Stay Hard as Steel!!!

Get Paid For
Using Social Sites!

Tired of ads
on this site?

Want a bigger penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!

STUFF, JUST STUFF

Discussion Forum on Show It Off

Page #1

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#819

Started by bella! [Ignore] 20,May,18 18:36  other posts
Please feel free to post miscellaneous subject matter, aka STUFF in this thread.

Please attempt to remain somewhat respectful to other members, ninnyhammers, dummies and folks you just don't like. Thank you.

New Comment       Rating: 11  


Comments:
By kebmo [Ignore] 09,Dec,25 15:20 other posts 
Effective today any child under the age of 16 in Australia is not allowed to be on social media sites. The ones in question are Instagram, Facebook, threads, Snapchat, YouTube, TikTok, Kik, Reddit, twitch and X.

Of course it won't be 100% effective but damn it's a good idea and you have to rip the Band-Aid off somewhere.
I just wonder how long it will take the kids will find a workaround.
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 09,Dec,25 15:28 other posts 
While it seems like a good idea, this all show and no substance. It’s impossible to enforce it. Typical of progressive politicians, the Aussie government is taking the easy route, banning children on social media with no way to ensure it works, just so they claim they did something and feel good about it.
By kebmo [Ignore] 09,Dec,25 16:54 other posts 
Is it better than doing nothing?
By bella! [Ignore] 09,Dec,25 16:59 other posts 
I agree, kebmo, it’s better than doing nuthin’ !
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 09,Dec,25 18:03 other posts 
Wouldn’t it be better to do something effective, rather than just jerking off?
By kebmo [Ignore] 09,Dec,25 18:47 other posts 
This is more than any country in the world has done for the safety of children on social media and yet here you are shitting on it.
Besides children, the people who really don't like this would be ped0ph1les and perverts.
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 09,Dec,25 20:21 other posts 
Nice straw man, buddy.

I’m only stating facts. There is no way to enforce this ban. It’s all for show, and nothing more. It’s the moral equivalent of wishing on a star.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 09,Dec,25 18:59 other posts 
Effective like what? At least they are trying.
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 09,Dec,25 20:11 other posts 
Trying what?

This is the moral equivalent to what they’re doing in Australia: A person is swimming twenty-five yards out in the water, when he suddenly realizes he can’t make it back to shore.

He sees people on the beach and he begins to call to them just as he begins struggling to stay afloat.

The people on shore hear his cries and look out on the water and locate the struggling person.

But, instead of heading out on the water to effect his rescue, they all begin praying that he gets saved. They all pray really, really hard.

And, he slips under the water and drowns.

Here’s what they all say afterward: Well, we did something. At least we tried.

Same thing.
By cenozoic [Ignore] 10,Dec,25 00:42 other posts 
Lots of beaches have dedicated lifesavers and swim safe zones.
Same Same
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 10,Dec,25 00:45 other posts 
That’s not the point. The point is that Australia is just jacking off, when it comes to “child safety” and the internet.

They can now claim, with puffed up chests, “Look, everyone! We did something,” even though it’s totally and utterly meaningless!
By CAT52! [Ignore] 10,Dec,25 07:17 other posts 
That would s exactly the point. Many situations that beg for a solution can’t be helped except in a token way. Your opinion is, generally, valid. But, there are many **** people (because we tend to think that this was passed to protect the little tikes ) that won’t listen to parents to not use social media but, can’t argue if they can’t access social media due to government actions. If one kid’s life is positively impacted, then, this is a good effort.
However, if we accept that this is whistling in the wind, then, as a very smart man, what do you recommend should be done short of shutting down the internet?
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 10,Dec,25 13:03 other posts 
The onus should be on the parents, not the government. Government has always had the excellent ability for messing up the lives of the people it was allegedly supposed to serve. History is rife with examples of government NOT doing the right thing, time after time. Billions have died prematurely because of organized governments.

In a perfect world, more parents would be more attentive and protective of their children. This is not a perfect world, however. People are flawed.

The ironic part is that government is made up solely of people. As stated above, people are flawed.

Why should we, then, trust government to always do the right thing, if the people in it are just as imperfect as the rest of us?

One thing is for sure: we can always trust the government to make a bad situation worse. Not even religion has had the ability to make the world right, and religion has been around far longer than government. The problem with religion, is the same as the problem with government: there are people involved in it.

A problem exists, and government’s solution, more often than not, is to make feel-good empty gestures for bragging rights, that is, when it's not trampling all over human rights. Doing “something" then becomes justification for spending more of our hard-earned money, just to micro-manage our lives.

The solution is to stop wanting the government to fix our lives and to take responsibility for ourselves. Modern societies have become far too reliant on government to solve their problems. That nonsense must stop, because government, whether through sheer incompetence or maliciousness, will ultimately be the end of human dignity and the death of humanity.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 10,Dec,25 14:32 other posts 
I’m guessing you are an anarchist
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 10,Dec,25 15:21 other posts 
No. I’m for limited government by the people. I’m for government that takes care of infrastructure, protects national borders, and protects national interests. Today’s governments are no longer for the people. They are for the self-interests of the persons controlling them. They’re for the elitists, of the elitists, and by the elitists.

Anarchists want the world to burn. They produce nothing but misery. I want the world to be protected, because I live in it. I merely don’t want the State to tell me how I should live my life, so long as I am harming no one.

It’s not a black and white world. Why do you seem to insist that it is by labeling me an anarchist? Do you actually believe that there are only two sides in this issue: total submission/dependency or total anarchy?
By CAT52! [Ignore] 11,Dec,25 11:06 other posts 
The control of the people, even by elitists, in this country, is achieved by having elections. You can argue, and I won’t dispute it, that money, lies, manipulation of facts, and character assassination is/are frequently used to get votes. Elections, however, where a voter CHOOSES to vote for an individual, is what chooses what our government will be. The results may or may not be good for the people, but, they choose. The limits that these governments have are directly proportional to the educated participation of the electorate and, the constant supervision of those that believe that because they got elected can do whatever they want. I’ve always believed that NO ONE wants an excess of government. Just enough to keep us safe and accommodating to our needs.

Okay, you are not an anarchist. I didn’t label you. Thanks for that clarification. It was more of a question by me than a statement, but, you are a conservative, right leaning, citizen, right? So, let me ask you, what do you think of the EPA, the WHO, abortion, gun control, conservation laws, and treatment of illegal aliens? Because, in my book, many people want to live their lives in a cocoon where they don’t care about their neighbors. They just, and I quote, “don’t want the State to tell me how I should live my life, so long as I am harming no one.”

And no, I don’t believe “ that there are only two sides in this issue: total submission/dependency or total anarchy?” and I never said that. I notice you project to conclusions that are not what I’ve written (I do that too, sometimes 🤣 I’ve also noted that the minute you saw my opinion and you didn’t like them, you went straight to character assassination instead of refuting them with facts. It seemed that you dismissed me and my opinions because I’m a dumb blond woman that should stay away from politics. I’m going to borrow from your book and say you are a misogynist.
By kebmo [Ignore] 10,Dec,25 14:37 other posts 
So we should let kids drive, smoke, drink and vote when they're seven years old? Get that government out of there.
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 10,Dec,25 15:12 other posts 
Always gotta go for the worst case scenario, huh. Proper parental guidance would prevent that, but here you are, promoting more government. Sheesh!

Why is it always a worst case scenario?

Government has been usurping the family unit for decades now. Look at the cities with the worst crime statistics. The family units are virtually non-existent in those communities, because government stepped in and told people, “You can’t do this alone. We’re here to help.”

You destroyers just can’t leave things alone.
By phart [Ignore] 10,Dec,25 23:20 other posts 
I think it was Johnson that told mothers they didn't need a father in the house, the government would pickup the tab.that was some of the early stages of the demise of America. when family was devalued.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 11,Dec,25 10:23 other posts 
Who is the Johnson you are referring to?
By phart [Ignore] 11,Dec,25 10:32 other posts 
that piece of shit that had Kennedy murdered
By CAT52! [Ignore] 11,Dec,25 11:12 other posts 
That is your opinion, but, don’t you think that 50 +/- yrs, with so many Republicans in power, that that supposedly bad advice would have been given the boot? Even today, a yr after the Clown got re-elected, I don’t hear him saying, “Johnson was wrong”.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 11,Dec,25 11:22 other posts 
Look to me, you are putting the cart before the horse. Government stepped in BECAUSE those cities were out of control. However, in what form did they step in? Bigger police forces? More funds for education? Fighting poverty? More employment? Higher minimum wages? Fairer voter participation?
Those family units that are virtually non-existent are a huge problem. I agree, but, without Big Government, how do you propose we deal with it? And before you say there’s too much red tape and waste of resources (and I agree with that), remember, nothing is perfect but something has to be done. Individual help is needed but it’s nowhere enough. Government help has to be.
By phart [Ignore] 11,Dec,25 11:28 other posts 
The simple concept of NOT reproducing if you can't support the results would be a Giant step in the right direction and would cost nearly ZERO to the individual "needing help" and the taxpayer.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 11,Dec,25 11:46 other posts 
Phart, we all know your views on government help for the poor but, we are taking about something else.
By phart [Ignore] 11,Dec,25 13:48 other posts 
it's all intertwined.
By cenozoic [Ignore] 10,Dec,25 00:44 other posts 
Part of the reasoning given was that algorithms are addictive.
Why not a blanket ban for all users.
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 10,Dec,25 00:55 other posts 
Shut down the entire internet. That’s the only sure way to “protect” the children. They’ll have to go back to sneaking peeks at girlie magazines, like in the old days.
By kebmo [Ignore] 10,Dec,25 04:18 other posts 
Start small.
By phart [Ignore] 11,Dec,25 11:30 other posts 
The AlGoreRhythms are a problem for about everything on the net. I use Youtube for music and sometimes just because i listen 1 song from a artist that is a bit different than usual, holy shit, if i walk away and let the thing autoplay, there is some shit will come up that makes me want to wack the computer with a hammer!
By CAT52! [Ignore] 11,Dec,25 11:50 other posts 
So don’t walk away. They want to be helpful. I’ve been using YouTube premium for years and most of the time they come up with a very good selection of videos I like. The more you use it the more they get it right.
By AngelofDeath [Ignore] 10,Dec,25 21:52 other posts 
The little crotch goblins will just lie about their ages or have their parents make them an account. As long as the parents give them phones and access to any internet capable device it won’t stop them.
By kebmo [Ignore] 10,Dec,25 22:06 other posts 
Like I said, the kids will probably find a workaround. I just wonder how long it will take for about 50% of the kids to be back online. Maybe they'll learn how to do crazy things like have conversations and maybe their neck will not hurt as much from constantly looking down. Maybe but I honestly think probably not but it's better than doing nothing.
By phart [Ignore] 10,Dec,25 23:21 other posts 
text neck is a actual medical term and condition now.
By phart [Ignore] 11,Dec,25 13:50 other posts 
only registered users can see external links
By phart [Ignore] 10,Dec,25 23:22 other posts 
I seriously doubt it would have stopped me had i been young when this was going on. Similar situation is the motivation for me winding up in college and getting my degree.to beat the system


By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 09,Dec,25 20:26 other posts 
HOLY SHIT!

only registered users can see external links
By phart [Ignore] 09,Dec,25 21:49 other posts 
Well that car owner is in for a headache because how do you file a claim to get your car fixed? It was not in a wreck with another vehicle, and airplanes don't carry auto insurance.
By Cody8789 [Ignore] 09,Dec,25 23:42 other posts 
Doesn’t matter, your car insurance. Pays you to fix your car once you cover your deductible, and the insurance. Companies lose out unless they try to sew the airplane operator
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 09,Dec,25 23:54 other posts 
Sonuva!


By bella! [Ignore] 08,Dec,25 00:29 other posts 
I have been in SW Florida for 2 months and I really don’t recall there being any “rain” days. Tonight, there’s a good amount of rain and a thunderstorm, too!
By CAT52! [Ignore] 08,Dec,25 17:09 other posts 
You are in the beginning of the dry season. Rain during these times (October to April) occurs ahead of a cold front.
By bella! [Ignore] 09,Dec,25 17:11 other posts 
And it has been a cool day today! I was up and out at 08:15 for a mani and pedi in Fort Myers and it was 59 degrees! Brrrrrrr! Fast forward to shortly after 5pm and back in LaBelle and it’s only 67 degrees! Not what I consider to be typical SW Florida weather, but I must admit that it looked like what I would have expected to be an overcast/going to rain kinda sky!
By CAT52! [Ignore] 09,Dec,25 18:57 other posts 
It is colder than normal for this time in the year. Locals bring out their arctic clothing 🤣
By Cody8789 [Ignore] 09,Dec,25 20:30 other posts 
Bella, it might dip into the forties where you are in a few days when the next cold front comes through.


By bella! [Ignore] 07,Dec,25 06:50 other posts 
Here’s a new way to exercise and hurt yourself, too. You guessed it, it’s a BUNGEE class! Woo hoo!

only registered users can see external links
By quint [Ignore] 07,Dec,25 07:37 other posts 
That hurts just to watch!
By bella! [Ignore] 08,Dec,25 00:16 other posts 
You wouldn’t be talking about the guy who looks like he’s trying to get the bungee off his balls, are you?
By phart [Ignore] 07,Dec,25 07:42 other posts 
I don't trust rubber that well, broken rubber is why I am HERE on earth!
By CAT52! [Ignore] 07,Dec,25 08:54 other posts 
🤣🤣
By bella! [Ignore] 08,Dec,25 00:23 other posts 
The one I really enjoyed was the one where the instructor (that’s my guess) appeared to fall forward into a push-up then bounced up and into a squat. The “hell no, that’s not happening!” look on the woman’s face that was standing behind her as she shakes her head left to right said it all!
By bella! [Ignore] 08,Dec,25 00:13 other posts 
Just STOP IT, phart!


By bella! [Ignore] 27,Jan,19 18:46 other posts 
And another thing that is eff'd up is that admin allows one person, licksipsuckit to be a moderator for so many groups, upwards of 400 groups, groups that she has no affiliation to. Yep, I was banned from participating in the group established for Americans. WHY? Because lix is the moderator.

/groups.php?id=6823

I think I'm going to try to join the group established for the gay men, but as you may have guessed, lix is the moderator for that one, too.
--------------------------------------- added after 4 minutes

Nope, I cannot join that group either! /groups.php?id=132
By DeepThroatThis [Ignore] 27,Jan,19 20:32 other posts 
That's bullshit...how is it that someone from another country can be a moderator for Americans?
By bella! [Ignore] 27,Jan,19 20:46 other posts 
Hey, it's bullshit that a woman is the moderator of a group established for gay men.

Look at the groups that begin with an asterisk (*) and she is the moderator. She is moderator of over 400 groups.

Take a look for yourself, anything prefixed by her signature * is a group that she is the moderator of.

/groups.php
By DeepThroatThis [Ignore] 27,Jan,19 20:58 other posts 
Maybe admin can explain?
By bella! [Ignore] 27,Jan,19 21:19 other posts 
Yeah, right!

I joined the American group before and was kicked out by her. Crazy me, I wondered what an Australian could add to a group dedicated to and established for Americans and in taking my concern to admin, his suggestion was that I start suggested that I my own group. I just wonder why admin gives her so much latitude.
By DeepThroatThis [Ignore] 27,Jan,19 21:25 other posts 
The optics are bad.....it's like the PM of Australia sitting in for Nancy Pelosi in Congress
By admin [Ignore] 28,Jan,19 06:12 other posts 
People create groups, then lose interest in them or leave the site altogether. Theredore long ago mechanics for transferring moderators position was implemented. Current moderator can transfer their rights to another member. Or, if current moderator ignores the group with some activity for more than 2 weeks, it is transferred automatically to the most active member. Most active in this case - the one who visits more often.

Exactly same happens with power in real life. If you don't care about something and don't want to spend your time on it - it often ends up in control of people you don't like. And then you are suddenly not happy.

Personally I don't care who runs the groups, I only care that someone does so I don't have to monitor them for some fishy activities. I did nothing to help lix get control of those groups, which means she got them simply because she was more interested in groups than any other member. So I don't see why I should do anything about this.
By bella! [Ignore] 28,Jan,19 15:46 other posts 
So you don't find it unusual that she would be the moderator for over 400 groups?

When I joined United States group, I responded to 3 inquiries made but did not see anywhere where she made a contribution.

Sorry, admin, I think you are wrong to allow her this much authority and control.
By admin [Ignore] 28,Jan,19 15:52 other posts 
What part of "no one else wanted it" you do not understand?
By bella! [Ignore] 28,Jan,19 15:59 other posts 
What part of I was interested in being a member of a group dedicated to Americans, hence I joined, contributed but was kicked out by a woman who doesn't even live in the United States do you not understand?
--------------------------------------- added after 17 minutes

Please speculate on why I was tossed out.
By admin [Ignore] 28,Jan,19 16:27 other posts 
I already made myself clear that I don't care about your personal accounts as long as someone who cares watches the groups.
By bella! [Ignore] 29,Jan,19 21:45 other posts 
You realty think she "cares" about groups? Get your head out of the sand! (That is a way of saying you are ignoring what is happening) You have allowed her to be a moderator for over 400 groups. Moderators should be impartial and apparently, she can not be impartial. For her to kick me out of a group that was established for Americans solely because she does not like me is not what a moderator should be focusing on. In my opinion, the only thing she "cares" about is being "large and in charge" and you have allowed that to happen.
By dgraff [Ignore] 27,Jan,19 21:10 other posts 
It's funny I keep joining her groups and she keeps booting me out hahaha it's a little game we play
By bella! [Ignore] 27,Jan,19 23:33 other posts 
Are you joining to piss her off or are you really interested in being a member?
By dgraff [Ignore] 28,Jan,19 05:58 other posts 
No just to ruffle her feathers
By bella! [Ignore] 28,Jan,19 12:29 other posts 
Please be nice.
By dgraff [Ignore] 28,Jan,19 18:57 other posts 
Hahaha I can try but I'm nice to those who are nice to me
By Sir-Skittles [Ignore] 01,Feb,19 21:09 other posts 
Lix is a retard.. nothing else to say. A meth tooth muppet.
By #578610 04,Feb,19 12:24
What is in it for the moderator?
By bella! [Ignore] 04,Feb,19 19:09 other posts 
What's in it for the moderator? POWER. Power to boot people she doesn't like just because she is a BIG fish in a small pond. But why wouldn't you ask that her that yourself?
By #578610 04,Feb,19 19:18
Who?
By bella! [Ignore] 04,Feb,19 19:44 other posts 
Abraham Lincoln was credited with saying;

"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time."


I know that YOU know that this particular post is about licksipsuckit. If you had any doubt, all you needed to do was to gaze upwards by a few posts from your initial comment of; "What is in it for the moderator?". Surely you did NOT miss seeing her name in BOLD BLUE PRINT.
By #578610 04,Feb,19 21:11
I did miss that. It looks like I'm bothering you.
who cares? start your own 400 groups

you are both always nice to me. be here to look at cunts and cocks not worry abot things you cant conrtrol
By dgraff [Ignore] 02,Feb,19 06:44 other posts 
But yet you think it's fine to send me threatening private messages you have no clue as to who I am but your soon going to find out so butt out
By bella! [Ignore] 02,Feb,19 11:05 other posts 
You received a threatening message? What prompted that?
By dgraff [Ignore] 02,Feb,19 17:49 other posts 
He some how got the idea from a walrus that I'm a cyber bully
By thickswingercock [Ignore] 02,Feb,19 22:51 other posts 
you are
By Sir-Skittles [Ignore] 04,Feb,19 09:56 other posts 
thickswingercock, get to fuck
and left fuck off punk on comment but from anonymous, same IP address as yours. not the brightest bulb
you said youd end me. i think threats like that should have you banned from this site. you are trash
By dgraff [Ignore] 03,Feb,19 06:55 other posts 
Well then show us all were I said I would end you throes words never came out of my mouth you started something with out knowing all the history of the problem your not a member long enough to know the full story may I suggest looking back three years in the dumpster for a little history lesson
By thickswingercock [Ignore] 04,Feb,19 02:41 other posts 
ive been off and on longer. also got your message abojt being a proud american blah blah blah. i didnt realize you were genuinely not that smart, like maybe mentally handicaped. go anead and continue to bully people and imagine things.
By dgraff [Ignore] 04,Feb,19 05:24 other posts 
Thank you sir I'm glad I have your blessings it means so much to me to have some one of such importance to extend his blessing to me
By bella! [Ignore] 02,Feb,19 11:04 other posts 
You do understand that licksipsuckit did NOT start those groups, right? Apparently, she spends a significant amount of time on the site and has acquired them through attrition. Do you really believe that she is able to add value, interest and/or to any input to groups that are outside of her scope, ie the *United States* OR *Gay Men* or the other 398+ groups that she moderates?
By Ray10754 [Ignore] 02,Feb,19 12:36 other posts 
she is the moderator of a group I started a while back, I couldn't keep it going due to being hospitalized for a lengthy period, and when I returned she was in charge of it!These are the reasons I mined my own here and don't get involved with much, just enjoy the photos and the forums and the few friends I have made here.
By admin [Ignore] 03,Feb,19 06:39 other posts 
You could ask her to return moderator rights to you or you could ask me if she refused. You did not do either.
By Ray10754 [Ignore] 03,Feb,19 08:34 other posts 
Thank you for the suggestion Admin!Was not aware that was possible.
By bella! [Ignore] 04,Feb,19 19:50 other posts 
Did you ask for your group to be returned to you?


If she doesn't blacklist you, ask her for the *United States* group, too!
By bella! [Ignore] 03,Feb,19 12:43 other posts 
Would you be kind enough to explain why being blacklisted by the moderator of the *United States* group would prohibit me from joining? The moderator is only 1 of 70+ people who are in that group and there would be no need to interact with her.
By Sir-Skittles [Ignore] 02,Feb,19 17:41 other posts 
Cryin' Bella.. always complaining.. but most of her whinges are in PM. A sign of weakness.
By milesbferry [Ignore] 03,Feb,19 18:01 other posts 
Admin is a pensioner, he's on his last legs down there in central america land. Give him a break!


New Comment   Go to top

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#819



Show It Off