007pat wrote (01,Jul,22 17:50):
Hi question does any one know how to delete a account on here not sure where to go.
Yes, on the far right side and under your points is the MEMBERSHIP box. Click on that and your very last option is DELETE PROFILE. Click on that and follow the directions.
All these MEN who where so vociferous about abortion. All these MEN who thought they had more rights than a woman deciding what to do with their body, you got what you wanted. Now, SCOTUS can go after your contraceptives, your type of sex, or whom you can marry. This site could be in danger of having to close.
It won’t end here. Women will bury you dirty old Republican men. Maybe not in 6 months, maybe not 2024, but soon, we’ll kick you in the nuts.
Women only have themselves to blame for most of the problem. Protection has been there to prevent pregnancy. Women CHOSE not to use it. Bad choice, consequences. And it is not OLD men that are the problem it is the young 1's that run around banging everything that will be still and running away, leaving the women to have to do something. MEN should accept part of the blame, but not the 1's you are singling out.
By the way, if you liberals decide to start kicking people in the nuts, you better wear something besides flip flops and sandels!
most old men are like me,aint had any in years.
The young men are the 1's out fucking all the time.
A zipper,a simple to operate device used to keep pants UP.
Besides that, only 10 states or so have banned abortion.So if you are into killing your babies, MOVE to a state that allows it. Sadly my state still allows it.But neighboring states are looking at fixing the issue.I hope we can get rid of our dumocrat governor and clean up the mess here to.
There are 26 states with laws just waiting for SCOTUS to bring down ROE. That day was today.
You have to be blind, deaf, and dumb not to realize that today the politics of the United States has changed.
Not really, murder has always been illegal.
And if you don't mind, show me the section of the constitution that says it is ok to kill a citizen before they exit the womb?
I looked over it a bit and see nothing that says it is ok to kill.
Phart, you say abortion is not mentioned in the Constitution. Neither is other rights we enjoy.
only registered users can see external links
Debates about whether some particular right is “in” the Constitution or not are debates about how to read and interpret the Constitution. Those who claim that the Constitution doesn’t say “right to privacy” or “separation of church and state” are relying upon the assumption that unless a particular phrase or specific words actually appears in the document, then the right doesn’t exist — either because the interpreters are drawing invalid implications or because it’s illegitimate to go beyond the exact text at all.
Whenever people complain about courts creating new rights that aren’t in the Constitution, they are usually talking about the right to privacy. Although the Constitution doesn’t mention any right to privacy, several passages imply such a right and many court decisions have found a right to privacy in different aspects of human life, such as contraception the education of children.
There is nothing in the Constitution about a right to be treated innocent until proven guilty,
There is nothing in the Constitution about a “right to a fair trial.”
Many people imagine that they have a right to tried in front of a jury of their peers, but there is nothing in the Constitution about that.
The Constitution lists no such explicit right, as the right to vote as it does with speech or assembly. It only lists reasons why you can’t be denied the ability to vote — for example, because of race and sex.
The idea that the courts have the authority to review the constitutionality of laws passed by legislatures is firmly entrenched in American law and politics. However, the Constitution does not mention “Judicial Review” and does not explicitly establish the concept.
The right to travel is not mentioned either. The same about the right to marriage or procreation.
Abortion was given the go ahead because it was a matter of privacy.
It was left like that. That was wrong. It should have been codified (made into formal Federal law). That is what is women will work hard to implement and we’ll do it through the power of the vote.
The right to travel is a part of the 'liberty' of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.
Freedom of movement under United States law - Wikipedia
only registered users can see external links › wiki › Freedom_of_movement_...
WRONG
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you.
Sixth Amendment | US Constitution - Legal Information Institute
Although the First Amendment does not explicitly mention the right of access, the Supreme Court has held that the right to attend criminal proceedings is implicit in freedom of speech and serves an important function in a democratic society by enhancing trial fairness and its appearance.
But it’s not mentioned in the Construction. These are rights that have evolved into common law and are there because of something else. --------------------------------------- added after 4 minutes
Travel is not mentioned in the Construction. The Constitution mentions what can happen to prisoners but there’s no mention about innocent until proven guilty. Abortion is the same.
Tecsan you are saying that same sex marriage is for states to decide. Same with gay sex and/or discrimination in giving gays service. You are saying women serving in the military should be regulated by the states. You are saying school segregation is up to the states. Illegal aliens be allowed to vote. None of these are in the Construction. I do agree that abortion should have been made into law, but legislators from both sides were and are pussies.
Illegal aliens should not ever be allowed to vote, unless they gain citizenship. Period. The rest is you putting words in my mouth like dems do. You keep mentioning federal agencies, we know the fed controls that. States cannot interfere in federal agencies.
Who is 'Clearance' [sic] Thomas? Just messing with you. I know who you are talking about. Thomas really made no comments like Alito did. Why attack him?
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said landmark high court rulings that established gay rights and contraception rights should be reconsidered now that the federal right to abortion has been revoked.
Thomas wrote that those rulings "were demonstrably erroneous decisions."
Oh yeah, you’re right. I guess prescription drugs cannot be sold directly from the website. --------------------------------------- added after 9 minutes
* these websites.
There will be a lot of prescriptions being sold online now to counter these archaic laws.
This is a sincere question, I thought Canada sold prescription medications via online. The hitch being you had to have a legitimate prescription written by a Canadian doctor.
I have never bought prescription drugs online so I don’t really know. I do know that a lot of Americans by their prescription drugs from Canadian websites and I assume they use prescriptions written by American doctors.
I also know that insulin is grotesquely more expensive in the US and a lot of Americans buy it from Canada.
Hey, you are my Canadian Connection and I look to you for answers that relate to Canada, my northern neighbor. I have never ordered medication from a website so I don't know what the protocol is. Logic suggests to me that Canadian pharmacies should require that in order for them to fill a perscription the patient must be seen by a Canadian doctor.
No Bella, as long as you have a prescription from your doctor and fax it to them, they will send your order, usually takes three to four weeks to get because it has to go through customs.
Strange that Canadian government and pharmacies are so lenient. Heck, everyone knows that Americans are drug taking, gun wielding, sue happy heteroclites
It's accually against U.S? Policy to get prescriptions from another country, but us government is not targeting the individuals, their more after drugs being sent here for sale. 65% of elderly on welfare get their prescriptions from Canada because it's afortable on there limited retirement. The us is trying to stop opioids from entering this country which most non opioids like elderly medications fall under this category which will hurt many retirees from getting their meds if it passes.
I agree with both you and CAT here. Except you do not need to be seen by a Canadian physician, you just need a valid RX from a physician in the US or Canada. I do not know about other countries though, Canada probably has some restrictions there which is understandable.
It’s because people just don’t care enough to go vote. That’s why people like McConnell, Trump, and Gorsuch get elected. Trash like Green too. Whole majorities want this country to go one way but, instead, we go the way of people like Phart or Tecsan
I vote, you vote. Just for opposite things.
You care, I care, again, for the opposite things.
The ruling was made by the high court. Adapt.
Have sex in a responsible way, or move to a state that agrees with killing of babies.
Well if it is done in a clean environment by a doctor, that is a viable option. But I wouldn't want that gal in the pic doing it with those bloody scissors.
What urks me is everyone is acting like abortion is now impossible and it is the end of the world. It's not banned, unless the state you live in bans it.
And people that fuck like rabbits usually live in califunny or new york or some other liberal state and it doesn't affect them the least. They can fuck like mice, and just go by the abortion clinic on the way to get their hair done as always.
As for rubbers and pills, you all seem to forget politicians fuck everything that moves like Bill clinton and even Trump had issues with keeping his pants up. I think stopping murder is as far as they will try to go as they would be cutting into their side action with their interns and so forth. The idea of prevention is far more viable, safer and cheaper than abortion. IF used properly, abortion would have been scarce along time ago. Just as with the spread of monkey pox at a party in uk because of random sex unprotected, , pregnancy is caused by random sex without protection.
pregnancy is caused by random sex without protection. I think you should have left out the word 'random'. Some are married to each other and are just idiots.
If you are a poor woman, having to travel to a state that allows abortion is not an option. You think men in conservative states have low sex drives? I didn’t know that. Carolinian men must have little balls.
That’s right. You would have to be awfully poor, and what happens to her job? What about lodging, meals? What happens if there are complications? What if she has kids already and no one to keep an eye on them?
What would have happened had she kept her clothes on?
We could discuss what if's until the cows came home and the chickens came to roost.
The simple fact is, your idea of not fucking, is the best thing for these ------- fill in the blanks with poor ,Asian, whatever ,women to do to prevent issues if they do not have the cognitive ability to choose protection or responsible males to mate with.
Phart, what you don’t seem to understand or refuse to do so, is that many many women don’t have the option to keep their panties on or afford protection or have sex with a partner that is willing to use protection. Whatever the reason, women have the right to choose to terminate their pregnancy if they choose to do so.
Why is there not a option to keep their panties on? you refuse to answer that for whatever reason.
ANY effort to remove those panties if the wearer is unwilling is R@PE plain and simple. There are and should be harsh repercussions for that.
As I have tried to elude to, there is no unknown law saying a woman has to give sex to a man. IF sex happens and the woman don't want it,it is R@PE and she should deal with it as such. Concealed carrry? Blow his nuts off? I mean really , quit acting like women are slot machines for men.
A husband can force a wife into sex and not get punished. A Catholic man married to a non religious woman into using the rhythm method as safe sex and she gets pregnant. The reasons can be many. You keep implying sex is something a woman can control. Not so, but, in any case, even if she wants to use it as a contraceptive, a woman should have the right to do so. It’s her body and whatever is growing inside her belongs to her,
Well there is no reason for a married couple to be having issues with sex anyway. Marriage and sex and procreation, parenting, are all together. Why did they get married if she doesn't want sex?
Why is a non religious woman marring a catholic? They are religious rabbits as they don't believe in nothing but making babies. Looks like a case of leaping before she looked.
A woman has control over the sex ,they are indoctrinated to believe they are the victims of everything and can hollar anytime and they are believed in a court of law over a man 10 to 1.
I totally disagree with what you say about women having no control.
They don't have to marry , they don't have to have sex, therefore no children to be had.
Your argument makes the Me to movement moot. you make it sound like men are entitled to sex.If thats the case,where in the hell is mine??
Nature made man as a being that wants sex all the time. It’s nature’s way of insuring human procreation. As thinking animals we try to control that urge but sex is a must. I gave you some examples. They are more true than you realize. Many adults give lip service to their religion but, in reality, they just don’t care. I’m tired of trying to use logic with you when you just don’t see the logic so, I’ll just say the following. Regardless what you think and what a MINORITY of the people think, abortion is a right that belongs to women. Take it or leave it.
I won't take it, not right to murder.
We can control our urges, sex is like any other urge ,you don't have to have that potato chip, that new car,or pussy.You are just in a position nowadays that credit will buy what you think you need and pussy allows it's self to be had so it can hollar "me to" 40 years later.
Democrats most likely will loose the House, but, this will assure that the loss will be minimal and we will be able to build on that to overcome in 2024. However, now, there’s a good chance we’ll stay on top.
only registered users can see external links
Although the rowing verses wading thing is causing a uproar for alot of liberals, most of us conservatives are still interested in the economy.You know if the economy was in good shape,people might be able to afford to raise a child. So the economy is going to decide the mid terms and that will slow bidens machine down until we can get a decent president to actually try to fix America.
The chance that your party wins enough seats to overturn a presidential veto is zero. That means that for the period until the 2024 elections, you despicable Republicans will not get anything done. Then we will bury you
time will tell. I wouldn't get my hopes up of burying anyone.
There are MILLIONS of Americans that are fed up. Mirical's do happen, we had a couple last week. Every journey begins with the first step.
And we conservatives are just now putting our shoes on.
These people that are whining, Delta is ready when they are.
Why are we despicable? Do not think I ever made that comment to you. I like democrats, I do not think any girlfriend that I ever had was a republican. Opposites attract as the cliche goes.
Perhaps I used a tar brush instead of a small one. Most Repuckers are decent people but a man like Trump, even if he had made the country into a treasure chest, is a perverted individual with racist tendencies. A very large part of the Republican Party follow him. What does that say about you, Repuckers?
I think his mind will discourage him as he’s drooling down to the front of his shirt the bumbling mindless twit that he is I certainly hope that the people that voted for the old fool are happy with the way they fucked up America 🇺🇸
I just read that over a million democrats have already switched to republican just recently.
As for Trump being racist, sheesh,
only registered users can see external links
Remember the Platinum plan? Remember lowest unemployment for all races during his term?
I thought that was great too, but research some more. I could be wrong, but it is closer to 370,000. Consider the Republicans that changed to democrats.
I'm asking this question on a serious matter, there is no sarcasm in this question. I haven't been keeping up with this abortion decision very much. Nor do I agree with anybody telling a woman or a man what they can do with their body. There's other equations to making abortional illegal, one of them is population control. I know that sounds cruel but it's the truth. So this is my question, again being serious. The states that will now vote to make abortion illegal is there stipulations to the rule? Such as if a 14-year-old girl is raped will her and the parents have the right to abort the child? If a father molest and rapes his daughter will she be forced to take that pregnancy the term? I'm not concerned with the women running around spreading their legs every night to a different man. I'm worried about the innocent children and r-ape victims. There's no way in hell these types of situations have to abide by the law?
This is a issue where I do believe there should be a option list with abortion as a last resort but possible for r@pe and 1ncest victim's.
I am against abortion-murder when it is used for cases like you mentioned,women just running around with men every night using it like a douche bag.
All good questions. Let’s get overpopulation out of the way first. Abortion will never change overpopulation. China tried that with their one child per family (2nd child was executed at birth). They stopped that.
Some states already have trigger abortion laws that went into effect immediately after the Supreme Court decision. Some of them have no provision in case of r@pe or !nsest.
Statistics show that promiscuous women or what is referred to as the modern woman, do use contraception and protection. Many are on the pill and most carry condoms to prevent STD’s. It’s unusual for them to get pregnant and, if they do, they have the financial ability to get help.
The problem is with women who are too poor to afford protection, women that home life is not conducive to have protection and, yes, women that are irresponsible, like drug addicts.
Ok, how do these women that are poor get pregnant if they know they can't afford to deal with the results? we need to fix that.
why is home life not conducive? we need to fix that. Are they being abused? If so,prosecute.
Phart, I’ve been posting answers to your questions over and over. Do the research. Some suggestions. American Medical Association. Mayo Clinic. Use Google to find other places. In particular, find right wing sites as they will give you answers that you will believe. Stay away from rag sheets like FOX.
Hi question does any one know how to delete a account on here not sure where to go.
Yes, on the far right side and under your points is the MEMBERSHIP box. Click on that and your very last option is DELETE PROFILE. Click on that and follow the directions.
Can't even follow instructions either. What a cunt! How many times did you piss on top of the toilet lid before someone told you to lift it up?
It won’t end here. Women will bury you dirty old Republican men. Maybe not in 6 months, maybe not 2024, but soon, we’ll kick you in the nuts.
By the way, if you liberals decide to start kicking people in the nuts, you better wear something besides flip flops and sandels!
The young men are the 1's out fucking all the time.
A zipper,a simple to operate device used to keep pants UP.
Besides that, only 10 states or so have banned abortion.So if you are into killing your babies, MOVE to a state that allows it. Sadly my state still allows it.But neighboring states are looking at fixing the issue.I hope we can get rid of our dumocrat governor and clean up the mess here to.
You have to be blind, deaf, and dumb not to realize that today the politics of the United States has changed.
And if you don't mind, show me the section of the constitution that says it is ok to kill a citizen before they exit the womb?
I looked over it a bit and see nothing that says it is ok to kill.
only registered users can see external links
Debates about whether some particular right is “in” the Constitution or not are debates about how to read and interpret the Constitution. Those who claim that the Constitution doesn’t say “right to privacy” or “separation of church and state” are relying upon the assumption that unless a particular phrase or specific words actually appears in the document, then the right doesn’t exist — either because the interpreters are drawing invalid implications or because it’s illegitimate to go beyond the exact text at all.
Whenever people complain about courts creating new rights that aren’t in the Constitution, they are usually talking about the right to privacy. Although the Constitution doesn’t mention any right to privacy, several passages imply such a right and many court decisions have found a right to privacy in different aspects of human life, such as contraception the education of children.
There is nothing in the Constitution about a right to be treated innocent until proven guilty,
There is nothing in the Constitution about a “right to a fair trial.”
Many people imagine that they have a right to tried in front of a jury of their peers, but there is nothing in the Constitution about that.
The Constitution lists no such explicit right, as the right to vote as it does with speech or assembly. It only lists reasons why you can’t be denied the ability to vote — for example, because of race and sex.
The idea that the courts have the authority to review the constitutionality of laws passed by legislatures is firmly entrenched in American law and politics. However, the Constitution does not mention “Judicial Review” and does not explicitly establish the concept.
The right to travel is not mentioned either. The same about the right to marriage or procreation.
Abortion was given the go ahead because it was a matter of privacy.
It was left like that. That was wrong. It should have been codified (made into formal Federal law). That is what is women will work hard to implement and we’ll do it through the power of the vote.
The right to travel is a part of the 'liberty' of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.
Freedom of movement under United States law - Wikipedia
only registered users can see external links › wiki › Freedom_of_movement_...
WRONG
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you.
Sixth Amendment | US Constitution - Legal Information Institute
Although the First Amendment does not explicitly mention the right of access, the Supreme Court has held that the right to attend criminal proceedings is implicit in freedom of speech and serves an important function in a democratic society by enhancing trial fairness and its appearance.
--------------------------------------- added after 4 minutes
Travel is not mentioned in the Construction. The Constitution mentions what can happen to prisoners but there’s no mention about innocent until proven guilty. Abortion is the same.
They were intelligent as hell. The best system in the world to date.
The framers took into consideration of changes, but you do have a small point here, I do not think they foresaw the changes that we have today.
They did a hell of a job and look how long it has lasted. There are things I look at and say how did they know to include this?
Smart if you ask most scholars.
Roe v Wade should have never been approved in the first place. State's rights. Remember to vote if you want change.
Thomas wrote that those rulings "were demonstrably erroneous decisions."
They are currently available on Amazon and Walmart sites in Canada.
--------------------------------------- added after 89 seconds
only registered users can see external links
--------------------------------------- added after 9 minutes
* these websites.
There will be a lot of prescriptions being sold online now to counter these archaic laws.
I also know that insulin is grotesquely more expensive in the US and a lot of Americans buy it from Canada.
Strange that Canadian government and pharmacies are so lenient. Heck, everyone knows that Americans are drug taking, gun wielding, sue happy heteroclites
You care, I care, again, for the opposite things.
The ruling was made by the high court. Adapt.
Have sex in a responsible way, or move to a state that agrees with killing of babies.
What urks me is everyone is acting like abortion is now impossible and it is the end of the world. It's not banned, unless the state you live in bans it.
And people that fuck like rabbits usually live in califunny or new york or some other liberal state and it doesn't affect them the least. They can fuck like mice, and just go by the abortion clinic on the way to get their hair done as always.
As for rubbers and pills, you all seem to forget politicians fuck everything that moves like Bill clinton and even Trump had issues with keeping his pants up. I think stopping murder is as far as they will try to go as they would be cutting into their side action with their interns and so forth. The idea of prevention is far more viable, safer and cheaper than abortion. IF used properly, abortion would have been scarce along time ago. Just as with the spread of monkey pox at a party in uk because of random sex unprotected, , pregnancy is caused by random sex without protection.
We could discuss what if's until the cows came home and the chickens came to roost.
The simple fact is, your idea of not fucking, is the best thing for these ------- fill in the blanks with poor ,Asian, whatever ,women to do to prevent issues if they do not have the cognitive ability to choose protection or responsible males to mate with.
ANY effort to remove those panties if the wearer is unwilling is R@PE plain and simple. There are and should be harsh repercussions for that.
As I have tried to elude to, there is no unknown law saying a woman has to give sex to a man. IF sex happens and the woman don't want it,it is R@PE and she should deal with it as such. Concealed carrry? Blow his nuts off? I mean really , quit acting like women are slot machines for men.
Why is a non religious woman marring a catholic? They are religious rabbits as they don't believe in nothing but making babies. Looks like a case of leaping before she looked.
A woman has control over the sex ,they are indoctrinated to believe they are the victims of everything and can hollar anytime and they are believed in a court of law over a man 10 to 1.
I totally disagree with what you say about women having no control.
They don't have to marry , they don't have to have sex, therefore no children to be had.
Your argument makes the Me to movement moot. you make it sound like men are entitled to sex.If thats the case,where in the hell is mine??
We can control our urges, sex is like any other urge ,you don't have to have that potato chip, that new car,or pussy.You are just in a position nowadays that credit will buy what you think you need and pussy allows it's self to be had so it can hollar "me to" 40 years later.
Although the rowing verses wading thing is causing a uproar for alot of liberals, most of us conservatives are still interested in the economy.You know if the economy was in good shape,people might be able to afford to raise a child. So the economy is going to decide the mid terms and that will slow bidens machine down until we can get a decent president to actually try to fix America.
There are MILLIONS of Americans that are fed up. Mirical's do happen, we had a couple last week. Every journey begins with the first step.
And we conservatives are just now putting our shoes on.
These people that are whining, Delta is ready when they are.
As for Trump being racist, sheesh,
only registered users can see external links
Remember the Platinum plan? Remember lowest unemployment for all races during his term?
--------------------------------------- added after 10 minutes
Adult Humnan Female, or what?
I am against abortion-murder when it is used for cases like you mentioned,women just running around with men every night using it like a douche bag.
Some states already have trigger abortion laws that went into effect immediately after the Supreme Court decision. Some of them have no provision in case of r@pe or !nsest.
Statistics show that promiscuous women or what is referred to as the modern woman, do use contraception and protection. Many are on the pill and most carry condoms to prevent STD’s. It’s unusual for them to get pregnant and, if they do, they have the financial ability to get help.
The problem is with women who are too poor to afford protection, women that home life is not conducive to have protection and, yes, women that are irresponsible, like drug addicts.
why is home life not conducive? we need to fix that. Are they being abused? If so,prosecute.
only registered users can see external links
New Comment Go to top