Page #206
Pages: #1... #201 #202 #203 #204 #205 #206 #207 #208 #209 #210 ...#778
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.A Forum Topic 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
So much for YouTube's guidelines
To give credit where it is due, I doubt 75% of the liberal population supports the subject matter of the video,1ncest and p@filia, how ever you spell it .BUT when they made sure that other fringe segments of the population had their rights put above the average citizen they set a precedent.
Ok, so they allowed gay marriage, ok they are allowing pot. Ok they are not ticketing jay walkers in california, and etc.
So the train is picking up speed. and there is no one at the controls.
I would say at the rate this subject has been coming up lately, with in 10 years ped0 and 1ncest will be acceptable, condoned and or decriminalized by the majority. Not that it is right ,not that it should happen. But with all the other taboo things that have been changed because of liberal interpretation of the laws, the folks that disagree will not have a leg to stand on to protest. It can be shown that all the other things considered taboo are now ok,so why not these subjects? It is a runaway train, and you can thank liberal thinkers.
only a male and female acting together can create a child.
All the duct tape and surgery in the world cant change that.
The mind of those people AS YOU HAVE ADMITED is altered to a point they claim to be disabled.
So are you saying p3do's and inc3sters are alien beings? No, they are sadly humans and it is not legal to drag their ass's out behind the barn and burn them for the vermin they are.
But when i say something like that, a person like Anassas, will step up and say that their lives matter and they have rights.
Don't you see the issue here?
Allowances have been made for to many things that were not "normal" and the train is picking up speed.
P@do's and 1ncesters will be considered equals and have more rights than YOU in 10 years.
What will be the next hurdle? murder being legal? meth being sold at Walmart? The train is a rollin' down the track and there is NO engineer.
And being a p3dophile is a mental disorder and not punishable by itself.
Only acting on that mental disorder is punishable.
I do think there should be some loss of rights to deny treatment for it.
Furthermore, I assume everyone considers inc€sters to be inseparable of child abuse, but it is also a term for sex between ADULT relatives. I don't really understand what the American laws says about that, but it's legal in The Netherlands. Everyone considers it to be creepy as hell, but it would not be of concern to the law. In The Netherlands, every consenting adult can have sex with any other consenting adult.
The speech of Matt Walsh resulted in attacks on a children's hospital.
I am principally consistent in saying 'ban YouTube channels who misuse free speech'.
This horrible idiot is misusing free speech and should be permanently banned.
So should Matt Walsh and if any leftists or liberals would similarly violate reasonable Terms of Service, or the law (like Alex Jones did), I would not protest that.
Then I heard the name of the channel "The Purpose with Josiah G. Mizukami".
When someone has the name 'Josiah', I expect he's religious.
Turns out my hunch is true; he is a religious wingnut. 'The Purpose' is a Youtube series, "which can be accurately recognized as the true word of God."
So don't you dare accuse liberals for this filth. This is religious extremism.
And if YouTube didn't block this fucker, it's because of 'religious freedom'.
I stopped watching at 2 minutes. Fuck the rest of that video and whatever it says.
If you or that video is accusing liberals over this religious ass-wipe, shame on you!
He's probably of Japanese descent too, because of his last name.
It would be 'profiling', if I concluded anything on his name alone.
I did not say what I said just because of his name. The hunch was fully confirmed. Google him and see for yourself.
only registered users can see external links
"Producer of The True Messiah of Earth, The Water Bearer of the age of Aquarius, The Righteous King of Judea, Judah and Israel and The True God in human form."
Or look at his YouTube channel (without giving him any views)
only registered users can see external links
And are you offended by my 'profiling' more than phart connecting p3dophilia
and 1ncest to a web of liberals? Is that not 'profiling'? Actually it's demonizing.
Ok,tell me ,who would be first to jump on the bandwagon to make sure this "man's" rights were not violated?
A liberal or group there of.
to a liberal ,Republicans and conservative's have no rights but let a jack ass like this guy get under the microscope and the democrats and liberals come slithering out of the wood works to make sure he is "treated fairly and his rights are not violated".
It is NOT unfair treatment or violating his rights to force him to obey the law.
I think YOU are the one thinking that any restriction of his 'free speech' would be unfair treatment or violating his rights.
Republicans and conservatives have the same TOS and laws as 'the libs',
but right-wingers just violate them constantly with incitement, defamation, fraud, obscenity, child pornography, fighting words and threats. Libs don't do that.
He should be treated the same as all the Republicans and conservatives who's videos were deleted or got banned for TOS violations or violations of the law.
I would say 'be treated the same as liberals and lefties', but that would be unfair treatment and violating his rights, because right-wingers get much more leeway. Lefties get banned over discrediting misinformation of right-wingers with facts and logic, while those right-wingers get a pass to keep posting that misinformation.
Him saying that "pe.do.phila like in.cest is completely righteous" is encouraging breaking the law. That's why he should be banned, at least temporarily and have that video deleted. And if he does it again, sanctions should be increasingly strict.
The right of 'free speech' is limited, by law. Banning his speech would not be 'violating his rights', because people don't have the right to break the law.
It's right-wingers who struggle with that concept, not liberals.
What thinking of yours applies to liberals on the subject of that guy.
dgraff
marko_k
mr_blue and
coyote7666
THANK YOU, gentlemen!
Hey, what did your better half prepare for your breakfast this morning?
--------------------------------------- added after 4 minutes
Who knows maybe i will make breakfast for her this morning nothing says love like snotty dippy eggs and greasy limp bacon 🥓
As far as "snotty dippy eggs and greasy limp bacon", I'm getting ready to hurl! Uh-oh, here it comes now.....
Me, I like both but I must say that I prefer a horse racetrack over cars. Cars are loud and I like betting on the ponies.....
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
I have never before seen this message trying to verify a member here. Does anyone here know what's this means?
This is the warning admin has; In case if it's discovered that verified member is actually a fake, all members who verified this member get their verified status revoked, their ability to verify permanently blocked and all verifications given by them in past to other members are also revoked which may cause further "chain reaction".
--------------------------------------- added after 6 minutes
I get many members aproach me to get verified, but I don't, and I tell them they need to get to know everyone better as they get to know you better and after a while as a member, then they can show proof who they are. When I'm sure of who they are and they've been here for a long while then maybe I'll give my verif.
--------------------------------------- added after 29 seconds
Awesome memory
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
I'm speaking of my memory!
New Comment Go to top