This reminds me of that joke about the Rabbi who saves up all the foreskins he cuts off until he has a large plastic bag full. He looks at the bag and thinks to himself that there MUST be a use for them, so after a lot of thought, he remembers that one of his flock is a leather bag maker......
The next day the Rabbi goes to see the man and shows him the bag of foreskins and asks if it might be possible to make something out of them. The bag maker is not too impressed with either the material or the task and tells the Rabbi that he will see what he can do, but to not expect much and come back in a week......
The Rabbi returns in a week and is presented with an equisite little purse beautifully stitched from the foreskins,.....The Rabbi exclaims his delight but then frowns and mentions that "it's a bit small"......Anxious to get rid of the Rabbi the bag maker ushers him out the door saying; "just get your wife to stroke it a few times and it'll turn into a suitcase".....
From Matt's Wife: This is going to turn into a flame fest. The foreskin crowd will come in and start calling everyone that is circumcised mutilated and not intact men. Sad
So true. This has come up time and again here on the Forum and the anti-circumcision crowd comes out of the woodwork.
For what it's worth, like most American men I am circumcised and I'm glad I was. For my sex partners I tend to prefer circumcised men. As you do, I think they look better.
But I definately can go either way on this. There are a LOT of ultra attractive un-cut dicks on this site and there is someting really exciting about slipping my tongue inside a foreskin to tickle a man's glans and savor the flavor of any man juice that might be there.
Hello Matt`s wife and Spermkiss.
Exactly as you predicted and as we expected, at the sounding of the bugle the usual individuals descended upon the discussion with their usual comments and agendas. They are as predictable as the taxman, a political speech or the sun rising in the east each morning.
The Canadian chill is as predictable as usual, even more so than the sound of the bugle.
On various matters I am predictable and this is one of them.
Basically we are both grumpy older men set in our ways, be careful not to slip on a maple leaf as I just stepped in some kangaroo doo doo.
From Matt's Wife: Am I ssupposed to care what you think? I am tired of threads that make it sound like half the members don't belong. If you don't agree with me fine but get off my back
I merely question your ability to read rather harmless forum posts. I also do not see why this thread would make any member feel as if they do not belong.
From Matt's Wife: Don't presume that you can ask or tell me to do anything. There are many on this site that are tired of the constant threads that bash circumsized men
ok so in a public forum i have crossed a line by asking a question.... ok, that makes sense... Also i originally was just pointing out that this forum doesn't bash circumcised men and i will never bash circumcised men.
Perhaps they look better, but they are slightly less functional as a result. I would assume the foreskin actually adds to both the physical stimulation of the man and the woman.
the uncut cock is the natural state. the design of the natural penis is perfect. to cut the foreskin of a babyboy, or any minor, without a medical reason, should be a felony!
I prefer uncut or natural penis's.
While I was one of thousands that were circumcised as an infant I have always resented the fact that it was done. I have been actively restoring my foreskin and I am very pleased with the result.
I have nothing against circumcision as long as it is the decision of the male and not done as soon as he is born.
interesting picture of your cock. I noticed you have a skin bridge, some what common with circumcisions.has this ever been an issue?. these skin bridges can be safely removed. or it could be a interesting placement for some penis jewelry....
Well firstly, I would defend the right of any ADULT individual to make changes to his/her own body of their own volition and free choice.....
Fortunately, for tiny defenceless babies, things are changing now. A BIG leap forward was the landmark German court case in Cologne about a week ago which found that an infant circumcised had been assaulted against his human rights.
Please 'google' "cologne circumcision" to read about the case and the furore it has caused in religous groups who mutilate as a matter of course. Also, look at the 'Betty Dodson With Carlin Ross' website and look under 'circumcision' to read a very interesting commentary and video presentation.
Quote;
".......The District Court in Cologne ruled that parents having their sons circumcised can be prosecuted for causing bodily injury - according to their ruling "neither the rights of parents nor the constitutional freedom of religion can justify circumcision"...."
In the US, with it's powerful 'bible belt' and exploitive religous mania, it will probably be the new interest in 'uncut porn' that will bring about the end of routine mutilation of infants.
It's actually 'circumcised' and 'non-circumcised',...ie.,it's exprememly difficult to "uncircumcise" a penis and has rarely(perhaps never) been achieved due to the difficulty of finding the same type of erogenous nerve endings that are in the foreskin anywhere else on the human body. The only real hope is to stretch the remaining skin, which is what restorers try to do....
.....In a full circumcision two thirds of this uniquely erogenous tissue is removed along with it's equally unique voluptus.
...The sexual pleasure sensation and excitement that is unique to the foreskin,.....cicumcisers insist that this does not exist as, to them, the foreskin is just a peice of redundant skin. In fact, the sensation of the foreskin being stimulated is different to that of the glans and shaft. This is probably the reson for circumcision in the first place,..ie., to remove as much of the voluptuous sensation as possible and thus attempting to make masturbation as unsatisfying as possible while leaving enough sensation for procreation.
Im cut and like it.... but i am fascinated with guys that are uncut... i think the penis looks beautiful both ways but because im cut i tend to like guys with fourskin.... kind of like a girl that is born with curly hair she wants straight hahahaha
The next day the Rabbi goes to see the man and shows him the bag of foreskins and asks if it might be possible to make something out of them. The bag maker is not too impressed with either the material or the task and tells the Rabbi that he will see what he can do, but to not expect much and come back in a week......
The Rabbi returns in a week and is presented with an equisite little purse beautifully stitched from the foreskins,.....The Rabbi exclaims his delight but then frowns and mentions that "it's a bit small"......Anxious to get rid of the Rabbi the bag maker ushers him out the door saying; "just get your wife to stroke it a few times and it'll turn into a suitcase".....
For what it's worth, like most American men I am circumcised and I'm glad I was. For my sex partners I tend to prefer circumcised men. As you do, I think they look better.
But I definately can go either way on this. There are a LOT of ultra attractive un-cut dicks on this site and there is someting really exciting about slipping my tongue inside a foreskin to tickle a man's glans and savor the flavor of any man juice that might be there.
The bottom line is that I like dicks.
Exactly as you predicted and as we expected, at the sounding of the bugle the usual individuals descended upon the discussion with their usual comments and agendas. They are as predictable as the taxman, a political speech or the sun rising in the east each morning.
On various matters I am predictable and this is one of them.
Basically we are both grumpy older men set in our ways, be careful not to slip on a maple leaf as I just stepped in some kangaroo doo doo.
While I was one of thousands that were circumcised as an infant I have always resented the fact that it was done. I have been actively restoring my foreskin and I am very pleased with the result.
I have nothing against circumcision as long as it is the decision of the male and not done as soon as he is born.
/pajoqunikp8tpic.html
Fortunately, for tiny defenceless babies, things are changing now. A BIG leap forward was the landmark German court case in Cologne about a week ago which found that an infant circumcised had been assaulted against his human rights.
Please 'google' "cologne circumcision" to read about the case and the furore it has caused in religous groups who mutilate as a matter of course. Also, look at the 'Betty Dodson With Carlin Ross' website and look under 'circumcision' to read a very interesting commentary and video presentation.
Quote;
".......The District Court in Cologne ruled that parents having their sons circumcised can be prosecuted for causing bodily injury - according to their ruling "neither the rights of parents nor the constitutional freedom of religion can justify circumcision"...."
In the US, with it's powerful 'bible belt' and exploitive religous mania, it will probably be the new interest in 'uncut porn' that will bring about the end of routine mutilation of infants.
It's actually 'circumcised' and 'non-circumcised',...ie.,it's exprememly difficult to "uncircumcise" a penis and has rarely(perhaps never) been achieved due to the difficulty of finding the same type of erogenous nerve endings that are in the foreskin anywhere else on the human body. The only real hope is to stretch the remaining skin, which is what restorers try to do....
.....In a full circumcision two thirds of this uniquely erogenous tissue is removed along with it's equally unique voluptus.
New Comment Go to top