Page #1
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#751
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.A Forum Topic 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
0:00 Introduction
0:17 1 - Weird noises
2:46 2 - Odd questions
4:48 3 - Meaningless do
6:05 4 - Phrasal verbs
9:16 5 - Why no genders?
12:13 6 - Pronouns
14:06 7 - Silly spelling
15:43 8 - Tenses
17:45 9 - Articles
19:37 10 - Things English doesn't have
I mean, part of this video, it appears he is broadcasting from the edge of a briar patch. not even maintained at all.
only registered users can see external links
We do actually constantly add new words that get added to the dictionaries. About 2500 words per year, which is a lot for such a small language (about 24 million people).
I recognized the points he was making, and probably had problems once with them,
but English was much more easy to learn than German and French. I still have some issues with the 'Phrasal verbs' sometimes, but I don't consider them weird.
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes
Now you made me hungry for baked goods I will have to get on Marcy about that
but is there any potential of Identity theft here? what better way to ruin someone than to show them to be a predator?
, I just wanted to mention it because it would in theory be possible to disclose information in a way to set up a person falsely.
In my world anyone can say anything but are they able to back it up with proof/facts? In my opinion, it wasn't just someone slandering someone...... Unless the particular website made an egregious error, charges look "official" to me.
but just don't pay me no mind,i should not have said anything.
I just had a brain fart that maybe it was id theft but it was not.
Please disregard my questions in regards to that.
Worth mentioning, that AnusLicker voted to allow predators on sex sites in Pitbull's poll...
Strange the timing,
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
I did
She also argued points that were well outside her scope of expertise... given her limited education and comprehension skills.
How are we to take her serious when she talks about the economy? She literally admitted in forum she could not get 10% of 100 calculated.
She is a muppet and knows very little about anything.
/blogs/57302.html
And in true CAT form, this was posted on Gntlmn's wall;
anonymous wrote (12,May,24 08:34):
I like your response to Bella! on your blog. CAT
And like a true lib- you go right to the racist, nazi name calling. VERY sophisticated!
Maybe you should delete and join Saggy on the sidelines!
Stupid cunt!
only registered users can see external links
My guess is that she referred someone to the Evaluation Panel for deletion on the 10th of September. My guess is that the referral was dismissed HOWEVER, the first person voting at 03:40 left a comment that was totally unnecessary. Hey, lix, that referral appeared to be open for at least 20 hours, surely you had time to see who posted that comment, but it wasn't me.
No worries, I reached out to admin hoping he could help, there's no need for Whatsupcocks to keep an "eye" on me. From the for what it's worth department, I wasn't online for 6 or 7 days, this kinda drama was getting to me, so really, it wasn't me. Have make it a good day, you can't help that you're a hater and haters are gonna hate.
I find it difficult to wrap my head around the idea that she was not online within the 20 hour period. Meh, something for her to bitch about and speculate that it was me. She is so fricken blinded by her "hate" toward me. Hey, lix, it wasn't me and contrary to your opinion, I have only one profile and IF someone pretends to be me, my guess it is Skittles or cody8789. Also, like I said, that was within the timeframe of that I was not on the website.
admin does not take this lightly, nor do I. Do you realize that every time she is insulted, it flips back on me. Think about it, years ago, when there was a group was formed about her, admin blamed me for that, even though I didn't come up with the concept, I didn't use my points to create and when another member brought the attitude into the forum, I tried to calm it down. The other day she was called a "walrus", i can't remember in what context, but admin pointed fingers at me and said something about "my group". I don't have a fricken group.
You've got to be aware that lix thinks very highly of herself and that if members say negative things about her, she THINKS it's because I fire y'all up and prompt you to say those things. And the same thing goes for Candy. You guys, there's several of you, can treat her like shit and she's okay with it. And then there are the sometimes that "your" actions will cause her to get shitty with me.
You want to call anyone a name here, do me a favor, make sure your name is attached to it. I don't need any of these "shit for brains" women thinking I'm behind anything. I am a MATURE person, I own what I say and I don't hide behind anonymous posts.
--------------------------------------- added after 10 minutes
How would it be even possible to vote on the abuse panel make a comment and not know who posted it I’m not understanding this
Apparently, if a referral is "dismissed", no record is kept. She's so damn angry, and I would be too, she can't think straight. My impression, based on the comments, the member is still here OR it she is unable to find the profile, they voluntarily deleted their profile. The only record admin has and keeps is the record of SUSPICIOUS profiles, that were PREVIOUSLY BANNED. If the member was not banned, he keeps no record of the referral.
IF THERE'S ANYONE THAT'S "FRIENDLY" with lix and could ask her why it took her 3 weeks to ask and be pissed off, I would be interested in knowing.
--------------------------------------- added after 75 seconds
I do get up around 4:00 am though and I must have missed it
New Comment Go to top