Let's go with this one:



Cock: The shaft is strong and smooth, with good veining. (Is there a slight bend to the left? Difficult to tell.) The head is a bit small for proper proportion to the shaft; good erection. Grade: A-

Composition: Lighting is a bit dim and focus is soft; cropping is good; not my favorite angle of view (side-view is better). Grade: B+

Your links don't work, so I'll pick this one:

[deleted image]

Cock: Surprisingly refined and smooth for such a large shaft; head is perfectly proportional and has a well-defined ridge; very powerful erection. Grade: A+

Composition: Focus, lighting, and angle of view are all quite good; background is a little distracting, and I would crop more of the curtain(?) out. Grade: A+

You have a TON of pics! Please choose one for me to grade.

Cock: Attractively smooth and strong shaft, powerfully erect; head is excellently shaped and proportioned, with a dramatically-defined ridge. Grade: A+

Composition: Excellent focus and angle of view; a bit of glare from the lighting; cropping is fine. Grade: A+

Your pic didn't show, so I selected this one:

[deleted image]

Cock: Strong smooth shaft, with a pleasing upward arc; powerfully erect; head is nicely shaped and well-proportioned, with a defined ridge. Grade: A+

Composition: Angle of view and lighting are excellent; focus is a bit soft; could be cropped a bit at the top and bottom. Grade: A-

Cock: The shaft is dramatically long, nicely smooth, and uniform along its entire length; head is well proportioned, but the ridge could be better defined; none of your pics show your cock with a hands-free upward-pointing erection. Grade: A

Composition: Some are better than others. Cumulative grade: A-

Not a very clear picture, but here goes.

Cock: Robust and smooth shaft; strong erection; points off because head is hidden. (I'm much more of a cock-head guy than a foreskin guy.) Grade: C+

Composition: Focus is very soft; cropping could be tighter; angle of view is good; lighting has some shadows. Grade: C

Cock: Shaft is ruggedly handsome, with an attractive upward arc, but the veining is a bit excessive; head is well-shaped and proportional; good erection. Grade: A

Composition: Excellent focus, cropping, angle of view, and lighting. Grade: A+

Cock: Very handsome and strong shaft, with perfect veining; head is well-shaped, but not quite proportional to the thick shaft; strong erection. Grade: A

Composition: Excellent focus, cropping, and angle of view; lighting shows some shadow and glare. Grade: A+

None show you all that well, but I'll go with this one:

[deleted image]

Cock: Shaft seems to be sturdy and nicely smooth; very good erection; the shape of the head seems a bit unconventional. Grade: B+

Composition: Lighting and angle of view are fine; could be cropped closer; focus and resolution are inadequate. Grade: B-

I'll comment on this one:

[deleted image]

Cock: Shaft is sturdy, nicely smooth (though less so in the inch below the head), and interestingly veined; head is perfectly proportioned and well-defined; very strong erection. Grade: A+

Composition: Focus is exceptional; angle of view and light are excellent; could be cropped at the top, and showing more at the bottom would have helped. Grade: A+

Cock: Shaft is sturdy, nicely erect, with a pleasing upward arc; head is well-shaped, but the color difference between shaft and head is a bit distracting. Grade: A-

Composition: Nice variety of angles, but all the pics suffer from soft focus. Grade: B

I wanted to choose a single pic that shows you best, but none really do.

Cock: Very attractive shaft, smooth and interestingly veined; head is not quite proportional to the shaft and lacks sharp definition of the ridge; good erection in some pics (though the hand-assist makes it difficult to tell). Grade: A-

Composition: As I said, none of the pics do you justice. Focus is soft; cropping could be tighter in most; props and graphics in some distract. I'd want to see a hands-off side view, fully erect, cropped to show just your cock and balls. Grade: B

You're gone already?

Sorry phone was being dumb rate please

Graded in your post below

You have LOTS of good pics, but I'll go with this one:

[deleted image]

Cock: Smooth, powerful shaft, with subtle veining; head is attractively shaped and nicely proportional; strong erection, bonus for close-trimmed hair. Grade: A+

Composition: Focus, lighting, cropping, and angle of view are all exceptional. Grade: A+

Rated in your second post, below.

I'll refer to this one:

[deleted image]

Cock: Very attractive shaft, robust and smooth; head is classically shaped, nicely proportional to the shaft, and has a well-defined ridge; strong erection. Grade: A+

Composition: Lighting and angle of view are very good; could be cropped a bit at the bottom; focus is a little soft. Grade: A-

Cock: Shaft appears a bit bumpy; excessive hair detracts from the view; head is covered by foreskin, so I can't say much about it; partial erection. Grade: C-

Composition: Lighting, cropping, and angles of view are ok but not great; focus is rather soft. Grade: B

Cock: The shaft is nicely smooth; the head is a bit narrow and lacks a well-defined ridge; excellent erection in pic #2; bonus for trimmed hair. Grade B+

Composition: Cropping is good; angle of view is ok, but a side-view would be better; focus is soft. Grade: B

Cock: Very attractive shaft, smooth, with subtle veining; head has a sharply-defined ridge (a good quality), but appears to be a bit short from tip to ridge; good erection. Grade: A


Composition: Excellent focus and lighting; cropping could be tighter; a hands-off side-view would show it better. Grade: A

This would be the best image for Balt`s comments.
[deleted image]