Page #2
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5|
Started by #601496 [Ignore] 07,Jan,20 17:42
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.Anthropological study 2.TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME 3.No Collusion. 4.Rain stops Trump 5.TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME analysis. Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
I can not fathom our countrys condition right now had Trump not got in office.
You can bet your guns would be threatened much more than they are now.
I don't own but a couple older guns that are not worth stealing. But I'll be damned if some sumbitch is going to take them away!
With that said who is the best candidate that will maintain this constitutional requirement? Sanders is a socialist and the rest of the challengers want to take your guns away, no more free speech with open borders..Raise Taxes and murder babies AFTER they are born.. ITs called BREAKING THE LAW!
There is only one person that will abide by our constitutional law to the best of his ability.. Guess Who It is?
(I promise not to make illegal deals with foreign powers to investigate rivals in the 2020 elections..........AGAIN)
Since when is socialism a dirty word? This country is full of socialistic laws (Social Security, unemployment insurance, minimum wage, food stamps, disability insurance, Obama-care, public hospitals, forty hour work week, etc)
Taking your guns away (really, really difficult) would be a Constitutional thing and a choice of the people, not just one person running for the presidency. You do know about that other document that is older than the Pledge of Aliegence? It starts like this,
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
That's "WE, THE PEOPLE". Something you right wingers seem to forget. Only your view is right. The other part of the country got it wrong.
Raise Taxes and murder babies AFTER they are born. Tell me when has a born baby been murdered except by lunatic parents and stray bullets?
Breaking the law is what this current president, this jerk and laughing stock of the world, did. Probably will do again.
The president is aquitted therefore he is innocent.. No evidence is presented other than your hopes of fantasy.. There is no evidence to support him doing this other than the democrats word which has lied and continuting to lie throughout history. They know they can't compete with the truth so they lie and point fingers.. Turns out they cheated in the election but STILL LOST... People voted for trump becuase he was the best candidate,, not because ome russian KGB agent or agency forced people to vote through mind bending tricks..
Actually it is the Left is the laughing stocks.. and you are enhancing... Look at you..You're their little bending over bitch...
The reason he gives us the inspiration and love required to be americans, perhaps for the first time since the kennedy assassination and coup by democrats.West Virginia still has jobs, ohil, PA MI, Wi are in a better position since 2001 from the 8-11 attack.
--------------------------------------- added after 106 minutes
BTW, That 5th of scotch must have gone down smooth.
Democrats and false or rhino "republicans" is MIGHT MAKES RIGHT
Conservatives(not neccessarily Republican) is Right makes Might...
During the 1990s, the Nordic countries shifted from Socialism Mach 5 (an open, free and competitive economy with very high marginal tax rates) to something between Socialism Mach 6 and Socialism Mach 7. While the details differ from one to another country, marginal tax rates were reduced to moderate levels, and various aspects of social insurances and social services were privatized. For example, parents could choose between government and nongovernment schools, and hospitals contracted-out many services. The reason for the shift was the relative stagnation that beset the Nordic countries. While the United States once enjoyed a standard of living only 70 percent of Sweden’s; by the 1990s, Sweden enjoyed a standard of living only 70 percent of the United States.
According to the latest edition of Economic Freedom in the World, Norway is the #25 country in the world and Sweden #43, out of 162; with the United States #6, and Singapore and Hong Kong first and second.
Germany describes its amalgam of free-markets and social insurance as the “social market.” Chile, with its privatization of Social Security, could be said to have moved completely to Mach 1 capitalism. The United States, somewhat uniquely among capitalist countries, practices extensive credit-socialism, and has a national government as well as many home-owners and students deeply in debt. There are positive and negative things to say about many real-world capitalist countries; but nobody - not even Ocasio-Cortez - wants to be associated with real-world socialist countries.
ARTICLE TAGS
TAXES ECONOMY
AUTHOR
cthies
Clifford Thies
Clifford F. Thies is the Eldon R. Lindsay Professor of Economics and Finance at Shenandoah University. He received his Ph.D. in economics from Boston College.
Full Bio
cthies@su.edu
The point is that those nordic countries, at one time, had a very strong socialistic system. They did some changes to be more equal to our capitalistic system.
Their system is best described as compassionate capitalism.
The Nordic countries practice mostly free market economics paired with high taxes exchanged for generous government entitlement programs.
First, it is worth noting that the Nordic counties were economic successes before they built their welfare states. Those productive economies, generating good incomes for their workers, allowed the governments to raise the tax revenue needed to pay for the social benefits. It was not the government benefits that created wealth, but wealth that allowed the luxury of such generous government programs.
In other words, they had very generous programs to help their citizens, and that's what Sanders and other "Democratic Socialism" proponents want. To you and people with your mind-set, you automatically think Venezuela, Cuba, and such. No one wants that.
What I want is a successful economy with safety programs for the less fortunate or poorer citizens. You can have a super-powerful military without the huge expenses of Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Iran, or N Korea.
This should make you happy. This makes your point........ kinda.
America’s is a mixed economy and so are Scandinavian countries’. It is the mixture that differs.
As someone who grew up under socialism and is still, barely, in his 30s, I hope to relate a few ideas to the young people who are “feeling the Bern.” First, Sanders is not a socialist, but a social democrat. Second, the United States does not have a strictly capitalist economy, but a mixed one. As such, it combines a high level of private ownership of capital and the means of production with relatively onerous regulation and taxation. Third, to the extent that what anti‐capitalist Sanders supporters really want is a Scandinavian‐style social democracy, with its high level of wealth redistribution and income equality, they should consider that even some of the most socially democratic countries on earth are, in one crucial way, more capitalist than the United States.
The idea, Petro, is what's best for our people.
--------------------------------------- added after 23 minutes
And Mr Blue is right. Both, Norway and Sweden have a military with both also having an Army Reserve.
Look at how we spend our money in US vs Norway or Sweden. We have bigger house. So we probably spend a bigger percentage of our income on homes. They have smaller home because it more expensive so they can only afford a much smaller place. Because they spend more money on taxes I would say.
In the US everyones has a car because you need one to get around and go to work. We have spend our money and buy a car. So we can't spend that money on taxes to pay for national heath care. Their are probably so many little different thing that people are not thinking about or don't know because we don't live in Norway. They have great vacation times off. They get like 30 day off every year. That normal to them we work 70 hours a week take very little time off.
We would have live the whole Norway life style to have the same benefits or cut spending like the biggest one is our military. Who want to cut the military to same size as Norway ? That's no aircraft carriers and stealth bombers, probably no drones and probably no nuclear submarines.
only registered users can see external links
As far as the insane amount of money we spend on the military, I don't believe we have to. If we stop these non-ending wars, we could still have the same military but with much less cost. One to one Norway is pretty identical to the US including transportation (cars), housing, energy. The point is that they have better safety nets than the US.
You keep saying, "we have these costs so we can't get into more debt. I think that's false. It's backwards. If we have to spend more to help our people, then, by all means, spend less on military, encourage families to be more frugal. Stop crazy projects like building a useless wall on our southern border. Limit presidential campaigns to 6 months duration and only special public money be used to finance it. All candidates have the same amount.
Maybe other people will comment. I don't think people want to pay that much money to have a system like Norway. It would require a big change to your average American. Let's see who get elected as the next president and see if Americans like the idea.
So if you look at it the dems are lying that a right wing exists. in the middle of the bird is the truth and pure morality.
You're so fucking dumb I can't believe it. You change your name because nobody even likes you here.. The country is being dragged into the mud from people like you.
So believe this: this dumb blonde believes the world would come out the winner if you would stop using oxygen.
Nobody likes you here.. Beat it..
only registered users can see external links
President Donald Trump on Wednesday placed Vice President Mike Pence in charge of the US government response to the novel coronavirus, amid growing criticism of the White House's handling of the outbreak.
At a wide-ranging White House news conference, the President defended the White House's response, stressing the administration's ongoing efforts and resources devoted to combating the virus.
"Because of all we've done, the risk to the American people remains very low," Trump said.
The President did not close the door to Senate Democrats' call for more than $8 billion in emergency funding for anti-coronavirus efforts, despite Democrats' dramatic jump from the $2.5 billion in total funding proposed by the White House.
"We'll spend whatever is appropriate. Hopefully, we won't have to spend so much because we really think that we've done a great job in keeping it down to a minimum," Trump said.
I UNDERSTAND HIS FIRST SUGGESTION IS TO PUT YOUR HEAD BETWEEN YOUR LEGS AND KISS YOUR ASS GOODBYE.
I have always felt like term limits were in the best intrest of the country and it should stay the way it is.BUT at the same time, this past 3 years for Trump have been made very difficult for him to do what he was elected to do because of the losing parties constant harrasment. VERY unfair that has happened. Hopefully once he is reelected, the nay sayers numbers in congress will be reduced to a point they are simply crying babies in the corner of the room and Trump can get downt to FIXING things instead of beating back the hounds of the democrats.
The first two years of his presidency, Trump had control of the House and the Senate. He has packed the Supreme Court with conservatives. This last year he has the control of the Senate to block all legislation. He OWNS the Justice department. How much more does he need to "succeed"? Oh! Wait a minute, I know. He needs a regiment of SS troops to jackboot their way through dissenters. Maybe he can declare himself "El Supremo" for life.
And, while we are at it, why should the dems (28% of the voters) move aside? Why not the repubs (also 28%)? Why not we all step aside and let the independents (41% of the voters) fix what, supposedly, both our parties fucked up?
Is anyone able to explain the "common law" marriage aspect as it relates to Canada? Google states common law marriages are not legal yet they are recognized IF you live together for 12 continuous months OR if you have a child/children together and there was a third OR. I guess what I am hoping to understand is; 1) can you claim your "spouse" on your income tax and 2) should the union dissolve, is there a possibility that alimony would be paid?
[deleted image]
The Dow tumbled more than 1,000 points and marked its third-worst point drop in history
only registered users can see external links
WELL, ONE MORE TIME TRUMPO BAILED OUT. SO THIS IS HOW HE TAKES CARE OF THE ECONOMY? THE DOW IS GOING DOWN THE TUBES AND HE'S GALLIVANTING IN INDIA PLAYING GUNGA DIN
only registered users can see external links
Would Alfred Deakin have acted like this joke of a president? I bet not.
Trump’s alleged attempt to strong-arm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Voting Ukranians are not the problem (not possible).Trump tried to rig the election by getting dirt against an opposing candidate. Now, if he had gone to the Justice Department, a branch of the executive branch (the president) and asked the head of it to investigate the Bidens, he would have been ok. Congress had voted to help the Ukraine by granting money and materiel. This was a lawful order by Congress and the President had no authority to interfere. He did interfere. He withheld this help until the Ukrainian president agreed to investigate Biden Jr and the connection to his father, VicePresident Biden. This is unlawful action in the United States and qualifies under High Crimes and Misdemeanors as reason to impeach.
The second part of his impeachment is that he, in the best legal description of English Law, obstructed justice by not allowing witnesses to tell the truth or testify.
These were not trumped up charges. The transcript of the call to the Ukrainian president was actually released by THE WHITE HOUSE (Trump himself). He also, famously, a few weeks later, verbally asked the Chinese the same in a televised news blurb on the White House lawn.
He's not a man's man. Reagan was a man's man. Clinton was a man's man. Putin is a man's man. Obama is a man's man. This jerk buys his way through life on the money his daddy left him. I don't put down a man (or a woman either) for licking to grab pussy. I do put him down for not asking for permission first. I don't think you like to go to the supermarket and have the produce manager grab your snatch. I certainly don't and this is from a self described slutty whore. BTW, Hilary is a non-issue. It happened 3 yrs ago. When will it be time to let that one pass and actually have this jerk of a president own up to his fuck ups?
As far as Nancy Pelosi tearing his speech, well, there's no love lost between these two. Most people don't realize or know that in her position she's the 2nd in line to the presidency behind the VicePresident. As a legislator she has help pass many important legislation.
only registered users can see external links
As far as her getting laid schedule, well, I doubt it's any worse than Melania"s, Our First Whore Of The Land.
A few years ago, a very prominent Congressman sent a very strong worded letter to the governor on NEW MEXICO. He told the governor that US policy is not MEXICO"S business. NEW MEXICO has been a state since 1912. So, yeah, we do stupid things, like electing the current jerk. What we also have is the most educated, the biggest pool of scientists from all walks of life, the most Diversified economy and the strongest military. We come, or used to come to the aid of any country who was trampled by a bigger one. We are still the policemen of the world .
The Aussies contributed 7,672 Australian soldiers in Vietnam, 531 killed, 3000 wounded. The USA lost 58,220 trying to protect the world from the Communist menace. Korea was bad and the US fought in World war two to save the world from another nightmare. Even in Australia.
I won't get used to this jerk. Because in this country we accept the decision of the electorate, we suffer the outcome, but, we also have the right to bitch until we are raw in the throat. And if the jerk performs a high crime or misdemeanor, we want him impeached.
Edit,yep,still making them
only registered users can see external links
they also have a handy flu tracker on that site,just enter your zip code
New Comment Go to top