Page #556
Pages: #1... #551 #552 #553 #554 #555 #556 #557 #558 #559 #560 ...#768
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.A Forum Topic 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
Stupidity and vulnerability are not unique to women alone, let's not forget about the fellas that are seeking relationships leading to marriage that join dating websites.
What is staggering is that romance scams are big business that net the organized worldwide criminal groups anywhere from hundreds to millions of dollars per victim.
Hey, maybe you could sort this mess out for me. My head is still spinning from all the information that was presented in young_dude 's blog. What I can't grasp is if admin is the member formerly known as MONTED and the member that is currently known as tecsan is also the member formerly known as MONTED, why is tecsan (aka MONTED) consistently bitching about being prohibited by admin (aka MONTED) from posting on another member's profile? Why did MONTED make things so complicated for himself?
Again, hoping you will sort this out and report back with information that makes more sense.
And if you find it in your heart, would you please post in ANGEL1227's new thread, NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III thread? I had privately messaged ANGEL and asked her to stop trying to stir things up between licksipsuckit, leopoldij and me. Apparently the only fix that she could come up with was to create a new thread and copy interesting posts that she found in the forum and paste these nuggets in her thread. I would wager to say that if you visited and posted, she would feel validated.
I heard a rumour that the Saggy Granny was spotted at Walmart this weekend. Her entire non-tourage was on deck- The gimp and the ex-con! Poor Saggy had to put on her best harness to pull the cart filled with junk food and the two invalids in their wheelchairs.
It sounds like that trailer is one more ailment from having their own Jerry's Telethon!
TWOWARMTTS, TWOWARMTTS2, hotpussy, CandyMandyBonBonCharlieTwits (I don't know why JustWill couldn't amend the name to include WetNoodle, too) and now known as ANGEL1227 mentions you with frequency in her thread. Why don't you pop by and say hello.
/forum/thread.php?id=28860#56
I am he as you are he as you are me
And we are all together
See how they run like pigs from a gun
See how they fly
I'm crying
Sitting on a corn flake
Waiting for the van to come
Corporation T-shirt, stupid bloody Tuesday
Man you've been a naughty boy
You let your face grow long
I am the egg man
They are the egg men
I am the WALRUS
Goo goo g'joob
And that complicates things even further.
I do know some people need to stay off certain substances before they come on here...
Place is starting to get like infowars... conspiracy on conspiracy...
I have already explained that I am EVERYBODY.
/forum/thread.php?id=26445
Did you happen to read young_dude's blog, the blog that has me all paranoid? young_dude claims admin is MONTED, admin posts that he has been accused of being me, I've been accused of being Skittles, something that I deny not because of the gender difference, because he his more creative than I, all this "who's who" makes me think of the song I AM THE WALRUS and that throws another member into the mix! To further muddy the water, mr_blue pops in with his thoughts and I decide to toss your name in there because you aren't as active as before. Gee, I thought that I might have a week or so before you would see my post and be pissed...... But NO! Within 2 hours you're admitting that you are EVERYBODY.
So there you go folks, JustWill admits he is MONTED, admin, Skittles and bella!, too. Now, JustWill, I wonder if you admit to being ANGEL1227 who you affectionately dubbed CandyMandyBonBonCharlieTwits?
You are NOT the WALRUS. (You are also NOT the Pissy Rant Fairy)
I am NOT Corona Candy (I might be weird, but I ain't THAT crazy. Nor was there the slightest amount of "affection" involved in the dubbing.)
I am also NOT the Pee in my Holes guy. ('Cause, damn, that shit is yucky.)
And it wasn't "within 2 hours". I admitted to being EVERYBODY more than two years ago...
I said this before and it's not a fabrication, Mr. Yumm and I JUST had a conversation about you and how we both missed you. Bingo-bango, there you are! FREAKY!!!!
They specialize in "argumentum ad ignorantiam" (also called the negative proof fallacy)--claiming that something is TRUE because it has not yet been proven FALSE and vice versa.
That also assume that TRUE and FALSE are the only two options.
/forum/?ct=2
The flyover was to honor the doctors and nurses who are putting their lives on the line in our hospitals during this time of crisis!
"...Bless em all, bless em all, the long and the short and the tall..."
What I find impressive is it would appear that creditors are able to seek and find legal resolution within a reasonable amount of time through the High Court. From what I gather, the High Court reviews matters revolving around unsecured debt such as unpaid rent, credit card debt, goods & services, etc.
The High Court agents are duly appointed agents of the court that are sent to execute a High Court Writ of Control that will hopefully lead the agents to collect, in full, all money owed plus additional legal fees. If the person is unable to pay, the agents will cease anything owned that will be sold at auction to pay off or pay down the debt. One of the saddest episodes that I saw was when the agents were executing a writ involving debt from a funeral expense. Seriously? Shame on that funeral director/home.
"This is a porn site"
a REASONABLE defense to post whatever the fuck you want i.e. beast-iality, in-cest, ra-pe, ped-o-philia, necro-philia, abuse type of sexual scenarios?
Furthermore, if a person posts something for ALL to see whether it be pictures, blogs, or simple comments.
Is it then fair game to be criticized on, good or bad?
I mean, if I'm outta line, please tell me. But I believe if you post it, then own it, and take what comes because of it. Again, am I wrong for this line of thinking?
The first question I find more tricky. I like to think of myself as a free speech absolutist but stuff about sexual practices that are illegal, morally dubious or both do trouble me. I find solace in my belief that a lot of it is fantasising and the shit a person says they did is, in all likelihood, BS. If I felt that every story about being in sexual scenarios with family members, being abused by adults when you were a child etc etc were 100% true I think I would be inclined to leave the site for good.
But I lived long enough to know that predators are attracted to vulnerability, not just to youth. It shows in what they say and it's quite different from those who just like firm looks of young adults (late teens and early twenties).
Example, a 17 year old girl has sex with her 19 year old boyfriend. Based on the laws in North America, she falls within the age of consent but I believe that she still is a minor. Regarding alcohol, a minor is someone under the age of 21. Bottom line, what is considered to be a "minor" is a gray area.
aghast at reading something involving a 14 year old, yet in another country a 14 year old is not an issue.
I’m not “understanding” of familial sexual relationships. There are too many people in this world, why your son, daughter, etc.
only registered users can see external links
You made me waste 5 minutes of my life for nothing and I don't appreciate it.
Admin, put her piece of shit in the dumpster mate!
Adorn, it's a verb, it means to enhance. Perhaps the four fellas didn't read my blog where I suggested cock rings, piercings, some kind of bling. Hey, if they would have wrapped their cock in a condom, toilet role tube, hung a bath puff on it or wrapped it with a scarf, that could also be construed as an enhancement. Sorry fellas, the other 15 understood the concept of the contest and in fairness to them, I had to boot you out.
If your day is too busy and you don't have time to flip through the Forum looking for something interesting, no worries! She's done all the leg work, just a bit of copy and paste, bingo-bango, it's there in her thread!
Please, check it out. /forum/thread.php?id=28860#14
Try it, you might like it. Both dgraff and huxley999 have, maybe they will share their thoughts.
only registered users can see external links
1. Cut and paste
2. No original thought- will still come here to get ideas
3. Gibberish and incoherent arguments
4. Comments and positions on things she can't possibly understand- without Google and a Dr. Seuss book to help
For the win- off the 22 comments in there so far, like 19 are from her.
73 and on a site like this... what a complete joke. Even Joe Biden is more stable than this old hog!
New Comment Go to top