Page #1
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.who likes sex outdoors 2.who likes sex outdoors 3.What's the dirtiest thing you've done? 4.Cock Site Court of Law in Session 5.Supreme Court horror stories Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
SITO Members,
Plaintiffs
v.
CAT52!
Defendant
.............................COMPLAINT.......................
This Court will show, based on the evidence of this case, that the defendant committed these actions:
COUNT I. SPONSORING A SEXUAL PREDATOR
1. The defendant's husband Charlie a/k/a Woody, was convicted of sex charges in the state of Florida.
2. This Court ordered the defendant's husband to delete his profile. Woody complied with this Court order
3. The defendant CAT52! has pictures of her husband on her profile page. This is a Violation of the Court rules, sponsoring or promoting a convicted felon.
JUDGE RuFino Final Judgement: Ms. CAT52! This Court ordered you to remove all pictures of your convicted husband. You have 20 days to remove any images, blogs, and other means of communication using his profile. Those are not acceptable anymore since he is no longer a member of this site. You are outrageously posting pictures of him, a convicted sexual predator.
December 4, 2025
plaintiffs,
v.
tecsan,
defendant.
___________________/
.........................COMPLAINT.......................
This Court declares all statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant tecsan violates the Clean Page Act.
2. The defendants' page is filthy with a lot of negative gifts.
3. Other members have complained about the defendant's. page.
Judge RuFino Judgment: Mr. tecsan is time to clean your page. You have plenty of time to clean your page. Order you to clean your page within 20 days, or I will hold you in Contempt of Court.
November 17, 2025
Oh, BTW---I plead guilty and tell you to shove your court bullshit up your ass.
If I am not mistaken judge rufino was caught selling her goods. She plead guilty and is awaiting sentencing. I hope the judge sticks it to her/hi...Either way it would probably enjoy that.
What did you do with all those pizza boxes?
plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52!
defendant.
____________________/
......................COMPLAINT...........................
This Court shows the statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.
COUNT I. PROMOTING A SEXUAL PREDATOR
1. The defendant's ex-husband was a member of this site under the name "woody". His first legal name is Charlie.
2. The defendant's former husband committed sexual crimes against a minor child. He was in jail and on probation.
3. CAT52! has posted a picture of his former on the defendant's profile page.
COUNT II. DESTROYING CASE EVIDENCE.
1. The defendant has destroyed case evidence on the page of member Montanaman.
2. Under the Court rules, no member is allowed to destroy evidence in a future Court case.
3. The defendant, CAT52!, has willfully decided to take evidence and destroy it.
JUDGE RuFino's case judgment: Ms. CAT52! here we go again. You will never learn from your past transgressions. You have disobey this orders from this Court, and you don't care about the consequences. Your seditious conduct is not acceptable on this site. You are now in a gag order by this Court.
November 20, 2025
“She’s carefully timing her departure just 1-2 days after her pension kicks in,” Ocasio-Cortez said in a statement on her Instagram account, and criticized her voting record on healthcare.
Greene abruptly resigned from Congress, effective 5 January, in a 10-minute video post outlining her unhappiness with Republicans on issues including the public release of the Jeffrey Epstein files in the government’s possession, US financing of foreign conflicts, Trump’s decision to potentially back a candidate against her, and the cost of living and healthcare.
plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52!,
defendant.
_________________/
......................COMPLAINT..........................
This Court declares all the statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.
COUNT I. POSTING A FAKE PICTURE
1. The defendant has posted a fake picture on the front page of this site.
2. The picture in question is from 1995. The picture does not accurately represent the defendant's actual appearance.
3. The defendant altered the picture using an application called RETAKE.
COUNT II. DESTROYING CASE EVIDENCE
1. The defendant, CAT52! destroyed case evidence of member bjuk.
2. The defendant posted gifts and deleted negative gifts. This is basically witness tampering.
JUDGE FREDESBINDA: Ms. CAT52, I have found you guilty of the charges listed above. You will now be on probation for 30 days.
November 8, 2025
Bjuka too!
“She’s carefully timing her departure just 1-2 days after her pension kicks in,” Ocasio-Cortez said in a statement on her Instagram account, and criticized her voting record on healthcare.
Greene abruptly resigned from Congress, effective 5 January, in a 10-minute video post outlining her unhappiness with Republicans on issues including the public release of the Jeffrey Epstein files in the government’s possession, US financing of foreign conflicts, Trump’s decision to potentially back a candidate against her, and the cost of living and healthcare.
plaintiffs,
v.
bella!,
defendant.
___________________/
.......................COMPLAINT............................
This Court declares all the evidence of this case to be true based on the evidence of the case.
COUNT I. DESTROYING CASE EVIDENCE
1. The defendant, bella! has been destroying evidence in the case of member, tecsan.
2. On November 12, 2025, the defendant destroyed all the negative gifts from the page of member tecsan.
3. The defendant intentionally and willfully destroyed case evidence with the intent to justify the defendant's conduct in a case.
Judge RuFino: This Court takes very seriously the destruction of case evidence by members. Your conduct is outrageous. I found you guilty of the above charge. You will be on probation for 30 days.
November 18, 2025
plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52!,
defendant.
__________________/
.....................COMPLAINT............................
This Court declares all the satements on this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF THE TECSAN ANTI SPAM RULE
1. The defendant violated the Tecsan Ant Spam rule.
2. Under the above rule the defendant spam the following forum; showitoff.org/forum/thread/php?id=31377.
3. No meber is allowed to spam forums wit the intent of attacking others.
COUNT II. PLAGIARISM
1. This Court takes very serious plagiarism. Once a member decides to copy other members comments constitutes a vioaltion inder the plagiarism rules of this site.
2. The defendant plagiarized member Sir-Skittles on the following blog; /blogs/60299.html
Skittles new car blog.
COUNT III. CONTEMPT OF COURT
1. This has issued a gag order against the defendant on October 18, 2025.
2. At the above time the defendant violated her probation by this Court.
JUDGE RuFino; Ms. CAT52! your conduct on this site is disgusting. You continue to attack others here daily. I suggest to stop writing blogs here. I want you to shut your mouth. I found you GUILTY of all 3 charges.
November 11, 2025
Desperate to stay relevant and young- Failing at both!
1. Charlie- touching that young girl
2. Failing to pay your bills= fucking $300 debt. Are you kidding me!
And much more! Public records- can be posted here!
After you tried to fuck a broom handle!
I can't imagine what an Arby's eating 81 year old asshole smells like. Barf
Nasty shit stained back cunt, hairy, and covered in toilet paper
cat52!
plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52!,
defendant.
___________________/
.....................COMPLAINT............................
This Court declares all the statements in this complaint to be true based on the evidence of this case.
COUNT I. WITNESS TAMPERING
1. The defendant, CAT52!, has destroyed evidence in the case of member tecsan.
2. The defendant was aware that the member tecsan had an open case with this Court, and she tampered with all the evidence in his case.
COUNT II. CONTEMPT OF COURT
1. The defendant has shown disrespect for this Court for all the comments she made on the November 17, hearing date.
2. No member is allowed to show disregard for this Court's decisions and judgments.
COUNT III. PERJURY
1. This Court takes very seriously cases of perjury.
2. The defendant lied about his age repeatedly.
3. Defendant has lied to members of this site, claiming she is 73, when in fact she is 81 years old.
JUDGE CLARISBINDA: Ms. CAT52! You are a big liar. How many other lies will you continue to make? The facts of this case show you are not telling the truth about your age. You also have shown no respect for the laws and rules of this site. I think you should be impeached again. You are guilty of the above charges.
November 14, 2025
New Comment Go to top