Page #1
Pages: #1 #2
New Comment Rating: 1 Similar topics: 1.Another button -- agree or disagree? 2.FAKE! 3.Why delete only the "fake" profile? 4.Easy test to spot fake pictures 5.Who is Dgraff ? Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
"I will take the "miscellaneous" category for $20.00, Alex."
Alex asks, "And the answer is; 'not many but stay SUPER SEXY' "
Not all, but a few of the women who your boyfriend has had contact with here you've tried creating trouble and stirring shit up about them. I can see a pattern forming here...
Take a step back and look at this behaviour. If you knew how to make an honest argument you will see why I have called your BEHAVIOUR fake, not you yourself fake as you've lead people to believe I've said. So next time you write a blog about me make sure you give your audience the full story, not a story of half truths.
Recently, she called a SYD member and myself as "arsehole". It seems that it got her knickers in a knot when the SYD member commented on the cemetery picture. My response to the comment posted by the SYD member was that I understood how he felt because in the region/state of the United States that he lives in, there were a number of battles fought and that many men that died.
Im sure her emotions are running high. You see, she considers him to be her "boyfriend" and he probably doesn't see her as anything beyond an interesting fu@k. I wonder if there could ever be a meaningful relationship between a woman, who is probably 20 years his senior and is old enough to be his momma?
I did see that drama as well. It's all good and well to take photos and fuck where you like. However when you start sharing them online and they aren't to everyone's taste you have to accept that as well without being rude. Once someone has to resort to nasty name calling they've already lost the argument and lost respect.
What? The picture of the clothespins attached to her worn out pussy didn't give you an instant boner?
I'm gonna have to read all of this when I'm a bit more sober.
2) They're a hot female
3) They're a hung male
4) They've got a sexual username (for eg. 'cumsponge69')
4b) They've got a number in their username
5) Their photos are of professional quality
6) Their photos are watermarked with another site's name/logo
7) Their photos are "of a friend"
8.) They say "baby" in conversation casually
9) They want to kik/text/cyber
10) They want to 'meet up'
11) They ask for your credit card number
Now, don't get me wrong, there's a *chance* that some or all combinations of those things apply to legitimate members here, and there are surely exceptions everyone can bring to mind but it's important to remember those are the *exceptions*...
BTW, text me your credit card number and we'll meet up later, baby
With regard to a "fake" having their pictures watermarked with another site/logo, SYD/SYC does not require their membership to be EXCLUSIVE to SYD/SYC. There are a number of amateur adult sites, so to say that a match was found wherever, is not conclusive.
There are a number of members, mainly SYD members, that post pictures of their "gf", yeah, right! There are SYC members that post pictures of their female friends. In both instances, how can that be challenged?
Are you really suggesting members should be suspect of "hot" females and "hung" males? Then I am suspicious of you!
I'm at a loss for words.....
He could add they always have an excuse for not skyping
Get real 1000's of the site members are just fakes of the core 200 members.
I'm sure you've noticed that there are members whose profiles reflect that they have a crazy number of uploaded pictures yet "you" might only see 10. This suggests to me that the other pictures are for "friends only" OR that the member sends a lot of private pictures. So for "us" to embrace the fact that their few friends know who they are is ludicrous! That seems like a perfect recipe to create fake accounts, if you know what I mean.
If so, wow! I hadn't thought of that!
That's why I posed the question in this thread. Sometimes I hear some wise things (well, especially from you, you're the wise one around here...)
There is way to much verification on here from people who have no idea if the member is real or not. I call those people the verification junkies
While 2&3 above are not evidence of a fake, a large number of fakes do fall within those categories.
5 is interesting, as there are many great quality images on here, but some just do have a 'feel' of being a fake. Eastern European porn has a certain qualitty to it's images for example. But again, I search for evidence.
6 is a warning light - but mainly if it is a 'professional' site, not a tumblr account or some other amateur posting site. HOWEVER, I do take admin's point that anyone who has posted elsewhere would surely post the original unwatermarked images here, rather than the downloads from the other site.
As for 7, this is SYD/SYC not Show Your Friends dick/cunt. We can never know the truth about these 'friends' or their permission having been given to post the images.
I could go on, but in the end we ALL sometimes get a feeling about a member and if we have evidence to support that feeling we should report it, and if not leave them be.
If a member is reported don't vote blindly, do your own research it only takes a couple of minutes at most.
I can honestly say that I DO NOT know how to do a reverse search from my phone, so I do rely upon and research the links when the member provides that information, plus, they're supposed to provide proof.
Thank you, Big9inch21!
Oh wait just one minute! According to numbers 4 and 4b, you are a fake! Your profile name is of a sexual nature AND you have a number in your name! Forget I even asked for your credit card numbers, you would have probably given me phony numbers!
So, will you being sending your credit card information by way of PM or will you be posting the information requested here?
Take a male member who posts pics of himself and pics of his "girlfriend" in various sexy and explicit poses. Whenever he posts pics of his cock they are sharp, crystal clear and of high resolution. Whenever he posts pics of the "girlfriend" with, say, legs open and a finger in her pussy, the pics are blurry, small, and of abysmally low resolution. As if they are screenshots from a Web chat cam. None, not even one, of her pics are of any quality. But all his pics are of good quality.
So this means that, on one occasion, he's using his camera, but, on the other, he's taking screenshots (while, probably, masturbating).
That, in my view, is a fake page. Any member doing so is deceiving (or trying to deceive) us into thinking that he doesn't only have sex with himself but that he also fucks a woman. Except that the woman is not real. It's a low resolution image of a woman behind the screen that he's never met.
What do you think?
Another clue is when the avatar is a chick with enormous tits and no public photos.
And, yes, I've seen those avatars too.
New Comment Go to top