![]() Laughably Small Penis? Enlarge it At Home Using Just Your Hands! | ![]() Stay Hard as Steel!!! | ![]() Tired of ads on this site? | ![]() Get Paid For Using Social Sites! |
Started by #578610 [Ignore] 19,Jun,19 13:20
New Comment Rating: 1 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.STUFF, JUST STUFF 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 4.A Forum Topic 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III Comments: |
The following list is of NINE things a woman couldn’t do in 1971 – yes the date is correct, 1971.
In 1971 a woman could not:
1. Get a Credit Card in her own name – it wasn’t until 1974 that a law forced credit card companies to issue cards to women without their husband’s signature.
2. Be guaranteed that they wouldn’t be unceremoniously fired for the offense of getting pregnant – that changed with the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of *1978*!
3. Serve on a jury - It varied by state (Utah deemed women fit for jury duty way back in 1879), but the main reason women were kept out of jury pools was that they were considered the center of the home, which was their primary responsibility as caregivers. They were also thought to be too fragile to hear the grisly details of crimes and too sympathetic by nature to be able to remain objective about those accused of offenses. In 1961, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld a Florida law that exempted women from serving on juries. It wasn't until 1973 that women could serve on juries in all 50 states.
4. Fight on the front lines – admitted into military academies in 1976 it wasn’t until 2013 that the military ban on women in combat was lifted. Prior to 1973 women were only allowed in the military as nurses or support staff.
5. Get an Ivy League education - Yale and Princeton didn't accept female students until 1969. Harvard didn't admit women until 1977 (when it merged with the all-female Radcliffe College). Brown (which merged with women's college Pembroke), Dartmouth and Columbia did not offer admission to women until 1971, 1972 and 1981, respectively.
Other case-specific instances allowed some women to take certain classes at Ivy League institutions (such as Barnard women taking classes at Columbia), but, by and large, women in the '60s who harbored Ivy League dreams had to put them on hold.
6. Take legal action against workplace sexual harassment. Indeed the first time a court recognized office sexual harassment as grounds for any legal action was in 1977!
7. Decide not to have sex if their husband wanted to – spousal **** wasn’t criminalized in all 50 states until 1993. Read that again...1993.
8. Obtain health insurance at the same monetary rate as a man. Sex discrimination wasn’t outlawed in health insurance until 2010 and today many, including sitting elected officials at the Federal level, feel women don’t mind paying a little more. Again, that date was 2010.
9.The birth control pill: Issues like reproductive freedom and a woman's right to decide when and whether to have children were only just beginning to be openly discussed in the 1960s. In 1957, the FDA approved of the birth control pill but only for "severe menstrual distress." In 1960, the pill was approved for use as a contraceptive. Even so, the pill was illegal in some states and could be prescribed only to married women for purposes of family planning, and not all pharmacies stocked it. Some of those opposed said oral contraceptives were "immoral, promoted prostitution and were tantamount to abortion." It wasn't until several years later that birth control was approved for use by all women, regardless of marital status. In short, birth control meant a woman could complete her education, enter the work force and plan her own life.
Oh, and one more thing, prior to 1880 the age of consent for sex was set at 10 or 12 in more states, with the exception of our neighbor Delaware – where it was 7 YEARS OLD!
Feminism is NOT just for other women.
KNOW your HERstory
AND STILL, IN THIS AGE OF FREEDOMS FOR ALL (SIC) MEN STILL WANT TO RULE A WOMAN'S WOMB.
BTW, what have you got against Gerome other than the fact he's black and I'm a white blonde? Jealous? Gerome is never here. He's even uncomfortable me mentioning him? You don't know him at all, so, leave him out of this. You have a beef with me, fine. You don't like my stance on abortion? Too bad. I think you are irresponsible having so many kids and you certainly don't have much care for your wife.
BUT, THE ABOVE POST WAS TO ILLUSTRATE THAT UNTIL RECENTLY WOMEN WERE JUST CHATTEL TO YOU, MEN. YOU, MEN HAVE FUCKED UP THIS WORLD SO BADLY THAT WE ARE ONLY A FEW YEARS AWAY FROM POSSIBLE EXTINCTION AS A SPECIES. YOUR MAN MADE RELIGIONS, YES! MAN MADE, HAVE CAUSED ALL KINDS OF DEATHS. BUT, I GUESS THAT SINCE IT HAPPENED FAR FROM A WOMB, IT'S OK. GIVE IT A REST, SCORPIO69. ONE DAY YOU'LL BE ABLE TO MAKE A RESPONSIBLE STATEMENT ABOUT LIFE. TILL THEN YOU SHOULD JUST KEEP GETTING WOOD AND DOING WHAT GOD GIFTED YOU WITH (IS THAT WRONG? SPILLING YOUR SEED?)
BUT, SERIOUSLY, WHAT IS EVERYONE'S BITCH ABOUT COPY/PASTE? ISN'T A PUBLIC POST TO BE READ BY THE PUBLIC? IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT TO BE THEN DO IT IN A PRIVATE MSG.
By bella! at 25,Aug,19 01:04
Can anyone explain why TWOWARMTTS2 is on the Recently Submitted Pussies page and posting this picture? I would hope that she does know that her hooha aka pussy is NOT reflected. Poor thing......
/l6m6uy6hbqt9pic.html
-------------------------------------------------------
YES BELLA, I CAN. WHEN UPLOADING A PIC THERE'S THE "CATEGORY" BOX THAT HAS TO BE FILLED (AT LEAST IT SHOULD BE). THE "TITS" AND "PUSSY" CATEGORIES ARE THE LAST TWO CHOICES. I MADE A MISTAKE AND DID NOT REALIZED IT UNTIL MY PIC SHOWED UP ON THE MAIN PAGE (I GUESS, DESPITE WHAT SOME PEOPLE CLAIM, THERE'S STILL SOME INTEREST FOR SAGGY TITS). I WAS GOING TO CHANGE IT. THEN, I REALIZED IF THE PIC IS TAKEN DOWN FOR MISLABELING OR I CHANGED IT MYSELF, I STILL WOULD LOOSE POINTS. NOW, YOU, BELLA, KNOW FULL WELL THAT THERE'S BEEN SCORES OF PICS ON THE FRONT PAGE THAT DON'T SHOW "HOOHA". AT LEAST, MINE SHOW A SET OF TITS WORTHY OF A GOOD TIME FOR ANY MAN. HECK, JUST A FEW WEEKS AGO WE HAD A MAN'S JUNK THERE. I'M BI. I HAVE A STRONG PREFERENCE FOR MEN, BUT, A GOOD LOOKING "HOOHA" DOES NOT GO TO WASTE WITH ME (JUST ASK MY GF BARBARA). I KNOW WHAT IT'S LL ABOUT. I'M LEAVING THE PIC WHERE IT'S AT. YOU OR ANYONE ELSE (I KNOW YOU SELDOM DO YOUR OWN DIRTY WORK, CERTAINLY NOT FACE TO FACE OUT IN THE OPEN) WANT IT OUT, MOVE YOUR ASS AND MAKE IT HAPPEN. MY PICS ARE IN THE FRONT PAGE ALL THE TIME (NOT BAD FOR A 67 YR OLD GRANNY WITH "SAGGY TITS")
only registered users can see external links
WHY BOTHER? GO COMMANDO,,
By bella! at 23,Aug,19 15:26
Not too long ago an 18 month member, Kangoo, was reported and deleted for posting pictures of another member, Batti . Kangoo returns as Ze_boss , goes premium paid, posts pictures of Batti AND uploads internet pictures and YOU KNUCKLEHEADS have voted his picture up on the Popular page. Way to go! Let's give adoration and recognition to a thief and a fake.
Here is the picture on Ze_boss's page
/ja60zzixwd86pic.html
--------------------------------------- added after 4 minutes
Here is Batti's picture posted 6 years ago.
/h7kqqqcusouxpic.html
------------------------------------------------------
BELLA, WHEN WILL YOU REALIZE NO ONE CARES. MOST MEMBERS LOOK AT A PIC AND IF THEY LIKE IT, THEY VOTE "HOT. THEY DON'T VOTE "HOT BUT ONLY IF IT'S REAL OR NOT STOLEN". THEY DON'T CARE NOR DO THEY KNOW HOW OR WHY SOMEONE GOT DELETED. I CERTAINLY DON'T. I SEE A PIC ON THE MAIN PAGE AND, UNLESS IT'S AN OBVIOUS PHOTOSHOP, I WOULD VOTE FOR IT. NOW, BEFORE I'M VILIFIED FOR THE ABOVE STATEMENT, I AM STRONGLY UPSET THAT SOMEONE GETS TOP BILLING BY STEALING SOMEONE ELSE'S PIC. WHAT I WON'T DO, AND IT LOOKS LIKE MOST MEMBERS WON'T EITHER, IS LOOK AT THE PEDIGREE OF THE PIC.
PERHAPS, YOU, BELLA, WITH YOUR OBSESSIVE PREOCUPATION FOR FAKE ACCOUNTS AND PICS, ARE MORE ATTUNED TO THIS OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOR. YOU REPORT IT. BRING IT UP TO THE "COMMITTEE". AND, MAYBE INSTEAD OF IT BEING SO SECRETIVE, THE "COMMITTEE" RESULTS SHOULD BE AVAILABLE TO ALL (NOT THE VOTE) TO SEE THE RESULTS. I'VE BEEN HERE FOR OVER 4 YRS AND I DON'T KNOW KANGOO FROM ADAM.
--------------------------------------- added after 2 hours
WHAT I DON'T KNOW IS HOW YOU HAVE ACCESS TO A SIX YR OLD PIC AND THE MEMORY TO REMEMBER IT. I THINK THERE'S MORE TO THIS STORY.
--------------------------------------- added after 15 hours
[deleted image]
THIS IS A REACTION FROM BELLA THIS MORNING.
-------------------------------------------------------
By bella! at 24,Aug,19 07:26
TWOWARMTTS2, AS LONG AS YOU ARE GOING TO TROLL THE FORUM LOOKING FOR THINGS REPOST, AT LEAST TRY TO EMBRACE THE ESSENCE OF THE POST.
MEMBERS SHOULD CARE AND DO CARE WHEN ANOTHER MEMBER "STEALS" PICTURES FROM OTHER MEMBERS AND CLAIM THEM AS THEIR OWN. IF YOU DON'T CARE, YOUR THOUGHT PROCESS OF WHAT IS RIGHT AND WRONG SURELY IS FLAWED. ISN'T IT CURIOUS THAT YOU FEEL MEMBERS SHOULD BE BANNED FROM THE SITE BECAUSE THEY "TRASH" YOUR PAGE YET YOU DON'T SEE THAT THERE IS ANYTHING WRONG WITH YOU "TRASHING" ANOTHER MEMBER WITH YOUR ABUSIVE LANGUAGE?
JUST AN F.Y.I., I DON'T "HUNT FOR FAKES" BUT I'M SMART ENOUGH NOT TO VOTE FOR FAKES, TOO BAD YOU AREN'T.
--------------------------------------------------------
BELLA, YOU MAY BE SMART ENOUGH NOT TO VOTE FOR FAKES. I'M NOT. YOUR STATEMENT THAT YOU DON'T HUNT FOR FAKES IS NOT TRUE. EVERY SO OFTEN YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT A MEMBER POSTING INTERNET PICS. I APPLAUD YOU FOR BEING SO "INTERNET" CONSCIOUS. I'M NOT. TO BE HONEST, I SELDOM GO TO THE FRONT PAGES OF THE SITE AND VOTE ON ANY PIC. THOSE THAT I DO ARE BECAUSE I LIKE THEM. YOU ARE ALSO WRONG THAT I DON'T CARE.
"I AM STRONGLY UPSET THAT SOMEONE GETS TOP BILLING BY STEALING SOMEONE ELSE'S PIC"
THAT WAS A DIRECT COPY/RE-PASTE OF MY STATEMENT ABOVE.
I TOOK A LOOK AT BATTI'S PIC AND ZE BOSS AND IF YOU LOOK AT ONE OR THE OTHER, THERE'S NOTHING TO SUGGEST ONE IS THE ORIGINAL AND THE OTHER IS A STOLEN PIC. NOT ONLY AM I NOT LOOKING FOR THE PEDIGREE OF THE PIC, I'M ALSO NOT CLAIRVOYANT. I, ALSO BET, NONE OF THE MEMBERS THAT VOTED FOR THE PIC KNOW IT'S AN ILLEGAL THEFT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
YOU ARE A HUNTER. YOU POUNCE ON EVERY PIC OR MEMBER THAT YOU THINK IS FAKE OR STOLEN. I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU DO IT. MAYBE YOU HAVE A WHOLE CADRE OF INFORMANTS THAT COME TO YOU WITH THEIR SUSPICIONS. THAT, MY DEAR, IS THE WHOLE "EMBRACE THE ESSENCE OF THE POST" LIMITS FOR ME
NOW, LET ME "EMBRACE" SKITTLES AND HIS PENCHANT TO TRASH MEMBER'S PAGES. I CAN UNDERSTAND HIM (OR ANYONE) BEING UPSET ENOUGH TO SEND SOME TRASH GIFTS. I CAN EVEN UNDERSTAND HIM LEAVING SNIDE REMARKS IN MY PAGE. ALL I HAD TO DO WAS SPEND OVER 400 POINTS TO REMOVE THE GIFTS (MORE THAN 7) AND DELETE HIS COMMENTS. I ALSO BANNED HIM. A FEW MONTHS LATER I UN-BANNED HIM. THE SAME DAY HE TRASHED MY PAGE AGAIN. AGAIN I CLEANED MY PAGE AND RE-BANNED HIM. IN THE BLOGS THERE ARE COUNTLESS BLOGS DETRIMENTAL ABOUT ME. HE IS THE BIGGEST TROLL ON SITE. AND I'M NOT ALONE IN THIS OPINION. MANY OTHER PEOPLE THINK THAT. IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME, GO LOOK AT THE POLL I RAN ABOUT SKITTLES. SO, YES, I BELIEVE HE SHOULD BE KICKED OUT OF THE SITE. YOU SEEM TO LIKE HIM WITH HIS SNIDE REMARKS. PROBABLY BECAUSE HE DOESN'T STAND UP TO YOU OR TRASH YOUR PAGE. I MAY HAVE INSULTED YOU IN THE HEAT OF THE MOMENT. ACTUALLY, I DID, AND BADLY, BUT, IT WAS OVER STRONG DIFFERENCES OF OPINION. YOU HAVE THIN SKIN AND CAN'T TAKE IT. I'M SORRY FOR THAT.
BTW, AND THIS IS A COMPLIMENT TO YOU FOR HAVING ONE OF THE MOST INTERESTING FORUMS ON SITE, I "TROLL" YOUR FORUM ONLY AND THAT'S BECAUSE YOU ARE TOO _____________ (PICK THE ADJECTIVE YOU LIKE) TO LET ME CHALLENGE YOU FACE TO FACE. I HAVE TWO PEOPLE IN MY BANNED LIST, SKITTLES AND SrCUMS. IT'S BEEN THAT WAY FOR MONTHS.
--------------------------------------- added after 15 hours
PS: YOU ARE WELCOMED TO UN-BAN ME, POST YOUR REPLY, AND BAN ME AGAIN.
Your statement leaves your motivation hidden as to why you should say what you've said. I challenged Bella's point of view. You did not comment on that or on my position that members really don't care what the pedigree of a pic is.
ALL I'VE SAID WAS IF I SEE A PIC I LIKE AND WANT TO VOTE ON IT, I WILL NOT FIRST GOOGLE IT OR GO TO THE RUSSIANS TO SEE IF THE MEMBER OWNS IT. I JUST VOTE.
DOES THIS EXPLAIN MY POSITION ON VOTING TO YOU, YOUR OTHER GIRLFRIEND, AND THE REST OF THE FUCKING MEMBERSHIP THAT I DON'T GIVE A FLYING FUCK ABOUT?
AND WHILE I'M AT IT, TELL THAT FUCK OFF SKITTLES HE'S LUCKY MISTRESS BELLA TALKS OUT OF BOTH SIDES OF HER MOUTH.
NOW, AGAIN, I DON'T APPROVE AND THINK IT'S WRONG FOR ONE MEMBER TO STEAL ANOTHER MEMBER'S PIC. LET ME REPEAT THAT, BECAUSE, TO THE AVERAGE MEMBER IT'S TOO HARD TO UNDERSTAND. I, THAT IS ME, TWOWARMTTS2, DON'T APPROVE AND THINK IT'S WRONG FOR ONE MEMBER TO STEAL AND USE ANOTHER MEMBER'S PIC.
IF YOU OR HER ROYAL HIGHNESS NEED CLARIFICATION PLEASE ASK ME AND I'LL TRY TO FIND SINGLE SYLABLE WORDS TO EXPLAIN
--------------------------------------- added after 10 minutes
AND WHILE YOU ARE AT IT, YOU CAN TELL YOUR MISTRESS THAT IT TAKES A SPECIAL PERSON TO BITCH ABOUT ANOTHER KNOWING FULL WELL THE OTHER PERSON CAN'T ANSWER DIRECT. OH, SURE, SHE'S NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR SKITTLES COMMENTS BUT SHE SURE DOESN'T EVEN TRY TO SENSOR IT. I HAVEN'T SAID ANYTHING ABOUT HER IN MONTHS. IF I COMMENTED IT WAS ON CONTENT. SHE'S LIKE A LITTLE GIRL THAT HAD HER ICE CREAM STOLEN. SHE'S GOING TO CRY FOREVER. GET A SPINE, LADY.
--------------------------------------- added after 68 minutes
---------------------------------
BELLA, HAHAHA..TOUCHE. THAT REALLY WOKE SKITTLES UP.
--------------------------------------- added after 77 minutes
--------------------
BTW, I CLOSED THE SKITTLES POLL ONE WEEK AFTER I OPENED IT. IF YOU OR DARLING SKITTLES WANT ME TO RUN IT AGAIN I WOULD BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO SHOW WHAT A PIECE OF SHIT HE IS,,,,,,AND,,,,,,BY ASSOCIATION, ANYONE ELSE THAT GIVES HIM THE TIME OF DAY.
BTW I'm fairly certain she not "scared" more like annoyed to put it mildly. 😉
SECOND, I DID GREET US TROOPS RETURNING FROM VIETNAM. IF YOU ARE INSINUATING I'M AN OLD LADY, I'LL GRANT YOU THAT. I'M 67 YRS OLD. BUT, ONLY OLD BY TIME. I HAVE A HEART OF A 20 YR OLD AND THE LIBIDO OF A 40 YR OLD. WHAT'S MORE, I COMPETE IN THE LOOKS DEPARTMENT WITH WOMEN A THIRD MY AGE AND I STILL GET TOP MARKS. OF COURSE, YOU WOULDN'T GET TO ENJOY ME, EVER.
By Skittles at 21,Aug,19 14:11
I remember reading in history class about twowarmtts2 greeting US troops returning from Vietnam...
I heard she took down more sailors than the USS Arizona..
GUNS DON'T KILL, SANDWICHES KILL
You guys carry a grudge for ever. And, you are too chicken of an old lady. HAHAHA
AS ALWAYS, ALL HOT AIR AND LIES, BUT, NO ACTION.
A man was shot in the stomach and leg early Tuesday in an apparent road rage incident in Orlando, police said.
The shooting was reported around 3 a.m. near South Orange Blossom Trail and South Street.
According to Orlando police, officers heard several gunshots in the area and found a driver suffering from gunshot wounds at a nearby Citgo gas station.
The victim was taken to Orlando Regional Medical Center in stable condition.
The shooter fled the scene in a vehicle, and a search for the car turned up empty, police said.
FOR THOSE THAT SAY IT’S NOT THE GUN, HOW MUCH DAMAGE WOULD THE GUNMAN HAVE DONE WITH A GUN?
--------------------------------------- added after 93 minutes
Without a gun
--------------------------------------- added after 55 seconds
Rich in oil under several thousand feet of ice.
--------------------------------------- added after 5 minutes
only registered users can see external links
Skittles, you are a troll. I don't know why Bella defends you in other forums.
only registered users can see external links
IT'S OFFICIAL. THE MAJORITY OF MEMBERS POLLED VOTED TO THROW SKITTLES OUT OF THE SITE FOR BEING THE BIGGEST, MOST ANNOYING TROLL ON SITE. HE TRASHES OTHER MEMBER'S PAGES AND BRAGS ABOUT IT. HE THREATENS MEMBERS HE'S GOING TO TRASH THEIR PAGES AND IS CONSTANTLY ABUSING SAID MEMBERS. THE POLL SHOWS 64% OF THOSE VOTING WANT HIM OUT. i DON'T HAVE ENOUGH TIME TO REFER HIM TO THE POWERS THAT BE TO BAN HIM. PERHAPS SOMEONE DOES AND WILL. HERE'S A PIC OF A POLL THAT IS STILL OPEN
[deleted image]
AGAIN, ONE MORE TIME (#200 AND SOMETHING THIS YEAR), A DERANGED MAN TOOK AN AK47 SEMI-AUTOMATIC MILITARY STYLE RIFFLE AND KILLED 19 PEOPLE. HE HURT A WHOLE LOT MORE. WHEN ARE WE GOING TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT?
WHAT DO WE TELL THE PARENTS, SONS AND DAUGHTERS, FRIENDS, COWORKERS? THE GUN DIDN'T KILL THEM, THE GUY DID? YOU, VICTIMS ARE STUPID FOR BEING HERE AND STANDING IN FRONT OF A BULLET? BECAUSE OF YOUR ACTIONS AND DYING, THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS IN TROUBLE?
WHAT A ROYAL FUCK-UP. POOR, POOR, PEOPLE
POOR, INNOCENT, PEOPLE.
makes me wonder why, but what is the point. there is no why. *lix*
You call this a few? If a terrorist organization from a know country kills these many in the USA, the country would go to war. If I'm complaining and you want to call it exploitation you go right ahead. We don't need guns.
One other point I will make, let's add your numbers up... 85 different occasions since 1990 until 2017 (your words). And a supposed 250 up til now. So... 335 INDIVIDUAL incidents over a period of 29 years, according to you... So a population of 327 MILLION as of 2018, should be punished with gun confiscation and whatever else you can dream of SIMPLY because of 335 bad eggs? Do I have that correct? Let me put it another way for you... 335 vs 327 MILLION So, you REALLY believe it's fair to punish the 327 million for the likes of 335 people? You obviously do, with that being pointed out, you stand firm on your beliefs. You're a complete idiot for wanting to hurt or diminish the rights of SO many because of a few bad people. YES FEW IN CONTRAST TO 327 MILLION! What's wrong with you lady?
As far as illegals murdering innocent Americans, all I can say, It's wrong.
There isn't 1 (ONE) year that there has been Thousands and thousands of murders done with guns in America in 1 year.
But there has been thousands and thousands of abortions done that as a Democrat you support.
And your kind supports kill / murdering babies by the thousands every year.
I checked YOUR WAY WRONG!
In 2019 alone, at least 62 people have been killed in mass shootings.
only registered users can see external links
Now shut YOUR PIEHOLE.
There's thousands of abortions per year. You can call it murder. I call it pro choise. A woman's right to take care of her body. But, regardless, we were talking about firearms and the killings they cause--------------------------------------- added after 11 minutesBTW, yes, I stand behind women of the world to have that choice. You men have your fun for a few minutes and then wash your hands of the whole thing. Pass a national law that if a woman doesn't want the baby, the father is obligated to take it into his home and support it until the child is 18 and then we can talk. You guys fuck us before, during, and after.
only registered users can see external links
Well said and no reason to say much more other than if you are against the regulation of guns and the outlawying of military style long guns, then, what is your solution? You tell us what can NOT be done. Why not tell us what CAN be done.
Go get her.
New Comment Go to top