Page #123
Pages: #1... #118 #119 #120 #121 #122 #123 #124 #125 #126 #127 ...#163
New Comment Rating: 12 Similar topics: 1.RAND0M BULLSHIT 2.The ORIGINAL "Random Bullshit" thread is now in the Dumpster 3.RANDOM STUFF..... 4.RANDOM STUFF, JUST FUCKING BULLSHIT STUFF 5.RANDOM BULLSHIT Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
I finally got round to buying a new camera today after carelessly smashing my old one knocking it off the table by accident. I'm still cross about that. I hope you don't mind if I give this VERY FIRST pic from the new camera its WORLD PREMIERE here
What's your thought or preference towards cookies? It might be easier if you agree with me.
I'm a "purist" when it comes to cookies. Brownies, too! I don't want extras added! My favorite brownies are the corner ones or edge ones. I love the crispy edges!
However, if someone hands me a crispy cookie, I'm likely to frisbee that sucker at a tree or give it to my rat.
Team soft cookie!
And my favorite is white chocolate chip and macadamia nut.
He hopped through the forest, picking up the field mice and bopping them on the head.
Bahahahaha.
Candy Necklaces
Bit-O-Honey
Wonka Fun Dip
Air Heads
Peas and Carrots
Root Beer Barrels
Nik-L-Nips
Bottle Caps
Sweet and Sour Pops
Bubble Tape
Mamba Fruit Chews
Runts
Boston Baked Beans
Chuckles
Lemonheads
Ring Pop
Cry Babies Guts
Necco Wafers
Tootsie Pops
Push Pops
Candy Buttons
Sugar Daddy Pops
Chupa Chups
Big League Chew
Sixlets
Wax Lips
YUM YUM
And an addendum for bella!
Foofoo
Adjective used to describe anything that is just a little to frilly, fancy, or "upper crust". Things that are foofoo might also be a bit on the delicate side, or too elegant by half, or even offensively fruity. Spoiled little lap-dogs, $1000 designer handbags, and pink capri pants worn by men all qualify as foofoo. Volleyball, a lightweight game - not a "sport" - played by athletic girls and openly gay men, does not qualify as foofoo.
There were so many tunes that they made popular, today's concert was lack luster. It would have been better if Christine McVie would have just remained a memory.
I was on my drive home, I look in the rear view mirror and the person driving behind me is so short that I cannot see their head or face popping above their steering wheel. For about 10 to 12 miles of my trip all I could think of was, I hope their legs are long enough to reach the brake pedal.
In all seriousness, though: Yes. That makes me nervous, too!
We don't grow 'em real big in our family!
Geesh! Our morning news in MICHIGAN, showed 2 roos duking it out in a neighborhood. Those things appear to be tall and they fight dirty! There were a number of kicks to what I thought was the "crotch region". My understanding is that they were fighting for the attention and affection of a female roo. Go figure!
I suggested to admin about placing a 24 hour "freeze" on voting to delete members that are reported for posting web derived pictures. Admin feels that that suggestion would not work for him, no problem. WHAT GOOD IS IT TO ASK A MEMBER TO CONSIDER REMOVING A PICTURE(S) IF WE DON'T ALLOW THEM TIME TO COMPLY?
Which brings this concern to mind; when a member is asked to delete a picture(s) and they comply, why, why, WHY are there still members voting to delete? Is it really necessary to get to the -5 vote?
The evaluation panel should not be considering matters that are not related to web derived pictures and I question whether we are competent to be voting on members that might not yet be 18. When I see a profile that states that the member is 18, who am I, who are you to question that? Err on the side of caution and have members unjustly deleted?
Referrals that are made with no explanation or something to the affect of; "you might remember this......". I've been voting for 9 months and had access to view the panel's voting prior to that time AND NO, I DON'T REMEMBER THAT! Reporting members should be clear about their complaint and provide proof. No explanation/no proof = no consideration.
Seriously, we are going to vote on deleting members that post benign pictures? A seagull in flight received a referral and I am happy to say several NO ABUSE votes yet the member posting 4 feet in 4 sneakers looks like they might be deleted. What is the logic and what is the difference between a seagull and shoes?
Admin fashioned the evaluation panel to be a jury of peer members. It is just my opinion ( I know, I know, opinions are like assholes, everybody has one
“If it appears later that the member was deleted unjustly - all members who were in favour of the deletion will be deleted and banned from the site.”
I believe that some of the "delete this member" votes cast in these cases are a result of personal grudges and/or a "voting block" which blindly votes according to the whims of a few specific members. In either case, it is an abuse of power, and should be stopped.
If anyone is not certain about what we are referring to, visit MONTED's page and clink on the evaluation panel link.
--------------------------------------- added after 31 hours
Hey *Jaime, just a question.....what was it that I said that prompted you to vote a -1? I appreciate the feedback. Thanks!
"Please delete the web derived image of the footwear. Posting web derived images is against group guidelines."
Seriously? Do all members with web derived images of ANY KIND get the same message, or just those posting shoe photos? How much time do they have to comply with your demand before they are deleted? Are ALL photos of footwear against guidelines, or just those depicting sneakers?
--------------------------------------- added after 21 hours
[deleted image]
Here's the photo in question. How is it a violation of Admin's rules?
I do not feel that the picture warranted that message and I don't understand why it was posted.
And with regard to your previous post of "voting blocks", I do BELIEVE that there are!
Would it be any use if the front welcome page included something like this.
Adult Warning
This website is meant to be viewed by ADULTS ONLY. The content is inappropriate for anyone under the age of 18. By clicking the "Enter" link below, you certify that you are age 18 or older. Please go no further if you are offended by sexually explicit material. In addition, if viewing material of this nature is forbidden by your local laws, do NOT enter this site. Use your browser's back button or close the page.
Also members should state if they have there pictures on another web site. As discovery of web derived images that do not belong to them will mean instant dismissal.
The concept of the panel is GREAT, it's too bad that voting members don't stick to the facts presented and adhere to the established guidelines. It might be beneficial if there was a moderator of some sort to oversee the referrals and to champion fair play!
New Comment Go to top