a high school party in the early 1980s.
In his speech, trump imitated Ford's testimony, saying,
“How did you get home? 'I don't remember.' How did you get there? 'I don't remember.'”
He used Ford's inability to recall certain details of the alleged assault to question her credibility, despite her clear recollection of the core event.
Experts in trauma and memory later criticized Trump's comments, explaining that trauma victims often remember the central details of distressing events but may forget peripheral ones due to how the brain processes traumatic experiences.
trump's remarks were widely condemned by Democrats and some Republicans, who viewed them as inappropriate and harmful to survivors of sexual assault. However, his comments were applauded by many of his supporters, reflecting the deep polarization surrounding the Kavanaugh confirmation process.
There is no excuse for trump's misogyny, cruelty, and refusal of sexual assault. Lady Gaga explains that very nicely.
The conclusion is that the maga are willing to ignore sexual assault and human rights. They say "it does not matter."
Chances are had he not been picked for the job, no one would have heard about the "assault", causing alot of people ,including myself, to wonder if there was 1.
You just can not fathom the world is not perfect and not everyone is "good" by nature. The liberal media,democrats used this womans testimony to try to topple a fellow from rising to a position in the courts because they didn't like him. Had he been a liberal you would have never heard about this at all.
Back in that time frame, drugs, sex, drinking were common, and still are.
But for some reason you can't comprehend the woman got drunk, let a guy feel her up and such, and it was normal behavior. people get drunk and get loose. but no,the media and such made it look like she was a saint that was on break from babysitting when a evil man came along and touched her.
BUT HOW many years has it been? WHERE is the PROOF?? A word is not enough to imprison a man. even our justice system ask for proof beyond a shadow of a doubt. that is why so many crooks get off as it is now. But anyone can claim ---- 20-30 years after a encounter. No evidence to be had. UNless you are monica lewinsky.
only registered users can see external links
What are the odds of being falsely accused?
False allegations are widespread in the United States. A national survey sponsored by the Center for Prosecutor Integrity found that 8% of Americans — 11% of men and 6% of women — report being falsely accused of sexual assault, domestic violence, or child abuse. The 8% figure represents 20.4 million adults (2).
thats a large enough number of people to make me wary of someone conveniently hollering ra-- when someone they don't like is getting a promotion or something.
Another google result
Why do people make false allegations of abuse?
Jealousy, Revenge, Mental Issues or just to gain Sympathy and Attention are the most common reasons of false allegations of sexual assault. Just because something is rare doesn't mean it cannot happen to you. Check back to the times something rare has happened to you and not someone else.Apr 10, 2021
How to beat false accusations in court?
How to Defend Yourself Against False Accusations
Stay Calm. ...
Hire an Attorney to Help You Fight Back. ...
Gather Evidence. ...
Challenge the Accuser's Credibility. ...
Find Your Own Witnesses and Present Evidence of Your Side of the Story. ...
Develop a Strategy in Criminal Defense Cases.
I know Leo, I could show you evidence that we have a moon orbiting Earth and you would say it's just a chunk of cheese but anyway, at least i tried to explain it. you have access to google as well, why not trying using it? you have the technology
--------------------------------------- added after 36 seconds
Data from the ****, Abuse & **** National Network (RAINN) illustrates the high rate of case attrition, or dismissal, within the criminal justice system.
For every 1,000 sexual assaults, only 50 reports lead to an arrest.
Of the arrested cases, only 28 lead to a felony conviction, and only 25 result in incarceration.
Research into child sexual abuse cases shows a similarly high rate of dismissal:
A 1995 study published in PubMed found that of 77 felony complaints initiated for child sexual abuse, 38% ended in dismissals or not-guilty verdicts.
A 2023 briefing from the Ballard Brief found that 67% of cases involving Native American women were dismissed.
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
The determination that a sexual assault report is false can only be made if the evidence establishes that no crime was completed or attempted. This evidence will only be available after a thorough investigation, not after only a preliminary investigation or initial interview with the victim.
When methodologically rigorous research is conducted based on this definition, estimates for the percentage of false reports converge around 2-8%.
For example, Dr. David Lisak and colleagues analyzed sexual assaults reported to a major Northeastern university over a 10-year period to determine the rate of false reporting. Of the 136 reports taken during that period of time, 8 reports, or 5.9% were found to be false (Lisak, Gardinier, Nicksa, & Cote, 2010).
In a study of sexual assault cases reported to the Los Angeles Police Department in 2008, researchers found that rate of false reports was 4.5% (Spohn, White, & Tellis, 2014).
In a multi-site study of 8 US communities involved in the “Making a Difference” (MAD) Project conducted by EVAWI, data were collected by law enforcement agencies for all sexual assault reports received in an 18-24 month period. Of the 2,059 cases that were included in the study, 140 (7%) were classified as false.
Statistics even appear to converge internationally. In an analysis of 2,643 sexual assault cases reported to British police, 8% were classified by the police department as false reports. Yet when researchers applied the official criteria for establishing a false allegation, this figure dropped to 2%. These criteria specified that there must be either “a clear and credible admission by the complainant” or “strong evidential grounds” (Kelly, Lovett, & Regan, 2005).
In reality, no one knows – and in fact no one can possibly know – exactly how many sexual assault reports are false. However, estimates narrow to the range of 2-8% when they are based on rigorous research of case classifications using specific criteria and incorporating various protections of the reliability and validity of the research.
--------------------------------------- added after 8 minutes
IN OTHER WORDS, IF LESS THAN 8% OF THE CASES ARE FALSE, THAN THAT MEANS THAT MORE THAN 92% ARE TRUE. You, Phart, think someone might accuse you of being a pervert if you interact with another person. So don’t interact. Live a lonely life. You are safe. Win-win for everyone.
New Comment Go to top