Page #69
Pages: #1... #64 #65 #66 #67 #68 #69 #70 #71 #72 #73 ...#163
New Comment Rating: 12 Similar topics: 1.RAND0M BULLSHIT 2.The ORIGINAL "Random Bullshit" thread is now in the Dumpster 3.RANDOM STUFF..... 4.RANDOM STUFF, JUST FUCKING BULLSHIT STUFF 5.RANDOM BULLSHIT Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
- Cats rarely listen to you.
- Cats are totally unpredictable.
- When you want to "play", cats want to be left alone.
- When you want to be alone, cats want to "play".
- Cats expect you to cater to their every whim.
- Cats are moody.
- Cats leave hair everywhere.
Hmmmmmm......is it possible that cats are tiny women in little fur coats???
Joe Thomas Sr., 55, is believed to be the oldest player to ever see the field in a Division I college football game. Thomas ran for three yards during the first quarter of the game, which was also Senior Day. He had been practicing with the team, but hadn't seen any playing time."
Way to go! 👍
Number of members who befriended just37: 98
Number of members who blacklisted just37: 15
Number of members whom just37 has blacklisted: 956
Overall rating of just37 is: friendly
A SYD member who has blacklisted 956 members, that's able just CRAZY! And if you were inclined to lean toward wanting to send a gift, you would not be able because of the change admin made to the blacklist feature.
I didn’t deleted it. I don't want that member to think I deleted it, because it was a nice message.
Usually if a member leaves, the message will still be there with their number ID instead of their member name. This message just disappeared, and I don't know where it went.
But since I didn't delete the message myself, this guy shouldn't be charged five points for it being deleted. I hope.
Has this happened to anyone else?
I hope all our kiwi members and their families located in the Christchurch area are well and safe!
I hope they're all safe too. I've chatted with quite a few New Zealanders on here... Gonna have to send them all messages to check in. Haha.
No matter what the outcome of this election is, the next 4 years are going to be "interesting", to say the least. GOD help our nation.
I shouldn't be really the same demographic that voted for trump voted for the Uk to leave the EU.
"The times they are a changin'"
Has anyone sorted out who they could possibly send a negative gift to? Would the folks on your "friends" list appreciate a nuclear bomb or a steaming pile of dookie, a pissing dog, a sack-o-crap, the middle finger? Inquirying minds would like to know......
This is a message directed to all the members who play PLAY BALL!!, if you ever want to earn 30 points for having a successful (clean) 5 or 6 person rally, THINK about who you are passing the ball to. Have you noticed that some of your SYC choices don't do anything with the ball once they receive it? If you have, DON'T CONTINUE TO PASS TO THEM!
--------------------------------------- added after 5 minutes
And I was not throwing Administration under the bus. I only included that because I assumed members would ask if I contacted him on the matter.
--------------------------------------- added after 9 minutes
And we are not bitching. But it does suck for the real members when these fake pics hold the top spots. But maybe that's what most like to view.
That may or may not be a true statement. Have you actually asked some those SYD members that bust a nut over a SYC member only to find out that they were really chatting Uncle Bruce? Those questionable accounts must provide something to the members that they are not getting from the real members....but what is it?
Take HarleyQuinn, for instance. "She"/Uncle Bruce was deleted and then returned as xxHarleyQuinnxx. xxHarleyQuinnxx was exposed as a "fake" and voluntarily deleted "her"/Uncle Bruce profile, yet has once again returned using a different name. Primarily, has the same friends and those friends gift "her"/Uncle Bruce and vote on "her"/Uncle Bruce's only visible to friends, pictures.
I'm not sure what the void is, but clearly, that void IS filled by a fake member.
As long as he believed Glysinder' was a hot female he was happy - once he discovered the truth he was appalled and embarrassed.
If a member on here interacts with another member believing them to be female but who in fact is a fake and does not know that to be the case, then that is a very different situation to interacting with a member knowing them to be a fake. The first scenario I imagine many people have encountered. The second, which I think you are referring to is rather weird.
Aside from outright i1legal images there are "digital millennium copyright act" and "fair use" doctrine, you can read about both on Wikipedia. Those are major principles I operate under.
I'm not obligated to delete any copyrighted material if there is no complaint from the copyright owner. For all I know some permit and even encourage others to redistribute their materials. If it's a free member I, however, consider it as my responsibility and delete such materials as if I posted them myself. When it's about paid member I have someone else to throw under a bus as you put it.
I'll try to explain this as clear as possible: Imagine that you run an announcement newspaper and some people give free announcements anonymously and some show you their ID and pay. Do you really think you will treat their announcements equally? Indeed if it's free and anonymous you won't publish something that looks suspicious. But if it's paid and the ID was shown - why would you care? If it will turn out to be lie, defamation or otherwise i1legal (but not obvious without some effort), you have someone to put a blame on. That very person who paid it.
If you do not understand this conception, I can't help you. But it was the same all along from the beginning of this site. I never changed my attitude towards it. Anonymous people and people who pay and show their ID (and in most cases internet payment is equal to showing an ID) are not equal on this site. Why it is so hard to grasp for some I do not know.
The vote currently stands -3 in favor of NO ABUSE. Five members have voted NO ABUSE because there are no visible pictures to base a deletion on, while two members have voted to delete. It would be, I'm going to use this word again, interesting to understand WHAT the two voting members have based their vote to delete upon.
/forum/thread.php?id=3535
Maybe it should be mandatory that EACH voter post a "reason"/comment to support their vote. Yeah, right!
So really, what were the member's who voted to delete basing their vote on? I wonder if those several members lack the common sense that admin refers to?
New Comment Go to top