Page #320
Pages: #1... #315 #316 #317 #318 #319 #320 #321 #322 #323 #324 ...#779
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.A Forum Topic 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
No,I don't go looking.BUT when i find something funny I share it.
And alot of us are getting to the age that we can't trust farts anymore.
only registered users can see external links
Seriously? can't you just drop kick the groper?
only registered users can see external links
I mean,of course it is not right grope a woman in reality. But in a fake, video game???? what negative affect could that possibly have on someone that knows the difference between reality and fantasy??
The above commercial was geared toward children and the message at the end about things appearing "really real but you know they're not" and encouraging the child to ask questions is spot on OR are you placing an entirely different spin on it with the message directed to adults?
I remember this from when I was a child
Seems the message is just as relevant now
Black and white.
As I have 1 like it. or did have if I didn't give it to the neighbor a while back. Eccentric old lady ONLY wants a SMALL black and white tv in her kitchen.
I must admit,the little hippo was cute running around there.Shame they are really MEAN,large , nasty creatures that spray their poop instead of just dropping it.
only registered users can see external links
Subject,
only registered users can see external links
Percentage of Total Women in US Population (2019) Percentage of Total Women in US Population (2060)
White (not Hispanic or Latina) 60.0% 44.3%
Hispanic or Latina 18.0% 27.0%
Black or African American 12.9% 15.2%
Asian 5.0% 9.5%
So biden says he wants a Black woman in the supreme court.
Ok , with the stats above,black women make up probably around 13 to 14 % of the US population? So is it not racist to openly and adamantly and deliberately, discriminate against the other 86 % of women in this country that are also climbing the ladder of success by getting educated and working hard to achieve their goals? NOT to mention he is openly and willingly discriminating against all Men in the population,and has not mentioned the tiny group of people that don't acknowledge their birth gender.
TO me,as a educated person,this is discrimination and racist as hell for a man,our PRESIDENT for Gods sake,standing before the people saying these things. Great unifier my ass. All the black men that have worked for law degree's not qualified,all the other folks,nope,not a chance.
What is your take on this Just will?
What IS racist (and sexist) is the folks that are screaming and making a fuss about the President deciding it is time to give a qualified BLACK WOMAN a chance to serve on the Supreme Court.
Of the 115 Justices to serve in the history of the Supreme Court, all but 7 have been WHITE MEN. Five of the current sitting Justices are WHITE MEN. There isn't, nor has there ever been, any lack of representation for that particular demographic on the Court.
Of the remaining 7, 2 have been BLACK MEN (one of whom is still serving) and only 5 have been WOMEN (only one has been a WOMAN of COLOR--and she is still serving).
Historically speaking, it is about time that a BLACK WOMAN gets a chance to serve. The COURT has been pretty racist and sexist for the past 231 years.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Temps in the 50's coming later in the week!
should get up to 47 but thursday, 66! strange! But I will take 66 any day!
Why else would they be dragging Omicron and it's new "sleath" variant along so long?
To justify the continued use of mail in voting which can potentially be used for fraud. Even Dgraff's state found it to be unconstitutional to have NO excuse mail in voting. I would have NEVER expected that from a northern state.
only registered users can see external links
It was the US showing it's power and it would be incredibly dangerous to fake something with that intention, because it's impossible to keep that a secret for ever and it would be incredibly damaging when it gets exposed.
Not that any conspiracy theory is false, but powerful people only take risks like that,
to protect themselves from something worse.
That's how basically any conspiracy can be dissected.
We were barely able to make transistors at that time and they were large and in sockets like vacuam tubes.
And it is so hypocritical for people to want to erase the confederacy but be proud of the fact they got to the moon using NAZI rocket tech.Don't believe me,dig a while on the net and you will find the rocket scientist working under Hitler were working for the US after the war.The US got them here before Russia got them. which to a point makes sense but still,NAZI tech in the end.
but that's not the most important science you need for going to the moon.
People don't want to erase the confederacy, they just don't want generals, who fought against the US to uphold slavery, worshiped with statues.
Whether scientific knowledge has been developed by good people or evil people doesn't make the knowledge good or evil. Good people can discover knowledge that can do great harm and evil people can discover knowledge that can be used for great things. I think rocket science is neutral. Going to the moon doesn't do much to benefit people either, but they say some of the advancement was beneficial.
It's probably true that some Nazi scientists escaped punishment, because they were useful to other nations. But I don't know how much they had blood on their hands. Maybe their punishment would have brought more honor to humanity, than allowing them to continue advancing science. But not using knowledge, because it was discovered by evil scientists, is not punishing the scientists, but humanity.
But why would they need those scientists, if they were going to fake the moon landing anyway? Just to make people believe? It seems like they had all the advancement and resources to actually do it, so why not do it for real? It's not like they couldn't find people willing to risk their life, getting in that rocket.
Thank you joe
Let’s go Brandon
New Comment Go to top