Page #67
Pages: #1... #62 #63 #64 #65 #66 #67 #68 #69 #70 #71 ...#163
New Comment Rating: 12 Similar topics: 1.RAND0M BULLSHIT 2.The ORIGINAL "Random Bullshit" thread is now in the Dumpster 3.RANDOM STUFF..... 4.RANDOM STUFF, JUST FUCKING BULLSHIT STUFF 5.RANDOM BULLSHIT Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
--------------------------------------- added after 62 seconds
If the word "mother" is OK, why for crying out loud does the word "s i s t e r" have to be censored?
--------------------------------------- added after 8 minutes
We have been blacklisted by 5 members. All who have internet pics all over their page. And are still current members. Yet we have not blacklisted any of them. Fake fucks.
We come here to see real people and their real pics, and fakes take away the fun of that.
Like you said, you ask very politely to remove the fakes. You still get blacklisted. Maybe they don't want to face the truth.
Thanks for your hard work. I for one appreciate it. Have a very Happy New Year!
So you believe that it requires nerve to refer a member to the evaluation panel for deletion for valid ans somerimes invalid reasons? Really? What I feel takes cajones are the members who vote and have an opinion that substantiates their vote. You've been a member for more than 2 years, why not try getting involved in the evaluation process?
Again, maybe I will be more active in the evaluation panel. It is just frustrating for me to think of a site of fakes.
I always want to give a member the benefit of the doubt, but if it's a proven fake and that's the truth then they should be requested to remove that picture.
I'm just saying if a member has a bunch or all fake pictures, what's the sense of them even being here. However, if they try to sneak in a pic or two, that needs to be brought to their attention, and maybe they could remove it, and still be a productive member of this site.
Is anyone, other than myself, distracted or annoyed or whatever, when they are engaged in a conversation with someone who seems to have too many "you know's" flying out of their mouth? I wanted to fricken stop her and tell her that I did not know!
Oooooh yes! Another one that like annoys me like that like is when someone like talks with like "like" oveer and over like too!
Even more annoying to me is the way some people talk to me as if every f*cking sentence they're saying has an upwards inflection in their voice, making it sound like they're asking a question! It comes across as if they must think I'm an idiot and don't understand what they're saying to me! I've actually been rude and simply walked away from people in mid conversation because of it too.... like.
I don't think so!
After you have 300 photos you have to pay 3 points for every photo you post until you get to 400 then it goes up to 4 points. Every 100 photos, you add a point in price. Right now I have 1487 photos and every time I post a photo it costs me 14 points. I have been a member for over 3.5 years and I like to post photos so now I have a lot of them.
Now, I am a serious CONTRIBUTOR to this site and I don't feel that I should have to scrounge to get points and save them so that I can add another photo to my gallery.
I would like to save points to post my better ones in the banner on the main page to get viewed a lot more and earn me more points.
I would also like to send gifts to all of the great people that comment on my photos and are regular viewers of my page.
I understand that I can become a paying member and buy points but that's not going to happen.
It is my opinion that there should be a maximum "price" per photo. I think seven is a good number.
Drops mike.
anonymous wrote (Dec 11, 09:03):
Dear Don. Christmas greetings to you and the bully from the Great Southern Land
Just an f.y.i. Dear anonymous, the member's name is not Don. For cryin' out loud, can't this darn asshat just quietly go away? I would have posted this in THE MEMBERS YOU MISS.... thread, however I don't believe that anyone even misses the old fart!
The author of this thread (aka you-know-who) recently blogged about SYC member #1 and referred to member #1; "a overly self pitying attention seeker". Really? Who in the frick is the "attention seeker"? Surely not the member #1 that you-know-who blogged about!
You-know-who has blogged about yet another SYC member, SYC member #2. You-know-who believes that member #2 has contacted other members and says that you-know-who is a "fake". The crazy thing is, you-know-who states she has never interacted with member #2, but in the same token, decided to blacklist her. Now I believe that you-know-who wrote somewhere that the SYC member #1 should have come to her page and addressed her concern "face to face" (not exactly her words) rather than posting what you-know-who felt were disparaging remarks about her. SYC member #1 only posted her feelings after she was referred to as a "nice bitch" by you-know-who. With that said, why wouldn't you-know-who approach member #1 and member #2 for clarification rather than blogging about them? Is it possible that she's seeking attention?
Hey, you-know-who, for what it's worth, I do not believe that anyone questions your authenticity but what ➡ I ⬅ question is the sincerity of your posts. I feel your posts are as "fake" as fake can be. My gosh, contacting members and telling them to "feel free" to visit your page (attention seeking) right down to the "STAY SEXY!" screams insincere thus fake!
Who says pocketbook rather than purse? And why was a purse ever referred to as a pocketbook?
New Comment Go to top