Page #23
Pages: #1... #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26
New Comment Rating: -3 Similar topics: 1.American men? 2.nude 3.Donald Trump 45th President of United States 4.🎆 🇺🇸 HaPpY BiRtHdAy America!! 🇺🇸 🎆 5.The Nobel Peace Prize 🏅 Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
You democrats put this guy in as president of the US?
damn
only registered users can see external links
In other words making it easier for the State Legislators to do fraud, without
any accountability to the courts, secretaries of state or even state constitutions.
It's what was needed to do Trump's fake elector scheme, without getting caught.
They want to claim 'Fraud!', without needing to prove fraud, and then change the results.
They are keeping up the fight to destroy democracy.
You just keep saying it, because you need team Trump to win.
You even understand that what Republicans are doing is cheating. You just call it
'tic for tat'. But if Democrats really won by using fraud, Republicans would fight fraud,
by organizing checks and balances on elections.
However, they are trying to make fraud easier and that is not consistent with a party
that lost because the other party used fraud.
The Republicans lost all their lawsuits about their claims of fraud. It was a lie.
And meanwhile Democrats are piling on the evidence of fraud by the Republicans.
I see one party using the law and I see another party doing more cheating.
And your brain is messed up badly, if you think that's the same.
Those phony allegations may end up with an indictment and jail term for Trump. You want to be proud of that? So be it, but, answer this. What Democrat has ever gotten into as much trouble as Trump, and why would you think Democrats would loose time and money going after a man that is no longer in office and has been proven a loser? It's because a person of interest in a crime or crimes has to be brought to justice. Be proud, Mountain Man. Be proud.
Also, Republicans are planning to impeach Biden. They don't know what for yet, but they know that they will think of something.
Overall 10 House Republicans have either introduced or sponsored a total of 21 articles of impeachment against Mr. Biden and his top officials. All completely bogus, but I'm sure you'll think those are all honest allegations.
Tic for tack
So you're just doubling down on nonsense.
Trump broke the law in dozens of ways.
Biden is just doing some of the things he promised his voters: democracy.
It like saying "You have the audacity to report me to the police for burning down your house? Now I'll kill your whole family.".
Tic for tack
Tic for tack
But the email thing with hillary,ditch it, The trump thing, ditch it, the hunter biden thing, ditch it.
Fuck it,we can't fix the past, WE CAN FIX THE FUTURE.
Liberal, conservative.
if 1 was gone,the other would turn in onto it's self.
Democrats remind me of a pack of wolves,if you scare them off from attacking your cattle by shooting 1 of them,they eat it.
--------------------------------------- added after 99 seconds
And I know the 5 blue counties in Pennsylvania to start in
You know what? You are, collectively, POOR LOOSERS.
These are tough times for this country .and nothing is going in a direction to make it better .How long do you think people should have to suffer before enough is enough?
BUT now,the situation is dire in the US again.It is because of government is no longer for the people,or of the Average American.It is a few blue counties in a few states running the entire thing.
People are fed up .
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
The three new stooges Trump put in are just Christian crusaders, who are handpicked by Leonard Leo, the leader of the Federalist Society; a bunch of Christian extremists, who don't like the separation between church and state and spend hundreds of millions in dark money to take over the Judiciary.
only registered users can see external links
Hollywood mongoloids threaten to leave Twitter... Sounds exactly like their piss stain threats to leave the US and move to Canada. Of course that never happens and most of these hypocrites would not even be allowed into Canada into the first place! Too many have criminal records!
The left- A bunch of petulant children. Miserable cunts who are never happy.
Poor bastards.
Suck it up candiass liberal whinybags ,after November, you may not matter anyway.
The only thing not allowed was hate-speech, calls for violence and constant racism,
you right-wingers seem to think is important speech worthy of 'communicating'.
That the use of the N-word has skyrocketed since Elon took over Twitter is telling.
Is that an 'opposing view point' that liberals need to be exposed to?
Sure it mentions the slang use even in 1920 but still,it was a lifestyle more so than a people.
I will try to find the dictionary and photo that section for you.
was the standard, it should now be good taste to still use?
BUT even white people ,like Cat here on this forum,thinks it is perfectly fine for blacks to use the word in reference to each other as a word of endearment I think was what she said once.
It is a double standard for it to be racist for whites and hispanices to use the word but ok for blacks.
If it is not ok for 1,it should not be ok for any. That is my biggest gripe about it.
What freedom of speech was missing on Twitter then, that right-wingers needed
to communicate their view points?
And is Elon Musk going to do what you all wanted?
"Elon Musk plans Twitter content moderation council as questions about Trump return loom"
only registered users can see external links
It's the same difference as between any fat person calling themselves a 'fatso' and being called 'Fatso!' by some random skinny guy on the street. It would feel better to the fat person, if the person calling them 'Fatso!' is just as fat or fatter.
It's a group prerogative.
A tic tokker tells it like it is. then the hodge twins explain it further.
If you want to have the free public square of ideas, you don't want it privately owned by a billionaire. It should be a public service and it's shouldn't be controlled by algorithms who are designed to pull people to the furthest extremes of ideas they once showed any interest in. That's not a public square, that's a rabbit hole. It should be designed to challenge people's beliefs and make people think. And there should also be some moderation, to make sure people are not threatening, doxing or scamming each other or posting illegal content from child molesters.
Having that publicly owned free public square of ideas is probably not realistic,
so if Elon Musk turns Twitter close to something like my ideal, I would be pleased
and I might even join Twitter. However with his current ideas, I would have left,
if I was on Twitter.
You keep idolizing guys like Elon. He was born in wealthy family and he had the opportunities most people don't have. He's not stupid and he has an enterprising mindset, but it's easy to take risks, when your family backs up your mistakes. Besides that, he also lucked out a couple of times. I agree, everything he did before 2000, were good ideas, but it all could have turned the other way if he had better competition or some bad luck.
At some point he became rich enough to just buy companies, and because like you, most Americans think "he's successful, so he's a genius", it's easy to find investors for ideas that no one else would get funded. However, there are thousands of people just like Elon Musk, who made similar choices and didn't get lucky. Looking at the end result of Elon Musk, he comes over as a genius. If you have a 1000 people tossing coins, someone will have heads 10 times in a row. That person is not smarter than the rest, it was just chance. But if you then give that person 100 million dollars to invest, they will probably turn out fine, if they are not completely stupid.
Looking at the choices Elon makes, he's not stupid, but he's certainly not a genius.
Paying 44 billion for Twitter isn't by far the only dumb thing he did.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
That would work for a person in a political office to if they would do it.But politicians want people following their lead,not helping pave the way.
Is the United States Postal Service socialism?
Why is government control worse than billionaire control?
Is the Washington Post better now it's owned by Jeff Bezos?
Do you switch companies, every time it's bought by a different billionaire?
Is that's what will be left of democracy; choose the billionaire you support?
New Comment Go to top