SITO members
Plaintiffs,

V

Chandy
Defendant.
‐---‐-------------/
,...................COMPLAINT.......................

This Court declares all the sameness on this complaint to be true based on the evidence of this case.

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CLEAN PAGE ACT

1. The defendant's page is dirty with negative gifts.

2. The defendant refuses to clean her page.

COUNT II. BASELESS BLACKLIST

1. Defendant blacklisted some members without a reasonable excuse.

2. A member must have reason to blacklisted other members without intimidation.

COUNT III. POSTING OBSOLETE PICTURES

1. Defendant's profile pictures are more than 20 years old

2. It is imperative defendant Chandy post current pictures.


Judge Fredesbinda; Ms. Chandy your conduct is outrageous. First you must clean your page. In addition, I also found you guilty counts 2 and 3.
July 24.26

/member.php?w=650074


All old ass pics from the 90's.. just look at the color, tone, and the furniture

Fake cunt-has to be like 64 now

Case of CAT52! a/k/a saggy granny

Site members,
Plaintiffs

V

CAT52!,
Defendant.

__________________/

?.......................COMPLAINT.........

This Court declared all the statements to be true based on the evidence

On count 1 THE COURT dismissed without prejudice the charges of: posting a picture of a sexual predator.

Count 2. ATTACKING AN IMMUNITY MEMBER

1. The Defendant violated the rule 101 which said: no other member should defame, attack by any means a member under the Court IMMUNITY RULE.

2. DEFENDANT CAT52! attacked IMMUNITY member Sir-Skittles several times.

Judge RuFino: ms CAT52! you have a nasty mouth.Your type of behavior is not acceptable here. Refrain from attacking other members without provocation. An old woman like you should set an example to others members of this site. In addition, in conjunction with the site Intel will investigate on who posted the picture of your sexual predator husband.

I found you guilty of the above charges.
July 19, 2026.

I heard there is going to be trouble the that doll fucking AI lass

SITO Members,
Plaintiffs,

v

GingerDaddy
Defendant
_________________/

....................VIOLATION OF PROBATION................

This Court hereby declares that the defendant GingerDaddy has violated his probation regarding his case of CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT on June 11th 2026.

Judge RuFino
June 16, 2026

SITO Court Members,
plaintiffs,

v

CAT52! A/k/A Saggy Granny
defendant.

_______________________________/

......................COMPLAINT.......................

This Court declares all the statements in this document to be true based on all the evidence.

COUNT I. POSTING OBSOLETE PICTURES

1. The defendant, CAT52!, has posted several pictures from more than 20 years ago.


2. She has posted pictures from 1990, 1998, and 2001, all of which do not represent her now.


3. She posts those pictures to attract more members to her page.


4. The defendant is now fat, wrinkly, with a fat belly.


JUDGE Clarisbinda: Ms. CAT52! Stop posting old pictures. Show the real you and not a fake picture of you from 20 years ago.
I found you guilty of the above charge. Stop now, posting those pictures, or you will be in Contempt of Court

June 11, 2026

SITO COURT members,
plaintiffs,

v

GingerDaddy,
defendant.
_______________________/

.......................COMPLAINT>>>>>>>>>>.................

This Court declares all the statements in this complaint to be true based on the evidence of the case.


COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT

1. The defendant has violated the Chat Room rule of abandonment.

2. On June 11, 2026, the defendant opened a chat room in the morning hours.

3. The defendant abandoned his room, with members in the chat room asking for his whereabouts.

4. The defendant never returned to his chat room, and the room was closed.


JUDGE RuFino. Mr. GingerDaddy, this Court will not tolerate your room abandonments. You have done this before without any excuse. You are rude when you leave without any notifications. This Court orders you to close the open rooms if you are not going to stay. The importance of a chat room is to be a good host, which you aren't. You are guilty of the above charge. You will be on probation for 30 days.

June 13, 2026

SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v

CAT52!
defendant.
____________________/

......................COMPLAINT...........................

This Court declares all the statements in this case to be true based on the evidence of the case.


COUNT I. POSTING A PICTURE WITH A SEXUAL PREDATOR.

1. The defendant, CAT52!, has posted a picture with her husband on the front page of the site.

2. Her husband is a sexual predator under the laws of the State of Florida, USA.

3. The defendant has committed a big offense when posting a picture of a man who was convicted of a crime.

4. The defendant intentionally and purposefully posted the picture on the main page.

JUDGE CLARISBINDA: Ms. CAT52, you have committed a serious offense. You must remove that picture of your husband and you from the front page within 30 days. You are a disgusting woman.

May23, 2026

SITO Members,
plaintiff,

v.

bjuk,
defendant.
_________________/

.......................COMPLAINT.........................

This Court declares all the statements in this complaint to be true based on the evidence of this case.


COUNT I. CHAT ROOM RULE VIOLATION

1. The defendant in a chat room used foul language, a violation of the chat room rules.

2. Defendant used words such as "fuck" in a chat room.

3. The defendant continued in the chat using the above words against other members while in the chat room.

COUNT II. ATTACKING AN IMMUNITY MEMBER

1. The defendant bjuk attacked member Sir-Skittles. This member is under the Immunity ACT.

2. The defendant told Sir-Skittles to "fuck off".

JUDGE Clarisbinda; Mr. bjuk, you have some serious charges. For your actions, you are now guilty of the above charges. You are now on probation for 30 days.

May 22, 2026

SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

bella!,
defendant.
________________/

......................COMPLAiNT............................

This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence of this case.

COUNT I. RACIST BEHAVIOUR

1. The defendant has expressed racist behaviour against some members.

2. The defendant has attacked several members of this site, calling them nigers, chicanos, and pigs.

3. The members befriended the defendant. They also visited the defendant's forums, expressing their opinions on the defendant's page.

3. The defendant is a racist and uses bigotry on her forums and blogs.

4. The defendant is a member of white supremacist groups.


JUDGE RuFino Opinion and Final Judgment: It is important to know that this Court has the names of the members the defendant attacked, showing her racism against them. This Court will protect the privacy of those members.

Regarding Ms. bella!'s charges, the Court will not tolerate your racism on this site. I suggest that you stay away from the members you have offended with your racism and bigotry. You know who they are. This Court found you guilty of the above charges. You will be on probation for 60 days.

May 15, 2026

SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v

bella!,
defendant.
___________________/

.........................COMPLAINT..........................

This Court declares all the statements to be true based on the evidence of this case.

COUNT I.FILING NO MERIT ABUSE PANEL COMPLAINTS

1. The defendant bella! has filed 2 Abuse Panel complaints.

2. Her first complaint was against member Michelle.

3. The defendant's complaint against Member Michelle was dismissed by the Abuse Panel.

4. The defendant again filed another Abuse Panel complaint against member Doris.

5. On the above case the majority of the members voted against the complaint.


JUDGE RuFino judgement; Ms. bella! You love to file complaints with the abuse panel to get rid of any female member that you don't like. Your complaints lack merit in both cases. The only reason you filed those Abuse Panel complaints is to eliminate women who are more beautiful than you. Stop wasting the Abuse Panel and members' time. Your jealousy is disgusting. Stay away from the Abuse Panel.

May 9, 2026

cat52!-


1. Attacking premium members

2. Banning premium members

3. Being below the minimum income for members of this site

4. Lying and making u tall tales to gain support and sympathy

5. Being above the age limit for females- Granny's should cover their cunt arts and sagging tits!

SITO COurt Members
plaintiffs,

v

CAT52!
defendant.
___________________/

....................COMPLAINT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

This Court declares all the statements in this complaint to be true:


COUNT I. USING FOUL LANGUAGE

1. The defendant has used foul language on this blog: /blogs/61879.html Exhibit "A" by member Sir-Skittles.

2. The defendant, CAT52! Use the word 'fuck' to attack member Sir-Skittles.


COUNT II. ATTACKING AN IMMUNITY MEMBER

1. The defendant violated the Immunity Member Act.

2. Under the Immunity Member Act, no other member is allowed to attack, defame, blacklist, or send negative gifts under this Act.

3. The evidence shows the defendant violated this Act several times during the member Sir-Skittles blogs.


Judge Florisbinda Judgment: Ms. CAT52! I found you guilty of the above charges. You will be on probation for 30 days. During those 30 days, no contact with member Sir-Skittles. You also will not be allowed to use foul language on this site's blogs.

April 19, 2026

SweetSucculentMilf

Persists with very distasteful and extremely insulting comments not only on my content, but many others as well. I guess you can do whatever you want to here if you "pay" to disgrace others.


This lump of shit banned me for just saying hello.

1. Attacking an immunity member

2. Telling site lies

3. Being below the required income of members

Can the Site Court investigate and charge this Taco Bell model?

SITO Members,
plaintiff

v

bjuk.
defendant/
_________________/

This Court declares all the statements in this complaint to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF IMMUNITY MEMBER ACT

1. The defendant in this case bjuk has violated the Immunity Member Act several times.

2. Under the Immunity Member Act no member(s), no other member in this site shall attack verbally, trash their page or blacklist them.

3. The defendant, bjuk has attacked verbally during the chat room member Sir-Skittles

4. Member bjuk also used the finger to attack member Sir-Skittles. The evidence shows the use of vulgar language in the chat room.


JUDGE RuFino Final Judgement: Mr bjuk you have a filthy mouth. You need to behave in the chat rooms. If you can't get along with other members in the chat rooms, then stay out.
I will place a Gag Order for the next 30 days.

4/8/26

Bella here with her fake profile AngleofDeath what an idiot

Hi Bella

SITO Members,
Plaintiffs,

v

CAT52!
Defendant.
________________/

...................COMPLAINT>>>>>>>>>>>>>

This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true based on the evidence of this case.

COUNT I. ATTACKING AN IMMUNITY MEMBER

1. The defendant, CAT52!, has violated the Immunity Member Act.

2. Any member under the Immunity Act cannot be attacked, defamed in any form.

3. The defendant attacked member Sir-Skittles several times; therefore, the defendant violated this Act.

COUNT II. CONTEMPT OF COURT

1. The defendant has ignored orders by this Court that she must obey.

2. This Court ordered the defendant to stop preventing other members from making comments on her blogs.

COUNT III. VIOLATION OF TECSANT SPAM ACT.

1. In a previous case law member tecsan spammed other members' blogs and emails. The Court stops the member from taking these actions.

2. The defendant in this case, CAT52!, has spammed the site front page twice in less than a week.

JUSTICE FLORISBINDA. MS. CAT52! I found you guilty of the above charges. I ordered all members to attack your page if you don't behave properly. You are an old woman, act
like one.

March 18, 2026
.

Cat played like a fucking fiddle- Deep plant fake

/blogs/61724.html#t224013

cat52!

SITO Court Members
Plaintiffs,

v

CAT52!
defendant.
____________________/

.......................COMPLAINT...........................

COUNT I. FILTERING A PROFILE PICTURE

1. The defendant, CAT52! has posted a picture that she has filtered(see pictures below) as Exhibit 'A" presented by member, Sir-Skittles.

2. She has used this picture on the front page of the site.

3. She wants the members of this site to think she looks younger than she does.

4. The evidence is very clear; she is fat, old, with
wrinkles.

COUNT II. PLAGIARISM

1. The defendant has plagiarized member Sir-Skittles blogs. This is a violation of the laws of plagiarism.

2. The defendant has plagiarized all blogs of member Sir-Skittles.

3. She wrote the following, plagiarized this blog; Skittles at Bronx hospital.


Judge RuFino: Ms. CAT52! Stop plagiarizing other members' blogs. You are not very intelligent at all when you copy someone's blogs. Regarding your picture, stop using fake pictures of yourself. You are old, and you should be happy the way you are supposed to look: fat and wrinkly. You are guilty of the above charges with 20 days' probation. 3/17/26

The Cat cunt has plagiarism charges pending-

She has stolen another one my blogs- She has not an original thought in her feeble brain. It was damaged at birth when she got stuck in her mom's cunt- '

Charlie giving her domestic violence every holiday with a crack to the head has not helped either. An imbecile and mongoloid.

More charges for this old lump- Posting heavily filtered pictures- Look at those old ass teeth! Yuck!


--------------------------------------- added after 311 hours



The actual, unfiltered pic!

Judge Florisbinda: This Court has charged the defendant CAT52! with the following: Suppression of free speech and attacking the Court Judges.


SITO members,
plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!
defendant.
____________________/

...................COMPLAINT............................

COUNT I. SUPPRESSION OF FREE SPEECH

1. The defendant, CAT52, a member of this site, has a forum on this site site. Stuff III.

2. On her forum members are allowed to leave comments of any kind, including pictures.

3. The defendant has deleted opinions on her forum because she doesn't like other members' statements or opinions.

4. It is the right of each member to have an opinion and not be deleted because the author of that forum does not like it.


COUNT II. ATTACKING the COURT ( Contempt of Court)

1. This defendant has sent threats to this COurt.

2. The defendant has disrupted this Court's judges' hearings

3. CAT52! has sent attacks in the form of plagiarism.


Judge Florisbinda: Ms. CAT52! you are disgrace of this site.
If you feel you are getting attacks on your forums, this Court suggests not to write any. A member should be able to accept opinions from other members, 3even if you disagree wit them. Once you delete members' statements from your forum is a complete aggression to free speech. I found you guilty of the above charges.

Chief Justice RuFino: Ms. CAT52! you have been charged with a serious charge; Sedition. This Court in consideration to other members have rejected your conduct on this site. This Court is not amused about your scandalous conduct on this site.

SITO MEMBERS,
PLAINTIFFS,

V

CAT52!
DEFENDANT.

,,..............
Case Complaint

1. The defendant has file unreasonable complaints to the Administration of this site.

2. The defendant has attacked several members of this site.

3. The defendant has blacklisted several members of this site. At the time of this hearing defendant unblocked all of them.

4. The defendant posted pictures of herself of more than 20 years. Most recently she posted in the front an altered picture based on the evidence of members Mongo and Sir-Skittles.

5. The defendant has shown racist and homophobic conduct against other members.

6. The defendant has several times has destroyed case evidence.

7. The defendant have committed bribery.

8. The defendant belongs to the KKK and Nazi groups. No members should be allowed in this site with this type of ideology.

9. The defendant support ****philes.

10. The defendant has neglected her duties as a mother.

11. The defendant created several fake profiles with the intention to attack other members.

This Court on this day 8th of March 2026 finds this defendant guilty of Sedition. She is now deemed by this Court a personna non grata.

All judges of this Court affirm this judgment.