Page #1
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#106
New Comment Rating: -7 Similar topics: 1.American men? 2.nude 3.Donald Trump 45th President of United States 4.🎆 🇺🇸 HaPpY BiRtHdAy America!! 🇺🇸 🎆 5.The Nobel Peace Prize 🏅 Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
The system caught the human error: The discrepancy was flagged during routine quality checks. The county noticed that the number of voters who checked in didn't match the number of digital ballots cast, which prompted them to look for the un-uploaded data. As Raffensperger noted, "Georgia's election safeguards are designed to identify discrepancies, and that is exactly what these guardrails did."
If you want a real systemic issue from this exact 2026 election cycle, look at what happened in Georgia in August 2025. The state quietly conducted one of the largest mass removals in U.S. history, purging 471,000 voter registrations (~6% of the state's total).
Civil rights groups like Black Voters Matter literally sued the Secretary of State in February 2026, because the state refused to turn over the full records on who they kicked off and how they picked them.
Republicans didn't win that state, they stole it,
because their fuckery was at record levels.
• The "Use It or Lose It" Policy: Georgia law allows the state to target registered voters who have not participated in recent elections. If these individuals do not respond to a single piece of mail, their registration is canceled. In 2017 alone, under then-Secretary of State Brian Kemp, over 500,000 voters were purged from the rolls in a single day, a move that heavily penalized infrequent, younger, and lower-income voters.
• Flawed Data Processing: Independent investigations, such as those conducted for the AP and specialized voting rights organizations, found that tens of thousands of citizens were wrongly removed under the assumption they had moved, when they had actually remained at their registered addresses.
• Disproportionate Impact on Minorities: Any minor discrepancy—such as a missing hyphen, an apostrophe, a typographical error by a government worker, or a maiden name variation—led to a registration being flagged and frozen.
• Targeting Specific Demographics: In the lead-up to the 2018 midterm elections, approximately 53,000 voter registrations were placed on hold under this policy; an analysis of the data showed that nearly 70% of those blocked registrations belonged to Black applicants.
• Targeted Closures: Between 2012 and 2018, Georgia municipalities closed more than 200 polling stations across the state. These closures were heavily concentrated in deep-blue urban areas and low-income, predominantly Black neighborhoods.
• Calculated Delays: The reduction of polling places, combined with a lack of functioning voting machines allocated to these specific districts, created a bottleneck. Voters in minority precincts routinely faced waiting times of four to eight hours to cast their ballots, which acted as a direct economic and physical deterrent to voting.
• Restricting Mail-In and Drop-Box Voting: The law severely limited the number of mail-in ballot drop boxes, capped their operating hours, and placed them inside government buildings, making them inaccessible outside of standard business hours. It also shortened the window to request an absentee ballot.
• Criminalizing Voter Support: The legislation made it a misdemeanor to distribute water or food to voters waiting in the hours-long lines outside polling stations, a measure explicitly seen as a punitive action against heavily populated voting precincts.
• State Takeover of Election Boards: The law granted the state legislature the power to suspend local county election officials. This allowed a partisan state body to intervene in the management and certification of election results in heavily Democratic counties like Fulton.
• Mass Target Campaigns: Leveraging the law, conservative activist groups submitted challenges against hundreds of thousands of individual voters right before elections, using automated data matching that frequently misidentified eligible citizens. This forced cash-strapped local boards to process massive volumes of challenges and created confusion, intimidation, and provisional ballot requirements for valid voters.
So spare me your nonsense about 253 votes. A lot of Republicans need to be
put in prison to defend future elections.
All we as average citizens have been asking for is voter id and honesty. and so many are against that.
But I can see your IQ < 70 so all is good
And it seems that only Democrats are voting fraudulently.
At least the maga people vote for trump and so they have no advantage to cheat.
Amazing stuff!
--------------------------------------- added after 8 hours
Guess_who, first you are a chickenshit hiding behind blocking. Second. If you think that the only way to win an election is by cheating then I guess the Clown cheated in 2016 and 2024.
--------------------------------------- added after 119 hours
I had to block him back. He kept trashing my gallery. That’s a real no-no for me
No,, he was voted in fair and square
IF Dems spoke like Kennedy did ,"ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country" or something to that effect, more folks would listen to them,vote for them and etc. but they have gone so far left feild. Look at Minnesota, MILLIONS in fraud, politician that married her BROTHER for goodness sake,"oh he is gay" so there was no sex, yea right.
Now in 2026 for the most part this idea has been destroyed by the invasion of socialism/communism. People are stupid now. Propaganda as indeed destroyed the vulnerable now they tried to get children as low as 10 years old the right to vote. Thankfully the supreme court overturned. If the house wins they will not propose a bill for the better good. Same with the senate and I'm hoping and feel the poles are wrong and wrong since when I can remember. So therefore they are wrong which means they don't want you to know the truth. Trump was forceasted to lose with that bimbo harris.. Who won?
Yes. 😂 I think I can make sense of what he's trying to say, although his message is quite incoherent and jumps between several subjects.
He's essentially combining a few political, moral and ideological arguments into one rather confused rant.
His claim ----- What we can establish
Children aged 10 were going to get voting rights ---- He gives no bill, state or evidence to support this.
The Supreme Court overturned it ---- He doesn't identify a ruling.
Socialism destroyed empathy ---- That's his political opinion, not an established fact.
Polls were wrong about Trump ---- Some polls underestimated Trump, but polling is not the same as deliberately misleading people.
Trump won against Harris ---- Correct. Trump won 312 electoral votes to Harris's 226.
The most interesting contradiction is that he starts by talking about empathy, kindness, altruism and treating people well, but then calls people stupid, refers to Harris as a "bimbo" and dismisses anyone who disagrees with his political views. That's quite a contrast.
My interpretation is that he's trying to communicate:
"I'm a traditional, patriotic American. I believe in kindness, personal responsibility and putting the country first. I believe left-wing politics, socialism and mainstream media have corrupted society. I support Trump because I think he represents the truth, and I distrust institutions that disagree with my worldview."
That's the underlying message. But he mixes genuine philosophical ideas with political assumptions, unsupported claims and personal insults.
In short: He starts with JFK's philosophy of public service and ends with a partisan political rant. The two parts don't sit particularly comfortably together.
A rather sharp but intelligent response:
You started with a rather beautiful thought about empathy, kindness and altruism. Unfortunately, somewhere along the way, you seem to have lost sight of those very values yourself.
You speak about treating people with kindness and respect, yet your message is full of contempt for people who don't share your political views.
Perhaps the real question isn't whether socialism or communism has destroyed empathy, but whether we are capable of practising the empathy we so readily preach.
Remember, this is not me, just ChatGPT. You don't deserve MY effort.
It's impossible for them to do a worse job than Trump.
Anyway, I hope that they will spend lots of time on REVENGE.
It's justified, because Trump has used his presidency to keep him out of prison.
But unlike Republicans, they actually have plans to make things better.
You just don't like those things. You are very clear that you want life to suck.
'Bimbo Harris' is completely made up to justify voting for PED0PHILE TRUMP.
My evidence for calling Trump a ped0phile: Trump sues the shit out of everyone,
except the people who call him a ped0phile. That's because in discovery he has to release the remaining Epstein files, where his name occurs more often than Jesus
in the bible. The remaining files should be called the 'Trump files'.
So gas will be 2 dollars a gallon january 2027,
etc,
Because accountability is important?
They will not do friggen thing to FIX anything, it will all be centered around revenge.
For the protection of democracy, lots of them need to go behind bars.
That's the ONLY thing that can FIX your democracy.
He was just talking about his ballroom, his reflective pool and renaming shit.
And why would I even answer that question, if the American people were of
zero concern to you while Trump was in office?
And I in fact DID answer your question, because I explained that the Democrats cannot do SHIT to help the American people, unless they act in a way that you consider 'taking revenge on Trump'.
But OK, I'll answer your question (again).
First of all; Democrats can walk and chew bubblegum at the same time.
Maybe Republicans make it look hard to actually do shit, but it ISN'T.
The struggle is purely on getting corrupt politicians to agree with it.
However, there is a real problem: Democrats cannot do much or anything to help the American people, as long as Trump is in office, because Trump just said that he would VETO everything. That means that getting Trump and all his cronies out (which you think is revenge) is the ONLY thing that Democrats can do to help the American people.
Understand that I have zero confidence in Democrats actually showing a pair,
and going after all the perps of the incredible corruption and crimes, but they SHOULD, or the next chance Republicans get, they will destroy democracy for ever. Also, if the Democrats fail to do that, the current MAGA system will be able to block everything, the American people see no results for their votes, and too much of them can sadly be stupid enough to vote for Republicans again in 2028.
What Democrats COULD do, when Trump doesn't veto it, or is in prison,
are the next Core Democratic Legislative Goals:
* Rebuilding Domestic Infrastructure: Modernizing American roads, bridges, and energy grids creates stable, well-paying blue-collar jobs that cannot be outsourced, while ensuring local communities have safe drinking water and reliable power.
* Expanding Veteran Care: Providing comprehensive healthcare, mental health resources, and housing assistance guarantees that those who served the country receive the benefits they earned.
* Upgrading Border Technology and Personnel: Providing the U.S. Border Patrol with advanced fentanyl-detection screening at ports of entry, hiring more high-tech law enforcement personnel, and funding additional immigration judges to process backlogs ensures the physical border is secure and lethal drugs are intercepted before entering American communities.
* Securing Retirement Benefits: Protecting Social Security and Medicare from future budget cuts ensures that working-class Americans who paid into the system during their careers receive their full retirement checks and medical coverage.
* Lowering Prescription Drug Costs: Authorizing the government to negotiate directly with major pharmaceutical companies slashes the out-of-pocket price of essential medicines for families and seniors.
* Targeting Transnational Crime and Fentanyl: Directing ICE resources strictly toward dismantling drug cartels, human traffickers, and fentanyl smuggling networks focuses federal law enforcement on the actual security threats that devastate American communities.
* Mandating Law Enforcement Bodycams: Requiring ICE agents to wear bodycams protects innocent American citizens from cases of mistaken identity, provides clear evidence during operations, and holds federal agencies accountable.
* Enforcing Judicial Warrants: Ensuring that federal agents must secure a judge's signature before entering properties upholds the Fourth Amendment right to privacy and protects the homes and businesses of all Americans from government overreach.
* Raising the Federal Minimum Wage: Increasing the baseline hourly wage ensures that full-time American workers can afford basic necessities like housing and groceries without relying on government assistance.
* Capping Healthcare Premiums: Expanding federal health insurance subsidies limits out-of-pocket insurance costs for families, ensuring that a medical emergency does not lead to household bankruptcy.
* Investing in Local Public Education: Directing federal funding toward local public schools and vocational training boosts math, science, and technical education, preparing American children for high-paying domestic jobs.
* Capping Childcare and Eldercare Costs: Creating a federal cap on the cost of childcare and eldercare ensures that working parents and families do not have to choose between keeping their jobs or paying exorbitant fees to care for their loved ones.
* Protecting the Domestic Supply Chain: Expanding federal incentives to bring back the production of vital goods—such as microchips, steel, and essential medicines—to American soil prevents global supply shortages and keeps critical industries safe from foreign control.
* Expanding Paid Family and Medical Leave: Establishing a baseline requirement for paid family and medical leave allows American workers to take time off to care for a newborn or recover from a serious illness without losing their income or risking their job security.
How It Is Paid For:
* Raising Corporate Tax Rates: Increasing the minimum tax rate on large corporations and closing loopholes that allow major companies to legally avoid paying federal taxes.
* Taxing High-Income Earners: Applying the Social Security payroll tax to incomes far above the current cap, ensuring the wealthiest individuals contribute the same percentage of their total earnings as working-class families.
* Imposing Penalties on Offshoring: Charging fees and removing tax breaks for American companies that move their factories and jobs to foreign countries.
* Leveraging Medicare Savings: Using the billions of dollars saved by negotiating lower drug prices with pharmaceutical companies to directly fund federal healthcare services.
* Closing Offshore Tax Havens: Ending legal loopholes that allow corporations and individuals to hide profits in foreign banks to avoid domestic taxes.
Does that answer your question?
To be clear, I don't think that impeaching Trump for anything right now is a good strategy. They should definitely file multiple articles of impeachment, but then investigate the shit out of Trump, his family, all his cronies, Elon Musk and DOGE. They will find so many crimes, that they can probably completely end all of the Republican party and its enablers.
If those were actual Democratic goals? These ARE!!! They represent the EXACT framework the party has voted for, attempted to pass, and consistently fought for over the last DECADE. While political rhetoric can often cloud the core message, the actual legislative record shows a sustained effort to enact these exact policies, with about half successfully made into law and the other half actively blocked by Republicans.
When Democrats held the majority, they successfully passed massive, tangible pieces of legislation directly matching these points:
• Rebuilding Infrastructure: They passed the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to modernize roads, bridges, and secure clean drinking water.
• Lowering Drug Costs & Healthcare Premiums: They passed the Inflation Reduction Act, giving Medicare the power to negotiate lower prescription drug prices and expanding subsidies to lower family premiums.
• Protecting Supply Chains: They passed the CHIPS and Science Act to bring vital microchip and high-tech manufacturing back to American soil to protect local industries.
• Expanding Veteran Care: They passed the PACT Act to deliver healthcare and benefits to veterans exposed to toxic environments.
For the remaining items on the list, Democrats have repeatedly drafted and introduced legislation, only for these goals to be blocked by Republican opposition and split party control:
• Raising the Minimum Wage: House Democrats repeatedly passed the Raise the Wage Act to lift the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour, but it consistently failed to clear the Senate due to unified Republican opposition.
• Capping Childcare & Paid Leave: National paid family leave and federal caps on childcare and eldercare costs were originally central pillars of the Build Back Better framework, but they were entirely blocked and cut during fierce Senate negotiations to pass the final bill.
• Border Technology & ICE Accountability: Democrats have routinely introduced funding for advanced fentanyl-detection scanners and extra immigration judges, alongside proposals from progressive factions for mandatory ICE bodycams and judicial warrant enforcement.
However, these specific measures have been repeatedly blocked or stalled as part of the broader, ongoing partisan deadlock over comprehensive border security and immigration reform.
The list isn't just a wishlist; it is a direct summary of the exact legislative blueprint the Democratic Party has spent the last ten years fighting to implement, succeeding where they had the votes and being blocked where they did not.
How many more billions do those high earners NEED to have an incentive? What incentive do you have left after you earned your 100th million, or your 10th billion? Why do want to reward them so much, while your only incentive for the working class is avoiding hunger?
You clearly don't understand tax brackets. You don't take home less money than your neighbor by crossing into a higher bracket. That is a total myth. You and your neighbor pay the exact same rate on the first $340,000. You only pay the higher rate on the extra money above that line. You always make more by earning more. Your investment in college still entirely pays off.
As for prices going up if we tax the rich? Corporations are already charging record-high prices right now while hoarding record profits. Fair taxes don't cause inflation; they fund the infrastructure, public schools, and healthcare that actually lower the cost of living for the rest of us.
Donald Trump passed huge tax-cuts for the wealthy. Did it lower inflation?
You are complaining about taxing the person making $375k, while completely ignoring that multi-millionaires and billionaires don't even pay income tax.
Their wealth is tied up in stocks and assets, meaning they pay next to nothing.
Because the ultra-rich pay so little, the well-doing American who actually went to college and invested in themselves has to pick up the TAB and pay MORE.
Your side literally caused the exact problem you are accusing Democrats of. Republicans talk big about cutting spending, but they always blow up the deficit by cutting taxes for the top 1% and giant corporations, leaving the hard-working professional to pay the bill.
Someone has to pay for all your wars and presents to the wealthy. You are on your last leg, so they cannot squeeze you any further. So, they look at the exact person you say to worry about.
Trump squeezed those people like no other actually. He made healthcare even more expensive, put tariffs on almost everything, and created massive inflation by blowing up the national debt. Your costs shot up, but did your income?
Then he let corporate interests run wild, doing absolutely nothing about Big Oil companies making record profits over the backs of hard-working citizens.
Your side makes them angry about paying taxes, but because of Trump's federal debt explosion, skyrocketing health insurance premiums, student debt interest, the absolute minimum income a family needs just to start a baseline middle-class life anywhere in America has shot past $100,000. People used to be well off at that income, and Trump is turning them POOR.
According to googles answer to the question, do democrats like to raise taxes,
Democrats generally advocate for raising taxes on high-income households (typically defined as earning over $400,000), large corporations, and capital gains to fund social programs, infrastructure, and tax relief for low- and middle-income families. Democrats and independent analysts note that many of their proposals pledge not to raise income taxes on individuals earning under $400,000.
Pew Research Center +5
Republicans generally oppose broad tax increases and favor lower individual and corporate tax rates, arguing that high taxes stifle economic growth and job creation. Republican leaders frequently accuse Democrats of supporting massive tax hikes by voting against legislation that extends or makes permanent the individual tax cuts from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which Republicans contend would result in higher tax bills for millions of families if allowed to expire. Conversely, critics of Republican plans sometimes argue that certain GOP proposals or expiring provisions disproportionately impact lower- and middle-income taxpayers
Question to google," do the democrats want to fix the problems America has or are they on a mission of revenge against trump" They want to fuck up things like the supreme court, something that is supposed to be non partisan. just because they don't agree with it. "
outline broader systemic goals, such as constraining executive power, reforming civil service hiring, addressing federal red tape, and pursuing structural changes like Supreme Court overhauls."
AI Overview
Following the 2026 midterm elections, where Democrats retook control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate, the party's approach involves a dual focus on legislative and economic governance alongside congressional oversight and investigations into the Trump administration.
The Democratic Position: Policy and Governance
• Legislative and Economic Priorities: Democratic leaders and strategy groups have emphasized focusing on cost-of-living issues, healthcare, SNAP benefits, and working-class economic concerns. Proposals include policy platforms centered on wages, social programs, and addressing inflation or household expenses that resonated with voters during the midterms.
• Institutional and Reform Plans: Strategic proposals like Democratic Project 2029 via Vox outline broader systemic goals, such as constraining executive power, reforming civil service hiring, addressing federal red tape, and pursuing structural changes like Supreme Court overhauls.
• Internal Debates: Figures within the party—such as Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and various leadership aides—have cautioned against getting entirely consumed by partisan warfare, arguing that Democrats must maintain a constructive, evidence-based agenda to retain durable trust with the electorate rather than relying solely on attacks.
The Oversight and Investigation Focus (Views on Retribution)
• Congressional Subpoenas and Investigations: With control of congressional committees, Democrats are positioned to launch oversight investigations into executive branch operations, cabinet officials (such as potential scrutiny surrounding administration figures like Secretary of War Pete Hegseth), immigration enforcement tactics by ICE, and executive finances.
• Division Over Impeachment: While a strong undercurrent of desire for political retribution exists among some rank-and-file lawmakers, congressional leadership (including Senate and House leaders) has generally expressed skepticism or resistance toward pursuing a third impeachment trial against Donald Trump, noting the lack of a two-thirds majority in the Senate required for a conviction.
• Republican and Critic Perspectives: Republican figures, such as Representative Kat Cammack, have characterized the Democratic congressional majority's anticipated actions as a "vendetta" or political retaliation rather than a genuine effort to govern, while independent analysts note that Washington is bracing for heightened partisanship and clash-heavy oversight over the next two years
You can make $400,000 a year without exploiting anyone, you CANNOT become a billionaire without exploiting lots and lots of people.
I'll look at the rest later. Until then, go sit in the shame corner for this oblivious argument.
between upper middle class and billionaires.
About the Supreme Court; that branch of government is broken, and Republicans destroyed it. We can all see clearly how they corrupt the meaning of the Constitution, just to favor the wealthy elites who pay them off. That blatant corruption needs to end, by any means necessary, and I fully support the Democrats in fixing it. Call it whatever you want, I call it saving the system.
This is why you calling it 'political revenge' is so hypocritical; you constantly defend a rule of law with harsh punishments for regular citizens. Whenever someone is killed by the police or ICE, your immediate justification is that they should have complied. You also blamed a black teenager for getting shot, just for ringing the wrong doorbell at night. Your demand for flawless compliance applies to everyone you don't like.
But when it comes to Donald Trump or his cronies, your entire philosophy vanishes. Suddenly, holding a man accountable for a decade of crimes, corruption and trying to overturn an election is labeled as 'revenge'.
You want strict compliance for the powerless, but absolute immunity
for the people you like. I'm not having it.
Your side baselessly accuses independent prosecutors like Jack Smith of weaponizing the law, while Trump openly orders the DOJ to hunt down his political enemies. He literally used Truth Social to command Pam Bondi to prosecute Adam Schiff, James Comey, and Letitia James. When career prosecutor Erik Siebert refused to bring baseless charges due to a lack of evidence, Trump fired him and replaced him with his own defense lawyer to force the indictments through. We just watched his administration send federal agents to raid the home of Representative Ilhan Omar. He even uses DOJ officials and billions in campaign money to sue the media for his personal hurt feelings, all while lying about private citizens every single day. ‘Revenge’ is a massive understatement, for Trump acting like a rabid dog biting at everyone around him.
Democratic leadership like Hakeem Jeffries is focused on governance,
so I don't have any confidence that they are going to do what is needed
to restore the rule of law. Crying about 'political persecution' the moment Trump is held to the same standards as everyone else is pathetic.
Cry me a river!
Your exchange with AI made me laugh, it completely rejected your framing. You’ll probably cry bias, but that’s exactly what AI is built to prevent. If I try to make it accept a biased angle, I get the exact same objective results.
AI operates on facts and logic, not partisan echo chambers. It didn’t take your bait, because reality doesn’t support your narrative.
I use AI to eliminate biases from my argumentation and check facts.
You should try it sometimes to prepare a message before you send it.
Direct quotes by Trump:
1. About Jeffrey Epstein (2002)
"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."
— New York Magazine, 2002.
2. About entering beauty pageant dressing rooms (2005)
"I'll go backstage before a show, and everyone's getting dressed and ready and everything else, and you know, no men are anywhere, and I'm allowed to go in because I'm the owner of the pageant and therefore I'm inspecting it."
"They're standing there with no clothes. And you see these incredible-looking women, and so I sort of get away with things like that."
— Howard Stern Show, April 2005.
3. About his 17-year-old daughter Ivanka (1999)
"She's 17 and doing great — Ivanka. She made me promise, swear to her that I would never date a girl younger than her. So as she grows older, the field is getting very limited."
— Howard Stern Show.
4. About Ivanka's appearance (2004)
"Yeah."
— Trump's response when Howard Stern asked whether Ivanka could be described as a "piece of ass."
5. About Ivanka's breasts (2006)
"She's actually always been very voluptuous. She's tall, she's almost 6 feet tall, and she's been, she's an amazing beauty."
— Howard Stern Show.
6. About dating 21-year-olds (2002)
"Over the past couple of years, I'd go out with somebody and she's like 21, and she's talking about, you know, 'What are you doing?' and she's studying algebra."
— Howard Stern Show.
7. About women aged 24 (2006)
"Oh, absolutely. I'd have no trouble."
— Trump responding to Stern asking whether he could be dating 24-year-olds.
8. About Lindsay Lohan (2004)
"She's probably deeply troubled, and therefore great in bed."
— Howard Stern Show, discussing Lindsay Lohan, who was 18.
9. About women and sexual entitlement (2005 recording, released 2016)
"I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait."
"When you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything."
"Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything."
— Access Hollywood recording.
10. About two 14-year-old girls (1992)
"Wow! Just think — in a couple of years I'll be dating you."
— Reported remark to two 14-year-old girls, attributed to Trump by contemporary newspaper reporting.
Your side called Biden a ped0, for supposedly smelling a girl's hair.
Trump's behavior is much much worse. These are JUST his own WORDS.
Trump,as with any famous person,has a image to project,protect.
Do you honestly expect him to say, "OH he is a asshole,"
teen beauty pageants to peep on them? If this was any other person than Trump,
you would condemn them to hell.
I don't care that he's an asshole, I care that he is now associated with r@ping
an EIGHT YEAR OLD GIRL. He is the exact type of ped0phile elite cabal monster that QAnon was going mental about. I thought they were crazy, but it all turned out to be true, only about Republicans and not Democrats. Maybe even the satanic part will leak eventually. That would make it complete.
Any look into the history of Trump instantly reveals what a horrible man he has been for all of his life, and you lot are loyal like dogs to him. Why do you like evil people?
Meanwhile you need to pretend that your political enemies are evil people on no evidence whatsoever, while you reject mountains of evidence about the politicians that you keep supporting, for no good reason at all.
What reason do you have to lie to yourself?
I will post this again,not a politicain but why aren't you as angry about bill clinton being photoed in 1 of epstiens bathtubs?
Sure, and there are also lots of decent and even exemplary celebrities.
If there were even the slightest reasons to suspect Clinton of a fraction
of what Trump is investigated for, I would indeed be just as angry.
Honestly, probably even angrier. I hold my political allies to a much higher standard of morals and ethics, than I do my political opponents.
Clinton is hardly an ally by Dutch standards, but the US only has 2 choices.
I expect representatives of my own party to not lie ever. That doesn't mean that I would force them to resign on the first lie that I catch them in, but I would certainly push a complaint up the ladder of responsibility. Meanwhile, we have become used to seeing politicians from the other side lie with total impunity, and their base doesn't seem to care at all. That is the real double standard.
My standards of evidence are the same for everyone. Facts and reason!
My trust in different sources is NOT the same for all. I evaluate a source based on its track record, whether their arguments and data are independently verifiable, and if they provide transparent evidence to support their claims in the first place.
A 'trust my words' attitude is an immediate red flag. Furthermore, I strictly look for financial or political conflicts of interest, a willingness to openly correct mistakes, and whether the claim can be verified by other credible, independent sources.
The specific law that allows foreign-born children to automatically become U.S. citizens when their parents naturalize is the Child Citizenship Act of 2000 (CCA), which is codified under Section 320 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
She could have lied about her age, but this (above) is what happened.
That's even the official story of your Trump regime. The rest is bullshit.
I expect this case to crumble, like most of Trump's cases.
Anyone of you following his case against the BBC?
"A Florida federal court recently issued a stern warning that the entire case could be dismissed due to his legal team's failure to cooperate with the discovery process." That's because in discovery, all evidence that Jack Smith collected about Trump's attempt to steal the election would be added to the case. That's all evidence that the BBC didn't engage in defamation, because their representation of his actions are entirely based on reality, even if they edited the video. It didn't impact Trump's reputation, because that's all on him.
with roughly 76.5% of the total vote share.
Also, your math on Florida doesn't hold up. The 2026 midterm results show that the Republican governor only won Florida with a razor-thin 50.02% against 48.71% for the Democrat. Half the state voted against your nonsense.
By the way, you might want to look up what 'holding the bag' actually means.
It means being left stuck with a failure or a massive loss while everyone else gets away. If you're waiting for the whole country to move to Florida so you can 'hold the bag,' you are accidentally predicting your own financial ruin.
to protect their incumbents.
Even in your beloved Florida, Democrats would have won, with just a fair game.
However, Angie Nixon lost, because the national Democratic party’s investment in Florida stood at effectively $0 in major media spending, compared to the tens of millions of dollars national groups poured into
other target Senate seats, such as Texas.
The only reason that she got this close, is because people supported her.
It's a damn shame that the national Democrats didn't support those people.
that clearly contradicts my claims. That should be EASY.
I am not here to serve you.. Get your bitch to do that.. I'm here for reasons you do not understand... You're lucky that CAT fucktard hid your gifts.. I can just start it all again.
You're lack of intelligence and ignorance is mare than enough determining I want nothing to do with you.
Is Zuid-Holland as stupid as you are? Free speech has nothing to do with it. But my right to respond to your rubbish has come to an end.. Get over it already.
Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, the ex-husband (and subject of longstanding rumors regarding his relationship) to Representative Ilhan Omar, identified himself as a gay man in an academic paper titled "Out in the Field: Notes on Researching Queer Violence in Kenya"
Overview of the Paper
• Title: Out in the Field: Notes on Researching Queer Violence in Kenya
• Author: Ahmed Nur Said Elmi (a doctoral researcher at the University of Bristol)
• Publication Date: August 27, 2026
• Publication: TOR: The Open Review for the Social Sciences (Volume 11, pages 33–40)
Core Themes and Content
• Focus: The essay reflects on the ethical, emotional, and methodological complexities of conducting ethnographic research on queerphobic violence and the criminalization of homosexuality across urban centres in Kenya (drawing on nine months of fieldwork).
• Positionality & Identity: Elmi writes from a reflexive standpoint, describing his identity as a "gay man of the East African diaspora" and noting that his fieldwork in a context where queerness is criminalized "was never neutral".
• Epistemology: The paper critiques standard institutional research ethics, arguing that studying violence in hostile environments requires viewing the field as a relational, embodied space shaped by power dynamics, vulnerability, emotional labor, and ongoing community accountability.
• Broader Context: The publication gained public and political attention in late October 2026 due to Elmi's identity disclosures and his past marriage to U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar amid ongoing political and federal scrutiny regarding their background.
Read the full essay via the University of Bristol Research Information Portal or view the text on ResearchGate.
New Comment Go to top