Page #18
Pages: #1... #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 ...#42
New Comment Rating: -9 Similar topics: 1.Does it actually matter? 2.SYD is a great place 3.Trump/Pence or Biden/Harris...Which do you feel will prevail??? 4.Kneeling before the American Flag during the National Anthem... 5.༼☯﹏☯༽ Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
I think this person is bat shit crazy.
only registered users can see external links
Post one article where they were outraged at the daily black on black shootings in LA, DC, Chicago, NYC, or greasy Atlanta
Racism, and anit-gun rants are used to help push America into socialism.
They are a very insolent bunch, but have the temerity to lecture everyone into compliance.
I mean, blm is a honest group of nice helpful people right?
blm, bring loads of money.
only registered users can see external links
Maby we need to offer free abortion pills to all people of color. perhaps even mandate abortions past the first born?
That would greatly reduce violence in the streets and eventually their numbers would dwindle and the racism problems would dwindle with those numbers.
I mean really, their lives have no value to them so why not? Just flush em all.
IS that the mindset we should have? Hell no.
Teach responsibility. Teach accountability.
Teach them lives matter, all of them. Not just theirs, but ALL!
We all have a history and that includes how we were brought up and the social environment in which we developed. Even amongst our own colour we have instinctive feelings about those to whom we relate.
Life is too short to fight about differences, we should concentrate on making our lives socially comfortable for ourselves and for those amongst whom we live.
In other words: "Life is what you make of it. Shut up and go home!"
Easy to say for someone who doesn't face their disadvantages.
Now explain this to the whiners that want everything everyone that has worked for a living has , handed to them.
It's your side who hurts them. It's only logical you don't want them to resist that.
You don't react the same, when it's something that affects you or your ideas.
They can do for themselves just as everyone else including me.
There are FEW Charites that don't have some skeletons in their closets but blm is NOTHING BUT a closet full of them.
Jail is to good for this bastard.Put him in a pool with some of those Pariona fish. A shallow pool so he can watch them eat his legs off first.
but yes, that's bad and I won't feel sorry for him, whatever punishment he gets.
Now imagine that, times hundreds or thousands: only registered users can see external links
And probably none of them will ever face justice.
Not at this rate, with what he's doing now. But, he could be. If he decided to use nukes, the death-toll of Stalin and Hitler could easily be tenfolded.
and the reasons he tells the Russian people are lies.
Are the lives of Iraqi people worth less than the lives of Ukrainian people?
Bush killed a million Iraqi people. Saddam did not have a million soldiers!
What the US called terrorists, were just civilians defending their country
against a foreign invasion, just like the Ukrainian civilians are doing now.
Bush accusing Iraq of 9/11 is just as dishonest as calling the people of Ukraine Nazis. Bush changed the motive later to Iraq has WMD.'s. When that turned out to be lies, most Americans changed their justification to "Saddam was a horrible dictator".
Yes he was, Saddam killed half a million people. Bush killed a million.
Saddam was developing Iraq, Bush turned it back to the stone age.
Most of that million victims were innocent civilians and many of them were women
and children. They died the same way as the victims in Ukraine, being bombed
and shot on sight, for just defending their country.
There were also US soldiers raping and torturing people in Iraq. Some were judged.
only registered users can see external links
But, ever heard of Abu Ghraib prison? Most of those that were tortured there
were innocent civilians, handed over to the US by warlords.
The Bush Administration is liable for 269 War Crimes.
There is lots of evidence of those War Crimes, but your government calls that 'confidential information' and the whistleblowers who uncover that evidence
to journalists, are called 'spies'.
Just like the US, Russia never agrees with their soldiers and officials being judged
by the International Criminal Court in The Hague. So there will be no 'tribunals'
for any of these war crimes.
Stone age? Hell,they never left it!
The US just wanted to steal the country, because it has great wealth. Iraq holds
the world's fifth-largest proved crude oil reserves at 145 billion barrels, representing 17% of proved reserves in the Middle East and 8% of global reserves. Off course the wealth wasn't shared with the citizens.
In 2002, one in five Iraqis or 4.6 million people suffered from chronic poverty; "About 13 years of stringent economic sanctions, three wars in two decades and failing economic policies have impoverished a majority of the Iraqi people and reduced them to relying heavily on free food handouts."
Would the US share the wealth with the Iraqi citizens? Off course not, the Iraqi people would be even worse off. You just want to steal their oil, because to you
the Iraqi people are just stone age Muslim terrorists, who should be eradicated. That contradicts the one remaining common justification for the Iraq war;
that Saddam was a horrible dictator to his people.
You argue that the US should have been worse than Saddam ever was.
Ukraine also has great wealth, but it was still the poorest country in Europe.
It was suffering from failing economic policies and massive corruption.
It was doing a bit better the last decades, but still had a GDP per capita
of not even half of Russia. If you think superpowers can just steal the lands
from stone age people, than Putin is just doing what you wanted Bush to do.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
I see many similarities between the US wanting to steal Iraq and Russia wanting
to steal Ukraine. The difference is that Ukraine is on the border with Russia and many Russians are living there. The US has no claim whatsoever on Iraq. That still doesn't justify Putin's actions, but his reasons for desiring to steal Ukraine are way more understandable. And his lies for doing so, are not worse than Bush's lies.
to steal it back (if they were capable of it), I would be against that too.
Up to 1830, most of the current Belgium was part of The Netherlands.
I would surely not support our king or our prime minister attacking Belgium,
to take it back.
You can act all indignant about the word 'becoming', but my comments about Putin have been more condemning than what right-wingers were saying about him.
That has changed recently and now he's suddenly compared with the worst monsters to ever walk the planet, like Hitler and Stalin.
Putin is not even close Bush's level yet. But, he's trying hard.
And right-wing outrage about killing civilians is very selective. You are still all whitewashing the mass murder of a MILLION Iraqis. Over half of the Iraqi civilians were killed with bombs and the majority by airstrikes. The US was just bombing houses, with children and women inside. Many children were also killed by unexploded ordnance (including cluster bomblets). More than 100 countries signed the international treaty prohibiting cluster munitions, because those are mass murder weapons. The US dropped a total of 61,000 cluster bombs on Iraq, releasing twenty million submunitions. That's much worse than Putin (so far).
US troops also killed 200,000+ Afghan citizens, but at least there was some justification from 9/11 for that. There was absolutely no justification for attacking Iraq, other than war hawks in your government, with massive ties to the military industrial complex, wanted to do so. But their propaganda campaign was obviously still effective on you until today. Other strategies work well too, like complete silence on massive war crimes by your friends. Because I never hear anything from right-wingers about Saudi Arabia doing genocide in Yemen. You and your friends can kill as many and who ever you want, because your intent is 'good' on presupposition.
Why do you keep telling us All Lives Matter?
We all know you don't give a damn if they are fucking Arabs.
The middle east has been a hot bed for violence before the USA was even a dream. Those people know nothing but war and hatred for anyone but their own kind.The koran teaches them to convert everyone to islam or kill them.
they only tolerate the infedals when it is to their advantage.
Are you talking about Iraq now? Because that is nonsense. Iraq was a normally functioning state at that point. It was a dictatorship, but it was stable. There were lots of religious fundamentalists living there too, but they were just citizens and Saddam Hussein managed to keep them under control. He was not doing that with gloves on, but what he did was a minute fraction of what the US needed to do, to contain the terrorist threat again. A threat that the US unleashed on the world, by destabilizing Iraq and giving religious fundamentalist citizens a chance to unite and start fighting for their theocratic hegemony wet dream.
That all started way after the US defeated Iraq and put in a fake government. The body count was up to half a million before Islamic State was really awakening.
The rest I mostly agree with.
The Middle East has been a powder keg for decades. But the US lit the fuse.
I just can't decide if it was stupidity or intent, because all the people responsible made lots of money from their ties to the military industrial complex.
All those trillions of tax dollars made lots of people very rich.
I just think you have a tendency to point blame to victims.
Your intuition is that people only kill in self defense,
which is admirable, but in my opinion more often incorrect.
In my opinion, in any case of one person killing another,
the burden of proof it was legitimate is on the survivor,
in any case of a nation attacking another nation, the attacking
nation needs to show it is necessary for defending itself, there is
no other solution and their own laws and international laws are obeyed.
If people defend an attacking country or a person killing another
and I don't recognize the justification, than my intuition is that
lives don't matter to those people.
What incredibly hyperbolic! Over half of US abortions are done with pills.
90% of abortions is performed BEFORE week 12. In weeks 9-12 that's often performed with suction curettage, in which the fetus indeed gets torn apart.
But it's at most about 6cm long, about the size of a plum and weighs about 18g. It cannot feel anything yet. It's just your idea that it is a person and it's gruesome, because it looks a bit like a tiny baby. Yes, it's not a pretty sight.
Get over it little snowflake. It doesn't feel anything!
Cows and pigs do feel something when they are pushed and pulled around
to be slaughtered. Chickens are fixed on a conveyor belt, upside down by their feet. Than knives cut off their heads. In some cases that doesn't work and they get plucked alive by a machine. Every animal we eat suffered fear and pain.
Have you ever seen that? Are you a vegetarian now?
People making fun of vegetarians are mostly right-wingers. They think of them as little snowflakes. Well you are little snowflakes and vegetarians have more reason to say "it's gruesome, so I am against it" than you. But they are not forcing other people to stop eating meat.
You think eating meat is FREEDOM, but you don't care about women's RIGHT to choose over their own bodies. Women only have FREEDOM over their body when it comes to vaccines (which I also support).
“Partial birth” is a political, not medical, term, and it does not refer to all late-term abortions. It refers to a very specific and rare procedure called dilation and extraction*, in which a fetus is partially pulled through the birth canal and then aborted, nearly always when the fetus cannot live outside the womb and typically when the mother’s health is in danger, the fetus has a serious abnormality, or both. Such a procedure is not conducted lightly: the fetus has a fatal defect and will not survive, or the mother is at risk of death herself.
I keep pressing you, because you keep justifying your ideas with hyperbolic nonsense. Stop spreading nonsense and I stop attacking the nonsense.
"Abortion is preventable" - By taking away people's choice?
"Abortion is a medical procedure" - So is sterilization, which you supported.
"Abortion results in the loss of a life" - So does contraception (by your standards). Christian right-wingers are talking about taking away that right too. That makes abortion a whole lot less preventable, doesn't it? Contraception was one of your arguments against abortion.
You keep evading that issue!
"Abortion is preventable" - By taking away people's choice?"
No dumbass, by fucking responsibly.
Use a rubber, take a shot, get a vasectomy, plenty of choices there to allow for all the sex you want.No violation of rights needed.
New Comment Go to top