Page #3
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.Destroy His Cock 2.Abuse reports 3.Abuse reports 4.Women who enjoy being degraded and sexually objectified after abuse. 5.Frozen abuse reports Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
Oh wait, it looks like a NEW Nudistguy71 is registered, but account not yet verified. Grass this cunt on arrival!!
Didn't these cunts get deleted for talking about fucking four legged friends? Disgusting cunts and NudistGuy was a good site friend of the fat lardo Lix..
Looks like scummy cunts run together ....
In my opinion, comparing one's penis to that of a 13 year old is nothing different than someone who compares and/or thinks they are "hung like a horse".
Oddly enough, 3 members agree Rosati should be banned but I question Youngluck2020's motivation behind his referral. admin has notes on Youngluck2020, which read as follows;
Current member: Youngluck2020 detected as possible previously banned members:
May be
Youngluck (#617664):
Deleted by admin, User claims to be under@ge
Be careful, Youngluck2020, your luck may run out!
leopoldij has referred Suknbigck to the Evaluation Panel for deletion and this is a snippet of his reason, verbatim.
"You should also note that all persons depicted on Suknbigck's are different. The tanned girl is different from the big tit white girl and different from the girl who's being fucked by that brown cock on the video. The men with huge cocks are also different."
What makes his reasoning so laughable is how many DIFFERENT WOMEN are featured in his gallery? Hmmmm.....?
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes
You know his best friend is very ape ish looking I seen the picture
Please pardon my ignorance if I have misunderstood
The examples you use do fit some of the scenarios that we vote on. Some of the "proof" submitted by the reporting member can clearly indicate that the site is an amateur site, sometimes the reporting member submits a lone "jpg" link that came from who knows where, and another favorite link to provide as a form of "proof" is Xhamster.
In my opinion, it's really a difficult thing to pass judgment on and I have no problem voting ABUSE HAS NO GROUND.
Some of my favorite "proof" is when reporting members will start placing mathematical equations on the reported member/picture. For instance, they will go as far as saying something like; the picture was cached in 2015, the member's bio says she is 20, therefore she was under the age of 18, blah, blah, blah...
I find it comical because in my opinion, I find that the majority of the voting members don't provide a reason why they voted as they did. Hey, I liken this panel to a jury, sometimes we "get it right" and sometimes we "fail to get it right"
Just recently, the Evaluation Panel deleted a longtime member of more than 4 years, pandorasbox. If memory serves me correctly, she had slightly more than 120 pictures and 3 of those 120 pictures were reported as being found on the internet by doing a reverse image search. Two of the pictures were of Nia somebody-or-another and there was another from someone else. If you look at the post made by admin, screen shot in my gallery, he does not appear to care about members that post an OCCASIONAL internet picture as long as the member does not claim them to be their own. I am going to extend myself by saying that it is MY UNDERSTANDING that he does not want us to say; my pussy, my boobs, my dick, my boyfriend's dick, my girlfriend, etc, if we are posting an internet pic. I'm also going to say that admin does NOT want his site to turn into a site where internet pictures are reposted. I guess he's hoping that we will exercise good judgement. I voted ABUSE HAS NO GROUND since the member did not claim those pictures to be of her and regardless, she had at least 117 additional pictures that were legit. Then comes another member that says regardless of admin's standing on the matter, it's a copyright infringement and the member should go. Members implement their own understanding or opinions and POOF!, pandorasbox was deleted.
Revenge porn, copyright infringement and posting a picture, I'm going to use 2nice as an example, are 3 different things. Both men and women can fall victim to revenge porn, no? There are a number of members that post a picture of someone else in their gallery. Should they be reported and deleted? Copyright infringement, my guess, those pictures should have some type of watermark on them. And if I'm a fella and snag a picture of 2nice and post it without his approval, in my opinion, that's theft.
Regards revenge porn , I never distinguished between male and female and am in complete agreement, males who break the rules need to go too, no room for malicious pictures or porn on any site ( regardless of gender ) it's just the lowest in and makes the poster pond scum in my opinion.
Regarding pictures of others in galleries , no a postmark isnt good enough, all that proves is they have been posted elsewhere , plenty of pictures will come from peoples phones and tablets theses days, straight on to the site. It is all about consent, no consent, no picture...and a warning to the member who clearly posts non consensual pictures .
There is a fine line between consensual and non consensual pictures when the person in the pictures isn't the member. I suspect that the poster, Admin and possibly the abuse panel if it had been informed could well end up in trouble in certain countries if a legal report was ever filed.
I just don't get why people can't post their own pictures, why post those potentially , of someone who has no idea they are being sprawled across a porn site
--------------------------------------- added after 35 minutes
Oh and also taking Leopoldij as an example ( again) , seeing as he reported Pandorasbox, how is what he does any different to what she did, in fact he's worse!. She had 3 pics , from what I'm lead to believe he has a lot more than 3 pictures that aren't him.
My humble suggestion to all this....
Rather than immediate deletion, how about a ' cooling off ' period. Maybe look at how often member posts/visits, so say a frequent member they get a week to remove offending pictures up to those who are less frequent who get a month. Repeat offenders get three strikes and they are instantly out and banned. I just feel the whole thing has got a little harsh reading through this abuse thread . No time for those that have ' offended ' in the past to correct their mistakes
All just my thoughts and no hard feelings towards any members mentioned
Allow me to preface this by saying that I do not think highly of any male member that has the cajones to post face pictures of their wife, girlfriend, fuck buddy, etc, but don't have the BALLS to show their own face. BOOM! With that out of the way, you asked; QUESTION- "do all those women know he has posted their pictures on a porn site? Would they be happy to find this out?..especially when a family member or work colleague stumbles across them when looking for porn. How do we know, or rather how does the poster and the abuse panel know for certain that the person in the pictures is happy with this?" Simple ANSWER, we DO NOT KNOW whether the various women posted on ANY MEMBER'S page has knowledge that her likeness is posted here. If it were only a hand, a pussy, whatever, no harm, no foul. When members start posting faces, I feel that they have crossed the line. Let me say this, there are profiles that do show both his and her faces and the pictures are consistent, meaning it's always the same faces, same him, same her. I'm mainly bashing the fellas because they are the members that are primarily at fault for doing this. Don't get me wrong, women are offenders, too. There have been several SYC profiles established allegedly by women that feature various different women. Really? Which woman are you and do you have the approval of the other 8 women, to post their pictures here?
Your question about a cooling off period, this is admin's mission statement for the Evaluation Panel voting members;
"The primary goal of this page - to quickly delete members posting illegal shit when admin is away and to resolve doubtful situations.
If your account is older than 2 years and you are verified by other members you can participate here.
Abuse gets +1 if you agree and -1 if you disagree. Once it gets -5 or gets older than 10 days the abuse gets deleted as invalid, once it gets +5 the member gets deleted for the violation.
No guidelines. If you do not have any common sense you should not participate here! If you "freeze" deletion of something really important like child porn you are banned from the site no matter what."
There was a time that I feel that voting members were afraid to go against the "establishment" and I do NOT mean admin. There were members that enjoyed hunting for fakes and were able to convince their friends to vote swiftly in their favor. It was almost uncommon for voters to vote ABUSE HAS NO GROUND. Years ago, I reached out to admin and asked him to implement a "freeze" voting option so that in the event that someone was reported for deletion because they had an internet picture in their gallery, there was time an an opportunity to reach out to them. I had hoped for 48 to 72 hour freeze, admin gave 24 hours, that's what we have to work with. In the example of pandorasbox, she was a 4 year member, had 120+ pictures, 3 internet pictures...in my opinion, she was a member worthy of trying to save. I froze the voting and sent her a private message. Apparently, she was not one that visited the site daily or otherwise because the profile was deleted in 4 days. Many members voted, many varied opinions, ultimately, the majority of the members voted her gone.
As far as the "cooling off period", I'm not sure how that would work and/or how the site could implement it. Heck, some members cannot even submit a cohesive deletion report.
As to why I was up at such an ungodly hour? I am every day through pure habit
And by the way, thank you for responding to my frivolous question about your sleeping habits 💤 .....
Too bad the same muppets grassing members left and right being on other sites will sadly ignore that report... Known scummy cunts like Leo should go poof... No one had issues with Leo posting in chat about how he shagged his cousin. Screenshots were taken....
Peculiar how when leo reports a SYC member for posting pictures found on the internet, there seems to be an entirely different group of members stepping up to vote. I didn't see any of those members vote in this referral. I realize there is a time difference between when I reported at approximately 23:45 EST. You know, some folks are sleeping, some folks at work, some folks trying to bust-a-nut, some folks are inundated with private messages and the massive amount of attention that they receive that they become overwhelmed and are unable to be concerned with my referral.
Also with regard to Leo's reports.. that is telling...
"What happens if you give a false verify?
- In case if it's discovered that verified member is actually a fake, all members who verified this member get their verified status revoked, their ability to verify permanently blocked and all verifications given by them in past to other members are also revoked which may cause further "chain reaction"."
I recall the situation but cannot remember the verified member's name... a SYC member sent him private pictures of herself, her face, and the SYD member uploaded the pictures as a form of blackmail. He was deleted and the members that verified him lost their privilege to verify others. I reached out to admin on behalf of one member and said we verify body parts, not their integrity. admin reconsidered and made the members whole, once again.
--------------------------------------- added after 5 minutes
I remember the member's name, it was jtmoney.
If this statement is true then I think it's a harsh penalty.
"What happens if you give a false verify?
- In case if it's discovered that verified member is actually a fake, all members who verified this member get their verified status revoked, their ability to verify permanently blocked and all verifications given by them in past to other members are also revoked which may cause further "chain reaction".
--------------------------------------- added after 6 minutes
You can just bet lix is rounding up the troops to save Leo just the same as i am rounding up the troops to gas his sick ass any how as soon as the freeze is lifted I’m sure you will see people vote that never have before
New Comment Go to top