Page #310
Pages: #1... #305 #306 #307 #308 #309 #310 #311 #312 #313 #314 ...#778
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.A Forum Topic 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
"Member posts stolen pictures from the internet or that belong to other members." And he did provide two yandex links.
Notice the wording, OR belong to other members. Jamie is the first to vote and voted NO ABUSE, his comment was "There no pics". Maybe leo was too lazy to click on the two pictures that he was reporting OR possibly the member had already removed the pictures in question at the time Jamie voted. Something else that's very lazy, why didn't leo's report include the name(s) or pictures of the mysterious "other members"?
At 23:47, AA, now known as you-know-who, was right behind Jamie's with her vote to DELETE. Of course she will support her buddy, leo, that's what friends do especially since he gave her such a glowing review of her Asian pussy!
I voted NO ABUSE at 03:54 this morning and left the following comment, "Pictures stolen from internet? I was unable to find the specific TWO pictures that match the two links provided. ALSO, the reporting member's referral asserts " or that belong to other members ●" as if the reported member has posted pictures of SYD/SYC members and has claimed them as his own. Which picture(s)? In both cases, the use of internet or member's pictures, the accusations are unfounded."
My guess is that you know who read bella's reason why the member should not be deleted and quickly reminded her vote to delete. Now who looks STOOPID? Not me.
I'd suggest reading into the meaning of the word "or"
I didn't allude to anything, the internet pictures that were cited were not found in the reported member's gallery NOR was there any trace of other members pictures, stolen or otherwise.
Please actually read before making such comments.
"So what about the pictures that were allegedly stolen from "other members"? Who were the "other members"?"
Perhaps you're not aware that admin is not adverse to members posting internet pictures in their galleries as long as the member does not claim ownership of said pictures. In the event that the member chooses to upload internet pictures I BELIEVE admin would prefer that the internet pictures do not dominate the member's gallery.
So let's get back to the picture I'm painting, I cannot find the two internet pictures that "you" were accused of posting AND who are the members or where can their pictures be found in "your" gallery? In my opinion, there's a discrepancy
that needs to be addressed and perhaps the member should not be deleted. Side note, there are a number of bounty hunters on this site who are always looking to report members for deletion for a 50 point bounty.
It makes no sense to me that some members are able to post internet pictures and are untouchable/nothing happens, yet some members are reported and deleted. Furthermore, a member should be given a "warning", advised that they're in jeopardy of being deleted because of internet pictures and given the opportunity to edit their profile. If a member "steals" another member's pictures and posts it, I feel that is a more egregious offense, that member should be deleted.
The asshole should have included besti@lity in his report, too. That would have covered all the bases. Maybe there's this, maybe there's that, let the panel members sort it out.
"Member posts stolen pictures from the internet or that belong to other members." And he did provide two yandex links.
But then go on to demand to see evidence of photos taken from members:
"So what about the pictures that were allegedly stolen from "other members"? Who were the "other members"?"
When it was never stated any photos were taken from members as it the word "or" was used.
That's all I'm saying.
I have no comment on the actual abuse report nor have an opinion, or care, about the outcome.
My take on this issue is be the real person behind the profile or be gone.
I know I am the square peg in a round hole on this but,anyhow,that is how I feel.
1.
used to link alternatives.
"a cup of tea or coffee"
2.
introducing a synonym or explanation of a preceding word or phrase.
"the espionage novel, or, as it is known in the trade, the thriller"
I will admit to not being real smart but how did you miss use the word "OR"? Looks like you used it ok.
Reminds me of bill clinton speaking lawyer talk, "“It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.”
Honestly, Bella's decision to not delete is agreeable as internet pictures where the member is obviously not claiming to be in the photos are harmless.
And as no pictures existed when she herself checked - going ahead with the deletion seems unjust.
(I'm also not a new member, just to the forums).
Ain't was first known to be used in 1749 but other records indicate it much early in the 1600's. BUT we southern folks are still considered "uneducated" because we use it..
according to google, The contraction ain't has been around since 1650. It's written form dates from 1750. Its earliest appearance in a dictionary is 1830.
And as far as their "dealings" aka mutual interaction being something that should go unjudged by you, that was probably one of the smartest things you have ever "said".
Thank you for making me feel good about myself. I’m trying hard to be like you.
--------------------------------------- added after 4 minutes
My opinion of dgraff is, he's warm affectionate and lovable, where my opinion of Leo, even though I don't know him, is un friendly, self centered and doesn't have much feelings for anyone.
Do you think this personal explanation to you will satisfy your curiosity? I hope so.
Getting back to Leo, I still think your animosity was due to his friendship and support for Lix. Personally, I’ve been Leo’s friend since I’ve first came on board. His like for whores and hookers never bothered me. I just ignore that part of him. I find Leo to be smart, and knowledgeable about politics and music. He is sweet with me and he is loyal.
Satisfaction? Well, you know what the Stones said about that, but, it is what it is.
I have personally explained why I feel as I do about leo and it is your choice to believe or not. Regardless of whether he pays for sex and the attention from women has little to no bearing about how I feel about him. Skeezy is skeezy no matter what way you look at it. What I find utterly repulsive about him in general, is his disrespect of women. Women are just a "pussy" for him.
So there you have it, I'm done.
--------------------------------------- added after 10 minutes
My self control or lack of it is for me to work with. Like I’ve said before, what you believe or don’t is your business and it is what it is
I've mentioned before, the SYD members can talk shit about you and you think it's fine and lap it up. But if I talk say anything that is not to your liking, you go "kray-kray". It's good that you mended fences with Mountain Man but why stop there?
Oh, yeah dgraff aka Mountain Man is warm and loveable. I would agree because I have taken the time to get to know him.
leo, on the other hand is a straight up PIG! I formed that opinion after I got to know him.
I will close by saying I do think you are a wack-job.
New Comment Go to top