Started by #303133 [Ignore] 10,Dec,13 13:50
 | Don't let 'em fool you!
A "HeteroFlexible" guy is just a Bisexual man who can bend his back enough to stick his head up his own ass. |
New Comment Rating: 0
Similar topics: 1.Gay Men in Military Service
Comments:
A guy who normally has sex with women REALLY wants to suck a dick.
He understands that only GUYS have dicks.
He also knows that the term for people who have sex with both genders is BISEXUAL.
Because he doesn't want to be a nasty, perverted,filthy BISEXUAL (gawd forbid), he just drives himself crazy beating-off and fantasizing about cocksucking...but never acts on it.
THEN,he hears the term "HETEROFLEXIBLE" (which, oddly enough, means...um...people who have sex with both genders)and he thinks "Hot diggity-damn! That's EXACTLY what I am!"
And he promptly goes out and gobbles cock until he lapses into a cum-coma.
All the while, he contentedly thinks to himself "That was AWESOME! At least I ain't no filthy BISEXUAL."
Bisexual implies a full interest in both sexes, sexual, emotional and romantic. This interest need not be the same for both sexes, indeed, very few bisexuals have equal interest in both sexes.
Then there are a lot of men who identify as heterosexual and form their emotional and romantic ties with women, but who have some sexual interest in men. Often this sexual interest manifests itself in a desire to perform oral sex on a man. I have long called these men straight cocksuckers, but the term heteroflexible has recently come into vogue and it also fits.
How many men like this are there? A LOT! All the time on this very site we see comments from men who claim that they identify as straight (often they're even married), but who want to suck another man off. I've known a dozen or more in my personal life. Often they have little or no interest in getting their own orgasmic release with another man, what they want to do with a man is suck him to climax. One man I knew was an extreme case in that he didn't get his dick out and didn't even want me feeling it thru his pants. He just wanted to suck me off; he got his own orgasmic release with his girlfriend.
There might be different levels of attractiveness to a gender.
Dress it up with whatever terminology you want,but it really is simple...if you have sex with both sexes or have had an experience with both ,you are bisexual...
As for pansexuals....
At the end of the day, I couldn't care less who someone is attracted to...but if you play with both you are bisexual...
"One example of situational sexual behavior includes when people might not have sex with prostitutes in their home countries, but may do so when they visit other countries, where such activities are legal or ignored by authorities. Another example is when individuals or members of a community might engage in homosexual behaviors but identify as heterosexual otherwise, such as some people in prison, the military, single sex boarding schools, or other sex-segregated communities.
Many people change their sexual behavior depending on the situation or at different points in their life.[1] For example, men and women in a university may engage in bisexual activities, but only in that environment. Experimentation of this sort is more common among adolescents (or just after), both male and female. Some colloquialisms for this trend include "heteroflexible",[2] "BUG" (Bisexual Until Graduation), or "LUG" (Lesbian Until Graduation).[3]"
There's also cultures where the divide is between penetrator and receiver (the concepts of gay, bi and straight not being prevalent), and horny young lads will stick their cocks up the local gay guy or tourist, because there's nothing else. Given the choice of on-demand arse or pussy, probably 95% of them would go for pussy but they are horny enough to think "a hole is a hole". Let's not even go onto "sheep shaggers", again, 99% of whom I assume do not masturbate over sheep, let alone want to marry and have kids with them.
Could HeteroFlexible mean someone who occasionally or rarely has sex with someone of the same sex but has no romantic attraction? Whereas bi would mean sexual and romantic attraction to both sexes? Surely the fact that the word HeteroFlexible has arisen is that people identify with it, and that gives it meaning? Homosexuality as a word and concept is extremely recent in the context of 100,000 years of human existence (and is also seen by many as a Western concept). I don't know when bisexuality was defined but can we really close the door and decide that we now know everything about human sexuality, and can never add any more definitions?
I for one would like to lick some south Asian pussy before I die but I would never describe myself as bi - perhaps I am HomoFlexible? I really doubt there's a woman in the world who I could settle down with but there are certainly women that I'd love to have sex with. And quite frankly (and I'm sure I speak on behalf of many gay men here), if zuffenhausen wanted to suck my cock, I'd fuck a fucking dustbin if that was a requirement but that does not make me DustBinSexual - just DustBinFlexible
Straight, bi, gay... Terms are too vague doesn't cover the full scale. What if you fuck 10 women a year but only 1 guy? What if you fuck 10 guts a year but only one girl? According to you they are both just bi and fall under the same label.
No, they very much do. These labels cover the content of one's sexual activity (or desire), not the degree of preference. 'Men,' 'women' or 'both' are the only options, really. Don't confuse the issue.
Newsflash: You don't KNOW me. I would never "suck any cock on offer", nor have I ever said or done anything on this site to imply that I would behave in such a fashion. Ask anyone who has had any communication with me here and they will confirm that to be true. Your accusation is unwarranted, unfair and patently false. You have taken my statement and twisted it-- in what passes for your mind-- in order to defame my reputation in a public forum. By the same "logic", I could accuse you of being a dim-witted, self-loathing bisexual who lashes out at other men who are comfortable with their sexuality in order to feel better about his own self-hatred. But...I didn't.
Er, when did I say I wast bi? I said I'm technically bi but the term is misleading. Bi is such a vague description of sexual behavior, gay or straight is cut'n'shut but bi could mean bloody anything. If we took your definition is that bi equals liking both sexes equally but that is just ignorant rubbish.
There isn't a shortage of gay guys on the net who JUST because they are gay must make them total experts on sexual dynamics. You don't like women at all so how are you in a position to comment on bi behavior?
Hate to say it justwill but you have zero idea what you are talking about.
And where did you come up with the odd notion that I do not like women at all? Are you implying that a gay man must also be a woman hater? Women are awesome! Even if your assertion was true, how would that preclude me from having an informed opinion on the subject? I don't like guns, but I know that shooting at people is a bad thing.
Sorry to tell you, Skippy, but just because you have zero idea what I am talking about (I know...words are haaaaard) that doesn't mean that I am wrong.
You said hetreoflexible is more precise...
BINGO!
Then you go on to defend yourself saying "I never said equally", yea good so we agree it can be unequal, ei like girls more than guys = hmm need a word for that, oh wait, we already have one!
And i implied you don't like women because it says on your profile you are GAY. Obviously I meant sexually. You are a gay man trying to pretend he knows the bi world, which you don't.
Sticking to basics, you say hetreoflexible means nothing, yet you clearly say agree there are different levels of bi.... Rrrrriiiigghhttt
I didn't SAY heteroflexible is more precise, I ASKED in what way it was more precise. Did you see that little hook shaped thing with a dot under it at the end of the sentence? It is called a "question mark", and it means that the writer is ASKING, not TELLING.
You keep making stereotypical assumptions about what a gay man can think and feel. That's clearly addlepated on your part. If we are to go by the silly standard you profess, given that you admit to being Bi, how can you possibly pretend to know the "gay world"? (there's one of those question mark things again) You didn't "imply" that I don't like women, you actually said it: "You don't like women at all" (See? I pulled that quote right out of your comment. Not a whole lot of "implying" going on there.)
I never said that there are "different levels of Bi". In fact, I keep saying the exact opposite thing. Bisexual is Bisexual. Since, however, you seem to be suffering from some type of mind-scrambling head injury, I will try to explain it--once again--but in very tiny words:
A BOY who makes sex with just GIRLS is HETERO.
A BOY who makes sex with just BOYS is GAY.
A BOY who makes sex with BOYS and GIRLS is BI.
A BOY who makes sex with 1 BOY and 10 GIRLS is BI.
A BOY who makes sex with 10 BOYS and 1 GIRL is BI.
A BOY who makes sex with BOYS on Tuesday and GIRLS on Friday is BI.
A BOY who eats a HAM SANDWICH was probably just HUNGRY (and, most likely, NOT an Orthodox Jew. The Jewish people have dietary restrictions, you see.)
You have yet to explain how "heteroflixible" makes anything more clear. Do you tell people: "Hello. I am (your name here). I am Heteroflexible Level 3. This means that I mostly like women, but I will also blow a guy if the stars are in a very specific alignment"?
What, exactly, are the DEGREES of heteroflexibility, and how do you keep the whole thing all sorted out so you know which heteroflexible guy is the right fit for you?
Can a Heteroflexible Level 1 boink a Level 5? Are there specific things that a Level 6 will do but a Level 2 wouldn't even think of attempting? How high does the heteroflexible grading system go?
Maybe you heteroflexible guys should get special I.D. badges...just to avoid any confusion.
And now your going on about different levels of heteroflexible, well if you want to get that specific I suppose there would be, just like there's different levels of bi, which you admitted there was different levels of bi, then you ignore your own statement, and continue on this crusade that labeling different levels of bi is stupid.
You can't even stick to your own argument, if there's different levels of bi (which you said there was yourself) then may as well... Wait I'm repeating myself, we already talked about this and you essentially already admitted defeat.
The key to determining one's sexuality is in the words, "a tendency to direct sexual desire toward...". As it's a matter of self determination an individual can take stock of his or her sexuality and easily apply the appropriate definition as described below.
Notice that since this is a self-determined, subjectively applied categorization that cannot be absolutely quantified; the possibility exists for an individual to legitimately define his or her sexuality by any of the categories, one or more times during their lives, and yet equally categorize themselves in another category at other times.
One could suppose that over the course of one's lifetime there becomes a predominant predisposition towards being Hetero-, Homo, or Bi-sexual however that requires a long-term analysis of one's sexual tendencies and can't be determined over the span of a short sampling.
So, let's get to the core of the discussion by examining the previously published article.
______________________________________
To begin, the Merriam Webster Dictionary provides the following definitions:
Heterosexual (slang: Straight)
1. Of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual desire toward the opposite sex.
2. Of, relating to, or involving sexual intercourse between individuals of opposite sex.
Homosexual (slang: Gay)
1. Of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual desire toward another of the same sex.
2. Of, relating to, or involving sexual intercourse between persons of the same sex.
Bisexual (synonyms: Ambisexual, Unisexual)
1. Of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual desire toward both sexes.
2. Of, relating to, or involving both sexes.
Also, the definitions of Ambisexual and Unisexual include the following exception for hermaphroditic individuals:
1.Of, relating to, or restricted to one sex, male or female but not hermaphroditic.
Note: For our purposes, Bisexual, Ambisexual, and Unisexual will be considered the same.
Notice that in ALL of the definitions, the phrase; "a tendency to direct sexual desire toward", is used to characterize one's sexual orientation. It does not say in any definition that sexual desires are always restricted to one sex or the other. So, when someone says they are "Straight" for example, it doesn't say they only have desires for the opposite sex, it means they are primarily attracted to the opposite sex however, they may also be capable of having feelings for the same sex at some ambiguous level. If a male identifies himself and believes himself to be heterosexual (Straight), it is equally possible that he finds people of the same sex to be sexually attractive to a lesser degree as well. It is equally understandable that a female who describes herself as homosexual (Gay) might well find males to be sexually attractive to a lesser degree too.
What leads to the confusion is that many individuals are trying to exchange "desire" for "sexual actions" which are two separate issues. One may desire many things in life but never act on the desire. This is the case were a heterosexual (straight) male says he can?t stop thinking about sucking on a cock. That may be a legitimate fantasy and in this forum he can openly express this desire however, even if presented a non-threatening opportunity to act on that desire, he may or may not. If he does engage in a homosexual act, it doesn't change the fact that his orientation is heterosexual.
In the end, a person's sexual orientation is a matter of their personal beliefs. They are not exclusively a result of their actions and their actions are not exclusively representative of their primary beliefs. Only when ones actions become a significant part of their life that they belie their stated beliefs, then and only then will the individual alter their definition of their orientation and pronounce it openly.
______________________________________
Firstly, we have to consider people, who are asexual. No sex for them at all.
Secondly, there are people, who are just bi-curious. They are thinking about it, maybe get excited watching same gender porn.
Thirdly, we have heteroflexible peeps, who are mostly straight, but once in a blue moon, will have a same sex sexual encounter.
Then we got homoflexible individuals, who are mostly gay, but will engage in an encounter with the opposite gender once in a while.
This kind of classification doesn't contradict the straight/bi/gay classification, just brings several more shades into this white/grey/black scale.
Does this make sense?
Oh yea, and taste the sticky goodness of every pussy on SYD!!!
A misplaced modifier can sometimes turn an erotic fantasy into a rather unpleasant thought.
New Comment Go to top