Male Multiple Orgasm
Discover your full Abilities!
Get Paid For
Using Social Sites!
Tired of ads
on this site?
Become an expert in
She'll Beg You For More!
Started by #10614 [Ignore] 04,May,09 12:37
New Comment Rating: -1
Similar topics: 1.Nude Sleeping 2.4Mykelby 3.Where to go to shoot my load? 4.Have you ever masturbated next to someone sleeping? 5.Nude family
Then there is my case. When I was in my t-e-e-n years I did a significant amount of sexual experimenting with my same sex first cousin. I don't think this damaged either of us.
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
And for what it's worth marriage between opposite sex first cousins is legal in many states.
are you suggesting that ANY consented sexual contact between family-members will lead to:
"signs of chronic depression, displays inappropriate sexual behavior, develops trust/boundary issues, manifests little self-worth and low-self-esteem and acts-out physically and sexually"
is THAT what comparing size and a jerk/suck off with your b r o t h e r or a nephew will lead to?
What I AM suggesting (as I mentioned in my original reply) is that relationships with family members can be extremely complicated WITHOUT throwing sex into the mix. The added sexual element has the potential to do way more harm than good.
I know someone who is dealing with that it is a real thing.
If he and his sister are attracted to each other, and as consenting adults, decide to have a sexual relationship, is that so wrong?
No one here is actually encouraging/promoting inc*st. We engaged in an intellectual exploration of the topic.
How is that wrong?
In all your abundance of reading and studies, are you able to explain why the majority of chi1d predators are men? Yes, you will hear about the occasional female teacher that becomes infatuated with the raging hormones of her teenage students but again, the majority of the chi1d predators are men.
Now, to your question. Men normally take active role in sex while women take passive. So it's really no-brainer why they are predators much more often than women. It's almost the same as to ask why so few men marry older women and so many women marry older men. Or to ask why so many men are killed in battle-lines and so few women are.
You will hear about this from time to time on the evening news, that men were caught taking pictures of young b0ys or teen males while in the locker rooms of schools, that hidden cameras are installed in apartments to watch young women, that grown men use the Internet to search and arrange meetings with young b0ys or gir1s and of course, r@pe. How does your response that men take a more active role in sex account for the sexual depravity that is exhibited in these instances?
I'm sure that there must be women involved in these heinous acts as well but nowhere to the degree of men.
Does it make sense that a woman will absorb about 30% more alcohol into her bloodstream than a man of the same weight who has consumed an equal amount?
Does it make sense that women do not play football against men? Or for that matter they don't play sports one against another at all. Not even chess.
Does it make sense that on this very site ratio of women to men is about 1 to 15 (and this is without correction for many female profiles actually being male fakes)?
I really don't know what's confusing you.
In familial sexual ab*se settings, the women tend to be ENABLERS if they are not actively involved in the ab*se. There is also a slight tendency for female predators to be more sadistic than their average male counterpart.
It's important to note, though, that sexual predation isn't necessarily about the sexual act. In many cases, it is about exerting POWER over a helpless victim. Guys tend to "express" power through sexual acting-out more than women do.
they see or sense what is happening, and yet they shut up and look away...
women are no saints, not by defenition
don't try to put everything (or me) into a frame of black/white and good/bad.
You take the poster to task for his question because it is asked on a site where people display their genitals and talk openly about sex.
There is a BIG difference between looking at a picture of a dick and fucking a goat, no?
what i DO say now is:
what's wrong with fucking a goat? ...or a unicorn????
oh, and by the way. since you brought this up mr. UC, FUCK religion!! ALL of them!! morality can do without it!
You said: "so worrying about morals you came to showyourdick/cunt to tell us about what is WRONG, SICK and DESPERATE??" in answer to the guy asking "Where are people's morals?"
The words you wrote imply that you feel a person who visits this site should not be concerned with morals.
At least that's how it looks in ENGLISH.
If you intended something different, you should have "framed" it a different way.
I agree with you on the religion issue but, sadly, there is no escaping its influence in the world we live in.
Also, though fucking a goat is wrong, I know a certain Unicorn that has no objection whatsoever to fucking...
second: i do NOT in any way NOT care about morals! you understand? NOT! i care about morals. you sensed right that i got cynic when the priest with his hard dick out his pants came to scream: WRONG, SICK, DESPERATE!
but leave it there please! don't follow me down with: you said this, so you mean that, so what you say is, if that is so, you want to, or you don't mind, etc. etc. etc.
(als we in het nederlands verder kunnen praten, prima! ik fileer je!)
I DO understand your point about the language barrier (I have told you many times that I respect your use of English and that it is often much better than that of NATIVE speakers, no?).
Look at it this way: when I challenge you, it only inspires you to improve your English so that you can try to verbally kick my ass.
Isn't that obvious?
It's like saying don't deposit your money in Al Capone's bank.
Religion has nothing to do with morality. Obvious!
So, I agree with you, but I suggest you don't stress the obviously obvious!
--------------------------------------- added after 10 hours
Correction: I find it funny too that, of all SIES, there are people who will talk about morals here. And some will even talk about religion!
--------------------------------------- added after 10 hours
I find it funny too that, of all SITES, there are people who will talk about morals here. And some will even talk about religion!
As to the religious aspect:
There isn't a religion in the world that doesn't have something to say about human sexuality and sexual practices. As a result, the religions of many people have an influence (usually negative) on how they view sex. Why is it unreasonable for members of a site where sex is discussed openly to express how their faith colors their views on sexuality?
In any case, I prefer to talk about sex and how to get it rather than restrictions, morals, and so on. As for religions, as far as I understand, they're incompatible with sex.
I don't understand what you mean by "faith".
See this page for example, these are photos of sculptures on some Hindu temple only registered users can see external links
Yes, maybe heavy topics of conversations are not for you and your friend.
True, heavy topics are not for me. I prefer sex.
--------------------------------------- added after 19 minutes
Besides, who decides right or wrong? Usually, it's the one with weapons. Nothing to do with morals and, certainly, nothing to do with religion.
--------------------------------------- added after 20 minutes
P.S. My friend? Who is my friend?
I don't care if two siblings love to f*ck eachother, or whether two ten y/o experimenting with eachother. Or a woman and man are together finely with an age difference of many years, or whether one likes the same gender more than the other. Or to get paid for sex.
If it's wise to have sex with a familymember, that's a whole different story, mostly because of genetics.
The only thing that matters to me if there's been an equal consent reached to get to the act.
New Comment Go to top