Male Multiple Orgasm Discover your full Abilities! | Become an expert in pussy licking! She'll Beg You For More! | Stay Hard as Steel!!! | Get Paid For Using Social Sites! |
New Comment Rating: 12 Similar topics: 1.RAND0M BULLSHIT 2.The ORIGINAL "Random Bullshit" thread is now in the Dumpster 3.RANDOM STUFF..... 4.RANDOM STUFF, JUST FUCKING BULLSHIT STUFF 5.RANDOM BULLSHIT Comments: |
He was an excellent performer as well as being an icon in the early days of rock and roll.
Here is "true love ways" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjFRHIhSvwc and also his classic "Peggy Sue" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEl3UUl1Fmw
The Diamonds were also around in those days, remember this tune on the radio.? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_JxwMcIbJc
See if you can pick Tom Hank`s father.
IT'S MY PARTY AND I'LL BILL IF I WANT TO
Five-Year-Old Receives Invoice From Friend’s Mom After Missing Birthday Party
By Mary Beth Quirk January 20, 2015
(BBC)
Throwing a birthday party for a bunch of k!ds is not an easy feat — there’s all the planning, the hordes of tiny people running around shrieking and yelling and shoving cupcakes in their faces while refusing to go to the bathroom when they have to, not to mention the expense involved. Nonetheless, the parents of one five-year-old boy say that despite that stress, the mom of their son’s friend shouldn’t have sent them an invoice after the **** missed a birthday party without advance notice.
The absent five-year-old brought home an invoice for £15.95 (about $24) from school one day in his bag, reports the BBC, placed there by his pal’s mom. She claimed his absence from a party at a dry ski slope in Cornwall just before Christmas left her out of pocket, and that his parents should pay or face legal action.
The mom claimed that the parents in question had her contact details, and didn’t let her know ahead of time. But they say that when they realized they’d double-booked their son with his grandparents, who he ended up spending time with instead, they didn’t have her phone number to cancel.
The dad who received the invoice says he was told he’d be taken to small claims court for refusing to pay.
“It was a proper invoice with full official details and even her bank details on it,” he told the BBC the bill. “I can understand that she’s upset about losing money. The money isn’t the issue, it’s the way she went about trying to get the money from me. She didn’t treat me like a human being, she treated me like a ch!ld and that I should do what she says.”
The birthday mom said in a statement: “All details were on the party invite. They had every detail needed to contact me.”
So should all parents be afraid of facing court over missed birthday parties? Probably not, as a BBC legal correspondent says the claims likely won’t hold up, considering a five-year-old isn’t really expected to understand he’s being held to a contract.
Recovering a “no show fee” in small claims court is a stretch, the legal correspondent says, because claiming that a contract had been created doesn’t hold water, if a contract is with a ch!ld, and “it is inconceivable that a five-year-old would be seen by a court as capable of creating legal relations and entering into a contract with a ‘no show’ charge.”
For cryin' out loud! How many of you have planned a party, whether it be a graduation, Halloween costume party, wedding reception, etc., received R.S.V.P.'s from family and friends and still have "no shows? Yikes, being invoiced for a "no show" fee would be something! What are your thoughts, WWJJD ( What would Judge Judy do ) what would YOU do?
Does anyone know how the term came to be?
There is no academic standard to which this information is related and I cannot confirm without a 1934 Webster's Dictionary. But the 'fact' appears in several different journals and old newspaper articles, so it's - at the very least - plausible.
Hope this is helpful. Your friendly neighborhood geek.
Humbug Day allows everyone preparing for Christmas to vent their frustrations. With Christmas being 4 days away, what are your frustrations?
Abuse Reports main page
The primary goal of this page - to quickly delete members posting **** shit when admin is away and to resolve doubtful situations.
If your account is older than 2 years you can participate here.
Abuse gets +1 if you agree and -1 if you disagree. Once it gets -5 or gets older than 10 days the abuse gets deleted as invalid, once it gets +5 the member gets deleted for the violation.
If it appears later that the member was deleted unjustly - all members who were in favour of the deletion will be deleted and banned from the site.
If the abuse is not grave please try to convince the member to delete the pics in question before deleting
The last sentence should be KEY for voting members but it seems that it is not. IF THE ABUSE IS NOT GRAVE PLEASE TRY TO CONVINCE THE MEMBER TO DELETE THE PICS IN QUESTION BEFORE DELETING. Admin has given the authority to members with 2+ years to decide the fate of other members. Sadly, I feel that sometimes the trigger seems to be pulled much too quickly for some members and some reports can be frivolous.
If you're already a voting member, please keep in mind the established guidelines and base your vote on FACTS, not your gut instinct. I believe that every member is entitled to a message of some sort, requesting that they comply with the site guidelines/rules (regardless of whether they're labeled as a "regular fake" and even once the message has been sent, allow them time to comply and REMEMBER, not everyone speaks and/or reads English.
Seems a bit shady, no?
Again, I hope you reconsider voting, it's time for dissatisfied member's voices to be heard! POWER TO THE PEOPLE!
A member voted DELETE on a referral and left this comment--
"I agree with waiting but how long.It's been 2 days.Enough for me."
Keep in mind, though, that the referred member hasn't actually been on the site for 2 days! He has no idea that he has been referred!
What's the big damn hurry?
Maybe admin should limit the reports that can be made by a member ?
One report a day/24hr gets a points reward,subsequent reports from that member are not rewarded for that time frame....
Or limit it to seven reports per member per week....
The problem is really that one member swings the vote for his own agenda....time and time again...
Vote his way then when 'you' report, he votes in favour of deletion....
Block voting is rife...by non verified members too,that in itself should ring alarm bells....members that are only onsite to vote on abuse reports....hmmm...who could they all be ?
Just who is it that you think is only here to vote on the evaluation panel referrals?
I would rather fix the problem than go putting up who I think is only here to vote/report on the panel...even though I will state openly that I think JohnS is only here for the panel.
Voting members should always consider the evidence offered and follow admins guidelines- a gut feeling of guilt is not proof. If the reporting member doesn't explain the violation and offer proof, then maybe that report should not be allowed.
I am reluctant to attribute an 'agenda' to anyone but when the same people vote the same way time after time without comment or explanation that is disappointing to say the least.
I do like the idea of the panel being restricted to verified members only. There are accounts on here which are eligible to vote but that I have serious doubts about.
Finally, all eligible members have a right to their view and that should be respected whether we agree with it or not.
That is why when I see the same members vote the same way time after time, I cringe. Admin has a 10 day time period for "abuse" resolution for a reason. Matters involving images found elsewhere on the Internet are not an egregious offence as members are entitled to post elsewhere and voting members should be open minded enough to realize that images can be "borrowed" without knowledge as Andthisisme has mentioned. It's not important to boot somebody within 2 hours if their pictures are found elsewhere.....we're all from different cities and countries, we all live in different time zones and we all speak different languages. So it is not unusual that we're all here for different reasons and at different times.
As for allowing only verified members the privilege of "sitting" on the evaluation panel, that's a thought. But keep in mind that in real life, when a jury is selected, it can contain a crosscut of people; blue collar, white collar, housewives/husbands, retired folks, etc..
I must agree with Andthisisme, if the reporting member does not offer proof, then their report is not valid. In life, can you make a police report advising the police of a matter that you are unable to provide any facts? Do you think that the police are going to spend their time and manpower trying to prove your sketchy allegations?
Something has to happen, something has to change.
(Fortunately, that one was not taken seriously.)
On the other hand, the referral I mentioned above--the guy who hasn't been on site for three days, so he hasn't even seen the Star Chamber message yet--is STILL getting DELETE votes.
Included are comments of this nature:
"Abuse is abuse. They knew the pics weren't theirs when they uploaded, despite numerous prohibitions. All of you who mollycoddle abusers are part of the problem."
"Sorry but I see no point in keeping fakes around"
"It's been 3 days and the fake still lives.This one is going to expire" (This last one is from the same member who thought that TWO days was reason to pitch a hissy. If this goes on for one more day, jackd might have a conniption!)
I ask again: How is giving this guy time to see and respond to the message such an urgent matter? SYD is NOT going to implode while we wait...
New Comment Go to top