Page #1
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#46
New Comment Rating: -9 Similar topics: 1.Does it actually matter? 2.SYD is a great place 3.Trump/Pence or Biden/Harris...Which do you feel will prevail??? 4.Kneeling before the American Flag during the National Anthem... 5.༼☯﹏☯༽ Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
"the so called winners rewrote history to make the south look bad."
It's all free speech now, right?
Or does that only apply to MAGA?
To me racism is supposed to be dead.
We should be going by merit.
BUT no, the very 1's that complain about racism, are the 1's bringing it up all the time.
It can't die if you keep waking it up
without those things being called racism.
You don't think that society should be based on merit.
You think society should be based on classism / inherited privileges.
When you think that the dumb, spoiled, useless brats of the wealthy deserve to get transferred the companies that their parents, grandparents, or great-grandparents created, you DO NOT believe in merit.
The netheregions are built for the most part on land below sea level. You can't be real smart if you do something like that and depend on mechanical pumps to keep you from drowning in your sleep at night.
About one-third of the Netherlands lies below sea level, with the lowest point being 22 feet (6.7 meters) below sea level. Photo by: Henry Do - @henry_do [IG] #archidesiign #architecture #design #travel #photography #europe #netherlands. At one time they were going to have a railway line across this dam.
22 feet, that is enough to swallow a 2 story building.How smart can you be to live WILLINGLY in that situation? talking about dependent on someone else,that is serious .If the pump crews go on strike, oh my, learn to breath under water.
“ Why not agree to just NOT POKE the fucking bear or "pup" in this case and learn to live and let live?”
There SHOULD BE more to life for ALL of you than this behavior.
Edit,maybe I shouldn't say a word.
BUT damn it, this is a rough time of the year for myself and many other people and a site like this is where we all come to get away from the BULLSHIT. I would like to come here and see people getting along,it might put all of us in a better mood for the Holiday season you know?
You know, even the hottest fire will go eventually go out IF the fuel runs out.
undies showing, you generalize that towards everyone who associates with BLM.
I know it's a joke, but it is a discriminatory joke.
so many rumors, and half truths about it,
only registered users can see external links
Yes, it is discrimination, because you accuse ALL OF THEM doing it,
and that's not true. And there is no link with BLM.
ChatGPT doesn't agree with your origin story:
The fashion trend of wearing pants low enough to show underwear—commonly called sagging—is generally traced to U.S. prisons in the 1970s–1980s, and later to hip-hop culture. Here are the main explanations:
1. U.S. Prison System (most commonly cited origin)
Prisons often forbade belts, because belts could be used as weapons or for self-harm.
As a result, pants frequently sagged, especially if they didn’t fit well.
Some versions of the story claim it signaled sexual availability, but historians and correctional officers largely dismiss this as a myth; the fit of clothing was simply poor.
2. Hip-Hop Culture (1990s onward)
Rappers and hip-hop artists adopted the look, partly reflecting prison culture and partly as a style of rebellion.
Artists like Tupac, Snoop Dogg, and groups like Onyx wore saggy pants in music videos, bringing it into mainstream youth fashion.
3. Skater and Street Cultures
In the 1990s and early 2000s, skateboarders also wore oversized, low-riding pants for comfort and style, which further spread the trend.
4. Symbol of Rebellion
For many young people, sagging became a deliberate anti-establishment statement,
a way to challenge dress norms and authority.
In short
Sagging emerged from prison clothing restrictions, became popularized by hip-hop, and evolved into a broad cultural fashion trend.
and it is very negative attention.
ALL LIVES MATTER...ALL LIVES MATTER...
Hey, ALM anyone.
Trump is blowing up boats in open waters, without any evidence of a crime.
Trump is randomly arresting people on the streets and disappearing them.
He had ICE just clear out a whole apartment block and arrest everyone.
He's assigning the National Guard to American cities.
He's putting snipers on rooftops during demonstrations.
If the government starts killing American citizens, would it matter to you?
You damn well know the four boats deserved what they got.
Wait for the evidence to surface idiot. You sure as hell know that anyone with any brain cell that intelligence reports do not get disclosed during an investigation.
How they know will not be disclosed to a socialist like you.
Are they diving for the evidence?
If a government kills people, they need to show on what evidence they did that.
They don't need an investigation, they should show the investigation that resulted
in their action.
By the way, even if they find 100 tons of cocaine, it's STILL no justification to kill them
in international waters. You're the one who should know better. It's your own law, idiot. Better protect it, or your legal protections will be violated at some point.
Correction, your legal protections are already violated. Trump is ignoring your elected representatives in Congress every single day.
"How they know will not be disclosed to a socialist like you."
They better will, because they are bringing lots of people to my camp, this way.
Trump's approval ratings are atrocious. He's the least popular president ever.
He knows he has no chance to win the midterms, so he is already working on ways
to steal the election, or not have elections at all. He's a traitor.
Everyone who supports Trump is a traitor too.
Do you want laws to protect you, when your side loses,
or will you accept what the other side thinks you deserve?
Yeah, blame us. Why don’t you look in a mirror?
There is a downward spiral of right-wing policies creating inequality,
people feeling abandoned and angry, turning them to the populist right-wing,
making inequality and anger worse, making them turn to the populist right-wing even more. Once their brain is fucked up to believe populist right-wing lies,
it's almost impossible to rehabilitate them.
People understand who fucked them over, they just fall for the lies of the distraction party.
Geert Wilders is again promising to stop immigration. He was the biggest party, had cooperation from the 3 parties in his administration, and several other willing parties, but he achieved NOTHING. His proposals were wildly unconstitutional and unlawful, so he couldn't get them passed. He also completely ignored labor migration, a huge problem. Our Socialist Party has achievable and lawful plans to reduce the net migration to 40,000/year, but Wilders keeps promising 0. Simple-minded people believe him, while he has cut funds for the migration services and shelters, making the problems of migration worse.
Geert Wilders is again promising to drop the deductible on health insurance. The VVD wants to raise it to €440. All his voters know that he didn't do it, while he was the biggest party, but they still trust him when he again promises to do it. He has no financial backing for his promise. He didn't present his program for independent financial validation.
Our Socialist Party also promises to drop the deductible on health insurance, but we DO have financial backing and independent financial validation for ALL our plans.
People are distracted by tough rhetoric and false promises,
even while reality shows them that Wilders is absolutely useless.
The SP has plans to solve migration, without any need for breaking the law:
all over the world, selling right wing policies that favor the wealthy and
fuck everyone else, with a message of hate towards people who are
even worse off in the world.
Yes, within the European Union (EU), citizens of member states generally have the right to cross borders and work in other member countries without major restrictions. This right is guaranteed by EU law.
A major part of the SP’s approach is less about outright banning labour migration, and more about regulating the conditions: requiring employer responsibility, improving rights of migrant workers, licensing of recruitment agencies.
Through higher minimum wages, stronger enforcement, and automation or training incentives, the government can reduce employers’ reliance on cheap foreign labor.
This approach doesn’t restrict workers’ rights, but employers’ access channels, which is legally defensible under EU law.
The SP and similar parties have also floated invoking a concept of “social disruption”, arguing that uncontrolled migration strains housing and social cohesion.
However, this would be legally fragile: the European Court of Justice (ECJ) interprets these exceptions very narrowly, and economic or social pressures alone aren’t enough.
The SP wants the Dutch government to push in EU-frameworks for stricter regulation of labor migration from other EU countries, including exploring a permit system for workers coming into the Netherlands.
They believe that EU countries should make bilateral/multilateral agreements within the EU to limit and regulate flows of labor migration, rather than simply allowing free movement without additional controls.
The Dutch Socialist Party (SP) explicitly calls for rethinking the Dutch economic model to move away from low-value, labor-intensive sectors
that depend on cheap migrant labor, and toward higher-value, more sustainable, and less labor-intensive production.
I talk to many members from the Netherlands and none are so obnoxious and nosy as you are
Here you are, suggesting an attack on The Netherlands, for opinions.
That pretty much validates my reason for calling you lot fascists.
You are already DOING IT, in your own country.
Because 'freedom of speech'...
Because freedom of expression and state's rights, right?
IF True equality is the desired goal, race would not ever be acknowledged in conversation or in anyway whatsoever out side of the medical establishment where race plays a part in certain medical issues and deseases. .
Race still plays a part, because of systemic discrimination.
Ignoring the existence of that is the opposite of having the goal of ANY equality.
If I mention that pygmy's have a blo0d type all their own, some would say that is racist. but it is factual.
If I acknowledge black women need different hair products than white women, i am called a racist.
You can't acknowledge race at all without some jurk calling you racist. I know what you are saying Ananas but it just is not allowed to work that way.
There is a difference between acknowledging race and associating negative characteristics with that race, and assuming someone has certain negative characteristics, because they are a member of a certain race.
So, acknowledging that people are different isn't racism.
It depends very much on what differences you are talking about.
If you are associating certain differences with race, that have nothing to do with race, eg intelligence or ethics or human value, then that can be called out as racism.
New Comment Go to top