Page #380
Pages: #1... #375 #376 #377 #378 #379 #380 #381 #382 #383 #384 ...#779
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.A Forum Topic 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
BUT perhaps going with the same theory I have in another subject thread about colleges.Perhaps liberals that like to kill babies need to leave Texas.And people that value their 2d admin rights can leave the liberal shit holes and go to texas. Resegregate people according to intelligence and abilty to act with common sense.
A ounce of prevention is worth way more than the cost of a abortion and much cheaper.
IF all the people that feel a certain way are in 1 place and all the people that feel another way are elsewhere ,then they would not be as affected by the opposing veiws.
/nat5hrg574llpic.html
only registered users can see external links
[deleted image]
Sorry you feel that I have taken cheap shots at you. Let me explain, sometimes my eyes begin to spin when I see some of your posts and I feel compelled to say something.
The statue of Robert E. Lee that towered over the onetime capital of the Confederacy has been cut into pieces and hauled away to some obscure warehouse, maybe the weaponized myth of Lee as a great man — or even a good one — can finally be mothballed as well.
AP News.
I guess since the 'great white north was the "winner" of the war you would rather have burn and rap@ Sherman up there wouldn't you?
why can't people like you learn that history is not pretty, there is parts of it that none of us like.But still people fought and died trying to protect their family's ,their homes, their lively hoods. And they should not be forgotten to satisfy the minority's.
1 thing about it, if the south still had enough MEN WITH BALLS to stand up and fight and help the South Rise again, we would win because there is nothing but pansy ass pussy's up there that don't like guns. So their sticks and stones and words would not help them
There’s no excuse, no extenuating circumstances. TRAITORS
Like Admiral Semmes, some officers in the Confederate Army were charged with treason after the Civil War. Though the 1866 Civil Rights Act vindicated those in the Confederacy in an attempt to help the reconstruction and reunification process, it did not protect the leaders of the Confederate Army. Many men in various ranks were charged with treason, and the South despised each arrest and often publicly disapproved of the arrests of their recently celebrated heroes. The Union did not arrest many officers, however. Though a great many in the North, including President Andrew Johnson, believed that treason was "odious" and should be punished by death, the law dictated that the Union had no jurisdiction to prosecute the rebels. In addition, many government officials in the Union believed that if the officers of the Confederate Army were executed, they would die martyrs and only make Reconstruction harder to accomplish.
only registered users can see external links
And this:
Confederate President Jefferson Davis, left, and Gen. Robert E. Lee were traitors under the U.S. Constitution's definition of treason, according to William A. Blair, yet neither man -- nor any other Confederate -- was ever tried for the crime.
Weather anyone was tried for treason or not, they were TRAITORS
All jokes aside,
It is sad ,quite sad,that people think it was so great that Sherman and men like him ,ra-ed women and children,burned crops, killed live stock and so on, to preserve this "wonderful Union". Slavery gets thrown into the mix, it only became a issue later in the war, if you read books of the era instead of revisionist history.
The south had slaves.Ok,they were brought here, they were clothed ,fed,learned something like growing crops, were later freed, and who took them in, democrats, that resumed the slavery under the name of welfare Money for votes.Shermans actions were evil,pure and simple,but yet,people demonize LEE? How many of his men burned people out and rap@d?
Never heard of it happening from the south have you? It was the North.
The southern farmers were not the enemy of the US, but yet they suffered and it seems to be ok.
IF people were really honest about this whole slavery thing, they would admit that most of the black people today driving Lexus and selling drugs to their own youth ,would not be alive or would be in Africa somewhere running with a spear from a big animal of some sort.
Their ancestors suffered as slaves and their sacrifice was the price paid for the freedom their descendants squander today.
Some of these trysts are against the law but it all boils down to the ages of those involved as well as what happened and under what conditions it happened. I tried to find something on the criminal sexual conduct laws of Michigan but was able to put my fingers on something understandable relating to Minnesota laws that was much clearer. Here's a copy and paste from Google because I don't know how to attach the link.
Degrees of Criminal Sexual Conduct
There are five different categories of criminal sexual conduct in the state of Minnesota, all of which come with serious consequences.
First Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct
First degree criminal sexual conduct involves “sexual penetration” in addition to one or more of the following aggravating factors:
Victim is under the age of 13, and the defendant is 3 or more years older
Victim is 13-15 years of age and offender is:
Four years older
In an authority position and uses that position to force submission
Victim is under the age of 16 and:
Offender has a significant relationship with the victim and/or the offender:
Uses force or coercion
Uses or threatens to use a weapon
Causes victim fear of bodily harm
Injures victim
Commits numerous sex acts over a period of time
Victim has fear of great bodily harm
Offender uses or threatens to use a dangerous weapon
Offender injures victim and:
Uses force or coercion
Victim is mentally impaired/incapacitated, or physically helpless
Offender is assisted by an accomplice who uses force or a dangerous weapon
Second Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct
Second degree criminal sexual conduct charges follow the same guidelines as first degree criminal sexual crimes. The difference is that “sexual penetration” is not needed. Instead, the law requires only “sexual contact.”
Third Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct
Third degree criminal sexual conduct is also similar to first degree criminal sexual conduct where “sexual penetration” is needed.
Third degree criminal sexual conduct requires “sexual penetration” and one or more of these aggravating factors:
Victim is under 13, and defendant is less than 3 years older
Victim is 13, 14, or 15, and defendant is 2 years older
Victim is 16 or 17, and the offender:
Has a significant relationship with victim
Is in an authoritative position over victim and uses that position so victim will submit
Has significant relationship to victim, and:
Uses force or coercion
Uses or threatens use of real or fake weapon
Causes victim reasonable fear of great bodily harm
Causes personal injury to the victim
There are multiple sexual acts committed over an extended time
Defendant uses force or coercion
Defendant knows or has reason to know victim is mentally impaired/incapacitated or physically helpless
Defendant is aided or abetted by an accomplice who uses force or threatens to use a dangerous weapon
Offender is a psychotherapist, victim is a patient and:
The act occurs during a therapy session
Emotionally dependent on defendant
The act results from a therapeutic deception
The offender is a health care professional, and the act occurs by means of false representation
Fourth Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct
Fourth degree criminal sexual conduct charges may be issued in the same instances as in third degree charges but with “sexual contact” rather than “sexual penetration.” Other aggravating factors for fourth degree offenses are:
Victim is 13, 14, or 15, and offender is:
Four years older
In a position of authority, and uses that position to force submission
Fifth Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct
Fifth degree criminal sexual conduct involves any of the following:
Nonconsensual sexual contact with anyone
Engaging in masturbation or lewd exhibition of the genitals in the presence of a minor under the age of 16
Removal or attempted removal of clothing covering intimate parts or undergarments
Nonconsensual touching of the intimate parts of another, if performed with sexual or aggressive intent
Lady Tecsan is also a staunch defender of Lix and the Saggy Granny.
What difference do the details of his fantasy blog make? The 14 year old boy is black, so what!? What if he added that he was 300lbs? Would you be screaming about "fat shaming", too?
As far as the word GUY goes, I'm not sure if there is an age that can be associated with the word. And IF you are a father of a boy, surely someone has said something like, "what a cute little guy", "how old is your little guy", etc. And GUY doesn't necessarily mean "male person" any longer. Sometimes a group of females will be referred to as "guys".
Your last sentence sums everything up; "why argue with a child that is 21 years of age, but it [sic] should know better...". THE PROBLEM IS YOU DON'T HAVE ANY COMMON SENSE AND YOU LOVE TO PISS AND MOAN LIKE A LITTLE GIRL.
Tecsan Lady Tecsan doesn't like to wear a white dress being she is always on her period!
New Comment Go to top