Stay Hard as Steel!!!

Get Paid For
Using Social Sites!

Become an expert in
pussy licking!
She'll Beg You For More!

Want a bigger penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!

STUFF, JUST STUFF

Discussion Forum on Show It Off

Page #127

Pages:  #1... #122   #123   #124   #125   #126   #127   #128   #129   #130   #131   ...#769

Started by bella! [Ignore] 20,May,18 18:36  other posts
Please feel free to post miscellaneous subject matter, aka STUFF in this thread.

Please attempt to remain somewhat respectful to other members, ninnyhammers, dummies and folks you just don't like. Thank you.

New Comment       Rating: 11  


Comments:
By phart [Ignore] 12,Apr,23 16:10 other posts 
Old but still accurate

Today I placed my Smith & Wesson .357 magnum revolver on a table next to my front door.

I left 6 cartridges beside it, then left it alone and went about my business

While I was gone, the mailman delivered my mail, the neighbor's son across the street mowed the yard, a girl walked her dog down the street, and quite a few cars stopped at the "stop" sign near my house.

After an hour, I checked on the gun. It was quietly sitting there, right where I had left it. It had not moved. It had not killed anyone, even with the numerous opportunities it had been presented to do that. In fact, it had not even loaded itself.

Well, you can imagine my surprise, with all the hype by the Left and the media about how dangerous guns are and how they kill people, either the media is wrong or I'm in possession of the laziest gun in the world.

The United States is 3rd in Murders throughout the World. But if you take out just 5 'left-wing' cities: Chicago, Detroit, Washington DC, St Louis and New Orleans -- the United States is 4th from the bottom, in the ENTIRE World, for Murders.

These 5 Cities are controlled by DEMOCRATS. They have The Toughest Gun Control Laws in the USA. Do you think maybe the Democrats just might have something to do with all the gun violence......or would it be absurd to draw any conclusions from this data?

Now I'm off to check on my spoons. I hear they're making people fat !!
By bella! [Ignore] 12,Apr,23 17:12 other posts 
This is the most recent publication of murderous cities in the U.S.

only registered users can see external links
By #610414 12,Apr,23 17:13
Ok, suppose the gun is loaded. You are holding it in your hand. You see the mailman delivering your mail. You raise the gun, aim it at the mailman and pull the trigger. You do the same with the kid across the street and the girl walking her dog. Any ammo left you use on passing cars. Does that make you crazy or deranged? I would say yes. Did the gun do that on its own? No. What if, instead of a gun you had left a knife on top of that table? Do you think the carnage would have been less or none at all? You take your right wing argument, "Guns don't k!ll, people ki!l" and assume we, liberals, want to get rid of guns because the gun kill!s. Not so. We can't get rid of the nut holding the gun so we don't want a gun available to that nut. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE, PHART.
By phart [Ignore] 12,Apr,23 20:02 other posts 
Let me ask this, Why can't we get rid of the nut holding the gun? Or knife or other deadly object? What is stopping us from getting rid of them?
Tell me please.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 09:47 other posts 
Did you read about the nut who just shot up a bank?
He had NO history of criminal behavior or mental problems.
He was just a guy who got outraged about getting fired, from that bank.
So he bought an AR-15 and went to the bank to kill everyone.

Maybe, if getting fired doesn't mean the end of your livelihood,
fired employees won't get the idea to do a mass murder/suicide run.
They will just collect their 'dole' for a while and find another job.
Your harsh society turns people into desperate lunatics.

So what do you propose to get rid of nuts like him?
Would you want to detain everyone who gets fired?

If he had a knife, the security guards would have been able to stop him.
But an AR-15 is a much more effective mass murder tool, so they couldn't,
or at least not before he killed 5 people and injured 9.

Before your government legalized assault rifles, there were less mass shootings.
Have you heard of many mass stabbings?
By the way, the UK has a stabbing problem, so they have KNIFE CONTROL!
At least they try doing something about the murder tools. You don't.
It's a bit more difficult, because everyone needs knives in the kitchen.
Most Americans don't need guns. They just make you feel like a real man.

Mass stabbings don't happen much, because cops have guns. Not a 'fair fight'.
With an AR-15, you do have a chance to kill many cops, before they kill you.
Combine that with the culture of Americans thinking they are Rambo,
that leads to what you see happening all the time, but only in America.
By #610414 12,Apr,23 17:25
DC is controlled by Congress. Baltimore is not in your list. Tell us how Dumbocrat city leaders promote crime, especially murder by firearms. Aren't firearms controlled (sic) by the states? The great majority of the population, Dumbocrat or Repucker, support more regulations of firearms (except those dumbasses in Congress). Why are you swimming upstream?
By phart [Ignore] 12,Apr,23 18:38 other posts 
Salman have swan upstream always.
Someone has to stand up and say enough is enough or there would be total chaos in the world.
Why would the gun be in my hand pointed at the mail man?
The mail man is doing his job.
Why would I shoot at passing cars?
Just because a hammer is in the tool box does not mean I use it to tighten a bolt.
The gun is there when the person who needs it to protect themselves from someone else that has no sense of right and wrong threatens them.
By #610414 12,Apr,23 19:06
And the victims in all the mass shootings were shot by someone who needed protection? Yeah, right.
By phart [Ignore] 12,Apr,23 19:56 other posts 
THey were shot by a sicko that needed to be off the street and in a padded room .
Instead of pumped full of Adderall and pushed back on the street
By #610414 12,Apr,23 20:33
You are proving my argument
By phart [Ignore] 12,Apr,23 20:46 other posts 
How? what am I saying that is so wrong? had that trans that was depressed been in a hospital they could not have killed those kids.
Explain how I am wrong
By #610414 12,Apr,23 21:27
How do you get that tran in a hospital? Don't say,"We just do". Tell us, step by step how that would have been accomplished.
By phart [Ignore] 12,Apr,23 21:38 other posts 
When that person went to the dr, and said I am not what my body is, the dr should have immediately went into action. Running test and asking questions. If that person showed signs of depression, which most trans do, they should have been ushered into medical care right then. Take them out of the world for a time, determine WHY they are depressed ,and determine a solution.
When I was injured, I can't recall how much testing I went thru, testing every aspect of my mental well being. there was therapy's and training and etc available if i needed it to overcome any issues I had .
Those same facilitys that were treating me with a brain injury by no fault of my own, were also capable of treating people like the trans that was depressed and so forth.
By #610414 13,Apr,23 07:40
That is possible if the person gives the approval AND is in treatment. Come on, Phart, give us the steps.
By phart [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 09:35 other posts 
Steps, that is the dr's job.
As for approval, let the dr determine if the person is a danger to themselves or others and then it is no longer up to the individual.
By #610414 13,Apr,23 09:47
Only if the person goes to the doctor. Only if the doctor suspects something. Only if the doctor doesn't want to be sued. And, if the person gets arrested, he'll be out in 3 days madder than hell. No, Phart, it's not the doctor job. You haven't told us shit so far. How, Phart?
By dgraff [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 10:39 other posts 
Boring I’ve heard all this crap many times but mark my words just try to take any of mine and I become the lunatic with many guns and a whole mountain top to play on
By #610414 13,Apr,23 16:20
10% or maybe 20% will be like you. We can make room in the local jail or Potter's cemetery
By dgraff [Ignore] 14,Apr,23 04:04 other posts 
I will build sniper nests on top the mountain awhile
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 14,Apr,23 05:50 other posts 
It's a strange 'hill to die on'. Why do you want to have guns so much,
that you are willing to kill and die for them?

What do those guns provide you that you cannot live without?
If target shooting is that much fun? You could still do that at a gun range
or pick up archery, if they would actually ban all guns, which not even
the most 'socialist' countries have done.

Or would you feel so afraid without guns, that you fear a fast death less,
than the unlikely possibility of someone coming for you and not being able to shoot them?

Or do you value your rights so much, that you would kill for them?
Then understand that Republicans took the right of women to have
an abortion and many feel just as strongly about that right as you do
for your right to form a 'well regulated militia', which you are not.
By dgraff [Ignore] 14,Apr,23 09:01 other posts 
It’s not like that at all some people have collected coins and stamps all their lives me i have collected guns and knives and bow and arrows or anything military I even have a working flame thrower I’m not saying I wouldn’t give them all up but it would have to have a price tag i have my collection insured for half a million against fire and theft so if they pay me for them they can have them but I didn’t collect them all these years to just let someone come in and take them
By #610414 14,Apr,23 09:56
I don't think anyone is saying that.
--------------------------------------- added after 81 seconds

Also, if you are a true collector, there could be special allowences for that.
By dgraff [Ignore] 14,Apr,23 12:14 other posts 
Good because if they do then we are nothing more than a nazi nation
By #610414 14,Apr,23 13:43
In that we agree. Same if women have to follow Christian dogma regarding their bodies and general health.
The Nazi regime actually relaxed the gun laws that were in place in Germany at the time the Nazis seized power.
Except for the Jews of course, the Nazi gun laws of 1938 specifically banned Jewish persons from obtaining a license to manufacture firearms or ammunition.
That's one humongous collection. Sure, people collect stamps and coins,
but I've never heard of such a collection being worth half a million.
I would know lots of better uses for that kind of money.

Obviously, the idea that all guns would be banned in the US is very hypothetical. There is no politician who is even suggesting it.
It would result in many complications like buying out collectors like you.
Just think of all the legal problems that it would cause.

However, your government needs to do something, because the most important job of a government is protecting its people and especially children from getting killed every other day. Do you also collect assault rifles or could you at least do without those?
By dgraff [Ignore] 15,Apr,23 10:31 other posts 
I have a few under lock and key
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 15,Apr,23 12:00 other posts 
Well, if I was an American, I would support laws that restricted those.
And a substantial package of other common sense gun control laws.
It wouldn't make sense for any politician to support more than that,
but they should just stick to what the majority of people support.
Even though complete disarmament would be more effective in solving the problem, I still believe in democracy more.
By phart [Ignore] 12,Apr,23 21:32 other posts 
only registered users can see external links
By Sir-Skittles [Ignore] 14,Apr,23 09:38 other posts 
WEIRD! Because we all know criminals play by the rules, follow laws etc. More missing front lobe left libs "fixing" things.



You also might notice that all of these shit hole cities that have major issues... NOT a single dem lives in the bad areas they represent.

The worst thing for blacks in the US- white libs!

Black and brown areas here in NYC are a war zone. Good work progressives!




By bella! [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 06:53 other posts 
There's been a blog authored titled "Fake pics" /blogs/53759.html . The essence of the blog seems to be regarding Photoshop'd pictures. One member asserts that that there's differences in pixelation, "bicubic upsampling" (whatever the heck that is) as well as accusations of blurry pictures!

In my head, I JUST KNOW that when I see a picture of a penis that is as big around as a piece of salami and hangs down to the fella's knee, the thing is not real! So why would this type of picture command 1176 views and 27 [HOT] votes?
/4rk924i9ntmopic.html

admin , I agree that this type of picture, one that has been digitally manipulated is better suited for a different category rather than being uploaded in the "Normal Dick" category but I ask you this, is it me, is it my eyes that cannot see the "leftover pixels of different colours" that surround whatever and bicubic upsampling? I ask you this, admin, can you see that?
By JustANormalGuy [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 07:37 other posts 
Fakes and photoshops. There MIGHT be 'bicubic upsampling'. There DEFINITELY IS always a sad little man
By bella! [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 11:00 other posts 
Hey, JANG, do you know what bicubic upsampling is and do you see the alleged leftover pixels of different colours?
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 11:45 other posts 
All these pictures are obviously fake, but some are better made than others.
This one looks fake the most: /vom4t0kay1pppic.html
There is no interaction between that nut-sack and the pants.

Bicubic upsampling is the way of the computer to calculate the color of intermediate pixels when the image is enlarged. The best way to prevent it (tip for the creator) is to work with pictures of a much higher resolution and reduce the resolution of the end result. Then all pixels are downsampled and it all looks better.

It's not bad photoshopping. I don't know if I could do better, but I know that it would take a lot of time. I'm sure it's fun seeing your own body with a big shlong, but why would he pretend on this side that those pictures are real? If people give him compliments for having a big dick, he still doesn't really have one. What's fun about getting compliments for something that's not real?

But, I don't think he's hurting anyone. It's just a bit sad.
By bella! [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 13:04 other posts 
"There is no interaction between that nut-sack and the pants." WHAT!?

The picture you selected was typical of the crap you can find in his gallery. The picture commanded 1304 views and not surprisingly, 26 numb nuts aka knuckleheads, voted [HOT]!
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 14,Apr,23 03:11 other posts 
Do you think that nut-sack hangs out his pants in a natural way there?
Either the pants or that nut-sack should deform there.
And I would expect more shadow. That's what I mean with 'interaction'.
When doing fake photo-shopping, physics and lighting are the hardest to recreate.
Pixelation is more of a noob thing to get wrong.
Thanks to Ananas2xl's post I now know what bicubic upsampling is. Tbh I'd say most fakes look obviously fake and/or unrealistic and/or if they were real you'd feel sorry for the poor guy.

Though apparently 'deep-faking' (whatever that is) is an issue on the internet so I guess it can be done much better. Sad world we live in.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 14,Apr,23 03:38 other posts 
True, at some point, no one will be able to tell what's real.
Unfortunately people will use that to claim 'fake' for real evidence that they don't like and will believe actual fakes, if the 'evidence' suits their narrative.

'Deep-faking' uses artificial intelligence. The cutting edge version creates an entire 3D head model from the source pictures or video and replaces one head for another, while compensating the result for physics and lighting. It has the potential to be indistinguishable from reality. We might be heading to a competition where only a computer can distinguish fake from real, unless the deep-fake computer was better.
By admin [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 07:40 other posts 
I don't look at dick pics, not interested in them. But because you asked I had to look at it and I can see the balls and the penis look different from the rest of the pic. For starters - all edges are obviously not right. However, my vision is not that good anymore even with glasses for me to see some "pixels of different colors".
By bella! [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 10:59 other posts 
Thank you for making an exception and analyzing the picture I selected from Italian28cm's gallery. I randomly selected only one of the EXAGGERATED pictures found on Italian28cm's page and in MY MIND, the numbers speak for themselves. Basically, many members, mostly SYD members, really don't care whether the picture is from the internet or whether the picture is Photoshop'd. From your perspective, are men gullible when it comes to basic anatomy?
By admin [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 12:00 other posts 
What little I have learned from being in this biz is that it "sells" primarily fantasies. And those who buy fantasies are looking to be deceived. Does a lot of people watching wrestling not raise similar questions? It's fake by design. People love it.
By bella! [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 12:56 other posts 
And I am a person that did and does love wrestling! I know it's not real, but I love wrestling for pure entertainment value!
By bella! [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 16:16 other posts 
One last question, please. When the "evaluate" option, the option that's attached to each picture, how many members, in total must be in agreement that a given picture was uploaded in [wrong category] OR [internet pic]? Please give an example of when one might use the [ what's this] notification.
By admin [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 17:32 other posts 
As it has always been - 5 members.
By bella! [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 17:50 other posts 
Thank you for your clarification. I apologize that I was not clear on the "evaluation" of the individual pictures.
By mr_blue [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 12:38 other posts 
Fake it,till you make it
By bella! [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 13:05 other posts 
Italian28cm has faked it so many tines, my guess is he thinks he has "made it"!
By phart [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 13:15 other posts 
A elephant would say ouch if he headed towards it with that thing.
By bella! [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 13:21 other posts 
Ya think!?
By mr_blue [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 13:40 other posts 
Most people here are never going to actually meet,so like admin has said, it's a fantasy.
I think most people know when it's fake,birds of a feather flock together,fakes seek fakes cuz it's all fake to them
By bella! [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 14:27 other posts 
So if I may paraphrase your post, the majority of Italian28cm's admirers know they are viewing something unrealistic however it's all good because it's just a fantasy. Correct?
By mr_blue [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 14:48 other posts 
Is bigger better? Most of the guys with a genuine large endowment have issues with dating cuz of the size of their member..so when I see the comments from people on those pics, it's clear they are in a fantasy world....like the women(husbands using their partners pics for gratification)
who are size queen's, when those so called size queens have no pics on their pages of playing with a big toy/dildo.... genuine size queens have big toys and show that they can take a big dick....
It is still funny to me,what people will fake,for a few clicks and likes...
Also,most big dick guys will show their dick in comparison to something to show how real it is or a video to prove what they have....
Lot of waffle there,but yes, most admirers of the horse schlong are in a fantasy land....
By Love-it [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 15:33 other posts 
Check out Swingcouple42 also. Absolutely ridiculous.
By mr_blue [Ignore] 13,Apr,23 15:46 other posts 
Face in the hole apps have been used here for ages.It is a fantasy for most of the users here,most of the female profiles are men using women's pics to get tributes...
If you search the pics they are online on other sites...
Onlyfans models are used here, there's even a UK minor celebrity having their pics used here.....
I used to give a shit,but now I just take it all as a joke!!!
By Dev01 [Ignore] 14,Apr,23 06:12 other posts 
Why are we pandering on fake pics? It's not a new trend, Wait till AI evolves lol.

We know many Real people here...

The office back in the day was a proving ground. Office has been shut since Evers and a great mate Johnny passed. Still real is real, Fuck monted was real.

Why worry about net pics, I mean they stick out like dogs balls.
By bella! [Ignore] 14,Apr,23 06:48 other posts 
I agree, "real is real", Love-it 's blog about Italian28cm and Swingcouple42 seemed to command a good deal of attention especially from a newer member, Centaur . Centaur speaks about different colours in pixels and bicubic upsampling... Uh, I'm not using a magnifying glass just my old eyes and when my old eyes see a schlong as long as an arm and/or bigger around than a baseball bat, my eyes tell my brain that said schlong is not real! So apparently there are an excessive number of numb nuts that buy into the fantasy presented and leave positive comments as well as [HOT] votes. My guess is that the positive encouragement then prompts the member to one-up the last picture and post more crazy crap!

A long while back, a female member of a popular Aussie couple admitted to using Photoshop to touch up her photos. My initial reaction is how do "we" as an adult community, separate that it's okay for her to Photoshop her pictures yet possibly delete a SYD member because of bicubic upsampling and leftover pixels?
By #688512 14,Apr,23 10:06
There are some easier ways to tell his pics are fake, for sure. One other way to tell is how the size of his shaved hairs increases between the transition from real to photoshop.

I'm happy for people to look at his pics, but I don't want to see them on the homepage just because other people fawn over him and slam the "hot" button without any critical thinking running through their heads.

I think modified pictures like his should be categorised as such, either "modified dicks" or "cock art" - because it's fantasy, not reality
By bella! [Ignore] 14,Apr,23 14:16 other posts 
And what do you think about the number of SYD members that post pics of their girlfriends, ex-girlfriends and side chicks?
By #688512 15,Apr,23 00:27
What do you mean? They should also go in the correct category.
By bella! [Ignore] 15,Apr,23 01:31 other posts 
And what category is that?
By #688512 15,Apr,23 05:39
Haha what's funny about that? Depends what they're posting. Asses, balls, cock art, cock measuring, misc/full body/penetrations/etc, modified dicks, normal dicks, not categorised, pierced dicks, tortured dicks, trans/cross, underwear/bulge.

You don't get to put something in "Normal Dicks" just because you want it to appear on the homepage.
By #610414 14,Apr,23 10:07
I think we all have done some photoshopping.

/bcjpfxtm29x8pic.html

🤣🤣🤣🤣

I had a C section. I had it when the procedure required a cut on the belly from one side to the other. The scar is horrendous and it leaves a flap of flesh on top of scar. I admit on some of my early pics I brushed it out. Vanity? Yes, but, now I believe that what you see is the way it should be. As it's very obvious, whatever hangup is involved, it's the viewers hangup.


New Comment   Go to top

Pages:  #1... #122   #123   #124   #125   #126   #127   #128   #129   #130   #131   ...#769



Show It Off