| Okay, the title is a cheesy play on the "got milk" campaign but it got your attention, huh?
There was an interesting topic posted yesterday that was initiated by another member. The member wondered about the member rating and what one would have had to do to receive a negative rating. admin quickly replied saying that the rating was based on how many actual members have you in their "black and friend lists".
This may be the opportune time to reach out to all members and suggest that they use good judgement when they choose to ban a member. Ask yourself this; Did that member warrant the ban? Is what I perceived to be a personal "attack" based on something that I may have provoked? Is what was said something that I could have ignored? Finally, Did I ask them to stop?
Just sayin'..... |
People please consider the PM feature to work out differences before deploying the terminal ban button. Most often it can be a simple misunderstanding.
I used to try the simple ignoring or being polite methods of dealing with troublesome members, but approximately 75% of the time it didn't work.
I ended up banning a lot of people, some of which returned with new accounts and I realised I spent more time here having to deal with unwanted and mostly shitty messages!
I decided to upgrade my membership simply for the invisibility option and my time here was so much more enjoyable again.
I don't have an issue with banning people, but I do it when it's deserved, that's all.
This month, I decided to hang fire on renewing the upgrade to see how things went. So far, I haven't felt the need to hit the ban button. Lets hope I don't have to
I got me big boy pants on.
I say, 'Yes, to Michigan'!!!!!
New Comment Go to top